Why does Cortes oppose the religious
beliefs of the native people?

The concept of judicial review—the ability of federal courts to declare legislative and executive actions unconstitutional—was established by the U.S. Supreme Court case the  Marbury v. Madison (1803). The chief Justice John Marshall penned the unanimous opinion. The chief Justice.

John Marshall's ruling in Marbury v. Madison established the judicial review principle, a significant contribution to the "checks and balances" system designed to prevent any one branch of the federal government from becoming overly strong. Marbury v. Madison was significant because it was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court used "Judicial Review" to declare the statutes unconstitutional.

To learn more about Marbury, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/11441602

#SPJ1

In defiance of the Union and the US Constitution, the Confederacy established the Confederate Constitution.

The Confederate Constitution sought distinct assurances of states' rights and defended slavery as an institution, which were the two main differences between the two.

The Confederate government resembled that of the United States in many ways. The Constitution of the Confederate States was similar to that of the United States, except it placed more emphasis on states' rights and openly supported the enslavement of African Americans.

A line-item veto and a nonrenewable six-year presidential term are also provisions of the Confederate constitution. It reaffirms the notion of state's rights that had prevailed under the Articles of Confederation and expressly endorses slavery.

To learn more about  Confederate constitution, refer

https://brainly.com/question/4821060

#SPJ1

After the elections of 1908, three of five congressional leaders in Oklahoma were republican. Then an appropriate answer is C.

Learn more about government in Oklahoma here: brainly.com/question/21595376

#SPJ4

The New Deal redefined the role of the government, convincing the majority of ordinary Americans that the government not only could but should intervene in the economy as well as protect and provide direct support for American citizens.

Historians and political scientists have most often linked the Great Society to the New Deal; there is no doubt that LBJ was committed to expanding the Rooseveltian reform structure, a phenomenon that he saw as organic rather than static. As he remarked in a March 1937 radio address: “If the administration program [the New Deal] were a temporary thing the situation would be different. But it is not for a day or for a year, but for an age. It must be worked out through time, and long after Roosevelt leaves the White House, it will still be developing, expanding. . . . The man who goes to Congress this year, or next year, must be prepared to meet this condition. He must be capable of growing and progressing with it.” In truth, the Great Society marked the culmination of the effort by liberals to use the concept of positive rights (the right to a decent education, a good job, adequate health care) as opposed to negative rights (freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the right to vote) to achieve social and economic justice.

But, ardent New Dealer though Johnson may have been, he realized that the 1960s were dramatically different from the 1930s. If the New Deal was about security and disengagement from the labor force through such devices as retirement pensions, unemployment compensation, and pensions for the worthy poor, the Great Society, in contrast, was about opportunity and labor force participation. The New Deal supported hard-pressed Americans at a time of economic catastrophe; the Great Society invested in people at the margins of the labor force at a time of economic opportunity. The New Deal was pessimistic, the Great Society optimistic. FDR wanted in the end to create a larger pie, but above all he wanted to ensure that the pieces of whatever pie that existed were more equitably distributed. Assured of an ever-growing pastry by postwar prosperity in general and by the Kennedy tax cut specifically, Johnson was more about political and educational empowerment of the poor and disadvantaged so that they could better compete. He did not on the whole support government-driven redistribution of wealth. He exhibited strong opposition to both guaranteed income measures and public works, favoring instead programs of social rehabilitation and affirmative action.

An “us against them” motif ran through each of the three great reform movements that preceded the Great Society. The Populists railed against bankers, middle men, and railroad magnates. The Progressives decried the threat posed to middle-class society by robber baron capitalists and ignorant, rootless immigrants. In his 1936 acceptance speech, FDR denounced “economic royalists” who were laboring to replace American democracy with an American plutocracy. Lyndon Johnson was determined to rule through consensus, to avoid pitting one group against another. Not only was this a personal inclination, but the stratagems developed for dealing with the civil rights crisis seemed to demand it, and the prevailing prosperity promised to permit it. LBJ made the enemy—the “them”—abstract. Poverty, ignorance, ill health were not the fault of a class or group—they were boils on the body politic. These things were not the result of evil intent or greed on the part of groups or individuals, but seemingly free radicals that everyone hoped to see eliminated from the environment.

The Great Society’s most glaring departure from Populism, Progressivism, and New Deal liberalism was its frontal assault on Jim Crow laws in the South. Despite their idealism, the reformers that preceded Johnson proved unwilling or unable to confront the issue of full citizenship and equality of opportunity for African Americans. In many respects, the interests of black Americans had been sacrificed in the drive by Populists, Progressives, and New Dealers to secure economic and social justice for male-dominated, white, working-class families. Even before he became president, LBJ decided that civil rights for black Americans was an issue that could not wait. If the United States was to retain its fundamental characteristics—individual freedom and democracy coupled with equality under the law and equal opportunity—the nation would have to turn its back on racism in both the public and private spheres. The Great Society would do what previous reform regimes had not dared attempt and in so doing move the nation forward in its ongoing effort to resolve the greatest American dilemma of them all.

sorry this is so long XD.

link: https://time.com/4280457/new-deal-great-society-excerpt/

Answer:

Liberals are the democratic party and conservatives are the republican party.

The liberals believe in liberty and equality

The conservatives believe in free-market and freedom, less laws, and anything that means less government control

Answer:

Most European nations were absolute monarchies, meaning the monarch had absolute power. We call a monarch who ruled like this an 'enlightened monarch' or 'enlightened despot'. The enlightened despots tried to institute enlightenment reforms but kept all of the political power without creating a constitution.

Explanation:

Most European nations were absolute monarchies, meaning the monarch had absolute power. We call a monarch who ruled like this an 'enlightened monarch' or 'enlightened despot'. The enlightened despots tried to institute enlightenment reforms but kept all of the political power without creating a constitution.

I hope this HELPS!

Texas became a separate province of Spain in 1718.

Answer:

1836

Explanation:

Texas became a separate province of Spain in 1836

Answer:

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Explanation:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Answer:

The fourteenth amendment

Explanation:

Answer:

lobal economy is the exchange of goods and services integrated into a huge single global market. It is virtually a world without borders, inhabited by marketing individuals and/or companies who have joined the geographical world with the intent of conducting research and development and making sales.

Explanation:

Answer:

The world economy or the global economy is the economy of all humans of the world, referring to the global economic system which includes all economic activities which are conducted both within and between nations, including production, consumption, economic management, work in general, exchange of financial values

Answer:

c one with a unicameral legislature, an executive committee, and

generally sovereign states

Explanation:

The New Jersey Plan was proposed as a response to the Virginia Plan. Because the Virginia Plan largely favored the larger states, the New Jersey Plan intended the opposite: to favor the smaller states.

For this reason, the plan proposed an unicameral legislature, whose members were apportioned not based on population, but based on state quality. This means that the smaller states and the larger states woud both send the same number of representatives to the unicameral legislature.

It also proposed an executive committee, and less federal power and more state power.

This plan was taken into account in the Connecticut Compromise. This is why the U.S. Senate has two senators from each state, regardless of population size.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

Hope this help :)

Explanation:

However, Lincoln did not directly force them to abolish slavery during the Civil War because he reasonably feared that, if he did so, they would secede from the Union to join the southern states and that this would result both in the North losing the Civil War and in the continued existence of slavery.

Answer:

B. Thomas Jefferson

Explanation:

In the early to mid-nineteenth century, property qualifications for voting was an issue of contention. It was prevalent in the United States of America, where only men who owned property were allowed to vote.

The argument behind this was that owning land or real estate made a man a responsible citizen and therefore, worthy of voting.There was a growing demand for democracy and universal suffrage among the working-class people. They argued that property qualifications for voting restricted the majority of people from participating in the democratic process, which was against the very spirit of democracy. The supporters of the property qualification rule, on the other hand, argued that only those who had a stake in society should be allowed to vote and that it would prevent uneducated people from making hasty decisions and voting for the wrong candidate.

Overall, property qualifications for voting was an issue of contention that reflected the struggle of the working class for political rights and the evolution of democracy in the modern era.

To know more about Voting Rights visit-

https://brainly.com/question/29759734

#SPJ11

d

Explanation:

people have rights that can not be denied by any government

Answer:

Virginia was nicknamed the Old Dominion for its loyalty to the exiled Charles II of England during the Puritan Commonwealth and Protectorate (1653–59). It has one of the longest continuous histories among the American states, dating from the settlement of Jamestown in the early 17th century.

Explanation:

The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries can primarily be explained in the context of European states acquiring growing technological and military advantages over non-European societies to expand their power. This was done through advances in naval power and weapons, which allowed European powers to assert their dominance through sea and land. In addition, the Industrial Revolution brought with it new technologies and weaponry which gave European countries the upper hand in global conflicts. These advances in technology and military power allowed European countries to expand their empires by conquering non-European societies and by establishing political, economic, and cultural dominance.

The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries is primarily explained in the context of European states using joint-stock companies to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies.The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries is primarily explained in the context of European states using joint-stock companies to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies.What is the joint-stock company?A joint-stock company is a business structure that was created to reduce the risks and costs associated with starting a business in the 16th century. It is similar to a modern-day corporation in that it allows individuals to pool their capital resources to establish a larger, more stable business. This makes the organization more stable because it spreads the risk among multiple investors, increasing the chance that it will be able to meet its financial obligations.When it comes to European states and their expansion, joint-stock companies were used to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies. In the 16th century, European colonial powers used joint-stock companies to gain a foothold in Asia, Africa, and the Americas.The same approach was used by Russia as it expanded its empire in the late 18th and 19th centuries. Peter the Great, in particular, launched numerous companies to attract foreign investors and promote international trade, with the ultimate goal of strengthening Russia's economy and expanding its territorial control. As a result of these policies, the Russian Empire was able to expand its control over Central Asia, Siberia, and the Caucasus.

For more such questions on Russian Revolution

https://brainly.com/question/28774072

#SPJ11

Answer:

a. trading post

Explanation:

Answer:

A. trading post

Explanation:

Got it right on edge

Answer:

Industrialization, urbanization, immigration, and political corruption lead to the Progression Era.

Answer:

Touch and hold a clip to pin it. Unpinned clips will be deleted after 1 hour.

An important feature of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was that it established the Federal Reserve System as the central banking system of the United States. This significant legislation aimed to provide a more stable and flexible monetary system for the country.

The Federal Reserve Act created a decentralized structure consisting of twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, overseen by a central governing board known as the Federal Reserve Board. This system aimed to address the issues of previous banking panics and financial instability by establishing a more coordinated and regulated banking system.

The Act granted the Federal Reserve System the authority to regulate the money supply, set interest rates, act as a lender of last resort, and supervise and regulate commercial banks. It also introduced the concept of a "dual mandate," which assigned the Federal Reserve the responsibility of maintaining both price stability and maximum employment. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 remains a crucial pillar of the United States' financial and monetary system to this day.

to learn more about The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 click here; brainly.com/question/1302974

#SPJ11

Answer:

Imperialism was a cause because building an empire needs manpower such as an army and a navy to conquer and keep the land that they colonised. The alliances system meant that a local conflict could easily result into an intimidating global one.

Explanation:

Answer:

He is right.

Explanation:

THANK YOU

When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so.

Both of these situations can be good or bad. For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense.

At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.

Hello. This question does not contain the source to which it refers. However, it is possible to find the same question and the source with a quick internet search.

Answer:

D. The introduction of the slave trade to the Atlantic World.

Explanation:

Source 1 presents the beginning of the African slave trade, also known as the transatlantic trade, which allowed that during 1450 to 1750 a large number of African slaves were bought at very low prices and transported to different parts of the world, mainly to the American continent, to be part of the workforce of the farms in European colonies spread across the continent. Most of these slaves came from West Africa and were sold by other Africans, but it was common for Europeans to sail to Africa and capture slaves with their own hands to be sold on the American continent, which was more profitable for the sellers.