Answers
You can sort an array with the standard library’s qsort function, using various programming languages.
Qsort has the following formal syntax: qsort (,sizeof (),compare_function. Using the quick sort algorithm, the qsort function sorts an array. The array to be sorted, the number of elements in the array, the size of each element, and a comparison function that establishes the order of the elements are the four arguments required by the function1.
To sort an array in C++, use the sort() method offered by STL. Sort (arr, arr + n);23 is the syntax.
The sort() method in JavaScript allows you to sort an array while it is already open and returns a reference to the sorted array. The elements are converted to strings and their sequences of UTF-16 code units values are compared to determine the default sort order, which is ascending.
To know more about programming languages, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/16936315
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Describe 2 situations a Criminal Justice professional would respond to or deal with where mediation could be used. Give a brief overview of the "situation" and how as an officer you would handle it and what the mediated outcome s/would be. Think of what each person would want and what would be the best case compromise. These can be scenarios in law enforcement, courts, probation, corrections, juvenile justice, etc.
Answers
1) Domestic Violence: In cases of domestic violence, mediation could be used to resolve disputes between the victim and the perpetrator. As an officer, my first priority would be to ensure the safety of the victim and arrest the perpetrator if necessary. Afterward, I would offer mediation as an option to resolve any ongoing conflicts between the parties. During mediation, the victim would likely want to feel safe and have the perpetrator acknowledge and take responsibility for their actions. The perpetrator may want to avoid criminal charges and maintain a relationship with the victim.
2) School Disputes: Mediation could also be used to resolve conflicts between students, parents, and school administrators. For example, if two students get into a physical altercation on school grounds, mediation could be used to resolve the conflict. As an officer, I would separate the students and ensure that no one is injured. Afterward, I would offer mediation as an option to resolve the conflict. During mediation, the students would likely want to be heard and understood. The school administrator may want to maintain order and safety in the school while avoiding negative publicity.
To know more about violence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8075105
#SPJ11
is the declaration of independence part of the constitution
Answers
Which statement is an example of reasoning to support a claim?
The suspect is guilty of the burglary that occurred at the grocery store on Tuesday.
The man's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon; he must have shot the gun.
Hair from the suspect was found in the kitchen and bathroom of the victim's home.
Trace evidence collected from the crime scene matches the suspect but not the victim.
Answers
Answer:
answer: 3. Gross physical evidence is easily seen, while trace evidence is very small
Explanation:
Evidence
The statement 'The man's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon; he must have shot the gun' is an example of reasoning to support a claim.
An example of reasoning to back up a claim is the statement, "The man's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon; he must have shot the gun." It establishes a logical link between the conclusion (the man fired the gun) and the evidence (fingerprints on the weapon).
This line of thinking is predicated on the notion that the man's fingerprints prove that he had a direct hand in the weapon and consequently the crime. It makes use of the idea of cause and effect and asserts that the fingerprint evidence is strong proof of the man's involvement in the crime.
To know more about evidence here
brainly.com/question/31812026
#SPJ2
kevin is a judge hearing the case of local dispatch co. v. national transport corp. applying the relevant rule of law to the facts of the case requires kevin to find previously decided cases that, in relation to the case under consideration, are
Answers
Judge Kevin must locate earlier cases that, in respect to the matter in question, are "as close as possible" or as similar as possible in order to apply the pertinent rule of law to the facts of the case.
For the avoidance of dispute, the term "relevant rule of law" implies any applicable rule of law that regulates the priority of charges created by an entity; it does not, however, include any statute regulating the precedence of such charges.
The rule of law is known as a system, procedure, or norm that upholds the equality of all the people in front of the law. It actually must ensure a form of governance that is not arbitrary.
Learn about the goals and objectives of the constitution such as the rule of law relevant today: https://brainly.com/question/933581
#SPJ4
the pendleton act required appointees to public office to
Answers
The Pendleton act required appointees to public office to take public examinations.
The Pendleton act was adopted in the year 1883 as a reform in civil services in United States. The Pendleton Act was enacted to appoint employees in federal government jobs on the basis of merit and the selection of these government employees through competitive exams instead of patronage. Formally know as The Pendleton civil services reform act in United States passed by the 47th united states congress and signed by the president Chester A. Arthur. The act made it illegal to fire these employees for political reasons and political pressure. Initially it covered only smaller percentage of federal jobs which are protected by such a law but later on with time and understanding to was extended to major portion of federal government jobs.
To know more about "Pendleton act" visit-
brainly.com/question/29886242
#SPJ4
Judeo-christian, greek, and roman legal codes contributed to the concept that the guilt or innocence of those accused of a crime should be decided by?
Answers
Answer: A jury.
Explanation: The Greeks, Romans, and Judeo-Christians had a variety of court procedures through out their thousand year old history.
However they all established a jury for judging which was thought to be less corruptible to bribes since it's a larger group and have more balanced opinions on review since it's a mix of different opinions.
This contributed to the idea of a jury deciding criminal trials in U.S law because it's more fair.
Which of the following is an example of the difference between law and ethics?
A. The law tells us how we should act, while ethics tells us which actions will lead to consequences.
B. The law tends to be universal, whereas ethics tend to be dependent on the situation.
C. The law is simple and easy to understand, whereas ethics are comples and require much more study.
D. The law is official and enforced by the government, while ethics are unofficial but still generally accept by society.
Answers
6. In the United States, most municipal solid waste is disposed of bya. Compostingb. Recyclingc. Incinerationd. Ocean dumpinge. Landfilling
Answers
Landfills are responsible for disposing of the majority of municipal solid waste in the United States.
What's wrong with landfills, exactly?Solid garbage is disposed of in modern landfills, which are efficiently managed and well-engineered. To ensure compliance with federal requirements, landfills are situated, created, operated, and watched over. Hazards from landfills include odour, smoke, noise, pests, and tainted water sources. Landfills and locations for the storage of hazardous waste are more likely to be located in minority and low-income regions. The ability to fight the location of these facilities is less powerful in certain places. Despite the fact that present-day landfills are built to contain toxic waste, leaks do occasionally occur. In light of this, landfills continue to pose a threat to both human and environmental health. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas that is emitted as a result of the decaying garbage and it plays a role in climate change on a worldwide scale.To learn more about Landfills, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29564374
You are a police officer assigned to the CIDG, Mr. XXX comes to your office and voluntarily reported a
case regarding corporation YYY which allegedly is counterfeiting apparel products and sell it in volume at
the Divisoria and Baclaran market. Mr, XXX alleged that his company is losing profit due to this illegal
activities done by company YYY.
1. How will you entertain the complaint?
2. How will you build a case against company YYY?
3. What are the evidences you need to consolidate to strengthen your case against YYY?
4. What case will you file against YYY?\
5. How will you testify in the court?
6. If you are the investigator, what is the possibility of conviction of company YYY?
Answers
Overview of how a police officer may approach a complaint of counterfeiting and building a case against the company involved.
1. To entertain the complaint, the police officer assigned to the case should first take down the details of the complaint, including the identity of the complainant, the name of the company being accused, and the alleged illegal activities being conducted. The officer should also gather any relevant documents or evidence that the complainant may have, such as invoices or photographs of the counterfeit products.
2. Building a case against the company YYY would require a thorough investigation by the police officer and other relevant law enforcement agencies. This may involve conducting surveillance, interviewing witnesses, and gathering evidence, such as seized counterfeit products and financial records. The officer may also need to collaborate with other agencies, such as the Bureau of Customs or the Intellectual Property Office, to verify the authenticity of the products being sold by the company.
3. The evidences that the police officer needs to consolidate to strengthen the case against company YYY may include physical evidence, such as seized counterfeit products and equipment used to manufacture them, financial records showing the flow of money and transactions related to the illegal activities, and testimony from witnesses who may have observed the illegal activities being conducted. It may also be necessary to conduct forensic analysis of seized products to confirm their authenticity.
4. The police officer may file criminal charges against company YYY for violation of intellectual property laws and other applicable laws, such as fraud and unfair competition.
5. If called to testify in court, the police officer should provide accurate and truthful testimony based on their investigation and the evidence collected. The officer may need to explain the technical aspects of the investigation, such as the process of verifying the authenticity of the products and how the financial records were analyzed.
6. The possibility of conviction of company YYY would depend on various factors, such as the strength of the evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and the competency of the legal team representing the prosecution. It would be up to the court to determine the guilt or innocence of the company based on the evidence presented during the trial.
To know more about counterfeiting click here:
brainly.com/question/29415876
#SPJ4
Under which section of it act, stealing any digital asset or information is written a cyber-crime.
Answers
Stealing any digital asset or information is considered a cyber-crime and falls under various sections of the IT Act.
Specifically, Section 43 and Section 66 cover offenses related to unauthorized access, hacking, and damage to computer systems. Section 43 deals with penalties for damage to computer systems, while Section 66 focuses on computer-related offenses, including hacking, data theft, and unauthorized access.
These sections aim to protect against the theft of digital assets and information by providing legal provisions and punishments for cyber-criminals. It is important to note that cyber-crime laws may vary across different countries, so it is always advisable to consult the specific legislation in your jurisdiction for accurate information.
Learn more about cyber-crime https://brainly.com/question/28691127
#SPJ11
The state constitution provides the people the opportunity to directly vote on whether to accept or reject a proposed law. This is known as a.
Answers
People having the opportunity to directly vote on whether to accept or reject a proposed law is known as Referendum.
What is a Referendum?
A referendum is a ballot that is voted on by the general population of a city, county, or state. It means that a political question is passed on to the people to decide rather than a legislative body.
Referendums are not allowed at the federal level in the U.S. government, but state and local governments can use them. They are usually put on the general ballot during most elections. Referendums are one of several forms of exercising ''direct democracy.'' This is the governmental practice of operating according to the will of the people. Mostly, referendums and other forms of direct democracy are used to decide issues rather than to elect politicians.However, referendums are meant to repeal or affirm laws created by legislatures. Referendums are considered effective for overruling legislative decisions that are unpopular.The process of using a referendum is:
A state or local legislature comes to a policy decision, or a sufficient number of citizens propose a policy. Many times, proposals (or initiatives) are created by citizen interest groups, such as civil rights groups.
Policy decisions are offered to the people on a ballot (usually as part of a general election).
The popular vote is tallied, and the opinion of the majority is followed.
Learn more about Referendums here:
https://brainly.com/question/15604110
#SPJ4
Scarlett and Mark want to lease an apartment from Connor for a year. Connor first agrees, but upon finding that they have two small children, refuses to lease them his apartment. Is Connor's refusal legal?
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cuz Connor is the land owner he has the right to say rather or not he wants children in his apartment.
Which of the following is NOT a reason for the origins of government?
A. Defend private property
B. Protect people from conflict
C. Provide law and order
D. Collect tax revenues
Answers
Answer:
D. Collect tax revenues
Explanation:
The reasons for the origins of government derives most probably from the requirement of protecting people from conflicts which may arise as people interact within each other or with peoples in other locations and to provide law and order among people living together so as to prevent internal conflicts due to selfishness and greed over privileges and property. Therefore, governments are meant to protect private property according to Karl Marx people are greedy and selfish because of property
The collection of tax revenues arise to finance already established governments and is therefore NOT a reason for the origins of government.
Answer:
D. Collect tax revenues
Explanation:
Who is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in thr State of California???
Answers
Answer:
Attorney General Becerra
You hear a commercial state that scientific research has proven the effectiveness of a new medication, so it must be effective. True or false?
Answers
if a term in a contract is ambiguous and unclear, when interpreting the term the court will generally construe the terms
Answers
When a term in a contract is ambiguous and unclear. The court will generally interpret the term by examining the contract as a whole and interpreting the term in light of its environment, purpose, and the intentions of the parties.
The court will consider the language used the circumstances embracing the formation of the contract. Any assiduity or trade customs that may shed light on the meaning of the term. The thing is to give effect to the parties intentions and to insure that the contract is interpreted in a manner that's reasonable and indifferent.
Eventually the court will seek to resolve any ambiguities in favor of the party that didn't draft the contract.
To learn more about ambiguous Contract:
https://brainly.com/question/29644701
#SPJ4
If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
Answers
Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.
Explanation:
A good team member ________________. does the least amount of work possible is actively engaged in the group doesn't let anyone else participate is unreliable
Answers
Answer:
B is actively engaged in the group.
he American Law Institute publishes and revises explanations and examples of the law in various areas of the law, known as: ______.
Answers
Answer:BrhfdjExplanation:shut up brainly admin is trash
How did citizens united change campaign finance laws? select three correct answers.
Answers
Citizens United changed campaign finance laws in the accompanying ways:
It eliminated the money related limits that enterprises and people can spend to impact a political decision autonomously.
It expanded how much cash was spent on elections.
It brought about a few affluent people having excessive impact in elections.
Citizens United v FEC was a 2010 case about the conflict connecting with the sum that can be spent on elections. The Supreme Court at last managed 5-4 and expressed that the Primary Alteration gave privileges to organizations to spend on elections and that there was no restriction on such sum.
Accordingly, the financial furthest reaches that corporations and people can spend to autonomously impact a political decision were eliminated. This guaranteed that there was an expansion in how much cash that was spent on elections.
Likewise, the choice by the Supreme Court brought about few rich people having excessive impact in elections.
All in all, Citizens United changed campaign finance laws as the cutoff points on the sum that can be spent on elections were eliminated.
to know more about the Supreme court click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Which statement describes the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
A. Southern states could no longer maintain racially segregated public schools
B. States could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs
C. Individuals accused of serious crimes unable to pay for an attorney were entitled to a state-sponsored one
D. Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The answer is b states could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs
Which type of first responders are most likely to use thermal imaging devices
Answers
Answer:
firefighters
Explanation:
For a firefighter, thermal imaging cameras can literally be a lifesaver.
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.
Answers
According to the top chart, what percentage of federal civil cases were tried before juries in 2010?
Answers
Hello. You forgot and put the graph to which this question refers. The chart is attached below:
Answer:
42.354%
Explanation:
To answer this question it is necessary to make a very simple calculation that relates the total number of judgments by jury to the number of civil cases judged by juris. In this case, you must analyze the last line of the graph and use the following values in the calculation.
5082 ---- 100%
2154 ----- x
x = (2154 * 100) / 5082
x = 42.354%
brenda is the ceo of a large corporation. she sent to her banker by ups financial statements that were falsified and overstated her company's assets and revenues while understating liabilities and expenses. this induced the banker to loan her company $1 million, which brenda's company did not pay back. which of the following crimes has brenda committed? multiple choice forgery bribery mail fraud larceny insider trading
Answers
Based on the scenario you described, Brenda has committed the crime of mail fraud. Mail fraud is a federal offense that involves using the mail to carry out a scheme to defraud others of money or property.
Brenda's act of sending falsified financial statements through UPS to induce the banker to loan her company $1 million and then not paying back the loan constitutes mail fraud. Forgery, bribery, larceny, and insider trading do not seem to apply to the scenario described. Forgery involves falsely making or altering a document with the intent to defraud. Bribery involves offering or receiving something of value to influence someone's actions. Larceny involves taking someone else's property without their consent. Insider trading involves trading securities based on material, non-public information.
Learn more about committed here:
https://brainly.com/question/19624717
#SPJ11
A pickpocket routinely carries a knife in his pocket just in case he needs it. On
one occasion, he is successfully able to remove a man's wallet without being
noticed. He is later caught and tried. Which of the following is the best
answer for why this occurred?
O A. The act is not considered robbery because no violent force was
used or threatened in the theft.
B. The act is considered robbery because the thief was armed and
able to use violent force.
C. The act is considered robbery because the thief knew the use of
force was a possibility for him in his plans.
D. The act is not considered robbery because the thief did not have a
firearm.
Answers
Answer:
dthe act is not consider tobery
Why National Security is important? I will give u brainlist in your own words.
Answers
Answer:
National security is important because it's for the safety of the people living in a certain country, for them to be secured from any danger that might happen to them.
Explanation:
hope it helps you po.
essence of international law
Answers
in a court case challenging a law prohibiting people under age 21 from purchasing firearms, who would bear the burden of proof?
Answers
In a court case challenging a law prohibiting people under age 21 from purchasing firearms, the burden of proof would be on the challenger. The burden of proof refers to the responsibility of presenting evidence to prove a case.
The challenger, who is someone who challenges the constitutionality of a law, would be required to provide proof that the law violates the constitution. In this case, the challenger would need to provide proof that the age restriction infringes on a constitutional right, such as the right to bear arms as stated in the Second Amendment. The standard of proof required in this type of case is strict scrutiny.
This means that the law must be shown to be necessary to serve a compelling government interest, and must be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The court would then weigh the evidence presented by the challenger against the government's interest in regulating firearms, and decide whether the law is constitutional or not.In conclusion, in a court case challenging a law prohibiting people under age 21 from purchasing firearms, the burden of proof would be on the challenger, who would need to provide evidence to prove that the law violates the constitution.
To know more about law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ11
major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by
Answers
Major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by the primary election process. In the United States, the primary elections allow registered party members and, in some cases, unaffiliated voters to participate in selecting their party's nominee for the presidential election.
This process involves a series of state-level primary elections and caucuses in which voters express their preferences for a particular candidate.
The primary election process has become the dominant method for selecting major-party presidential nominees over the years. It allows for broader participation and a more democratic approach compared to the previous system, which relied heavily on party leaders and delegates at the national conventions to choose the nominees.
Through primary elections, voters have a direct say in determining the candidate who will represent their party in the general election. Candidates campaign extensively, seeking support from voters across different states and competing to secure the majority of delegates needed to win the party's nomination.
To know more about presidential nominations refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31185431
#SPJ11