What prohibits information from being classified?

Considering the situation described above, Kaelyn's child and dependent care credit in 2021 if her AGI for the year was $130,000 is "$16,000."

This is because according to the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, individuals can claim the child and dependent care credit of $16,000 of expenses for two or more qualifying people.

Given that the qualifying people here are four-year-old twins, this makes it two or more qualifying people.

Though Kaelyn's Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) is $130,000, the rule of using 50% - 20% of expenses to claim the child and dependent care credit will come into play if the eventual credit will be more than $16,000.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is $16,000.

Learn more about the child and dependent care credit here: https://brainly.com/question/14441741

Answer:

Kaelyn's child and dependent care credit is $1200 if you use year of 2022 applicable percentage.

Explanation:

My opinion is that the amount won't be so high like first answer, so I write down what I think here.  

I didn't get the percentage about 2021, but I think the number is near, so I use 2022 percentages for reference. Next person may get one ask for 2022.

In 2022, the maximum child and dependent care credit is $3,000 for one qualifying person, so twins will get $6000. The applicable percentage is 20% of the AGI over 43,000, so it is $6,000 x 20%=1200.

Answer: Articulate his or her concerns

Explanation:

If the concerns are founded in bias, you can take action to remove or overcome the bias or repudiate any support for it. On the other hand, the sellers' concern may be the product of considerations or impressions which you or your sponsoring broker can either clear up or explain in non-discriminatory terms.

A description of the responsibilities the offices of the House General Counsel and Senate Legal Counsel played in these investigations is included in the report's conclusion.

What are examples responsibilities?

An obligation to complete a task is one example of a responsibility. Your parents, for instance, anticipate that you will brush your teeth. It is your job to clean your teeth every day since it is "a responsibility" to do so. Another illustration is that your teacher anticipates you to complete your homework promptly and to the best of your ability. Therefore, it is your duty to complete your assignment and do it to the best of your ability.

A duty could be how you are required to behave. For instance, if you go play at the park, your parents anticipate that you won't play in a way that endangers you or another else.

Know more about conclusion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/78686

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The law that applies to this situation varies depending on the country or state you are in.

In the United States, most states have a zero-tolerance policy for drivers under the age of 21 who are found to have any measurable amount of alcohol in their system. This is typically referred to as a "zero tolerance law." Under this law, drivers under 21 years old with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .02 or above can face penalties such as license suspension or revocation, fines, and mandatory alcohol education programs.

It's important to note that the specific penalties for violating this law can vary by state, and the legal drinking age is also different in some countries. It's always best to check your local laws to ensure you understand the specific regulations and penalties that apply to your situation.

According to the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, drivers who are under 21 years old with a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of .02 or above may lose their license.

The Zero Tolerance Law was designed to protect underage drivers from the dangers of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. When a driver under the age of 21 is found to have a BAC of .02 or higher, their license will be automatically suspended for a certain amount of time. This law was put in place to discourage underage drivers from drinking and driving, as the consequences for doing so are much more serious than for adults.

Here you can learn more about zero tolerance law https://brainly.com/question/30706389

#SPJ11

Answer:

billie Jean is a Chrysler car dealership located

Answer:

He's representing the United States.

Explanation:

When the President greets and welcomes the Pope to America, not only is he representing the American people, but he's also representing the United States as a whole. He is seen as Representing the United States.

Answer:true

Explanation:

Answer:

Definitely C!

Explanation:

..... .....

1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.

2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.

The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.

These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.

Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.

Learn more about fundamental rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/1261546

Answer:

you need to put the options

Explanation:

Answer:

Guardianship

Explanation:

Please give the brainliest, really appreciated. Thank you

Answer:

The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution (Archives.gov). It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.

Establish Justice is the first of five objectives outlined in the 52-word paragraph that the Framers drafted in six weeks during the hot Philadelphia summer of 1787. They found a way to agree on the following basic principles:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Explanation:

mark me as brainliest thank you

Any of the listed defenses (illegality, incapacity, unconscionability, misrepresentation, duress) can potentially be asserted by either party to the contract as a defense to contract enforcement.

Being against the law or the regulations is the state of being illegal. Sometimes breaking the law is necessary to bring about change. The students considered it worth it to reform a bad law, even though they were aware that their acts were against the law and that they would be arrested. When a major health illness, its treatment, recovery from it, or subsequent treatment prevents a person from working, attending school, or carrying out other routine daily activities, this is referred to as incapacitating that condition. Any time a woman is unable to work due to pregnancy or to receive prenatal care.

Unconscionable is an adjective that refers to something that shocks the conscience because it is immoral, done without conscience, or shockingly unfair. The word is widely used in the area of contract law to describe agreements that contain blatantly unjust and oppressive conditions. An unconscionable contract is one that cannot be enforced by a court. A misrepresentation is a false or deceptive statement of truth made by one party to another during negotiations in a common law jurisdiction with the intent to induce that other party to enter into a contract. In law, a situation in which someone acts under duress or coercion is one in which the person is subjected to violence, threats, or other forms of pressure.

However, the success of such defenses may vary depending on the specific circumstances and the laws governing the contract. It is always recommended to consult with a legal professional for guidance on contract issues and defenses.

To learn more about Duress, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28283746

#SPJ11

It can be inferred that it took so long for the Sixth Amendment right to become standard practice in America because: "

Most people are not aware of all the amendments and what they guarantee." (Option B)

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial before a completely unbiased jury of the State and district wherein the crime was committed, which district shall have been previously determined by law, and to be notified of the character and cause of the accusation;

to be challenged with the witnesses against him; to have a mandatory procedure for gathering evidence in his favor; and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

In governance and law, an amendment is an addition or change made to a constitution, legislation, or legislative bill or resolution.

Modifications can be made to existing constitutions and statutes, as well as to legislation during their transit through a legislature.

Learn more about the Sixth Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ1

U.S. v. Moon case is about the illegal distribution of controlled substances by a physician named Moon. As per the facts of the case, the physician was engaged in illicit activity and providing controlled substances to his patients without any legitimate medical purposes.

According to the textbook reading and the precedent case law, it is concluded that Moon committed a criminal act by breaking the rules and regulations associated with the medical profession. Furthermore, he committed several torts that are as follows: Medical Malpractice: The physician Moon committed medical malpractice by illegally prescribing controlled substances to his patients without any legitimate medical reason or purpose.Negligence: Moon was negligent while prescribing controlled substances to his patients without keeping in mind the legitimate medical reasons or purposes.Battery: The physician Moon committed battery by providing harmful drugs to his patients that caused physical harm to their bodies.The mentioned torts and criminal acts committed by the physician Moon are not permissible under the United States laws and regulations. Moon's unethical and illicit behavior resulted in serious harm to his patients, thus the court found him guilty of the charges brought against him.In conclusion, it can be inferred that Moon's behavior was highly unethical, and he failed to follow the laws and regulations of his profession. The precedent case laws suggest that prescribing controlled substances to patients without any legitimate medical reason or purpose is illegal and considered a serious offense.The physician, in this case, was found guilty of breaking the laws and committing several torts. Therefore, the judgment against him was appropriate and justified.The physicians are accountable for their conduct and actions, and they must follow the legal and ethical standards associated with their profession. The U.S. v. Moon case serves as an example of how serious the consequences can be if physicians violate the laws and regulations governing their profession.

To Know More about committing visit:

brainly.com/question/29385308

#SPJ11

Answer:

do you have the answers to that whole test because im taking the exact same one right now.

Explanation:

thank you.

Steven, a prosecutor, has decided to bring three other felony charges against Brian, in addition to the burglary he was originally arrested for. He is engaging in Horizontal overcharging.

A single defendant is unfairly the target of a "horizontal" overcharging of accusations. Every technical criminal transaction in which he took part may result in a separate accusation being brought against him, or the prosecution could break up a single criminal transaction into several component charges.

In legal parlance, "tacking on" extra charges that the prosecutor is aware he cannot support is known as overcharging. It is used to give the prosecutor more leverage while negotiating a plea deal. All of the charges in cases of horizontal overcharging may be true, yet the defendant cannot be found guilty and sentenced on all of the charges. In order to reduce the number and severity of charges, the defense attorney should begin objecting to the overcharging as soon as they can.

Learn more about Guilty here:

https://brainly.com/question/8193162

#SPJ4

Answer:

They are:

1. We become responsible.

2. People love and respect us

3. We may become revolutionary icon.

4. Our country develops rapidly and progresses.

5. We become a good person.

Explanation:

hope this help uhh

Answer:

true.

Explanation:

Increasing speed limits on highways and interstate highways means that drivers are free to drive at ever higher speeds.

High-speed steering makes it difficult for the driver to have complete control of the vehicle and also impairs the driver's ability to react, which can cause serious and fatal accidents. With that, we can say that in states where speed limits have been increased, road fatalities will happen more frequently. This is a scientific fact, since it is proven that as the speed limit is increased by 5mph, there is an increase of 8.5% in cases of fatality on the highways.

Intrastate commerce, which refers to economic activities that occur within the boundaries of a single state, can indeed be regulated by the federal government if it has an impact on interstate commerce.

This authority stems from the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. The Supreme Court has recognized that intrastate activities can have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. This principle, known as the "substantial effects doctrine," allows the federal government to regulate intrastate activities if they have a substantial economic impact on interstate commerce or if they are part of a broader regulatory scheme addressing interstate commerce.

The rationale behind this approach is to ensure the uniformity of economic regulations and prevent states from enacting protectionist measures that could hinder the free flow of goods and services across state lines. By having the power to regulate intrastate commerce with interstate implications, the federal government can address potential disparities, promote fair competition, and maintain a cohesive national economic framework.

It is worth noting that the scope and extent of federal regulation in intrastate commerce have been subject to judicial interpretation and limitations to preserve the balance between federal and state powers. However, the ability of the federal government to regulate intrastate activities connected to interstate commerce remains an essential aspect of maintaining a unified national economy.

Know more about Interstate commerce here:

https://brainly.com/question/4656005

#SPJ8

Answer:

The criminal justice decision-making flowchart does not reveal __________.

the crime victims.

Explanation:

The criminal justice system forgets the crime victim in the criminal justice decision-making flowchart.  Victims and witnesses are mostly ignored.  Sometimes, they are merely used to identify the offenders, who are then made to face the criminal law process.  However, the victims and witnesses feel like "forgotten persons" during the whole justice process.  This should not be.  We know that crimes are offenses against the state, but individuals are also involved, as either victims or witnesses.  Therefore, they should not be neglected.  The system should cater for their needs and offer them the correct protection and psychological support.

ADIA "is a government-run organization that belongs entirely to the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. After lengthy negotiations between the parties,

ADIA invested $7.5 billion in Citigroup in November 2007. 20.) The exchange was "intensely negotiated by the parties and their counsel over the course of several days at arm's length.

ADIA's original $7.5 billion investment was to be converted into Citigroup common shares on four different occasions between March 2010 and September 2011 in line with the ensuing agreement between ADIA and Citigroup (the "Investment Agreement").

Depending on the market price at the time of conversion, each share would be worth between $31.83 and $37.24.

To learn more about Adia filled in the given :link:https://brainly.com/question/22321141

#SPJ4

The California gross income of Jamar and Natasha is $97,000. The correct response is option (A).

Gross income in California includes what you are paid as a salary and wages, as well as gratuities, pensions, interest, and dividends that are taxed, capital gains from mutual funds (on Form 1099-DIV, Box 2a).

Gross income is the total of all earnings, profits, interest payments, rent, and other sources of income that families and individuals get before any deductions or taxes. It differs from net income, which is calculated by deducting from gross income all applicable taxes and other deductions.

The income portion of the federal form 1040 is duplicated here. There are no more changes to CA 540NR. Jamar and Natasha's combined gross income in California is therefore $97,000.

To know more about California gross income, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28879319

#SPJ1

Tilda must pay Patty and also make sure to find recourse with Ronston in the situation given above for finding an appropriate legal outcome.

A legal outcome may be referred to or considered as the result or output, which may not be completely desired, but is as per the legal remedies mentioned under the laws related thereto. As per the law, paying to Patty and finding recourse with Ronston is most likely an appropriate legal outcome of the given condition that can be taken into interpretation by Tilda.

Learn more about legal outcome here:

https://brainly.com/question/25901482

#SPJ4

Complete question

tilda purchases an automobile from ronston. at the time of sale, ronston tells tilda that the car has had only one previous owner and has been driven only 25,000 miles. tilda, relying on these statements, purchases the car. she pays 10 percent down and signs a promissory note to pay the remainder of the purchase price, with interest, in fifteen equal monthly installments. ronston transfers the note to patty. tilda then discovers that the car has actually had three previous owners and has been driven 250,000 miles. what is the appropriate legal outcome if patty is a holder in due course (hdc)?

1. The current administration's immigration policy has impacted the federal government's economic, security, and humanitarian policy by reinforcing national security while failing to marry the economic and humanitarian disasters and benefits of immigration.

2. Before 9/11, immigration was regarded as a humanitarian way of national openness and was never a security concern.

3. The current immigration policy has mandated the United States to create the Department of Home Security, charged with ensuring safe land borders with Canada and Mexico.

4. Following the creation of the Department of Home Security, the dignity accorded to migrants, whether legal or illegal, has been completely lost on the altar of physical and economic security.

5. The COVID pandemic worsened the U.S. immigration policy because it imposed outright border closures. As a result, the closures brought untold hardships to migrants, who were left stranded at the Canada and Mexico borders with humanitarian catastrophes.

Immigration is the international movement of people who leave their countries of origin to reside in another country or become citizens.

Many reasons for immigration include:

Learn more about the United States' current immigration policy at https://brainly.com/question/20544005

#SPJ1

Answer:

Advertising plays a major role in how

**NOT OPINION POLLS BUT BRAINLY WONT LET ME SAY IT**

presents or characterizes a political

**candidate**

during election periods. Each ad has a specific

**message**

created to

**persuade**

a viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.

Explanation:

I'm 86% sure that correct but its more helpful than the other awenser for now atleast :P

Advertising plays a major role in how

-(B) Media

Presents or characterizes a political

-(B) Candidate

During election periods. Each ad has a specific

-(B) Message

Created to

-(A) Persuade

A viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.

Media is a sword arm of democracy. In general it means various means of communication.

Media is intended to reach and address a large target group or audience. Media can be categorised into print and digital media.

Media acts as a watchdog to protect public interest against malpractice and create public awareness.

It acts as the fourth pillar of democracy and has an embracing role to act against injustice, oppression, misdeed of our society.

Persuasion is an art of influencing the individual. Persuasion can attempt to influence a person's beliefs, attitude, intention, motivation and behavior.

Psychology looks persuasion through the lens of individual behavior and neuroscience studies the brain activity associated with this behavior.

Persuasion is also often used tool in the pursuit of personal gain such as election campaigning.

It can also be interpreted as using one's personal or positional resources to change people.

To learn more about Media and Persuasion here

https://brainly.com/question/14047162

#SPJ3