why did southern states secede from the union

Answer:

its easy

Explanation:

the declaration of the rights of man and of the Citizen was passed by Frances national Consultituent Assembly in August 1789, is a Fundamental document of the French revolution that granted Civil rights to some commoners, although it excluded a significant segment of the French population

Answer: In August 1775, the Shawnee, Delaware, Mingo, Seneca, Wyandot, Potawatomi, and Ottawa had agreed to the Treaty of Pittsburgh, recognizing the Ohio River as the Indian boundary and pledging neutrality. By the end of 1776, the treaty had fallen apart and Native Americans began randomly attacking settlements.

Explanation:

The British-American Indian alliance fall apart after Tecumseh’s death. Thus, the correct answer is the last option.

The Native-British Alliance was a mutually beneficial alliance formed in the mid-eighteenth century that did not survive the War of 1812. According to historical evidence, the British required Native American support to protect Canada, while the Native Americans required Britain to provide weapons and food.

Tecumseh, enraged by US expansion, led a multi-tribal army that allied with the British against the US. However, with Tecumseh's death at the Battle of the Thames near our Canadian border, the Indian alliance disintegrated, forcing the British to retreat, effectively ending the War of 1812.

Therefore, the US victory and Tecumseh's death in battle effectively ended any possibility of a Native American alliance system or confederation, and the British essentially abandoned their Native American allies.

To learn more about British- American Indian alliance, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/20730447

#SPJ6

The ancient Jews' expectations of the Messiah were shaped by their religious and historical background.

Explanation: The ancient Jewish expectations of the Messiah can be traced back to their religious texts and historical experiences.

The Hebrew Bible, particularly the prophetic writings, played a significant role in shaping these expectations.

The prophecies spoke of a future anointed one, descended from King David, who would bring deliverance and restoration to the Jewish people.

The Jews' historical experiences, such as foreign domination and oppression, also influenced their expectations of the Messiah.

They longed for a savior who would liberate them from their enemies, restore their independence, and establish a period of peace and prosperity.

The concept of the Messiah evolved over time and varied among different Jewish groups.

Some envisioned the Messiah as a political and military leader, while others emphasized spiritual and moral transformation.

Nonetheless, the common thread was the anticipation of a figure who would bring about redemption and fulfill God's promises to the Jewish people.

Learn more about the  ancient Jewish culture visit at:

https://brainly.com/question/562280

#SPJ11

A militia was a group of physically fit men that guarded their cities, colonies, and finally states during the American Revolutionary War. The militia was a state-based institution.

The Insurrection Act does not exist in a strict sense. It is a broad, overarching idea for a number of statutes that date back to the 1790s that deal with the use of American armed forces inside the United States rather than a specific piece of legislation. 1 The major justification for granting the President the right to use armed forces domestically is found in these legislation, which were ultimately codified in the current Title 10 U.S. Code 251-255.

To know more about the American Revolutionary War visit here :

https://brainly.com/question/1466912

#SPJ4

Answer: Slavery was profitable

Explanation:

Slavery was very profitable so it turned people into millionaires and because of slavery the south was able to become more profitable with the crops and were able to pick more crops daily

Answer: I believe it is A.

Hope this helps.

Answer:................................

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Document 4a - Historian Eric Foner was interviewed for a documentary special entitled "Africans in America". Below is an excerpt of this interview.

Q: What is the relationship between slavery and westward expansion?

A: … The westward expansion carried slavery down into the Southwest, into Mississippi, Alabama, crossing the Mississippi River into Louisiana. Finally, by the 1840’s, it was pouring into Texas…. Now in the Southwest, West, and South, slave owners insisted that slavery was absolutely essential to that story of progress. Without slavery, you could not have civilization, they said. Slavery freed the upper class from the need to do manual labor, freed them from actually settling and creating civilization, freed them from working on the land, to worry about economic day-to-day realities…. and therefore gave them the time and the intellectual ability to devote themselves to the arts and literature and mechanical advantages and inventions of all kinds. So that it was slavery itself which made the progress of civilization possible.…Therefore, in order to settle the Southwest and Western territories, slavery would be a necessary institution.  

4a. According to Eric Foner, suggest ONE reason Southern slave owners supported the expansion of slavery into the west.

Answer:

One reason for the expansion of slavery to the west was to promote the colonization of that land and therefore to promote civilization.

Explanation:

According to Erick Foner's response, slavery allowed whites to create American civilization, according to their own thoughts. This is because, according to the scruocratic thought, if slaves took care of heavy work, whites would promote art, science and literature, which are the factors they believed were the shapers of civilization. thus, by supporting the expansion of slavery to the west, the colonizers believed that they were taking civilization to these lands.

Answer:

atrocious

Explanation:

Answer:

Negligible, Atrocious, Bad, Inferior, Insignificant, Low-grade, Low-class, Inconsiderable, Second rate, Terrible.

Answer:

Women should be allowed to vote using the first amendment because laws affect women just as much as men.

I don't really have much to say, lol.

In conclusion, the period from 1875 to 1950 was marked by numerous social and political challenges in Latin American countries. These challenges impacted the region's economic development, political stability, and social structure and continue to shape the region's contemporary political landscape.

Over the period from 1875 to 1950, Latin American countries faced significant social and political challenges that impacted the region's development. Among these challenges was the impact of colonialism and its lingering effects on the region's economy, social structure, and political landscape. The growing disparity between the wealthy and poor citizens, as well as between rural and urban areas, was a significant social challenge. This disparity was often compounded by weak institutions, rampant corruption, and political instability. Many of the region's political leaders struggled to balance competing interests, maintain order, and implement reforms to address these issues. Another significant challenge was the exploitation of natural resources by foreign companies and the impact on the environment and local communities. This exploitation often led to environmental degradation, displacement of indigenous populations, and exploitation of workers. Additionally, the period saw the rise of authoritarian regimes, military coups, and political violence. These developments further undermined the region's stability and contributed to significant human rights violations.

to know more about  social and political challenges visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9049400

#SPJ11

Most Irish immigrants who arrived in the United States in the 1840s and 1850s faced significant challenges and hardships.

The majority of Irish immigrants who arrived in the United States during the 1840s and 1850s experienced difficult living conditions and economic struggles. Many of them were escaping the devastating effects of the Great Famine in Ireland, which resulted in widespread poverty, famine, and disease. Upon arrival, they faced discrimination and hostility from established Americans who viewed them as a threat to jobs and cultural norms.

Most Irish immigrants settled in urban areas, particularly in cities like Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, where they often lived in crowded and unsanitary tenements. They faced low wages and were often employed in low-skilled and dangerous jobs, such as construction, factory work, and domestic service. Anti-Irish sentiment and nativist movements, fueled by xenophobia and fear of competition, further marginalized the Irish community.

Despite the challenges, Irish immigrants were resilient and formed tight-knit communities that provided support and solidarity. Over time, they made significant contributions to American society, particularly in politics, labor movements, and cultural life. Their descendants would go on to play prominent roles in shaping the United States.

To learn more about Irish immigrants Click Here: brainly.com/question/28128958

#SPJ11

The main drawback of a categorical grant-in-aid is that it may be too broad in scope.

This type of grant provides funds rather than manpower, and is used for a specific, narrowly defined purpose, making it difficult to adapt to changing needs or conditions.

Additionally, categorical grants typically come with “strings attached”, requiring the State to follow Federal guidelines in order to receive the funds. This often means that the State must comply with certain regulations and may not be able to use the funds as desired.

Additionally, the Federal government may not be able to provide the necessary technical knowledge or assistance for the State to effectively use the funds. This could result in the State having to spend additional funds to obtain the required expertise, resulting in a net loss of funds for the project.

In some cases, the Federal government may also not provide adequate funding for the project, resulting in the State having to make up the difference using its own funds.

To learn more about funds visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4521829

#SPJ4

The Anti-Federalists did not want the federal government to have a standing army or be taxed to pay off the national debt incurred by the Revolutionary War.

Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential abuse of power by a strong central government. They feared that a standing army could be used to oppress citizens and enforce unpopular laws. Moreover, they believed that the responsibility for national defense should lie primarily with state militias.

As for taxation, Anti-Federalists were wary of giving the federal government the power to tax, as they believed it could lead to excessive and unfair taxation.

They preferred leaving the majority of taxation power to the individual states. The Anti-Federalists' concerns ultimately led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, which aimed to protect individual liberties and limit the power of the federal government.

To know more about federal government click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/371257#

#SPJ11

Answer:

western china Han Dynasty

Explanation:

Answer:

popular sovereignty

Explanation:

In 1922, the Five-Power Treaty (Washington Naval Treaty) did the following: It limited the size of the world’s most powerful navies and promoted disarmament by setting quotas for the number of battleships, aircraft carriers, and cruisers that each major nation was allowed to possess.

There were several major provisions of the Washington Naval Treaty or Five-Power Treaty. Below are the provisions of this treaty:1. It limited the size of the world's most powerful navies and promoted disarmament by setting quotas for the number of battleships, aircraft carriers, and cruisers that each major nation was allowed to possess.2. Japan, the United States, and Great Britain agreed to maintain the status quo in the Pacific.3. Japan and Britain agreed to maintain the status quo in the Far East.4. A Four-Power Treaty was signed between the United States, Britain, France, and Japan to resolve any future conflicts between the signatories.5. China's independence and territorial integrity were to be respected and maintained by the signatories of the treaty.

Learn more about Washington Naval

https://brainly.com/question/20897709

#SPJ11

Answer:

In 1870, Rockefeller created Standard Oil. In 1882, Rockefeller combined his many companies into the Standard Oil Trust. The trust enabled Standard Oil to monopolize all aspects of the oil industry from production to marketing. With a monopoly or trust, the competition has been eliminated in the market.

The wealthy and corporate elites benefited the most from the economic trends of the 1970s and 1980s. The economic trends of the 1970s and 1980s, often referred to as neoliberalism or Reaganomics, were characterized by deregulation, tax cuts, and a shift toward free-market principles.

These policies resulted in significant wealth accumulation for the wealthy and corporate elites. The deregulation of industries and financial markets allowed for increased profits and the consolidation of corporate power.

Tax cuts, particularly for high-income individuals and corporations, further widened the wealth gap by providing substantial benefits to the wealthy. Additionally, the decline of labor unions and the weakening of worker protections contributed to the concentration of wealth among the top earners.

As a result, the economic gains of the era disproportionately favored the wealthy and corporate elites, while the middle class and low-income individuals experienced stagnant wages and reduced social protections. This period marked a significant shift in wealth distribution and set the stage for the growing income inequality that persists today.

Learn more about the wealth gap  here:- brainly.com/question/30185865

#SPJ11

The government and military united the millions of people in the Roman Empire and the Latin became the official language.

A language that is used for administration in a certain legally formed political body, as a State or a section of a State. There is no official language in India. Article 343(1) of the Indian Constitution, however, specifies that Hindi written in Devanagari should be the official language of the Union.

The national language is linked to the socio-political and cultural functions of the country, whereas the official language serves as an administrative language, meaning it has to do with the government and its activities.

Thus, it is Latin.

For more information about official language, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3319595

#SPJ1

The presidency in fifty years is likely to remain a powerful institution, with the ability to shape policy and influence public opinion.

Predicting the future of the presidency is a difficult task, as it will depend on various factors, including political, economic, and social developments in the coming years. However, it is possible to analyze current trends and make some informed predictions about the future of the presidency in the next fifty years

It is important to note that the power of the presidency has increased significantly over the past century, as the role of the federal government has expanded in response to domestic and international challenges.

This trend is likely to continue in the next fifty years, as global issues such as climate change, economic instability, and political conflict will require strong and decisive leadership at the national level.

The presidency is likely to face continued challenges to its authority and legitimacy, as political polarization and social unrest continue to undermine public trust in government institutions.

The presidency will therefore remain a powerful institution, with the ability to shape policy and influence public opinion.

Learn more on presidency in the future here: https://brainly.com/question/2432124

#SPJ1

a. Applying the Realistic Analytical perspective, one can explain why drug lords in Central and Latin America have not applied similar actions to impose the sale of illicit drugs in the USA.

B. Medicinal Use and Domestic and Economic c. The theory of Historical Materialism, developed by Karl Marx, would explain the working-class addiction to opium in 19th Century England in the context of socioeconomic conditions

a. Applying the Realistic Analytical perspective, one can explain why drug lords in Central and Latin America have not applied similar actions to impose the sale of illicit drugs in the USA.

b. In 18th and 19th Century England, opium and opium derivatives had various medicinal, domestic, and economic uses among the working class. Two examples include:

1) Medicinal Use: Opium and its derivatives were used for pain relief, particularly among the working class who often faced physical labor and ailments.

2) Domestic and Economic Use: Opium-based products, such as patent medicines and tonics, were widely available and marketed for various purposes, including treating coughs, promoting sleep, and providing relaxation. These products were accessible and affordable, offering a means of escapism or relief from the hardships of daily life.

c. The theory of Historical Materialism, developed by Karl Marx, would explain the working-class addiction to opium in 19th Century England in the context of socioeconomic conditions. According to Historical Materialism, the social, economic, and material conditions of a society shape the development of its institutions, including patterns of addiction.

Learn more about drug lord at https://brainly.in/question/29000190

#SPJ1

Answer:

Communism is the idea that all property and wealth are owned and controlled by the state to create a classless society. A classless society is one in which there are no differences between the wealthy and the poor, between genders or between races and socioeconomic system promotes equality and communal hard work to progress a nation’s economy and social wellbeing

Explanation:

Answer:

answer a........ loveu

According to the Gallup Poll taken in 2007, both Republicans and Democrats value honesty and integrity the most as a trait. One difference between Democrats and Republicans is their stance on social issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. Democrats generally support pro-choice and same-sex marriage laws, while Republicans tend to be pro-life and against same-sex marriage.

Republicans and Democrats are both political parties in America. Republicans are mostly made up of the rich because it supports them.

They believe in free market capitalism, free trade, deregulation of corporations, and restrictions on labor. Democrats, on the other hand, are made up of the middle to lower classes.

They believe in fairness, justice, and equality for all by standing up for all middle-class Americans and those struggling to get there.

Read more about Republicans and Democrats at https://brainly.com/question/12266802

#SPJ11

Answer:

While President McKinley ushered in the era of the American empire through military strength and economic coercion, his successor, Theodore Roosevelt, established a new foreign policy approach, allegedly based on a favorite African proverb, “speak softly, and carry a big stick, and you will go far”. At the crux of his foreign policy was a thinly veiled threat. Roosevelt believed that in light of the country’s recent military successes, it was unnecessary to use force to achieve foreign policy goals, so long as the military could threaten force. This rationale also rested on the young president’s philosophy, which he termed the “strenuous life,” and that prized challenges overseas as opportunities to instill American men with the resolve and vigor they allegedly had once acquired in the Trans-Mississippi West.

Explanation:

LoL hope it helps u