Why does the Executive Office of the President include?

Answers

Answer 1

The Executive Office of the president uses the mass media to gain support for the policies.

What is mass media?

The term "mass media" describes a wide range of media technologies that are used to communicate with huge audiences. There are many outlets available in the technology used for this communication. Films, radio, recorded music, and television are examples of broadcast media that use electronic transmission to deliver information. Internet- and mobile-based mass communication are both considered to be digital media. Online radio and television are examples of internet media, along with email and social media websites. In this approach, they are able to take advantage of the Internet's accessibility and reach capabilities, easily and effectively disseminating information over a wide range of global locations. Physical items like books, comics, magazines, newspapers, or pamphlets are used in print media to deliver information. Additionally seen as components of mass media are planning events and public speaking.

To learn more about social media, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/21901194

#SPJ4


Related Questions

Audrey was granted stock appreciation rights in 10,000 shares of company stock when the share price was $50. If she exercised her rights when the share price was $70, how much income, if any, must she recognize at that time?

Answers

The income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.

Audrey will earn $200000 if she sells all the shares when the share price is $70 because there is $20 increase occur from the time when she receives the share until now. When she receives the share, its price is $50.

But after sometime when the share price increases and reaches up to $70 so we can conclude that the income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.

Learn more about shares here: https://brainly.com/question/1957305

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/26058343

the following are examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts except: group of answer choices appellate court family court traffic court probate court

Answers

The appellate court is not an example of limited jurisdiction trial courts

Appellate courts hear and assess appeals in the American legal system. Appellate courts review the procedures and decisions made by the trial court to ensure that they are fair and that the correct law was applied. It is not an illustration of a trial court with restricted jurisdiction. In matters that have been appealed from lower courts, an appellate court instead evaluates the legal questions and arguments raised in written briefs and during oral arguments rather than conducting trials or hearing evidence.

The other three given options namely family court, traffic court, and probate court are all examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts, which are tribunals with the power to hear and decide issues pertaining to a specific area of law or subject matter.

Read more about the Appellate court on:

https://brainly.com/question/11744340

#SPJ4

Congressional members must address various levels of representation that include all of the following except _____.

Answers

Members of Congress must address multiple levels of representation, which include all of the following, with the exception of international organizations. Here option D is the correct answer.

Congressional members are elected to represent their constituents in their home district or state, but their responsibilities extend beyond just their local constituency. They also need to address the concerns and priorities of national political parties, interest groups, and lobbyists who have a stake in the legislative process. These groups often lobby Congress to promote their agendas and policies, and their influence can be significant.

However, Congressional members do not have a direct responsibility to address international organizations. While they may need to consider the implications of their actions on the international stage, their primary duty is to represent the interests of their constituents and the nation as a whole. International organizations are typically not within their jurisdiction, as they are separate entities that operate on a global level.

In summary, while Congressional members must address various levels of representation, including their constituents, national political parties, interest groups, and lobbyists, they do not have a direct responsibility to address international organizations.

To learn more about international organizations

https://brainly.com/question/31642994

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Congressional members must address various levels of representation that include all of the following except _____.

a) Constituents in their home district or state

b) National political parties

c) Interest groups and lobbyists

d) International organizations

Earning enough money to take a vacation is which rewards of work factor?

A Benefits
B Career
C Compensation
D Work content

Answers

I think it’s d work content

Earning enough money to take a vacation is a compensation rewards of work factor. The correct option is c.

Earned income enables the ability to take a vacation, which is option C- Compensation. Wages, salaries and bonuses are all examples of financial rewards for work, which collectively constitute compensation. A concrete result of the compensation factor is the ability to earn enough money to take a vacation.

Demonstrating the connection between one's efforts at work and the financial resources that allow them to engage in leisure activities. This aspect of pay demonstrates how the financial benefits of work can be translated into rewarding experiences and benefits outside the workplace which benefits employees general wellbeing and work-life balance.

To know more about financial resources here

brainly.com/question/32199479

#SPJ3

true or false: the chinese government passed a law that provided private property owners with the same protections granted to the state. hernando de soto would be in favor of this law.

Answers

The given statement "the chinese government passed a law that provided private property owners with the same protections granted to the state. hernando de soto would be in favor of this law." is False because Hernando de Soto would not be in favor of this law.

He was a strong advocate for the protection of the property rights of individuals and the need for developing countries to recognize and protect such rights.

De Soto argued that without secure property rights, individuals cannot use their assets as collateral for financial transactions, leaving them susceptible to exploitation by the state and unable to benefit from their resources. Thus, de Soto would not be supportive of a law that provided the same protections to the state as to individual property owners.

To know more about advocate , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28272829

#SPJ4

If I go to class tomorrow without having done the reading, my professor will call on me and be angry that I am not prepared. However, if I stay up all night, which is what I would have to do to catch up on the reading, he will be angry because I will be too tired to stay awake in class. The above argument is constructed to lead to which one of the following conclusions?

A. If I go to class tomorrow, my professor will be angry with me.
B. If I stay home tomorrow to catch up on the reading, my professor will be angry that I skipped class.
C. It would be better for me to skip class tomorrow than to stay up late reading
D. My professor will be angry.
E. If my professor is angry with me, it is because I fell behind on the reading.

Answers

I believe it would be D. My professor will be angry.

No matter the situation, or choice it leads to the same conclusion. There is no right option available without the teacher becoming angry.
I shall assume B it sends a better message

Do you feel bicameralism actually satisfies representation for both sparsely and densely populated states? Why/why not?

Answers

Instead of consolidating authority in one body, this bicameral system divides power among two houses that serve as a check and balance on one another.

What is the bicameralism for both sparsely and densely?

As a safeguard against tyranny, the founders formed Congress as a bicameral legislature. They were concerned about one government entity becoming overly powerful.

Instead of consolidating authority in one body, this bicameral system divides power among two houses that serve as a check and balance on one another.

Therefore, Bicameral, which means “two chambers” in Latin, refers to a system of government with two houses, or legislative bodies, that are distinct from one another when debating.

Learn more about bicameralism here:

https://brainly.com/question/20295264

#SPJ1

Select the best description of the mortgage note.
It commits you to paying your loan
It lists all costs associated with your loan

Answers

Answer:

The correct option is;

It commits you to paying your loan

Explanation:

A mortgage note is a note promising to repay a stipulated amount of money as well as interest incurred at a stipulated rate at an agreed time in order to live up to the terms of the promise

The mortgage note outlines the debt and the interest rate and requires the borrower, that is the signatory to the note individually responsible for the repayment of the mortgage

Therefore, the correct option is that it commits you to paying your loan.

The best description of the mortgage note is B. It lists all costs associated with your loan.

What is a mortgage note?

A mortgage note is a promising note that stipulates the:

Amount of loan involved Interest rate and amount to be paid periodicallyMaturity period of the mortgage.

Thus, while signing the mortgage note commits the borrower to pay off the loan with interest, the best description of the mortgage note is that it lists all costs associated with the loan.

Learn more about the mortgage note at https://brainly.com/question/1318711

which court decision held that the basic elements of procedural due process must be present when decisions are made concerning the disciplining of an inmate?

Answers

The court decision that held that the basic elements of procedural due process must be present when decisions are made concerning the disciplining of an inmate is the landmark case of Wolff v. McDonnell.

In this 1974 decision, the United States Supreme Court held that prisoners are entitled to certain procedural protections when facing disciplinary sanctions, including advance written notice of the charges, an opportunity to present evidence and call witnesses, and a written statement explaining the reasons for the disciplinary action taken. This decision established that prisoners are entitled to due process protections, even though they are in a custodial environment and have limited rights compared to the general public. The ruling in Wolff v. McDonnell has had a significant impact on the administration of justice in prisons and has helped to ensure that prisoners are treated fairly and justly.

To know more about court click here:

brainly.com/question/15147174

#SPJ4

How many different laws are there will give best answer brainest

Answers

Answer:

There are five types of legal system i.e. civil law; common law; customary law; religious law and mixed law. In Indian Judicial System there are four types of law. The Criminal law is enforced by the police

Explanation: or This article provides you with some essential federal laws you should know as an American citizen.

The Social Security Act (1835) ...

Freedom of Information Act. ...

The Pendleton Act (1883) ...

The G.I. ...

The Patriot Act (2001) ...

The Civil Rights Act of 1964. ...

No Child Left Behind (2001) ...

The Privacy Act.

Answer:

approximately 200–600

Explanation:

All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT

a. businesses sell goods and services in the product market
b. individuals supply resources in the resource market
c. the government buys goods and services in the product market
d. businesses sell resources in the product market

Answers

All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT businesses sell goods and services in the product market. Thus the correct option is A.

What is the circular flow model?

The circular flow model shows the supply of funds in society. Money is sent back to and from producers and employees in the form of wages and payments for goods.

Determining how money circulates within an industry is the central goal of the model of circular flow. It separates the economy into its two main sectors, namely, households and corporations.

The circular flow model offers one method for illuminating the relationships between various economic sectors. The interconnections between the various sectors' flows of money, products and services, production inputs, and income are represented.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about the circular flow model, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11324259

#SPJ2

Write a report based on a news article wherein a court convicted an individual based on DNA evidence years after the crime took place. Discuss how science and technology helped in this case

Answers

A sample of a suspect's DNA can be compared to biological evidence discovered at a crime scene if the suspect is known. Technology can provide a more efficient way to investigate.

The results of the comparison may then be used to determine whether the suspect committed the crime or was present at the crime scene. A chemical test called DNA fingerprinting can reveal a person's or another living thing's genetic make-up. It is used as testimony in court, to identify corpses, find blood relatives, and search for medical treatments. In a criminal investigation, a forensic scientist's duties and responsibilities are vital because they entail carefully reviewing an item of evidence while making sure it hasn't been tampered with. The investigation of a criminal act involves a varied group of forensic scientists and forensic equipment.

Learn more about testimony here:

https://brainly.com/question/26651069

#SPJ4

Voir Dire is also known as __________________________________.
Group of answer choices
Jury Selection
Writ of certiorari
Plaintiff
Defendant
All of the above

Answers

The correct option is Jury Selection. Voir Dire is also known as "Jury Selection." This term refers to the process of selecting and questioning potential jurors in a court case.

During Voir Dire, the attorneys for both the plaintiff and the defendant have the opportunity to question potential jurors to determine their suitability for the case. The purpose of Voir Dire is to ensure that the jury is impartial and can fairly evaluate the evidence and arguments presented in court. Attorneys may ask questions to assess potential biases or prejudices that could influence a juror's decision-making.

This helps to ensure a fair and unbiased trial. Jury selection is a crucial part of the legal process, as the composition of the jury can greatly impact the outcome of a case. By selecting jurors who are impartial and capable of considering the evidence objectively, the court aims to uphold the principles of justice and fairness. In summary, Voir Dire is the process of selecting a jury and is also known as "Jury Selection." It plays a vital role in ensuring a fair and unbiased trial.

To learn more about  Attorneys  visit here:

brainly.com/question/17215189

#SPJ11

The presumptive penalty for a violation of the theft statute is determined by calculating the object's
fair market value minus reasonable depreciation.

T/F

Answers

Answer:

Correct answer:

Explanation:

I am kinda sure its True

Hope this helps....

Have a nice day!!!!

Happy Halloween in advance, :D

20 points !! please help


Compare and contrast the U.S. Presidency and Congress with the Michigan governorship and state legislature in terms of membership, terms, term limits, and powers under the Constitution.

Answers

carrots most likely

Can the decision-making model help you avoid saying things you regret later?

Answers

Answer:

yeah because they try to help you think of the consequences later

What was the brown v stone court case about?

Answers

Mississippi Supreme Court Decision: Brown v Stone. Stone, a 1979 state Supreme Court case in which the Court lead that a religious immunity in Mississippi statute was unlawful.

Answer:

Explanation:

It was about the right of a parent to with hold immunization from a child for religious reasons. The immunizations would have protected the child from diseases described by health officials (I think in the state of MIssissippi).

The religious right appeal goes right back to the First Amendment which guarantees religious freedom. The court found that when a child endangers himself or others by not being protected from deadly diseases, the First Amendment's protection does not apply.  

If OC expert is requiring pre-payment of depo fee, DFC prepays and then sends us the invoice, correct?

Answers

Answer:

calculate it by self and know

Answer: There are certain situations where a deposit is required from either buyer or seller. In such cases, you may issue a prepayment invoice, sometimes called a prepaid invoice.

A prepayment invoice is a document used to record advance payments from suppliers or clients. It contains the amount to be prepaid on a sales order and enables you to invoice deposits required from clients or sellers.

Prepayments can be calculated based either on the percentage of the total order or have a fixed amount.

Explanation:

The authority to make decisions in enforcing the law based on one's observations and judgment
rather than the letter of the law is referred to as which of the following?

Answers

Answer:

Explanation;:

A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president biden relating to what kind of debt?.

Answers

A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president Biden relating to student loan forgiveness plan of debt.

On the same day that a judge dismissed a Republican-led lawsuit by six states contesting the loan-forgiveness scheme, a U.S. appeals court temporarily stopped President Joe Biden's plan to cancel billions of dollars in college student debt.The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered an immediate stay prohibiting any student debt discharge under the program until the court resolves on the states' request for a longer-term injunction while the ruling against them is reviewed.While the six Republican-led states posed "important and significant challenges to the debt relief plan," U.S. District Judge Henry Autrey in St. Louis dismissed their complaint on Thursday, claiming they had the proper legal standing to prosecute the case.

Thus the answer is student loan forgiveness plan.

Refer here to learn more about federal appeals court: https://brainly.com/question/24978344

#SPJ4

On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey reasons that AAA had no control over the independent contractor's work and thus Pershad was an employee of Five Star, but Five Star (and by extension, Pershad) were independent contractors to AAA. This type of arrangement is not uncommon. Neither are situations where trucking companies (among others) employ individuals who are designated as independent contractors but are trained by the company and have a manual of regulations provided to them which, in essence, controls where they drive, how they drive, how long are the drivers' work breaks, and who can ride in the cab of the truck. Additionally, drivers often wear a company uniform. The artifice of calling someone an independent contractor when the driver actually is not, is no more than an effort to avoid liability for the person's actions on the job and certain regulatory (unemployment insurance; workers compensation, etc.) and tax considerations. Consequently, the situations must be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis to discern the actual status of the individual. Do you agree with the courts reasoning? Why?

Answers

Answer:

Follows are the solution to this question.

Explanation:

Yeah, We agree with the North Carolina Court the decision that 5 Stars was an independent consultant. AAA does hire and fir five Stars staff, who may not evaluate all staff to see if their company is fit. they will not. AAA employed 5 Star in the name of the rental agency and was not responsible for its and other businesses. It is an employer, that is a consultant regardless of who determines to work. Decided to hire that work or even the independent contractor the company that had hired an independent contractor. We employ people as they already have the training to do a work, which the organization has completed, this is like recruiting an employment agency. I don't think companies avoid liability.

Explain the Rule of Law and explain its development on the American legal, political, and governmental system.

Answers

Answer:

The idea that those who govern must follow the laws; no one is above the law.

Explanation:

The Rule of Law has a huge impact on our government officials and institutions, from how they are held accountable (responsible) to how decisions are made to how laws are enforced! The Rule of Law protects us from tyranny (corrupt government) and is the foundation of liberty!

What is a main difference between the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament?

The Congress is made of two chambers, the House and the Senate, but the Parliament is only one body.
The Parliament deals only with matters of taxation.
Government ministers may not hold office and belong to the Parliament at the same time.
The British courts do not have the authority to declare acts of Parliament against their constitution.

Answers

The U.S. Congress consists of two chambers, the House and the Senate, whereas the British Parliament is a single body.

1. The U.S. Congress: The United States Congress is composed of two separate chambers - the House of Representatives and the Senate. This bicameral structure ensures checks and balances within the legislative branch of the U.S. government.

The House of Representatives is based on the population of each state, with each state having a varying number of representatives. The Senate, on the other hand, consists of two senators from each state, regardless of the state's population size.

2. The British Parliament: The British Parliament, also known as the Westminster Parliament, operates as a unicameral body. It comprises the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

The House of Commons is elected by the public, while the House of Lords is composed of appointed members, including life peers, bishops, and hereditary peers.

3. Taxation Matters: While the U.S. Congress has the authority to address all aspects of legislation, the British Parliament primarily deals with matters of legislation, including taxation. Tax-related decisions, such as introducing or amending taxes, fall under the jurisdiction of the Parliament.

4. Government Ministers and Parliament: In the British system, government ministers can simultaneously hold office and be members of the Parliament. This allows ministers to actively participate in legislative debates and decision-making processes. In contrast, members of the U.S. Congress cannot hold cabinet positions in the executive branch simultaneously.

5. Judicial Authority: The British courts do not possess the power to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional or against the constitution. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty in the United Kingdom affirms that Parliament is the supreme legal authority, and its acts cannot be overturned by the judiciary based on constitutionality alone.

In summary, while both the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament are legislative bodies, they differ in their structure, taxation matters, the involvement of government ministers, and the judicial authority to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional.

For more such questions on British Parliament, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30792867

#SPJ8

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied

50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.

Answers

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

What is the relationship between a product and its price?

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.Price in Dollars1816141210842102040Quantity Supplied50What

Question 1 of 10
Which is the term for concepts in a study, such as the average age of a
person upon acquiring his or her first job and the average salary he or she
was paid for that job?
O A. Results
B. Predictions
O C. Variables
D. Outcomes

Answers

The answer is C, variables

2. List all the facts relevant to deciding whether
Damms had taken enough steps to attempt
to murder Marjory Damms according to the
Wisconsin statute. In the case of state v. damms

Answers

Actors who attempt to conduct crimes that they plan to do are nonetheless guilty of the crime even

If it is impossible and the actor is unaware of it.

A clear action taken with the intention of committing a crime suffices to qualify.

Since the actor knows he did all required to ensure the planned crime was committed, he cannot avoid punishment due to the fortunate situation that the desired outcome was unattainable due to a fact he was not aware of to murder Marjory Damms.

Defendant was found guilty of attempting to murder someone. In his appeal, the defendant maintained that because the pistol was empty, it was impossible for him to have committed the murder, and as a result, he was not guilty of the crime.

According to the defendant, the statutory phrase "save for the involvement of some other extraneous circumstance" in Wis. Stat. 939.32(2) applied to the inability of achievement caused by the pistol not being loaded. Additionally, the defendant claimed that there wasn't enough evidence to find him guilty of attempted murder.

To know more about murder visit:https://brainly.com/question/19271039
#SPJ9

Explain the difference between a direct and indirect way people can participate in democracy (4marker)

Answers

Answer:

Direct: A direct way to participate in Democracy is to vote in elections, this infact is the easiest way to participate in Democracy, choosing you're an official to represent you may help you see action in idea's you would like.

Indirect: An indirect way to participate in Democracy is to contact your local Representative on a bill you would like propose, believe it or not, many other people would like this, and probably would vote for the Representative that proposes the bill.

The Federal Protective Service (FPS) has noted that the contract (or private) security guards they hire are often ill equiped to monitor X-ray and metal detection equipment to detect firearms, which represent machines and tools they use every day. What do these FPS reports indicate for people in private security

Answers

These Federal Protective Service (FPS) reports indicate that people in private security require better training and equipment than they currently receive.

The private security guards will improve their protective security services with increased training on reading and monitoring X-ray and metal detection equipment.

According to available records, the Federal Protective Service is the uniformed security police division of the United States Department of Homeland Security. The FPS prevents, protects, responds to, and recovers from terrorism, criminal acts, and other hazards threatening the U.S. Government's critical infrastructure, services, and the people who provide or receive them.

Thus, the FPS provides essential protective services and reports to improve protective services.

Related link:  https://brainly.com/question/18187050

Q1: Identify the sources of Canadian laws and distinguish their
components.
Q2: Describe the structure of the courts in Canada and
illustrate the litigation process.
Q3: Explain the following with sim

Answers

Q1: Sources of Canadian laws and their components:

Canadian law is a blend of civil law and common law, and there are three sources of Canadian law that must be recognized:

1. Federal Law: Federal laws are laws passed by the Canadian Parliament, which is made up of the House of Commons and the Senate. The laws apply uniformly throughout Canada. The Canadian Constitution Act of 1867 enumerates the various topics on which the Canadian Parliament has the power to pass legislation, including criminal law, copyrights, and patents, as well as immigration and extradition law.

2. Provincial and Territorial Law: Provincial and territorial laws are established by provincial and territorial governments in Canada. In Canada, each province has its legislature and passes laws that apply to its residents.

3. Common Law: Case law, or common law, is the third source of Canadian law. This includes rulings made by Canadian courts over time. Courts use prior legal precedent, or similar case decisions, to reach a decision, and that decision becomes law.

Q2: Structure of the Courts in Canada and Litigation Process:

In Canada, there are two types of courts:

Superior and Inferior. The superior courts of the provinces and territories include the Provincial Courts of Appeal, the Superior Courts of the province, and the Territorial Courts of Appeal. The Federal Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court of Canada are the superior courts of Canada .The Provincial Court is the lowest level of court.

It has two divisions:

criminal and civil. The Provincial Court has the authority to hear a variety of criminal cases, as well as family law, civil, and traffic cases. The Supreme Court of Canada is Canada's highest court. Appeals from both the Federal Court of Canada and the superior courts in the provinces and territories can be heard by the Supreme Court. The trial and appellate stages of the litigation process are the two main stages. The trial process includes pleadings, discovery, trial preparation, and the trial itself, while the appellate process includes the filing of a notice of appeal, the perfecting of the appeal, and the appeal hearing.

Q3: Explanation of the Following with Sim:

1. Homicide: Homicide is the act of killing someone else, whether intentionally or unintentionally. For example, if you are driving recklessly and accidentally hit someone, you have committed homicide.

2. Assault: Assault is the act of causing harm to someone else, whether intentionally or unintentionally. For example, if you hit someone with a baseball bat, you have committed assault.

3. Sexual Assault: Sexual assault is a type of assault that involves sexual contact with someone without their consent. For example, if you force someone to have sexual intercourse with you, you have committed sexual assault.

Learn more about Parliament from:

https://brainly.com/question/3710026

#SPJ11

Which of the following is a question of fact?
A. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.
B. Whether pre-meditation is necessary for a first-degree murder conviction.
C. Whether speech is protected by the First Amendment.
D. What is necessary for service of process?
E. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light and also what is necessary for service of process?

Answers

I believe c is a question because all the others are pointing towards needing an opinion or evidence. C is the only one with facts.

The one among the statements that i a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.

For better understanding, lets explain what question of fact means

Question of Fact is simply known as when a speaker wants to persuade people about how to interpret facts that was presented.In law, question of fact, focus on questions that must be answered by the act of one's reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising drawn from those facts. it is also known as a question for the jury in a jury trial or for the judge in a bench trial. Fact questions are evidentiary questions in nature and are often concern with who, what, where, and when.

From the above, we can therefore say that the answer is that the one among the statements that a question of fact is  Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light, is correct

Learn more about question of fact from:

https://brainly.com/question/13857186

Other Questions
What Happens in Hamlet Act 2 Scene 2? Given that S is the midpoint of AK , AS = 2x -1 and SK = 6x - 6 what is the value of x? Los _____ tambin corren ____ las calles. Los participantes ____ ____ pot las _____. Los participantes corren rpidamente _____ lostoros!word bank:rpidamentelentamentedeparaparticipantescallescorrenporcaminan explain what compatibilism and give examples of free acts and unfree acts and explain how they are different. who invented the first light bulb? Prezint subiectul textului ntr-un enun.(Animaia Ratatouille) According to the majoritarian model of democracy, the role of public opinion in a democratic government a. is often ambivalent about specific policies and issues. b. provides clear and consistent opinions on government policies. c. is always right. d. should be generally disregarded as skewed. A city experiences rain, on average, twice in every ten days during the summer Rain is predicted on average for 70% of the days when rainfall actually occurs, and rain is predicted, on average, for 33% of the days when it does not rain. Assume that rain is predicted for tomorrow. What is the probability of rainfall actually occurring tomorrow? 0.1054 0.6535 0.3465 0.8946 Please help. I really need to pass this. How does paragraph two and its three key points relate to the introduction?-They itemize a series of request at the conus wish to make of England-The state ideas of support the conus decided to break away from England-describe the structure of Connell government under the England rule- they list of specific grievance sent to the conus hold against the English rollerThe story is called experts from the do you know my name is stipulation for 13 and states for America by Thomas Jefferson WILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST Are these triangles congruent? How do you know?A. Not sure not enough infoB. Yes, by HLC. Yes, by ASAD: yes, by AAS Identify the BrnstedLowry acid and the BrnstedLowry base on the left side of each of the following equations, and also identify the conjugate acid and conjugate base of each on the right side:HCOOH(aq) + PO43-(aq) gives HCOO-(aq) + HPO42-(aq) The most important tip for Arianna to remember as she begins her job at Angeli Day Spa is that her work revolves around _____. consider the function represented by the equation y-6x-9=0. which answers shows the equation written in function notation with x as the independent variable Jake stabs and fatally injures Chris, his neighbor, in Austin, Texas. To avoid being arrested, he takes refuge in Philadelphia. However, the state police of Pennsylvania arrest and imprison him after they are notified by the state police of Texas. The governor of Texas appeals to the governor of Pennsylvania to send Jake back to Texas so that he can be tried for his crime. In this scenario, the process of sending Jake back to Texas is known as _____. A chess player won 3 out of 4 games, or 75% of her games, during a tournament. Her goal this season is to win 90% of thetournament games she plays.How many more consecutive tournament games would she need to win to meet her goal? Select all expressions that are equivalent to 3 x 5 6 x 4 y + 3 x 3 y 2 . A. 3 x 3 ( x y ) 2 B. 3 x 3 ( x 2 2 x y + y 2 ) C. 3 x 3 ( x + y ) 2 D. 3 x 3 ( x y ) ( x + y ) E. 3 x 3 ( x y ) ( x y ) Please find Surface Area of the Prism. 5mm 4mm 7mm. Thanks Mary is 14 years old. Her resting heart rate 70 beats per minute. Calculate 50% of Mary maximum heart rate to fine her target heart rate 6 1/7 as an improper fraction