What words or phrases did president did Jacksonuse ro describe native American

The response of the French people to the rule of Louis can be compared and contrasted in terms of admiration and discontent.

Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, ruled France from 1643 to 1715. The response of the French people to his rule can be viewed in two distinct ways. On one hand, Louis was admired for his grandeur, accomplishments, and the centralization of power. Under his rule, France became a dominant European power and saw significant cultural and artistic development. Louis invested in the expansion of the French army, the construction of magnificent palaces like Versailles, and patronized intellectuals and artists, elevating France's reputation globally.

On the other hand, there were discontent and criticism among some segments of the French population. Louis's absolute rule and his pursuit of a centralized monarchy led to resentment from nobles, regional parliaments, and the common people. The heavy taxation imposed to fund wars and extravagant court life placed a burden on the general populace. Additionally, Louis's persecution of religious minorities, such as the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, sparked unrest and forced many Huguenots to flee the country.

Learn more about Rule of Louis

brainly.com/question/29029695

#SPJ11

Answer: First of all, the Articles of Confederation allowed America to fight and, ultimately, win the war against the British. The Articles provided America with a unified government of the colonies which allowed them to be a much more effective fighting force.The federal governmental structure under the Articles was (deliberately) weak, but a sense of unity still prevailed between the states as they came together, not through centralized compulsion, but through a shared commitment to liberty. Sustaining and maintaining this radical notion of republican liberty was undoubtedly an achievement of the Articles, one whose spirit still lives on today.

This lead to another major achievement. As the Articles were forged in the cauldron of war, Americans came to reflect on what changes needed to be made to the nation's governance. In other words, the Articles helped pave the way towards the provisions of the Constitution. Although the loose governmental structure had enabled the United States to win the war, it soon became clear that significant changes needed to be made if the new nation were to establish itself on the international stage.

Finally, the Articles of Confederation established a process whereby new territories in the west could be admitted into the United States. This mechanism allowed the relatively speedy resolution of territorial disputes that otherwise would have threatened to rip the new nation apart. This process culminated in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which was of great strategic value; it greatly strengthened the United States against any possible future incursions by hostile foreign powers because, as a result, there was now considerably more land and people to conquer and subdue.

Indeed, it is noteworthy that even after the Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation, Congress enshrined the Northwest Ordinance as law, retaining what was undoubtedly the Articles' most significant and lasting achievement.

Explanation:

Two Prime Ministers of Canada who had the longest service are William Lyon Mackenzie King and Sir John A. Macdonald.

William Lyon Mackenzie King served as Prime Minister for a total of 22 years, making him the longest-serving Prime Minister in Canadian history. He was in office from 1921 to 1926, 1926 to 1930, and 1935 to 1948. Sir John A. Macdonald served as Prime Minister for a total of 19 years, from 1867 to 1873 and 1878 to 1891. Both of these Prime Ministers were successful for different reasons. Mackenzie King was known for his exceptional political skills and ability to navigate through complex political situations. He was a master strategist and consensus-builder, often relying on compromise and negotiation to achieve his goals.

His skill in managing the diverse interests of the different regions of Canada allowed him to maintain stability and unity during challenging times. Additionally, Mackenzie King's economic policies, such as his implementation of social programs and protectionist measures, were successful in mitigating the impacts of the Great Depression and ensuring economic recovery.

On the other hand, Sir John A. Macdonald was a visionary leader who played a key role in the formation of Canada as a nation. He successfully led the country through its early years, overseeing the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway and establishing policies that promoted economic growth and national unity. Macdonald's leadership during the challenging process of Confederation and his ability to balance the interests of different provinces were crucial in the success and stability of the newly formed country.

Tagging:

To know more about Macdonald visit:

brainly.com/question/30592641

#SPJ11

Explanation:

According to the authors, the causes of the decline of the Mughal Empire can be grouped under the following heads: a) deterioration of land relations; b) emergence of regional powers as successor states; c) selfish struggle of nobles at the court; d) lack of initiative in modern weapons; e) lack of control over the

Answer:

Caesar was a very powerful leader who had a great influence on the Roman Empire. He was one of the most influential leaders of the ancient world. Caesar ruled with both physical and mental power. His amazing knowledge in many areas including military strategy and politics is what allowed him to be a great leader. Caesar was an amazing writer, his speeches and pamphlets allowed him to show his views and to control other’s views of him. He was well loved by the people of Rome. His personality combined with his incredible knowledge and great military strategy made it possible for him to rule the Roman empire and allow it to greatly prosper.

Answer:

It points to the next animal on the food chain. Normally it will point from prey to predator. In other words, it points from the animal that is eaten to the one that eats it. For example, a worm points to a bird. Hope this helps.

Explanation:

Mazzini argued that Lombardy should be allowed to achieve personal independence from Austria because it had the common bonds necessary for a nation-state, such as common language, common traditions and shared ancestors.

He argued that the people of Lombardy should not be kept from freely associating with each other because of foreign domination. He believed the people of Lombardy should struggle for country and liberty, and be allowed to enjoy their own personal independence.

Mazzini's argument for independence for Lombardy was based on the idea that the region had the bonds necessary to be an autonomous nation-state, and that it should not be kept from enjoying its own personal independence by foreign domination.

To know more about Mazzini , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7365706

#SPJ4

The important legal practice that dates back to Henry II is the establishment of the English common law system. Henry II played a significant role in shaping and expanding the common law by instituting legal reforms during his reign in the 12th century.

These reforms included the introduction of royal judges who traveled throughout the country to administer justice based on standardized laws, thus creating a unified system of law for the entire kingdom. This system, known as the common law, formed the basis of the English legal system and had a profound influence on the development of legal systems in many other countries.

It emphasized the principle of precedent, where decisions made in previous similar cases served as guidance for future cases, promoting consistency and fairness in legal proceedings.

For more such answers on Henry II

https://brainly.com/question/436979

#SPJ8

Republic form of government took over in china after the last emperor was removed from power. Hsian-T'ung, the last emperor of China, was forced to abdicate following Sun Yat-sen's republican revolution on 12 February, 1912. So, the correct option is B.

Republic form of government ensured that it is a form of government in which state is ruled by representatives by the citizens of that country. A state in which power is in the hands of people and their elected representatives  or nominated president rather than a monarch.

It is very important to each and every country to be republic because there is so many advantages of a republician government such as fairness, freedom and prosperity, equality and social justice of the citizens.

Learn more about Republic government click the link here:

https://brainly.com/question/19044837

#SPJ4

Answer: it set aside land for public schools

Explanation: this was in the time they were dishing out loads of land and wanted to make sure public school remained prominent.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

When the British tried taking over what was the US, the French stepped in and tried to stop them from doing so. Hope this helped you!

dj vnhkd hkdshfj, hda iahesfuevaehfsdxfhmrthuijenfhetlajrnvjn

The significance of the Declaration of Independence was that its set forth the ideas and principles behind a just & fair government which is observed in the Constitution.

Toward end of revolutionary war, the declaration was created and  declared that U.S. were independent from Britain and that a new country would be formed out of its former colonies. The idea therein were mainly inspired by an Enlightenment ideas which were natural rights, liberty, private property and equality.

In conclusion, the founding document broke all political ties between American colonies & Great Britain and set forth the new ideas and principles behind a just and fair government as well as how the government would function.

Read more about Declaration of Independence

brainly.com/question/9515546

#SPJ1

One similarity between the Argentinean currency crisis of 2001-2002 and the impact of Brexit on the British Pound is the significant economic uncertainty and volatility experienced in both cases.

In the Argentinean currency crisis, the country faced a severe economic downturn triggered by a combination of factors, including excessive government spending, a high fiscal deficit, and a fixed exchange rate regime that became unsustainable.

As a result, confidence in the Argentinean economy collapsed, leading to a sharp depreciation of the currency (the Argentine Peso) and a subsequent banking crisis.

Similarly, the uncertainty surrounding Brexit and its potential consequences created a volatile environment for the British Pound. The referendum vote in 2016 for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union caused significant uncertainty regarding trade agreements, investment flows, and the overall economic outlook. This uncertainty put pressure on the British Pound, resulting in periods of depreciation and heightened market volatility.

One key difference between these two events is the underlying causes and nature of the crises. The Argentinean currency crisis was primarily a result of domestic economic mismanagement, characterized by unsustainable fiscal policies and a fixed exchange rate system that became unviable.

On the other hand, Brexit was a political decision by the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, driven by concerns over sovereignty, immigration, and economic governance. While the Argentinean crisis was largely self-inflicted, Brexit was a deliberate policy choice with long-term implications.

Additionally, the scale and global impact of these events differ. The Argentinean crisis had a significant impact on the country's economy, leading to a deep recession, mass unemployment, and debt default.

However, its impact on the global economy was relatively contained. In contrast, Brexit has broader implications due to the United Kingdom's role as a major global economy and its integration with the European Union. The uncertainty surrounding Brexit negotiations and its potential consequences had implications for trade, investment, and financial markets not only in the UK but also across Europe and beyond.

In summary, the Argentinean currency crisis of 2001-2002 and the impact of Brexit on the British Pound share a similarity in terms of the economic uncertainty and volatility experienced. However, they differ in their causes, with the Argentinean crisis stemming from domestic mismanagement and the Brexit impact resulting from a deliberate political decision.

Furthermore, the global repercussions of these events varied, with the Argentinean crisis primarily affecting the domestic economy while Brexit had broader implications for the UK, the EU, and the global economy.

To know more about economic mismanagement:

https://brainly.com/question/33035890

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Two revolutions are similar to the French Revolution, excepting for one or other aspect:

   The American Revolution

   The Russian Revolution

According to Crane Brinton in his book The Anatomy of Revolution, there are stages to be followed and goes from the euphoria to terror. The American Revolution didn't have a terror regime, but the euphoria to freedom leads to the separation of England and the thirteen colonies. On the other hand, the Russian Revolution follows the same steps of the French Revolution, beginning with the euphoria to take down the Tsar and his government, and followed by the establishment of a communist regime which leads to a regime of terror.

Answer:

Explanation:

If you join the needs of the military (weapons like planes and battle ships and flame throwers and rifles and tanks and jeeps) with industry which can provide all those things, you endanger freedom and democracy.

I say that because there is not longer any competition. The military pays for what it needs with tax-payer dollars, and the big companies in industry just get bigger and bigger.

Why is this dangerous? It is because industry can dictate terms to government. "Do as we say or our factories in your state will evaporate and then what do think voters will do? You will lose them their jobs. And don't think we can't do it. We can."

If your talking about the trans-Saharan trade, the answer is that the trans-Saharan trade route transformed West Africa by connecting it to the larger parts of the world. This trade route in particular was intriguing as it required the need for human adaptation and innovation over this vast desert area.

Answer:Richard and Mildred Loving

Explanation:Loving v. Virginia was a Supreme Court case that struck down state laws banning interracial marriage in the United States. The plaintiffs in the case were Richard and Mildred Loving, a white man and Black woman whose marriage was deemed illegal according to Virginia state law.

One cause of expanded trade in the Indian Ocean Basin in the period 1200-1450 was the rise of Islamic empires.

The Islamic empires, such as the Abbasids and the Seljuks, played a major role in the expansion of trade in the Indian Ocean Basin during the period 1200-1450. The Islamic empires facilitated the exchange of goods and ideas between the East and the West, creating a vast network of trade routes that connected the Indian Ocean Basin with other regions of the world.The Islamic empires helped to promote a common culture and a shared language, which further facilitated trade and commerce.

They also encouraged the development of new technologies and innovations, such as the astrolabe and the compass, which made navigation easier and safer for traders and merchants.In conclusion, the rise of Islamic empires was one of the main causes of the expanded trade in the Indian Ocean Basin in the period 1200-1450. The Islamic empires facilitated the exchange of goods and ideas between the East and the West, creating a vast network of trade routes that connected the Indian Ocean Basin with other regions of the world.

Learn more about indian ocean basin here:https://brainly.com/question/28851897

#SPJ11

Answer:

Jared diamond refers to the people of new guinea as "among the world's most culturally diverse and adaptable people in the world", yet they have much less than modern americans. diamond has developed a theory about what has caused these huge discrepancies among different countries, and he says it boils down to geographic luck. discuss and give several examples from the film to support diamond's theory

Answer:

O'Sullivan's essay urged that "It is now time for the opposition to the Annexation of Texas to cease." O'Sullivan argued that the United States had a divine mandate to expand throughout North America, writing of "our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HEPLS

Answer:

The United States was justified in going to war because Mexico had shed American blood on American soil, Texas was an independent republic and had the right to govern itself, and Texas was trying to become part of the United States

Explanation:

i hope this helps

Answer:

1. Shahadah

2. Salah (prayer)

3. Sawm (fasting)

4. Zakat (charity)

5. Hajj

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

Answer:

Shahadah ( To believe that there is no God but Allah and prophet Muhammed is the Messenger of Allah)

Salah (Prayer)

Zakah (Giving charity)

Sawm (Fasting)

Hajj ( Pilgrimage)

Answer:

The success of Sputnik had a major impact on the Cold War and the United States. In this way, the launch of Sputnik fueled both the space race and the arms race, in addition to increasing Cold War tensions, as each country worked to prepare new methods of attacking the other.

Explanation:

I hope that this helped you ;)

Answer: D. Enumerated

Explanation:

The powers of the national government specifically stated in the Constitution are referred to as "enumerated powers." These powers are listed and described in the Constitution and include the power to tax, regulate commerce, declare war, and maintain a military, among others. The idea behind enumerated powers is to clearly define the scope of the national government's authority and to limit its power. This helps to protect individual rights and liberties by preventing the government from overreaching its authority and infringing upon the rights of the people

Answer:

a. Russia relied on serfs and the serfdom system too much

Explanation:

Why it was difficult for early tsars to free the serfs is because "Russia relied on serfs and the serfdom system too much."

This is evident in the fact that Serfs worked throughout the year for their masters, mostly Noblemen of Russia, with only a week of freedom. The serfs worked on the agricultural fields, but some were also used in domestic activities at home.

Answer:

Merchants is the answer. Merchants is not a class. Hope this helps :).

Answer: Large Steel Globe.

Explanation: Something unique about Trinity test is that it is shaped like a large steel globe.

Hope it helps!

Patrick Henry delivered his infamous speech to an audience of Virginia politicians to persuade them to embrace the War of Independence, during the historical event of the Second Virginia Convention at St. John's Church in 1775.

Sir Patrick Henry gave one of the greatest speeches in history at St. John on March 23, 1775 in front of a Virginian audience. His main goal was to ensure that the state he oversaw was free. The speech came to be known as - 'Liberty or Death' due to Henry's famous quote- "Give me Liberty or Give me Death!"—and his efforts to break Great Britain's grasp over the American islands were appreciated all over the world.

In his speech, Henry emphasized that the American colonies must decide whether to remain obedient to Britain or declare their independence. He claimed that the quest for American freedom is destined and invokes the divine will of God and inspired bravery in his listeners in preparation for the probable and impending war with Britain.

To learn more about the Virginia Convention refer:

https://brainly.com/question/9475076

#SPJ9

Answer:

c is for the first one

Explanation:

I looked it up