Chief Joseph was a member of the Nez Perce Tribe who led the Wallowa band from 1840 to 1904. In 1877, he became famous for leading his people on an epic flight across the Rocky Mountains.
He was born in 1840, and Reverend Henry H. gave him the name Joseph.
What did Chief Joseph do and who was he?Chief Joseph was a leader of the Nez Perce people. He led his tribe, the Wallowa band of Nez Perce, through a dangerous period in the history of the United States. These indigenous people came from Oregon's Wallowa Valley. Chief Joseph was an effective defender of his people's right to remain on their homeland.
What is Chief Joseph's statement's primary objective?Chief Joseph addresses the American leaders in a formal manner and informs them of General Howard's surrender conditions by stating that he has kept them "in his heart." Despite the fact that he is the one who gives in, the way he begins his speech emphasizes the obligations of the winners to keep their promises.
To learn more about Chief Joseph here:
https://brainly.com/question/4375167
#SPJ4
What is the difference between the civil rights of the 1 amendment and due process rights of 4th, 5th, 6th,and the 8th amendments ?which is more important?
The difference between the civil rights of the 1st amendment and due process rights of 4th, 5th, 6th,and the 8th amendments is that the first amendment grants most basic rights, thus, it is most important.
What is a Civil right?Basically, the civil rights means the guarantees of equal social opportunities & protection under the law regardless of the race, religion, language etc.
What is a due process?Basically, the due process means following the course of legal proceedings in accordance with yje rules and principles that have been established in a system of jurisprudence for the enforcement and protection of private rights. The right associated with the due process is found in the 4th, 5th, 6th,and the 8th amendments.
Read more about Bill of right
brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
Which is the most accurate statement concerning the relationship between state and federal regulations
Answer:
The relationship between state and federal regulations in the United States is one of delegation and complement: in principle, the states are the holders of sovereignty and, therefore, possess all the rights and powers that they have not expressly delegated to the Federal Government to through the Constitution. In turn, in the event that the states have delegated prerogatives to the federal government, these may only be exercised by the federal government, and subsidiarily (and always in a complementary manner and respecting federal guidelines) by the states.
1. Edit the following sentence. Name the grammar mistake (e.g., misplaced modifier, faulty parallelism, and so forth). Then correct the error by rewriting the sentence.
Because of the fact that paralegals’ time is charged at lower rates, paralegals may be employed by law firms and corporations to perform tasks previously performed by lawyers.
2. Edit the following sentence. Name the grammar mistake (e.g., misplaced modifier, faulty parallelism, and so forth). Then correct the error by rewriting the sentence.
With specificity, paralegals may be asked to perform legal research of case and statutory materials in the event that a client requests an answer to a problem of a legal nature and is concerned about saving money.
3. Edit the following sentence. Name the grammar mistake (e.g., misplaced modifier, faulty parallelism, and so forth). Then correct the error by rewriting the sentence.
It is important to note that some states are considering allowing paralegals to practice independently.
4. Edit the following sentence. Name the grammar mistake (e.g., misplaced modifier, faulty parallelism, and so forth). Then correct the error by rewriting the sentence.
Try this schedule; shower, eat breakfast, drive to the train, go to work, and come home.
5. Edit the following sentence. Name the grammar mistake (e.g., misplaced modifier, faulty parallelism, and so forth). Then correct the error by rewriting the sentence.
The prosecutor will attempt to within the course of the trial persuade you that the defendant committed the crime.
6. Edit the following sentence. Name the grammar mistake (e.g., misplaced modifier, faulty parallelism, and so forth). Then correct the error by rewriting the sentence.
The substance of Walter Mondale’s speeches is more similar to Jimmy Carter.
Answer:
Grammar mistake: Faulty parallelism
Corrected sentence: "Law firms and corporations may employ paralegals to perform tasks previously performed by lawyers because their time is charged at lower rates."
Grammar mistake: Wordiness
Corrected sentence: "Paralegals may be asked to conduct legal research and review case and statutory materials for clients who want to save money and have questions about legal problems."
No grammar mistake. The sentence is grammatically correct as is.
Grammar mistake: Lack of parallel structure
Corrected sentence: "Try this schedule: shower, eat breakfast, drive to the train, go to work, and then come home."
Grammar mistake: Word choice
Corrected sentence: "The prosecutor will try to convince you during the trial that the defendant committed the crime."
Grammar mistake: Lack of parallel structure
Corrected sentence: "The content of Walter Mondale's speeches is more similar to that of Jimmy Carter."
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
Sandra owns a Jewelry store. She has invested a large amount of money in the business. A single burglary in the store could result into huge
losses. Sandra thus wants to install a security system in her store to protect her investment. Which of the following private security personnel
should she approach?
ОА.
a security guard
OB
a private investigator
OC.
a security contractor
OD
a personal guard
What is meant by trade dilution
Answer:
this is a law order given the owner a standing order to forbid others from using the mark in a way that will lessen the beauty or priority.
FAST Which is the best reason for why it is important to keep personal information private online?
to prevent becoming the target of a scam
to ensure strangers do not approach them
to prevent others from using it dishonestly
to stop people from following them online
Answer:
I thank the best one would be to prevent others from using it dishonestly
Explanation:
if someone uses your information it not just hurt you but the people around you its safe to keep your personal information personal
Answer:
B
Explanation:
ed2020
why was the city such a central element in progressive america
The city was a central element in Progressive America because it was seen as a place where the problems and challenges of modern society were most visible and most acute. Urbanization and industrialization had led to rapid population growth, economic change, and social dislocation.
Progressive reformers saw the city as a site of opportunity and experimentation, where they could apply their ideas and values to improve the lives of urban residents.
In addition, cities were also centers of political power and activism. As more people moved to urban areas, they gained greater influence over politics and government. This led to the emergence of new political movements and interest groups, such as labor unions and social reform organizations, which sought to influence public policy and advocate for the rights and interests of urban residents.
Furthermore, the city was also a place of cultural and intellectual ferment, with new ideas and values emerging in the areas of art, literature, and social thought. The city was a place where new ideas and social norms were being developed, and it served as a catalyst for the larger social and cultural changes taking place in American society at the time.
To know more about Progressive reform refer to-
brainly.com/question/17106136#
#SPJ11
in the book night by elie wiesel explain how the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of elie and his father. chapter 8
Answer:
The roles of father and son are truly reversed in Chapter 8 of Elie Wiesel's novel "Night," when Elie and his father, Shlomo, endure the challenges of the concentration camp together. The severe environment and terrible events they face cause this reversal.
Elie's father had been the dominant role in their relationship at first, offering guidance and encouragement. Their roles, however, begin to evolve when they are subjected to the horrors of the concentration camp. Elie is becoming increasingly responsible for his father's physical and mental well-being.
Elie recalls the terrible winter circumstances in the camp and the physical toll it takes on his father in Chapter 8. He talks about how he must look after his father, making sure he has enough food and shielding him from the camp's violence. Elie's devotion to his father's survival is clear when he gives up a piece of bread for him, despite the fact that he is starving himself.
Furthermore, Elie becomes his father's mental and physical support. He attempts to encourage and motivate his father to persevere in the face of adversity. Elie's job as a caregiver becomes critical as he attempts to hide his father from the worst aspects of their circumstances, providing him with comfort and hope.
Throughout the chapter, Elie's actions demonstrate his deep love and devotion to his father. He takes on the responsibility of caring for him, ensuring his survival and providing emotional support. The reversal of their roles showcases the extent of their bond and the lengths Elie is willing to go to protect and care for his father.
Overall, in Chapter 8 of "Night," Elie Wiesel depicts a reversal of father/son roles, with Elie taking on the role of carer and protector for his father in the face of the horrific hardships of the concentration camp.
In the book Night by Elie Wiesel, the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of Elie and his father. This is particularly highlighted in chapter 8.
In this chapter, Elie and his father are both in the same concentration camp and are struggling to survive. Elie’s father is weak, sick, and is not able to keep up with the work that is required of him. This leads to Elie becoming his father’s caretaker. He helps his father with his work, carries his father's weight when he can no longer walk, and feeds him whatever scraps of food he can find.
The relationship between Elie and his father is one of love and devotion. Elie cares for his father, despite the terrible circumstances they are in. However, as his father's health deteriorates, Elie begins to feel a sense of anger and frustration. He becomes angry at his father for not being able to take care of himself and for being a burden on him. He is also angry at himself for feeling this way and for not being able to do more to help his father. Despite these feelings, Elie continues to care for his father until the very end.
To learn more about Elie Wiesel visit here:
brainly.com/question/15099354
#SPJ11
a girl was raped by a man and she then went to the court and so they ave him 3 years to get imprisoned according to the law . so if you were the judge according to the law is the law fair, and if it was you what could you do
Answer:
It is not fair according if he did the same thing in the past I would fight for him to have mo time for what he did .
Explanation:
Hope this helps !!
The burden of proof in civil cases is fairly low. A plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and then he collects 100 percent of his damages. Is this result reasonable
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
Kenneth is a 28 year old resident of Florida. He was born in Miami and wants to run for a federal office. According to the United States constitution what is the only federal office Kenneth can run for at the time?
Answer:
He can run to be a member of the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
The Constitution outlines, in Section 2, that someone must be a minimum of 25 years to run for HOR.
Answer:
US Representative
Explanation:
Took the test
77) Under the five critical factors "Thrives in a culture where people feel comfortable and empowered by having many degrees of freedom" is related to which factor?A) PersonnelB) DynamismC) SizeD) Culture
The factor “Thrives in a culture where people feel comfortable and empowered by having many degrees of freedom” is closely related to the factor of Culture. Culture can be defined as a shared set of beliefs, values, and norms that guide the behavior of individuals and organizations.
A culture with many degrees of freedom allows individuals to feel empowered and comfortable in their work environment. This, in turn, allows them to be more creative and productive, as they are not constrained by too many rules and regulations.
An organization with a culture that fosters many degrees of freedom also enables the organization to adapt to changing customer needs and demands. This flexibility can help the organization stay competitive and ahead of its competitors.
Furthermore, a culture that values creativity and innovation can help attract and retain talented employees, which can ultimately lead to higher customer satisfaction and better business outcomes.
Know more about organization here
https://brainly.com/question/13278945#
#SPJ11
Ok I swear the censor thing is annoying. I just wanna gib som points to my hommies ya feel me?
intellectual property (ip) is different from personal property in that it cannot be bought, sold, donated, licensed, or exchanged for something of equal value. True or False?
False. Intellectual property (IP) is different from personal property in terms of its nature; IP refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, artistic works, designs, and symbols.
Personal property refers to tangible items that you own, such as a car or furniture. However, IP can still be bought, sold, donated, licensed, or exchanged for something of equal value, just like personal property.
Inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, and symbols, names, and pictures used in business are all examples of intellectual property (IP).
Patents, copyright, and trademarks are a few instances of IP protection under the law allowing people to profit financially or gain notoriety from their creations. The IP system seeks to provide an environment where creativity and innovation are encouraged by striking the correct balance between the interests of innovators and the larger public interest.
learn more about Intellectual property here:
brainly.com/question/1621623
#SPJ4
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an example of the overjustification effect?
Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.
Answer:
Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.
Explanation:
State law of gravitational force
Answer:
Explanation:
Newton's law of gravitation, statement that any particle of matter in the universe attracts any other with a force varying directly as the product of the masses and inversely as the square of the distance between them.
please help, how can a victim of a crime be assisted and empowered in the criminal justice system?
Answer:
Victims of crimes and empower other victims to speak up and can provide valuable information that can lead to an arrest.
Explanation:
A driver was operating his vehicle along a residential street at the posted speed limit when he saw a ball roll across the street. The driver did not slow down because the ball cleared his path before he reached it. A few seconds later, a child darted out into the street after the ball without looking for cars. The driver's car struck the child, and the child was injured. The child's parents brought an action on the child's behalf against the driver in a jurisdiction that follows traditional contributory negligence rules. At trial, the above facts were established. At the close of the evidence, the driver moved for a directed verdict. What should the court do
Deny the driver's motion because it will be up to the jury to determine whether he should have slowed down to below the speed limit. A jury could find that a reasonable prudent person under similar circumstances (watching the ball roll into the street) would slow down to avoid any foreseeable risk of hitting a child darting into the street.
At the trail for the injured child, as the driver moved for a directed verdict; the court will "deny the driver's motion".
What is Direct Verdict?A trial judge's decision to direct a jury's judgement is made after concluding that there is insufficient legal evidence to allow a fair jury to reach a different verdict. A directed verdict may be granted by the trial court spontaneously or in response to a motion made by either party.
The direct verdict is asked by-
In a criminal trial, the defense attorney for the defendant may move to have the charges dropped on the grounds that the prosecution has not made its case.In effect, in both kinds of cases, the lawyer asks the judge to direct a verdict for the defendant. The judge will either grant or deny the motion.Reason for the denial of drivers' verdict is-
As for the given case of child accident, the court will deny the driver's motion because because the jury will decide whether or not he ought to have slowed down to the legal pace. A jury could decide that a reasonable, cautious individual would have slowed down in the same situation (seeing the ball roll into the street) to reduce the likelihood of running into a youngster who was darting into the roadway.To know about the authenticity of evidence, here
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ4
news media is likely to pitch a story toward which political slant?
News media is likely to pitch a story toward a political slant that aligns with their target audience or their own editorial bias.
The political slant of news media can vary significantly depending on the outlet, the journalists involved, and the target audience. Some news organizations strive to maintain impartiality and present news stories in a balanced and objective manner. Certain media outlets may have a known or perceived political leaning. For example, some news organizations may be considered more conservative-leaning, while others may be seen as more liberal-leaning. These outlets might pitch stories or frame their coverage in a way that appeals to their target audience or aligns with their editorial stance.
Additionally, news media can be influenced by market forces and audience preferences. In an increasingly polarized media landscape, where consumers often seek news sources that reaffirm their existing beliefs, media outlets may be inclined to cater to specific political slants to attract and retain their viewers or readers.
It is essential for consumers of news to be aware of potential biases and seek information from a variety of sources to obtain a well-rounded understanding of events and issues. Critical thinking and media literacy skills are vital to evaluate news content, identify potential biases, and form informed opinions.
To learn more about News media click here:
brainly.com/question/30157284
#SPJ11
The 0.9 percent additional Medicare tax applies to ______.A) self-employed individuals when wages and self-employment income combined exceed a threshold amountB) self-employed individuals only when such individuals also earn income as an employeeC) employees, but does not apply to self-employed individuals
The 0.9 percent additional Medicare tax applies to option A: self-employed individuals when wages and self-employment income combined exceed a threshold amount.
Only individuals who earn greater wages are subject to the 0.9% additional Medicare amount. In addition to the regular Medicare tax, it is paid. For a total of 2.35% of their salary, an employee will pay the 1.45% basic Medicare tax as well as the 0.9% supplemental Medicare tax.
When salaries and self-employment income surpass a threshold amount, it is solely applied to self-employed people. Employers are not required to make any contributions through the extra Medicare tax. When a person's total income exceeds the cutoff for their filing status, they become subject to the extra Medicare tax.
To know more about medicare taxes, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29760938
#SPJ4
Bob Holmes only has one credential listed: Journalist. If he only has a journalist degree, what is he qualified to do in this article? A. Report the details of the topic, B. Give expert analysis, C. Provide commentary, D. Critique the details of this story
It might be B because I think it is.
Select the correct answer.
According to routine activity theory, which is a possible reason for internet fraud?
O A. increasingly motivated offenders
OB. easily available suitable targets
O C. lack of capable guardians
OD. people with no internet access
Answer:
Im not sure if this is right but i thnk its (B) Available Suitable Targets
Explanation:
gain or loss realized on the disposition of property is recognized unless the tax law provides a nonrecognition exception.
The sum of the money received and the fair market value of the property other than the money received is the amount realized from a taxable sale or other disposition of property.
Section 1231 of the United States Internal Revenue Code is the source of the term. Buildings, machinery, land, timber, and other natural resources are all considered assets under Section 1231, as are unharvested crops, cattle, livestock, and leaseholds that are more than a year old. Capital gains are taxed on gains from property sales under Section 1231.
What constitutes property disposition gain or loss?The adjusted basis of a property is typically subtracted from the cash and property realized on its sale or disposition to calculate gain or loss on property sales or other dispositions. However, special tax rules apply to the calculation of gain on property acquired prior to June 1, 1971.
To learn more about disposition of property here
https://brainly.com/question/29389003
#SPJ4
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
Based on the data, which conclusion can be drawn about the impact of the 19th amendment?.
Based on the data, the conclusion which can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment is that, The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.
What is the 19th Amendment?
On June 4, 1919, the Congress approved the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and on August 18, 1920, it was ratified. Women now have the right to vote thanks to the 19th Amendment. Women began to demand the right to vote in the middle of the 19th century through protests, petitions, and acts of civil disobedience, but it took them decades to succeed.
For American women, reaching this milestone was challenging since it required a protracted and challenging battle, but it was a win. The right to vote for women in America is thus legally guaranteed by the 19th amendment.
The 19th Amendment had a significant impact on the rising number of votes cast by American women, according to the data. Even decades after American women were granted the right to vote, their number of votes has continued rising and they now outnumber men.
To know more about 19th Amendment refer:
https://brainly.com/question/9822287
#SPJ4
Disclaimer- The complete question is-
Based on the data, which conclusion can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment?
The high percentage of women voters has had a political impact.
Despite the opportunity to vote, women do not vote as often as men
Despite the ability to vote, women register in lower numbers than men.
The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.
8. reserved
Reserved blank
When was the Constitution Act enacted?
A)1981
B)1982
C)1868
D)1867
What did the Constitution Act do?
A) Made Canada a fully independent nation
B) Unified the 10 provinces of Canada
C) Fully repatriated the constitution
D) Reorganized Canada into a federation
Answer:
i think it is B I'm not sure
When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as:
Answer:
A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).
This ultimately implies that, a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a type of injunction obtained by a party, so as to intimidate, censor and silence activists, perceived enemies or critics based on slander, libel, defamation, interference, abuse of power etc. It typically involves a huge amount of money to defend a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)and as such, it used to buy time away from a litigation.