The teacher said to her,”How did you do that “?

Answer:

True

Explanation:

This is true. In tennis, either the serving or receiving side may score.

Let me know if this helps!

Title: A Comparative Analysis of Biased Reporting on Climate Change

Source A, an online news outlet, presents a comprehensive overview of climate change, highlighting human activities as the primary cause and advocating for immediate action. In contrast, Source B, a conservative-leaning television network, questions the extent of human influence and emphasizes the need for further research.

Title: Analysis of Biased Reporting: A Comparative Study of Two Media Sources on Climate Change

Essay:

Introduction:

Climate change has emerged as one of the most pressing issues of our time, capturing global attention across various media platforms. However, media reporting on this topic can often be influenced by biases, leading to different perspectives and narratives. In this essay, we will analyze and compare two media sources, namely Source A and Source B, which report on the issue of climate change. The objective is to assess the biases of the sources' creators and provide an in-depth evaluation of their reporting.

Summary of Source A:

Source A, an online news outlet, presents a comprehensive overview of climate change, focusing on its causes, impacts, and potential solutions. The report features interviews with scientists, policymakers, and environmental activists, providing a balanced view of the issue. The article emphasizes the urgency of addressing climate change and highlights the role of human activities in exacerbating the problem. Furthermore, it explores the potential consequences of inaction and proposes various mitigation strategies, such as transitioning to renewable energy sources and implementing sustainable practices.

Summary of Source B:

In contrast to Source A, Source B, a conservative-leaning television network, presents a distinct perspective on climate change. The report acknowledges the existence of climate change but questions the extent to which human activities contribute to it. It highlights alternative theories and scientific dissent, suggesting that natural climate cycles may be primarily responsible for the observed changes. The report also raises concerns about the economic implications of climate policies and argues for a more cautious approach, emphasizing the need for further scientific research before implementing substantial measures.

Comparative Analysis:

When comparing the two sources, several key differences become apparent. Firstly, Source A adopts a more urgent tone, emphasizing the need for immediate action. It presents climate change as a global crisis caused primarily by human activities and portrays a broad scientific consensus on the matter. In contrast, Source B adopts a more skeptical stance, acknowledging climate change but questioning the extent of human influence. This source highlights alternative perspectives and scientific dissent, suggesting a more nuanced approach to addressing the issue.

Analyzing Biases:

Both sources exhibit biases that align with their respective creators' perspectives. Source A, being an online news outlet, tends to attract an audience concerned about environmental issues and leans towards progressive ideologies. Consequently, its reporting emphasizes the urgency of climate change and advocates for comprehensive action. While Source A attempts to maintain a balanced view, its bias towards environmental activism and sustainability is discernible.

On the other hand, Source B, a conservative-leaning television network, tends to cater to an audience with a skeptical view of climate change or a desire to preserve economic interests. As a result, its reporting adopts a more cautious approach, focusing on dissenting voices and emphasizing potential economic repercussions. The bias of Source B can be seen in its emphasis on skepticism and its tendency to downplay the human role in climate change.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the analysis of Source A and Source B reveals distinct biases that shape their reporting on climate change. Source A leans towards an environmentalist perspective, advocating for immediate action to combat the issue. In contrast, Source B takes a more skeptical stance, questioning the extent of human influence on climate change and emphasizing the need for further research. Understanding the biases of media sources is essential for critically evaluating their reporting and forming a well-rounded perspective on complex issues such as climate change. As consumers of media, it is crucial to seek out diverse sources and critically analyze the information presented to us.

For more such questions on research, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/968894

#SPJ8

Answer:

they are children

Explanation:

advertising works on children. For example, the more TV a child watches, the more toys that child is likely to want and ask for.

This is why it’s important for children to learn that advertisements are trying to make you buy something. Advertisements are trying to influence the way you think or change your mind about something. And advertisers always aim to make their products look good, perhaps even better than they really are.

The type of vocabulary the author uses in his or her text is the way he or she wants the readers of the book to understand according to his or her point of view which is called Diction.

The language decisions a writer takes to clearly express an idea, a point of view, or tell a tale are referred to as diction. In literature, an author's choice of words can assist build a recognizable voice and style.

The words were chosen by the author. Style is a writer's unique way of expressing themselves, formed by their choice of words, usage of grammatical structures, literary devices, and other language use options.

In order to make their writing more evocative and interesting, they could employ imagery, literal and metaphorical language, and aural methods. Even without explicitly declaring it, an author's words might convey their voice or that of a character in a novel.

Therefore, A literary device known as diction is the writer's choice of words or writing style to communicate a point.

Check out the link below to learn more about the author's vocabulary;

https://brainly.com/question/1133259

#SPJ2

Answer:

1. I will visit Japan next year.

2. The wound will heal slowly.

3. Will you hear from her often?

4. I want to get a new car.

5. He will drink himself to death.

6.He will go from door to door selling books.

7.What horse will come in first?

8. This will be a needless trouble.

Based on the provided scenario, the type of satirical technique used in this television show would likely be B. "incongruity."

Incongruity refers to the use of contrasting elements or situations that are unexpected or out of place, creating humor or commentary on the disparities between them. In this case, the teenager waking up in the future and witnessing significant changes in society and culture creates an incongruous situation, highlighting the stark contrast between the 1980s and 2028.

Incongruity, as a satirical technique, relies on juxtaposing contrasting elements or situations to create humor, irony, or social commentary. It involves presenting something that is unexpected or out of place, which can draw attention to the disparities and differences between them.

Learn more about satire on

https://brainly.com/question/4230795

#SPJ1

Answer:

Incongruity

Explanation:

I just know (;

Answer:

well, i can say that the dinner was a complete disaster

Answer:

Open the Voice Memos app.

Click the large red circle to start recording sound. ...

Click the red pause button (two parallel vertical lines in an oval) to stop the recording.

If done, click Done, then click on the words "New Recording" to name the file.

Explanation:

Answer:

In the Voice Memos app on your Mac, click the Record button (or use the Touch Bar).

To pause, click the Pause button . To continue, click Resume.

When you finish, click Done in the lower-right corner.

Explanation:

The student version of the Original text should not be considered as plagiarism. Option C. This is not Plagiarism

Plagiarism means taking credit for someone else work or idea. When a person fails to reference or give recognition to the originator of the information they use in their work, they've plagiarized.

In the student version, it can seen that student brought in their understanding of the text and added new information to the text. It cannot be said that they explicitly paraphrased the text, neither cannot it be said that there are any copied resemblance of the student text with the original text.

Find more information on plagiarism here;

https://brainly.com/question/24405302

#SPJ1

Answer: It would have to be "O Myths contain scientific facts"

Explanation:

it couldn't be the second  on because some people belive in myths or urban legends. it couldn't be the third on because anyone can tell a myth. it couldn't be the fourth one because myths can describe more "recent" events like in the 1800's. really hope you get it right.

"The noise of you clubbing him like chopping a tree down" is an example of figurative language in the passage above called Simile.

A simile is a figure of speech that compares two unlike things using the words "like" or "as." Similes are used to add color and interest to language and to help the reader or listener better understand or visualize a concept or idea. For example, someone might say "Her eyes shone like stars" to describe the brightness and sparkle of someone's eyes, or "He ran like the wind" to describe someone's speed.

In the case of the sentence "The noise of you clubbing him like chopping a tree down"  the simile compares the noise of someone clubbing another person to the sound of chopping down a tree. This simile uses vivid and descriptive language to help the reader or listener imagine the intensity and force of the action being described.

Find more information on simile here;

https://brainly.com/question/13366240

#SPJ1

Answer:

It is effective because it makes listeners feel unified.

The best reason why President Wilson uses the word "we" is it is effective because it makes listeners feel unified. The correct option is c.

In order to address what he perceived to be the causes of the world war. Wilson called for the repeal of secret treaties, a reduction in armaments, an adjustment to colonial claims in the interests of both native peoples and colonists, and freedom of the seas. Wilson's recommendations would ensure future world peace.

He called for the abolition of trade barriers between nations, the assurance of “self-determination” for oppressed communities, and the establishment of an international body that would provide a uniform system of security for all nations. The purpose of Wilson's 14 Points was to demoralize the Central Powers and inspire the Allies to victory.

Therefore, the correct option is c, It is effective because it makes listeners feel unified.

To learn more about the speech of President Wilson, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/29553272

#SPJ6

The question is incomplete. Your most probably complete question is given below:

We have no feelings towards them, but one of sympathy and friendship.

Answer:

to show that the Americans have God on their side just as Joan of Arc did.

Explanation:

Distinguish the ideas of Machiavelli that you agree with, such as the idea that leaders should always conceal their genuine goals, from those that you disagree with, such as his views on political leadership or the best methods for governing.

Machiavelli's main points: In order to maintain the state, leaders should frequently "act against pity, against faith, against humanity, against frankness, against religion." These are only a few of the principles that Machiavelli advocated. His name has come to represent sly rulers. In order to effectively rule, according to Machiavelli, public and private morality must be understood as two distinct concepts. A monarch must therefore be willing to act dishonestly when necessary and must not merely care about maintaining a good reputation.

Although I don't agree with that viewpoint, I am not an authority on political leadership or what makes for good government. Machiavelli was a shrewd individual, and there is undoubtedly a good case to support their assertions. People frequently use this specific passage to prove that it is a satire. Being feared isn't morally or ethically superior than being liked; in Machiavelli's opinion, it's simply more successful. I personally don't subscribe to that view, but nevertheless, I believe it's fair to say so.

To learn more about Machiavelli's ideas Visit : brainly.com/question/3135172

#SPJ4

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Based on the Fraction, the fifth-shortest piece is 3 inches long. Matthew's piece of string is 3 inches long.

The line plot shows the lengths of the pieces of string, from shortest to longest. The fifth-shortest piece is the one that is halfway between the third-shortest and fourth-shortest pieces. The third-shortest piece is 2 inches long, and the fourth-shortest piece is 4 inches long. So the fifth-shortest piece is 3 inches long.

Matthew's piece of string is as long as the fifth-shortest piece, so it is also 3 inches long.

Learn more about Fraction on

https://brainly.com/question/78672

#SPJ1

Eloise has a piece of string that she cuts into smaller pieces. This line plot shows the lengths of the pieces.

Matthew has a piece of string that is as long as Eloise's fifth-shortest piece. (Note: The problem says fifth-shortest piece, not fifth-shortest length.)

How long is Matthew's piece of string?

Two Kinds and Daughter of Invention deal with characters seeking to fit into American life. The stories treat this topic as follows: The narrators of both stories react to the teasing from American-born children by hiding any signs of their cultural identity. The mothers in both stories attempt to create in themselves and their children behaviors they perceive as representative of the American way of life.

The correct options are;The narrators of both stories react to the teasing from American-born children by hiding any signs of their cultural identity.The mothers in both stories attempt to create in themselves and their children behaviors they perceive as representative of the American way of life.

The first story, "Two Kinds," is about a Chinese girl who was raised in America. Her mother believes that America is the land of opportunity and that her daughter can become anything she wants if she works hard enough. She forces her daughter to take piano lessons, hoping that she will become a child prodigy.

The daughter rebels against her mother's strict regimen, feeling like a failure when she doesn't achieve the success her mother desires. She becomes embarrassed by her Chinese heritage and tries to assimilate into American culture as much as possible.

When she grows up and looks back on her life, she realizes that her mother only wanted the best for her and that she should have appreciated her mother's efforts.The second story, "Daughter of Invention," is about a Puerto Rican family who moves to America.

The mother is an inventor, but her inventions never work. She is determined to become successful and fit in with her American neighbors. She forces her daughters to speak English and to behave like American girls. The girls are embarrassed by their mother's odd behavior and are teased by their classmates.

Eventually, the mother's inventions become successful, and the family becomes wealthy. The daughters become proud of their mother's accomplishments and appreciate the lessons she taught them about hard work and perseverance.In both stories, the narrators react to the teasing from American-born children by hiding any signs of their cultural identity.

The mothers in both stories attempt to create in themselves and their children behaviors they perceive as representative of the American way of life.

For more question on representative

https://brainly.com/question/24560833

#SPJ8

Answer: Her

Explanation

Read it with the word her sounds bettr

Answer:

her

Explanation:

her is the answer

Answer:

B

Explanation:

I would go with be analyzing the organization of paragraphs because you could have a great essay but it sounds terrible because the order is mixed up and confusing. the best thing to do while revising is check grammar, punctuation, and spelling as well as how the paragraphs sound together and how they would make sense to someone who doesn't know the topic.

hope this helps.

Answer:

The first paragraph: "The assailants are still on the march, threatening other nations, great and small." , or last one: "Armed defense of democratic existence is now being gallantly waged in four continents. If that defense fails, all the population and all the resources of Europe, Asia, Africa and Australasia will be dominated by the conquerors."

Choose which one makes more sense to you as your answer.

Explanation:

Those parts tell us the problem that he is speaking on, and the problem is - obviously- the reason why he needs to give a speech.

Don't forget to click thanks and rate!! Also, please mark brainliest:)

An empirical source is one that is based on direct observation or evidence. An example of an empirical source that Josh could use in his essay could be an article from a scholarly journal that provides research and data on the topic he is analyzing.

He could also use a survey or case study that has recently been conducted or published or a government report. Rhetorical analysis is a type of critical analysis that examines the effectiveness of a speaker’s argument in a particular context. This type of analysis looks at how the speaker uses language, delivery, and other tools of persuasion to create a desired effect. In order to do a thorough rhetorical analysis, you must be familiar with the speaker’s context, the argument they are making, the techniques they are deploying, and the potential biases that may be influencing the argument. By looking at the text with a critical eye, you can evaluate how well the argument is constructed and whether it is persuasive or not. Additionally, by looking at the speaker’s motivations and choices, you can gain interesting insights into the history, context, and impact of the speech.

Learn more about empirical sources here

https://brainly.com/question/30064580

#SPJ4

The above question wants to analyze your reading and writing ability, for that reason I can't answer this question for you, but I'll show you how to do it.

First, you will need to read the two texts your question refers to. In this reading, you should pay attention to the textual structure, the presentation of characters, the actions presented, and how these elements are important to the story.

You can search for articles that analyze these texts and show more detailed information about the stories.

After that, you should identify the most significant 4 paragraphs of each text and compare them to show the similarities and differences.

You can present these differences and similarities as follows:

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/25427658

Tina shouted at her sister.

Answer:

Tina didn't shout at her sister.

Explanation:

I know you said "Change into Negative". This is the negative form by adding no or not(also n't). Eg:

Positive Negative

did didn't

could couldn't

can can't

would wouldn't

must mustn't

In a sentence:

Samantha slapped her own sister, Anna.

Into negative form:

Samantha didn't slap her own sister, Anna.

NB: Changing into Negative form is easy but somehow trickery. Thank you!

Thanks!!!❤❣

Answer:

hope it's helpful to you ❣️✌️

Answer: identified the subject

Explanation:

took the post test

Answer:

Photosynthesis is the process where plants prepare and make energy and food for themselves.

During photosynthesis, plants take in carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O) from the air and soil.

Answer:

C. Attacking the person's character in lieu of the issue.

Explanation:

Ad hominem, Latin for “to the man”, is when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making it rather than the argument itself.

Hope it helped! :)

Answer: C

Attacking the persons character in lieu of the issue

Explanation: well the

Translanguaging in simple words,  is defined as the act performed by the bilinguals for accessing different linguistics features or various modes which are  described in autonomous languages, so as to maximize the potential of communication.

Translanguaging uses all  the cognitive and  linguistic and resources, including one's native language in order to make sense to the academic contents that are being delivered in such a language which one is starting or about to learn. Notemaking during organizing graphic or while doing practical is an example of Translanguaging.

Translanguaging helps the  learners to collect the already known information to  new information. Translanguaging is implemented to preserve one's cultural heritage.

To know more about linguistic features here

https://brainly.com/question/9973566

#SPJ1

Answer:

While-reading activities are designed to help learners engage with a text and deepen their understanding of its content. Some examples of while-reading activities that learners can do include:

Predicting: Before reading the text, learners can make predictions about what they think the text will be about, what information it will contain, or what the author's viewpoint might be. This can help to activate prior knowledge and build anticipation for what is to come.

Skimming and scanning: Learners can use skimming to get a general idea of the text and scanning to locate specific information. This can help to improve their reading speed and comprehension.

Highlighting and note-taking: Learners can use highlighting or underlining to mark important information, or take notes to summarize key points or record questions they have. This can help to improve their retention and recall of the information presented in the text.

Discussion: Learners can engage in small group or whole-class discussions to share their reactions to the text, ask questions, or clarify their understanding. This can help to deepen their comprehension and build their verbal communication skills.

Summarizing: Learners can write a brief summary of the text, either on their own or in pairs or groups. This can help to reinforce their understanding and identify the most important information presented in the text.

Responding: Learners can write a short response to the text, expressing their opinions, reactions, or questions. This can help to engage them more fully with the text and encourage critical thinking skills.

Overall, while-reading activities should encourage learners to actively engage with the text and develop their reading comprehension skills. The specific activities chosen will depend on the level of the learners, the length and complexity of the text, and the learning objectives of the lesson.

Explanation: