What was the point of view of Chief Joseph's speech I will fight no more forever?

Answer:

the rational is that the train staff/coach is responsible they should have been out there watching the football player a number of things could have happened to him, they shouldn't of had him doing football in 97 degree weather but its not given if it was his decision or if he did it on his own time

Explanation:

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (or SOX Act) is the U.S Federal law was enacted as a result of the Enron and mci/WorldCom accounting scandals that helps protect investors by making corporate disclosures, accounting and auditing more reliable and accurate.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was signed into law by President Bush on July 30, 2002, in response to the 2001 accounting scandals at Enron and WorldCom.

SOX, named after its sponsors, Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley, has four titles that regulate the financial disclosures of public companies and the accounting practices of publicly traded companies and their auditors, in addition to creating specific penalties for committing accounting fraud against shareholders.

The legislation strengthened criminal penalties for fraudulent financial reporting and provided for shareholder lawsuits against executives who commit fraud or violate federal securities laws.

The purpose of the act: The U.S. Federal law that became known as Sarbanes-Oxley resulted from the Enron and WorldCom accounting scandals that occurred in 2000 and 2002 respectively.

The act is made up of eleven sections of law and created new securities legislation with a focus on accuracy, reliability, and transparency within corporations' financial reports.

It also places more responsibility on corporations' auditors to make sure they are meeting their obligations.

With respect to securities fraud, this section provides for a prison sentence of up to 10 years for willfully destroying records, altering documents, and making false statements in any matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States or in any case filed under section 78y.

In connection with that prohibition, Section 302 also prohibits those individuals who are not directors but do manage a company's books and records from falsely certifying those documents.

SEC. 802. ENFORCEMENT OF CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTS.

(a) Section 13(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m

(b)(2)) is amended by striking or willfully or recklessly fails to make a reasonable effort to determine whether the issuer is in compliance with any provision of this chapter and inserting fails to comply with any provision of this chapter.

To learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act refer to: https://brainly.com/question/27915345

#SPJ4  

Answer:

I think he may be guilty and I'm not to sure how much money they would have to pay to be bailed out

Explanation: I think he's guilty because, he said he wouldn't know what marijuana looks like but that is false because he is a farmer and there's a 80% percent chance he's had to deal with it. ( You would also need to know more about his farming business and a lot more accusations because if you're wrong then you can ruin someone's life)

Answer:

In my opinion, people should not be prohibited from expressing their opinions under any circumstances, given the individual freedom of each individual to think independently, unless the ideas expressed were totally contrary to the common good (such as expressions that promote terrorism or defending regimes such as Nazism).

In other words, as long as the opinions of individuals do not promote violence or damage to society, they should be allowed, to guarantee the freedom of expression of citizens.

The courts that serve areas consisting of three to nine states known as circuits are called Court of appeals. The correct option is C) Court of appeals

The United States Court of Appeals is divided into 13 circuits. It has a total of 179 judges. 13 circuit courts have jurisdiction over appeals from district courts in their circuits as well as appeals from certain federal agencies and some other forms of litigation such as bankruptcy.

These courts operate under an adversarial system where the lawyers for each side of the case present their arguments before a panel of three judges. This panel is known as the court of appeals. Circuit courts of appeal have jurisdiction over all federal courts' decisions and proceedings within their jurisdiction.

They also have jurisdiction over decisions and proceedings of federal agencies in their regions. There are twelve Circuit courts of appeal, and each of them serves a designated area known as a circuit that consists of three to nine states.

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the thirteenth circuit court, has national jurisdiction and has the exclusive jurisdiction to hear appeals in certain specialized areas of law. These areas of law include patent law, international trade law, and claims against the federal government.

To learn more about Court of appeals here:

https://brainly.com/question/20302931#

#SPJ11

The word that best completes the underlined word from the given sentence is:

From the given question, we can see that an action is about to be taken, but there is a problem that cannot allow them to proceed. This problem is a bug snowstorm which has stopped all vehicular and air travel.

As a result of this, we need to use a word that highlights this problem and shows the reason why the regional sales meeting cannot proceed as planned.

Therefore, the correct answer is option D because the transitional word "Since" is used to show why the meeting could not take place.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/12644119

Answer:

this is a law order given the owner a standing order to forbid others from using the mark in a way that will lessen the beauty or priority.

The lack of a federal court system under this law led to inconsistency, lack of uniformity, difficulty in resolving interstate disputes, and challenges in enforcing national laws and protecting individual rights.

Some problems with the law that allowed individual states to create their own courts without a federal court system were:

1. Inconsistency in laws: Since each state had its own court system, different interpretations of the Constitution and laws could lead to inconsistency across states.

2. Lack of uniformity: The absence of a federal court system meant that there was no uniformity in the application of laws across the nation.

3. Difficulty in resolving interstate disputes: Without a federal court system, it was challenging to resolve disputes between states, as each state's court might favor their own state's interests.

4. Inability to enforce national laws: The lack of a federal court system made it difficult for the national government to enforce its laws consistently across all states.

5. Limited protection of individual rights: Without a federal court system to ensure the consistent interpretation and protection of individual rights, citizens' rights could vary significantly from state to state.

To know more about national laws  , refer here

https://brainly.com/question/8867273#

#SPJ11

A DNS-based traffic load balancer is a type of Azure load balancer that uses DNS to distribute traffic across multiple servers or endpoints. Thus option (A) is correct.

Azure Load Balancer is a Layer 4 load balancer that distributes incoming traffic across multiple VMs or instances in a backend pool. It supports both public and private IP addresses, and can be used for both inbound and outbound traffic.

When a client requests a connection to a particular hostname, the DNS servers return a list of IP addresses for that hostname, and the client selects one of the IP addresses to connect to.

Learn more about  load balancer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30036917

#SPJ4

Answer:

sorry if wrong

Explanation:

Due diligence helps investors and companies understand the nature of a deal, the risks involved, and whether the deal fits with their portfolio. Essentially, undergoing due diligence is like doing “homework” on a potential deal and is essential to informed investment decisions.

Answer:

Due diligence helps investors and companies understand the nature of a deal, the risks involved, and whether the deal fits with their portfolio.

Explanation:

Essentially, undergoing due diligence is like doing “homework” on a potential deal and is essential to informed investment decisions.

Narrative Therapy created an avenue through which family therapists who wish to address and integrate issues of social justice into their clinical work are to do so by focusing on the stories that clients tell about themselves and their lives.

Narrative therapists believe that individuals construct their identities through the stories they tell, and that these stories are shaped by social and cultural influences.

By exploring these stories and the social and cultural contexts in which they are embedded, therapists can help clients identify and challenge oppressive cultural narratives and construct more empowering narratives that promote resilience, agency, and social justice.

In this way, Narrative Therapy offers a framework for understanding and addressing the ways in which power and oppression shape individuals' lives and relationships, and for working towards social change both in and outside the therapy room.

To know more about Narrative Therapy click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28401017#

#SPJ11

If I see a gesture in another culture that I do not understand,  then I would need to observe, ask question and make reserch.

If you see a gesture in another culture that you do not understand, here are some steps you can take:

Observe: Take a moment to observe the context in which the gesture is being used. Look at the facial expressions, body language, and other nonverbal cues that accompany the gesture. Try to understand the situation and the people involved.

Research: If you have the opportunity, do some research on the culture to gain a better understanding of its customs and traditions. You can also search online for information about the gesture specifically.

Ask: If possible, ask someone from that culture to explain the meaning of the gesture. Be respectful and open-minded in your approach. Remember that different cultures have different ways of communicating and expressing themselves, and what may seem strange or unfamiliar to you may be perfectly normal in another culture.

Learn more about culture at:

https://brainly.com/question/25010777

#SPJ1

The above statement is true. In the given scenario, Joe's act of stealing some tires would not be considered a third strike offense.

A three-strikes law typically refers to legislation that imposes harsher penalties, such as longer prison sentences, for individuals who have been convicted of a serious crime on three separate occasions. However, the statement does not provide information about Joe's previous two convictions or whether they were serious offenses that would qualify as strikes under the three-strikes law. Without knowing the details of Joe's prior convictions and their nature, it cannot be determined if his current offense would count as a third strike.

Therefore, based on the information provided, it is true that this type of offense cannot be considered a third strike.

To learn more about Joe's act, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31536415

#SPJ11

The above statement is true. In the given scenario, Joe's act of stealing some tires would not be considered a third strike offense.

A three-strikes law typically refers to legislation that imposes harsher penalties, such as longer prison sentences, for individuals who have been convicted of a serious crime on three separate occasions. However, the statement does not provide information about Joe's previous two convictions or whether they were serious offenses that would qualify as strikes under the three-strikes law. Without knowing the details of Joe's prior convictions and their nature, it cannot be determined if his current offense would count as a third strike.

Therefore, based on the information provided, it is true that this type of offense cannot be considered a third strike.

To learn more about Joe's act, click here:

brainly.com/question/31536415

#SPJ11

No matter who does the investigation, citizen complaints are inherently difficult to sustain in favor of the complainant. Investigating citizen complaints is a complex task that requires thorough examination of the facts.

However, there are inherent challenges in sustaining these complaints. First, gathering sufficient evidence can be challenging, as incidents often occur without independent witnesses or conclusive proof. Second, establishing credibility can be difficult, as the complainant's account may be disputed by the accused or subject to subjective interpretations.

Lastly, biases and limitations within the investigative process, such as institutional biases or procedural constraints, can impede a fair and thorough examination of the complaint. These inherent difficulties in sustaining citizen complaints highlight the need for a robust investigative process that addresses these challenges.

To know more about complaint investigation, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/32295735

Answer:

First, research has shown that three strikes laws have not been effective in reducing crime rates (Kovandzic, Sloan, & Vieraitis, 2004). ... As a result of the laws being accompanied by many issues, more rehabilitative-type approaches should be embraced, such as with the Second Chance Act.

While three strikes has been ineffective in reducing the crime rate, Parker says, the law has contributed significantly to California's serious budget woes, which now also impacts county jails as inmates are transferred from state prisons to local jurisdictions to comply with court orders to reduce overcrowding

Explanation:

have a good

thank me later

✨ jufaith ✨

Whole life insurance is a form of life insurance that produces monetary value right away. Although whole life insurance typically has the most flexible options and features for cash value accumulation, other insurance policies that produce cash value include universal life, indexed universal life, and variable universal life.

Cash value life insurance is a type of permanent life insurance that includes a cash value savings component and lasts for the entirety of the policy holder's life. The cash value can be used by the policyholder for a variety of things, including as a source of loans or cash or to pay insurance premiums. Because it covers the policyholder's life, cash value insurance is considered perpetual life insurance. Due to the cash value component, cash value life insurance typically has higher premiums than term life insurance. A fixed-level premium payment is needed for the majority of cash value life insurance policies, with the remaining amount being deposited into a cash value account and the remaining amount going toward the cost of insurance.

Learn more about  Cash value from

brainly.com/question/4099983

#SPJ4

.

Answer:

Was it breached if the neighbor sells it to someone else for $100 more?

Being charged with identity theft in a court of law - results in a maximum fine of $300,000

The unauthorized seizure of another person's property with the purpose to permanently rob them of it is considered theft in law. This might include real assets like cash or personal property as well as intangible assets like trade secrets or private data. Depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the incident, theft is a serious felony that may be punished with fines or imprisonment.

The maximum sentence for identity theft in federal court is 15 years in federal prison, but identity theft cases sometimes also involve other counts that might lengthen the prison term.

For such more question on theft:

brainly.com/question/30293258

#SPJ4

Answer:

its a

Explanation:

Answer: A. The electrical force is reduced.

Answer:

Pathology is the study of the effects of disease on the body, while forensic pathology studies the disease of crime.

Explanation:

Quizlet yeah

An admission is a statement made in court, under oath, or at some stage in a legal proceeding in which one party against whom charges have been brought admits that an oral contract existed, even though the contract was required to be in writing.

The federal court docket machine has 3 primary levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the primary stage of appeal, and the ideally suited court docket of the USA, the very last degree of attraction within the federal device.

Fundamental differences have to be made among criminal and civil courts, between courts of fashionable jurisdiction and those of confined jurisdiction, and among appellate and trial courts.

Learn more about courts here https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics.

Here are some Supreme Court justices who practiced it:

This claim is untrue because the Family Medical Leave Act requires employers to continue paying their workers while they are on leave in order to mitigate any potential effects of absence.

According to the  Family Medical Leave Act, qualified employees of covered businesses are entitled to unpaid, job-protected leaves of absence for qualifying family and medical needs, with group health insurance coverage continuing under the same terms and circumstances as if the employee had not taken the leave.

Who or what is the employer?

An organization, firm, government agency, business, consultant, nonprofit, small business, merchant, or individual who hires or places a person known as an employee and specifically a female employee to work is considered to be the employer.

How might a potential employer appear?

More specifically, an employer is a company, organization, government agency, non-profit, consulting firm, small business, retailer, or individual who employs or otherwise places people who may be referred to as employees or staff members to work.

To learn more about Family Medical Leave Act please click on the given https://brainly.com/question/1425386

#SPJ4

Risk factors are traits that exist at the biological, psychological, family, community, or cultural levels and are related to or precede bad outcomes and increase their risk effective prevention programs.

Protective traits are those that make bad things less likely to happen or lessen the effects of risk factors. effective prevention programs An illustration of risk and protective factors shows how they relate to social and health consequences. To choose the risk factor priorities on which a strategic plan might be focused, communities can measure local risk factor levels using the tools provided by the CTC process. Personal characteristics, such as the capacity to handle stress, persevere in the face of adversity, and problem-solving abilities, are examples of protective factors. physical fitness and wholesome habits. levels of physical exercise.

Learn more about effective prevention programs hear :

https://brainly.com/question/15150374

#SPJ9

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

The options to this question are:

A. Equality and justice
B. Reason and logic
C. Right and Wrong
D. None of the above

Your answer is option C or "right and wrong." Right and wrong is one of the most common principles of social acceptance in any society. If a person see's someone's action as right or correct they will be more willing to accept that person. While if that person sees someone commit wrong, they will become more concerns or willing to explain their concerns. This is called a moral compass, something all humans are born with.

Hope this helps.

The Declaration of Independence, signed on July 4, 1776, was a pivotal document in American history that aimed to sever the political ties between the American colonies and Great Britain. Its primary purpose was to declare the colonies' intention to form an independent nation, free from British rule. While the declaration marked the beginning of a revolution, it also laid the groundwork for the fundamental rights and principles that would shape the newly emerging United States of America.

The Declaration of Independence outlined the grievances of the colonists against the British government, asserting that all individuals are endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It stated that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed and that when a government fails to protect the rights of its citizens, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.

By declaring independence, the Founding Fathers aimed to establish a government based on the principles of self-governance, equality, and individual rights. The declaration was a bold assertion of the colonists' determination to create a society where citizens had the freedom to govern themselves and pursue their own happiness. It laid the foundation for the formation of a democratic republic and inspired future movements for liberty and equality around the world.

While the immediate impact of the Declaration of Independence was the severance of ties with Britain and the initiation of the American Revolutionary War, its long-term significance was in shaping the principles that would guide the American nation. It influenced the drafting of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which enshrined the rights and liberties of American citizens, including freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial.

Overall, the Declaration of Independence was a revolutionary document that set forth the principles of self-determination, individual rights, and government by consent that formed the basis for the United States of America and continues to resonate as a symbol of freedom and independence.

for more questions on Great Britain

https://brainly.com/question/30054989

#SPJ11