Charles Riley was credited with saving French industry in the late nineteenth century, fo the wine.
He also understood that American grapes were immune to the deadly root diseases that killed French vineyards. Riley visited France to observe the infestation firsthand, and he asked Jules Planchon, the leading French specialist, to visit Missouri to examine American grape plants.
The two came to the conclusion that the best course of action was for France to import and plant American grapes before using those plants as a rootstock to graft French grape vines. The plan was successful, saving the French wine industry, and Riley received recognition from the French government for his contributions.
To learn more about French follow the link: https://brainly.com/question/25311986
#SPJ4
The National Defense Education Act, which for the first time offered direct federal funding for higher education, was passed into law by Congress in 1957 in response to Group of answer choices inner-city riots, and the rise of feminist activist endeavors across the Midwest. the French defeat by Vietnamese forces at Dien Bien Phu. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev's visit to the United States. the Soviet launch of the first artificial Earth satellite, Sputnik.
Answer:
Option: The Soviet launch of the first artificial Earth satellite, Sputnik.
Explanation:
The National Defense Education Act passed in reply to Soviet Union success in the space race. The Sputnik I as artificial satellite by the Soviet Union became first to go to space. The United States changes its approach to science after launching Sputnik I by encouraging scientific progress in 1957. The law provided funding to higher education, loans to students, and supported education in the areas of mathematics, and science.
write a short note on the the causes of the two world wars
Answer:
Even though there were many immediate causes for the two World Wars, there were many other causes that contributed to this. Some of these causes are mentioned below:
1. The immediate provocation for World War 1 was the murder on 28th June 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria by a Serbian fanatic.
2. Austria immediately declared War on Serbia.
3. Serbia was with allied Powers like UK, France, and Russia. The Austrian attack on it made these allied powers to come to Serbia's rescue.
4. Austria was allied with central powers like Germany and Italy. This marked the beginning of World War I.
5. The immediate cause for World War II was Hitler’s invasion of Poland as punishment for refusing to hand over the port of Danzig to Germany.
6. Aggressive nationalism, imperialism, militarism, secret alliances and ideological failure of the league of nations were also major factors that led to the foundation of world wars.
7. After the first world war, these causes continued to lead the way to the second world war. Other causes include dissatisfaction of Germany with the legacy of World War I.
8. A large industrial complex had come into function which promoted the idea of wars between countries as the only solution to conflicts.
9. Most of these causes are prevalent to the current situation as well. The nationalism in its extreme form can often infuse the feeling of superiority over other nation. This can create pride in oneself and hatred towards other.
Explanation:
How did most delegates from northern states view slavery? A. They didn't want slaves to count toward a state's population. B. They wanted each slave to count as three-fifths of a person. C. They wanted slaves to count toward a state's population. D. They wanted more slaves to be allowed into the country.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Im sorry if this is wrong
C. They wanted slaves to count toward a state's population.
Explanation: I took the quiz
What tensions existed between the Delian and the Peloponnesian Leagues?
A. The Delian League resented paying tribute to the Peloponnesian League.
B. The Delian League wanted the Peloponnesian treasury moved to Athens.
C. The Peloponnesian League wanted to limit the power of the Delian League.
D. The Peloponnesian League refused to fight with the Delian League against Persia.
Answer:
The answer is A. The Delian League resented paying tribute to the Peloponnesian League.
Explanation:
hope this helps,
Happy holidays,
Please give brainliest if you like my answer
What were conditions like at the camps where the Unangans were relocated?
possible awnsers.
The facilities had been designed to house a large number of residents.
The facilities were very similar to the homes the Unangans had left behind.
The facilities were in poor condition, with very little in the way of supplies.
The facilities were comfortable but could hold only a limited number of people.
The conditions of the camps were the Unangans were relocated were in poor condition, with very little in the way of supplies.
Who were the UnangansThese people were the Aleuts. They were also known as the native Alaskans. During the second world war, these people were forcefully held and relocated from their homes.
The areas that they were kept were very unsanitary areas in the Southeast of Alaska.
Read more on the native Indian tribes here:
https://brainly.com/question/24724492
Answer: C
Explanation:
Choose Aristotle's artistic proofs:
Answer:
Aristotle's rhetorical theory, the artistic proofs are ethos (ethical proof), pathos (emotional proof), and logos (logical proof).
Someone pls help me I will make you brain
Information of the american slave trade?
Answer:
The Atlantic slave trade, transatlantic slave trade, or Euro-American slave trade involved the transportation by slave traders of various enslaved African people, mainly to the Americas. The slave trade regularly used the triangular trade route and its Middle Passage, and existed from the 16th to the 19th centuries.
Explanation:
9.10 Graded Assignment: The Great Gatsby Literary Essay: PLEASE WRITE A ESSAY ABOUT THE GREAT GATSBY. DONT NOT TELL ME WHAT AN ESSAY IS I WANT YALL TO WRITE A ESSAY ABOUT THE GREAT GATSBY PLEASEEEEEEEE!!!
1. THESIS
2. THREE PARAGRAPHS- 4 SENTENCES EACH
3. CONCLUSION
I WILL MARK YALL BRAINLIEST IF YALL DO THIS FOR ME JUST PLEASEEEEEEEE!!!!!
The overall message of the novel titled "Great Gatsby" is to pass the moral that the American Dream is ultimately unattainable.
What was the literacy piece "Great Gatsby" about?The novel titled Great Gatsby is a written by an American writer F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1925 and set in the Jazz Age on Long Island, near New York City. The novel depicts the first-person narrator Nick Carraway's interactions with mysterious millionaire Jay Gatsby and Gatsby's obsession to reunite with his former lover, Daisy Buchanan.
It was inspired by a romance Fitzgerald had with socialite Ginevra King and the riotous parties he attended on Long Island's North Shore in 1922. Following his move to French Riviera, he (Fitzgerald) completed a rough draft of the novel in 1924 and submitted it to editor Maxwell Perkins, who persuaded Fitzgerald to revise the work over the following winter.
Read more about Great Gatsby
brainly.com/question/26090930
#SPJ1
can someone tell me How did the evolution of cultural traditions in India and China differ from one another? withouth this Tundexi guy answeing because he doesnt help
ASAP
Answer:
India and China are two ancient civilizations that have a rich history of cultural traditions, including religious beliefs, artistic expression, and social practices. While there are similarities between the two cultures, there are also significant differences in how their cultural traditions evolved over time.
One key difference is that India has been shaped by a variety of religious and philosophical traditions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, among others. These diverse traditions have coexisted and influenced one another over thousands of years, resulting in a complex and multifaceted cultural landscape. In contrast, China has been dominated by Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism, which have played a central role in shaping Chinese culture and society.
Another difference is that India has a long history of artistic expression, including sculpture, painting, and music, which have been shaped by the country's religious and cultural traditions. In contrast, Chinese art has been characterized by a focus on calligraphy, landscape painting, and ceramics, which reflect the country's emphasis on order, harmony, and balance.
Social practices also differ between the two cultures. In India, the caste system has been a defining feature of society for thousands of years, while in China, the emphasis has been on social harmony and the importance of the family unit. Additionally, Indian society has historically been more hierarchical and stratified, while Chinese society has been more centralized and bureaucratic.
In summary, while India and China share many cultural traditions, the evolution of these traditions has been shaped by different historical, religious, and social factors, resulting in distinct cultural landscapes.
Sorry I didn't answer sooner.
India's cultural traditions evolved around its various religions and philosophical diversities, while China's cultural traditions were influenced more by a centralized monarchy system, social harmony, and balance promoted by Confucianism and Taoism. The differences in the evolution of cultural traditions in India and China can be attributed to their distinct geographical settings, spiritual ideologies, and social organization systems.
Explanation:The evolution of cultural traditions in India and China has differed enormously due to differences in geography, spirituality, and social organization. In India, the ancient Indus Valley civilization left a legacy of urban planning and architectural sophistication that would shape future periods. This civilization also gave way to the dynamic and multifaceted Hindu religions, which came to dominate the subcontinent. Additionally, challengers to the religious status quo, such as Buddhism and Jainism, emerged in India, creating a complex cultural tapestry.
Meanwhile, in China, the civilization evolved along a centralized monarchy system under the Zhou Dynasty. Confucianism and Taoism, emphasizing social harmony and balance, became integral to Chinese culture. Although both cultures evolved sophisticated bureaucratic systems, India's was more often decentralized, whereas China leaned towards a strong central state.
In essence, India's cultural tradition developed based on religious and philosophical diversities, whereas China was more influenced by political stability and societal balance. Therefore, the cultural evolution of these two civilizations reflects their unique experiences and influences.
Learn more about Cultural Evolution in India and China here:https://brainly.com/question/33557144
#SPJ2
What is one major difference in the political viewpoints of Republicans and Democrats?
Answer:
Republicans tend to support the idea of a smaller government that is less active in society and Democrats tend to believe the government should have a more active role in society in order to help it grow.
Explanation:
Evaluate the postwar settlement in terms of justice, power and citizenship
The postwar settlement was seen as largely just, as it allowed for a re-distribution of power and rights to citizens.
Evaluate the postwar settlement in terms of justice, power and citizenshipThe postwar settlement of 1945 was a significant period of change in the world, as the end of World War II saw the creation of several international organizations and agreements, such as the United Nations, the Bretton Woods Agreement, and the International Monetary Fund.In terms of justice, the settlement provided for a new international order based on principles of self-determination, human rights, and collective security. This allowed for the establishment of a more equitable world order, based on the principles of international law. In terms of power, the settlement was largely favorable to the United States and its allies. The United States emerged from the war as the most powerful nation in the world, and its allies were given preferential treatment in international organizations, such as the UN Security Council. This allowed the US to exert considerable influence over global affairs, and it was able to shape and control the international order in its favor. In terms of citizenship, the postwar settlement provided for the recognition of the rights of all citizens, regardless of race, gender, or social class. This was a major shift from the pre-war era, when the rights of certain groups were not recognized. This allowed for the establishment of a more inclusive and equitable global order, based on principles of equality and universal rights. Overall, the postwar settlement of 1945 provided for a more just and equitable international order, with the US and its allies having a significant degree of power and influence. It also provided for the recognition of the rights of all citizens, regardless of race, gender, or social class.To learn more about postwar settlement refer :
brainly.com/question/30536742
#SPJ1
What are the mysteries of the Cahokia and Teotihuacán
Cahokia and Teotihuacán are two ancient civilizations that have left behind fascinating archaeological sites, yet they still hold many mysteries and unanswered questions. Here are some of the mysteries surrounding Cahokia and Teotihuacán:
1. Cahokia:
Cahokia, located near present-day St. Louis, Missouri, was once the largest city in North America during the Mississippian culture (900-1500 CE). Despite its prominence, there are still enigmatic aspects of Cahokia's civilization. One mystery revolves around the purpose and function of the massive earthen mounds found at the site. These mounds, such as Monk's Mound, were monumental structures that served various purposes, including ceremonial, residential, and administrative. However, the exact rituals and activities conducted on these mounds remain uncertain.
Another mystery is the decline and abandonment of Cahokia. By the 14th century, the city's population dwindled, and it was eventually abandoned. The reasons behind this decline are still debated among scholars. Possible factors include environmental changes, political instability, social conflicts, or the spread of diseases. Unraveling the specific causes of Cahokia's decline would shed light on the factors that shaped the fate of this once-thriving civilization.
2. Teotihuacán:
Teotihuacán, located near modern-day Mexico City, was one of the largest and most influential cities in ancient Mesoamerica. Its monumental architecture, including the Pyramid of the Sun and the Pyramid of the Moon, reflects the city's grandeur. However, much about Teotihuacán remains a mystery. One enigma is the identity of its rulers and the nature of its political organization. Despite extensive archaeological research, no clear evidence of kings or a centralized ruling system has been found.
Another mystery is the purpose and symbolism behind the elaborate murals and iconography found throughout the city. The meanings behind the intricate frescoes and carvings are still not fully understood, leaving room for interpretation and speculation.
Additionally, the collapse of Teotihuacán is another unresolved mystery. Around the 7th century CE, the city experienced a decline and eventual abandonment. The causes of this collapse, such as social unrest, environmental factors, or external invasions, are still subjects of ongoing research and debate.
Studying and uncovering the mysteries of Cahokia and Teotihuacán is an ongoing endeavor that involves archaeological investigations, interdisciplinary research, and the analysis of cultural and historical contexts. By piecing together the fragments of these ancient civilizations, we can gain a deeper understanding of their complexities and the factors that shaped their rise and fall
for more questions on .archaeological
https://brainly.com/question/928273
#SPJ8
What was the impact of the Mayflower Compact on United States history?
1) The establishment of a limited government
2) The concept of due process
3) The foundation for individual rights of the people
4) The principle of majority rule
Answer:
1) The establishment of a limited government
Explanation:
Most of the people on board of the Mayflower were Puritans fleeing religious persecution from the King of England. Because of this, they were afraid of encountering a similar situation in the future colonies.
For this reason, they wrote the Mayflower Compact on board, in which the pledged formal allegiance to the king, but established a form of self-government with their own rules. They had the goal of forming a colony for themselves, with law and order.
Answer:
4) the principle of majority rule
Which of the following is not a potential benefit of using more nuclear
energy?
A. Fuel is easy to move, so there is less pollution from shipping
O B. Cost of fuel is very low
C. Proper control can ensure safe handling
D. More air pollution
Answer:
balances. Explain the purpose and structure of the systf checks and balances and give an example of how it works
Explanation:
What do you believe is the most important element of civil disobedience? write your response using your own words. 15px.
The most crucial component of civil disobedience is that it must be an intentional act of defiance.
- Passive resistance is another name for a civil disobedience.
- Civil disobedience is the peaceful rejection of a rule of law, regulation, or authority that is deemed unfair. Civil disobedience is thus a nonviolent means of protest.
- It is the act of a citizen refusing to submit to a government's demands or directives without using force. Typically, civil disobedience is used to pressure the government into making concessions.
Therefore, I think the most crucial component of civil disobedience is that the act of disobedience must be deliberate.
To know more about civil disobedience, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/12041258?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
what city was Francisco pizzaro able to start
Answer:
Lima
Explanation:
Lima is the capital of Peru and one of the south America's largest cities.Its area is 2,672 km2.
Answer:
San Francisco
Explanation:
thanks :)
The nation fought against the British in the French and Indian war
O Miami
O Huron
O Iroquois
O Anishinaabe
Answer: Iroquois
Explanation: The Iroquois fought alongside the French, and the Ohio tribes fought alongside the British.
Answer:
C:Iroquois
Explanation:
The main enemies in the war were the French and the British. Both sides had American Indian allies. The French allied with several tribes including the Shawnee, Lenape, Ojibwa, Ottawa, and the Algonquin peoples. The British allied with the Iroquois, Catawba, and the Cherokee (for a time).
Which of these show how housing for Black Americans was unequal after World War II? Select FOUR answers.
OFHA financial help for developers
small homes or apartments
Levittown's rules
Odenial of G.l. Bill benefits
Ohigher property taxes
use of redlining
cheap construction materials
The four answers that show how housing for Black Americans was unequal after World War II are:
Denial of G.I. Bill benefits
Use of redlining
Levittown's rules
OFHA financial help for developers
Europeans learned the use of the astrolabe from the _____
Romans
Muslims
Indonesians
Chinese
Suppose you are creating a student government. Would that government be federal in form? Why or why not ? Please help me
Answer:
A student government would not be a federal government.
Explanation:
It would not be a federal government due to the "student government" being the only members of the government to make changes. A federal government is where the power to make changes is split between a more then one group. Which a "student government" is not more then one group.
A federal government is a type of government in which the powers are not only concentrated with the center but also equally exercised by the states.
Characteristics of a federal government :
Power is divided among different sectors both in the center as well as the state. A bicameral legislature can be seen where there are two houses in power. The constitution is written and rigid, which cannot be easily modified or changed. The Constitution is always the supreme which divides powers among the different houses.When students form a government :
We know that the federal form of government exists where there are two houses present. Apart from the student government, there must be a house upper, lower, or equal to them. As different houses exercise respective powers, there are strong chances of rising in disputes as each person in power has different views that make them collide. The federal government is a little expensive form of government to maintain as there is more than one house which leads to an increase in costs like campaigns and foreign tours, which could be a tough job for students to manage.There is always a threat to unity as different houses can demand separation of powers which can lead to the division of the responsibilities.Based on the above facts we can conclude that students can't form a federal government.
Learn more about the government here :
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ2
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of The Schlieffen Plan.
Answer:
German was able to sweep through northern France within 41 days. Germany would have start an attack even if she was ready or not.
Explanation:
The New Immigrants who came to the United States after 1880
a. had experience with democratic governments.
b. arrived primarily from Germany, Sweden, and Norway.
c. were culturally different from previous immigrants.
d. received a warm welcome from the Old immigrants.
e. represented nonwhite racial groups.
The New Immigrants who came to the United States after 1880 arrived primarily from Germany, Sweden, and Norway.
What is immigrant?An immigrant is, to put it simply, a person who was born outside of the country they currently call home. That person will always be an international migrant, regardless of whether they have acquired citizenship in the country of destination, served in its military, married a native, or have another status. Around 600,000 Italians immigrated to the country in only that decade; by 1920, there were over 4 million. Over 2 million Jews from Eastern Europe who were fleeing religious persecution came to the United States between 1880 and 1920.
To learn more about immigrants click,
https://brainly.com/question/24475673
#SPJ4
why did the national assembly end
Answer:
After Louis XVI's failed attempts to sabotage the Assembly and to keep the three estates separate, the Estates-General ceased to exist, becoming the National Assembly.
Has the balance of power between religious and secular authority stayed the same or changed since the 11th century? Is this positive or negative? Brainly
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Has the balance of power between religious and secular authority stayed the same or changed since the 11th century?
No, of course not. It has changed dramatically for the good of human beings.
After the total control and dominion of the church during the Middle Ages, the beginning of the Renaissance represented a major change in the way people viewed the influence of the church in their everyday lives. Artistic expressions, architecture, and literature played a major role in trying to make people understand that the church was dogmatic.
However, it was until the advent of the Enlightenment that brilliant thinkers and philosophers came with new ideas about the use of reason and science started to explain the natural phenomenon that in past had been attributed to religious explanations.
Thinkers like Baron de Montesquiou, Jean-Jaques Rosseau, Voltaire, and John Locke introduced innovative concepts about new forms of government, the division of powers, freedom, citizens rights, social contracts, and more. The church was relegated to second place in people's minds.
Today, religion plays an important role in people's private lives, but not in public life. Religion does not interfere anymore in political, economic, or social decisions, and that is a blessing(no pun intended).
Explain the change in educational attainment for black workers from 1970 to today. use data from the readings and video to support your response.
Over the past five decades, there has been a significant change in educational attainment for black workers in the United States. According to data from the readings and video, in 1970, a smaller percentage of black workers had completed higher education compared to today.
However, with increased access to education and efforts to address systemic barriers, more black workers have pursued and completed college degrees, leading to a rise in their educational attainment.
This progress is attributed to various factors, including civil rights movements, affirmative action policies, and initiatives promoting equal educational opportunities. Although disparities still exist, the trend shows a positive trajectory towards greater educational attainment for black workers.
Learn more about educational attainment:
https://brainly.com/question/28333857
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question.
Explain the change in educational attainment for black workers from 1970 to today. use data from the readings and video to support your response. support your answer.
Historians treat religious texts as primary sources, that is, as sources written by people at the time being studied that express their beliefs, ideals, and practices. to interpret religious texts as historical documents, historians have to put their own religious beliefs on hold and approach religious texts for what they tell us about the people who created them. historians are not concerned about whether the religious beliefs were correct or not; that is a theological rather than a historical concern. so, with that in mind and putting your own religious beliefs aside, please answer the following questions:______.
1. what is the tone of the zoroastrian and hebrew texts?
2. who do you think were their audiences?
3. did the texts represent a new form of inclusiveness as kevin reilly argues? why or why not?
4. how were the texts connected to other developments of the iron age?
5. what surprised you most about the texts? why?
The tone of the Zoroastrian and Hebrew texts can be seen as both reverential and authoritative.
The Zoroastrian texts are often full of exhortations to humility and reverence for the Zoroastrian faith, while exhortations to moral behavior and the adherence to divine laws can be found in the Hebrew texts. This reverence is often expressed in poetic language, sometimes interspersed with dramatic episodes and vivid descriptions that illustrate the importance of the Laws of these two faiths.
At the same time, both the Zoroastrian and Hebrew texts have an authoritative tone, as they offer instructions and commands to believers, emphasizing the importance of studying the scriptures in order to properly uphold the faith.
To know more about Zoroastrian , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8148348
#SPJ4
The Question-
Historians treat religious texts as primary sources, that is, as sources written by people at the time being studied that express their beliefs, ideals, and practices. to interpret religious texts as historical documents, historians have to put their own religious beliefs on hold and approach religious texts for what they tell us about the people who created them. historians are not concerned about whether the religious beliefs were correct or not; that is a theological rather than a historical concern. so, with that in mind and putting your own religious beliefs aside, please answer the question-
what is the tone of the zoroastrian and hebrew texts?
1. Define the following terms:
Indigenous:
Disputed Territory:
Seigneurial System:
terms:
terms:
United Kingdom of Great Britain:
Treaty:
Oral History:
Alliance:
The definition of the given terms are given below:
The Definition and ExplanationsIndigenous: Refers to the original inhabitants of a particular geographic region or area who have lived in that region for generations before the arrival of settlers or colonizers.
Disputed Territory: Refers to a geographical area whose ownership or sovereignty is contested or in dispute between two or more parties, often leading to conflicts or tensions.
Seigneurial System: A system of land ownership and social organization used in New France (present-day Quebec) and some other French colonies, where large tracts of land were granted to seigneurs (lords) who in turn leased the land to tenant farmers.
United Kingdom of Great Britain: Refers to a sovereign state that existed from 1707 to 1801, formed by the union of the kingdoms of England and Scotland. In 1801, it was expanded to include the Kingdom of Ireland, forming the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.
Treaty: A formal agreement between two or more sovereign states, often negotiated and signed to establish peace, settle disputes, or regulate trade and other relations between the parties.
Oral History: Refers to the tradition of passing down historical knowledge, cultural practices, and stories from generation to generation through spoken narratives rather than written records.
Alliance: Refers to a formal agreement or partnership between two or more individuals, groups, or nations for mutual benefit or protection, often established to achieve common goals or defend against common threats.
Read more about treaty here:
https://brainly.com/question/939952
#SPJ1
After independence Mexico made it easier for settlers to come east in order
to increase
Answer:
economic growth and security
Explanation:
Answer:
economic growth and security
Explanation:
just did the quiz :)
have a nice day!!
Question 2: What is the attitude expressed by General DeWitt towards Japanese-Americans and what is his opinion of Japanese internment?
Answer:
Explanation:
General John DeWitt was the Commander of the Western Defense Command during World War II, and he was responsible for the internment of Japanese Americans. DeWitt's attitude towards Japanese-Americans was marked by suspicion and distrust. He believed that Japanese-Americans were a security risk and that they could not be trusted to be loyal to the United States.
DeWitt's opinion of Japanese internment was that it was a necessary security measure. He argued that the internment of Japanese-Americans was needed to prevent espionage and sabotage by Japanese agents during World War II. He claimed that there was evidence of Japanese espionage and sabotage, although most of this evidence was later found to be exaggerated or untrue.
DeWitt also argued that the internment of Japanese Americans was necessary because they could not be easily distinguished from Japanese nationals. He claimed that it was impossible to tell which Japanese-Americans were loyal to the United States and which were loyal to Japan. This argument ignored the fact that the vast majority of Japanese-Americans were loyal to the United States and had no connection to Japan.
Overall, DeWitt's attitude towards Japanese Americans was one of suspicion and distrust, and his opinion of Japanese internment was that it was a necessary security measure, despite the lack of evidence to support his claims. The internment of Japanese Americans was a dark chapter in American history, and it was a violation of their civil liberties and human rights.