What are the scale factor and center of the dilation?

Answer:

45

Step-by-step explanation:

(3)(7)−(6)(−4)

=21−(6)(−4)

=21−(−24)

=45

A. N, B ≥ 0 (non-negativity constraint)

B. The recommended investment portfolio (in dollars) for this client can be found by reading the values in cells A1 and B1.

C.  You can solve for the recommended investment portfolio (in dollars) by reading the values in cells A1 and B1.

D. You can solve for the recommended investment portfolio (in dollars) by reading the values in cells A1 and B1.

(a)

The linear programming model to find the best investment strategy for this client can be formulated as follows:

Maximize: 0.09N + 0.08B

Subject to:

N + B ≤ 85 (maximum investment of $85,000)

N ≤ 55 (maximum investment of $55,000 in the internet fund)

6N + 4B ≤ 410 (maximum risk rating of 410 for a moderate investor)

N, B ≥ 0 (non-negativity constraint)

(b)

To solve the problem using Excel Solver, you can set up the following spreadsheet model:

Cell A1: N (amount invested in the internet fund)

Cell B1: B (amount invested in the Blue Chip fund)

Cell C1: =0.09A1 + 0.08B1 (annual return for the portfolio)

Constraints:

Cell A2: ≤ 85

Cell B2: ≤ 85

Cell C2: ≤ 55

Cell D2: ≤ 410

The objective is to maximize the value in cell C1 by changing the values in cells A1 and B1, subject to the constraints.

Using Excel Solver, set the objective to maximize the value in cell C1 by changing the values in cells A1 and B1, subject to the constraints in cells A2, B2, C2, and D2.

The recommended investment portfolio (in dollars) for this client can be found by reading the values in cells A1 and B1.

(b)

For the aggressive investor with a maximum portfolio risk rating of 450, the linear programming model remains the same, except for the constraint on the maximum risk rating.

The new constraint would be: 6N + 4B ≤ 450

Using the same spreadsheet model as before, with the updated constraint, you can solve for the recommended investment portfolio (in dollars) by reading the values in cells A1 and B1.

(d)

For the conservative investor with a maximum portfolio risk rating of 320, the linear programming model remains the same, except for the constraint on the maximum risk rating.

The new constraint would be: 6N + 4B ≤ 320

Using the same spreadsheet model as before, with the updated constraint, you can solve for the recommended investment portfolio (in dollars) by reading the values in cells A1 and B1.

Learn more about investment from

https://brainly.com/question/24703884

#SPJ11

Answer:

$21.98

Step-by-step explanation:

$146.54 x 15% = $21.981

The line which contains the points (4,0) and (0,-2), value of y when x =3 is,  -1/2

The equation of a straight line is a relationship between x and y coordinates, The two point form of a straight line is y-y₁ =  y₂-y₁/x₂-x₁(x-x₁).

Given that,

The points, (4,0) and (0,-2)

Equation of line for given two points,

y-y₁ =  y₂-y₁/x₂-x₁(x-x₁)

y-0 =  -2 - 0/0-4(x-4)

y = 1/2(x - 4)

2y = x - 4

when x = 3,

y =  1/2(3 - 4)

y = - 1/2

Hence, the value of y is -1/2

To know more about Line check:

https://brainly.com/question/17188072

#SPJ1

Answer:

45

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Algebra I

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

g(x) = 10 - 7g

g(-5) is x = -5

Step 2: Evaluate

Answer:23

Step-by-step explanation:

The constant of variation, k , is 23 .

The curve of best fit is an illustration of a quadratic regression

The equation of the curve of best fit is \(y = -\frac{17}{18}x^2 + \frac{17}3x + 2\), and the height of the frog after 6 seconds is 2 feet

To determine the equation of the curve of best fit, we make use of a graphing calculator

Using the graphing calculator, we have the following calculation summary

The equation of the curve of best fit is represented as:

\(y = ax^2 + bx + c\)

Substitute the values for a, b and c.

So, we have:

\(y = -\frac{17}{18}x^2 + \frac{17}3x + 2\)

After 6 seconds, the value of x is 6.

So, we have:

\(y = -\frac{17}{18} * 6^2 + \frac{17}3 * 6 + 2\)

Evaluate

\(y = 2\)

Hence, the height of the frog after 6 seconds is 2 feet

Read more about curve of best fit at:

https://brainly.com/question/25226042

Answer:

V=56.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula for finding volume of a cylinder is  V=pi r^2h, substitute h for the height and r for radius. V=pi 3^2 2

Answer:

y=-⅔+5

Step-by-step explanation:

using the slope formula we can figure out the slope is -4/6

using point slope formula (y-y1=m(x-x1))

y-7=-4/6(x--3)

y-7=-4/6x-2

y=-4/6x+5

Answer:

y=-3x-24

Step-by-step explanation:

(-3,7) (3,-11)

-11-7 = -18

3-(-3)= 6

-18/6= -3

y=-3x+?

b= y-3x

b= -3-3*(7)

b= -3 - 21

b= -24

Answer:

7.50x=185

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Find the first way to share 6/6 into 3

The first way could be to share 6/6 equally into 3 parts.

That is,

Therefore, the model is

In the diagram, we have

Step 2: Find the second way to share 6/6 into 3

The second way is to share 6/6 in the ratio 1:2:3. That is the model is

In diagram, we have

Therefore, the models are

6/6 = 2/6 + 2/6 + 2/6

and

6/6 = 1/6 + 2/6 + 3/6

Case-control study

This type of study is referred to as a case-control study. In such studies, people with a particular disease or condition (cases) are compared to people without that disease or condition (controls) to see if the condition is linked to a particular exposure or risk factor.What is a case-control study?A case-control study is a research method in epidemiology, which is the study of illness patterns in populations. This research investigates whether a suspected risk factor is linked to an outcome or disease. This approach involves identifying people who have the disease (cases) and people who do not (controls).The individuals are then assessed to see whether they have been exposed to a particular risk factor or not, and the odds of developing the disease in the exposed group are compared to the odds of developing the disease in the non-exposed group. Therefore, the type of study described above is referred to as a case-control study.

  Learn more about case-control study

  brainly.com/question/6853023

  #SPJ11

The yield of stock at yesterday's closing price is 3.43%.

Annual dividend is the profit of the stock which is divided among the shareholders, both common and preferred shareholders annually.

Given,

Annual dividend = $1.20

Today's closing price = $34.50

Net change = -$0.50

Let x be yesterday's closing price.

Net change = Today's closing price - yesterday's closing price

⇒ -0.50 = 34.50 - x

⇒ x = 34.50 + 0.50

⇒ x = 35

Yield = \(\frac{Annual dividend}{Price}\) × 100

         = \(\frac{1.2}{35}\) × 100

         = 3.4286 % ≈ 3.43 %

Hence the stock's yield at yesterday's closing price of preferred stock is 3.43 %.

Learn more about Annual Dividend here :

https://brainly.com/question/15871366

#SPJ4

The eICU waiting time data consists of 40 patient wait times in minutes. The mean wait time is 43.3, there is no comparison given, mode is 42, and first and third quartiles are 41 and 45 respectively.

a. To compute the mean waiting time for the 40 patients, we need to add up all the waiting times and then divide by the total number of patients. The mean waiting time can be calculated as follows:

(40 + 45 + 42 + 49 + 49 + 43 + 55 + 42 + 44 + 40 + 46 + 45 + 46 + 41 + 40 + 42 + 43 + 40 + 45 + 37 + 49 + 38 + 41 + 48 + 42 + 41 + 42 + 49 + 61 + 39 + 44 + 51 + 45 + 42 + 43 + 41 + 40 + 43 + 37 + 43) / 40 = 44.5 minutes

So the mean waiting time for the 40 patients is 44.5 minutes.

b. To compare the mean waiting time, we would need a reference point, such as the average waiting time for similar patients in a different hospital, or the target waiting time set by the hospital or healthcare organization. Without this information, we cannot make a comparison.

c. To compute the mode, we need to find the value that occurs most frequently in the data set. The mode of the waiting times is 42 minutes, as it occurs the most (3 times).

d. To compute the first and third quartiles, we need to order the data set from smallest to largest and then find the values that correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The first quartile (Q1) represents the 25th percentile and the third quartile (Q3) represents the 75th percentile. The formula for finding the quartiles is as follows:

Q1 = (n + 1) / 4 * (th) value

Q3 = (3n + 3) / 4 * (th) value

Where n is the number of values in the data set and th value represents the th ordered value.

So for the 40 waiting times, Q1 can be calculated as follows:

Q1 = (40 + 1) / 4 * (10th) value = 10.25th value = 41 minutes

And Q3 can be calculated as follows:

Q3 = (3 * 40 + 3) / 4 * (30th) value = 30.75th value = 46 minutes

So the first quartile (Q1) is 41 minutes and the third quartile (Q3) is 46 minutes.

Learn more about mean here: brainly.com/question/30112112

#SPJ4

Complete question is in the image attached

Answer:

The ratio of women to men that the school employs can be expressed as:

6:8

This ratio can be simplified by dividing both sides by their greatest common factor, which is 2:

6 ÷ 2 : 8 ÷ 2

3 : 4

Therefore, the ratio of women to men in simplest form is 3:4.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3:4

Step-by-step explanation:

To reduce a fraction to its simplest term, we always divide both the numerator and denominator by the Least Common Multiple (LCM)

Answer:

35°, 75°

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the measures of the remaining two angles be 7x and 15x

By interior angle sum Postulate of a triangle.

70° + 7x + 15x = 180°

22x = 180° - 70°

22x = 110°

x = 110°/22

x = 5°

7x = 7*5° = 35°

15x = 15*5° = 75°

Yes, the fact that people are living longer is likely causing a decrease in infant deaths at birth in the US. This is because advancements in medical technology and healthcare have allowed for better prenatal care and delivery methods, which have contributed to lower infant mortality rates.

Additionally, as more people live into old age, there is likely more knowledge and experience in caring for newborns, further decreasing the likelihood of infant deaths.

Therefore, the negative correlation between the number of infant deaths at birth and the number of people over the age 65 can be attributed to a combination of factors related to improvements in healthcare and the aging population.

To know more about healthcare, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/17051267#

#SPJ11

Answer:

To find (fºg)(6) first find (fºg)(x)

(fºg)(x) = 9(√x - 2) - 4

(fºg)(6) = 9(√ 6 - 2) - 4

= 9√4 - 4

= 9 (2) - 4 = 18 - 4

= 14

Hope this helps

Response Variables: Variables are characteristic or attributes of an item or individual being researched or studied. Nominal response is a type of response variable in which the different values are different categories that are not ranked in any specific order whereas, Ordinal response is a type of response variable in which the different values are different categories that are ranked in some specific order.

Following are the examples of response variable for each part (a) (f) below, with clear explanation of why it fits the part description.

a) Nominal Response: Nominal response is a type of response variable in which the different values are different categories that are not ranked in any specific order. An example of nominal response variable is gender, in which categories are male and female. This variable cannot be ranked as neither gender is superior or inferior to the other.

b) Ordinal Response: Ordinal response is a type of response variable in which the different values are different categories that are ranked in some specific order.

An example of ordinal response variable is academic grade. Academic grades consist of categories like A, B, C, D, and F. These grades are ordered in a specific sequence with A being the highest grade and F being the lowest grade.

To know more about Ordinal response visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31600071

#SPJ11

The percentage of items that cost ,

less than $1 is 21.82%.

More than $4 is 15.03%

Between $2 and $3 is 21.05%

40th percentile is $2.333

60 percent of the supermarket items cost more than is $4.11.

Cost per item follows an exponential distribution,

Formula to calculate probabilities,

P(X < x) = 1 - e^(-λx)

where X is the random variable representing the cost per item,

λ is the rate parameter of the exponential distribution = 1/mean

Percentage of items that cost less than $1,

P(X < 1)

= 1 - e^(-λ1)

= 1 - e^(-1/3.51)

≈ 0.2182

Approximately 21.82% of items cost less than $1.

Percentage of items that cost more than $4,

P(X > 4)

= e^(-λ4)

= e^(-1/3.54)

≈ 0.1503

Approximately 15.03% of items cost more than $4.

Percentage of items that cost between $2 and $3,

P(2 < X < 3)

= P(X < 3) - P(X < 2)

= (1 - e^(-λ3)) - (1 - e^(-λ2))

= e^(-1/3.52) - e^(-1/3.53)

≈ 0.2105

Approximately 21.05% of items cost between $2 and $3.

40th percentile is,

solve for x in the following equation,

P(X < x) = 0.4

⇒0.4 = 1 - e^(-λx)

⇒e^(-λx) = 0.6

⇒-λx = log(0.6)

⇒x = log(0.6)/(-λ)

     ≈ 2.333

So the 40th percentile is $2.333 (rounded to the nearest cent).

Amount such that 60% of items cost more than that amount,

P(X > x) = 0.6

⇒0.6 = e^(-λx)

⇒-λx = log(0.6)

⇒x = log(0.6)/(-λ)

     ≈ 4.113

So 60% of items cost more than approximately $4.11.

Therefore , using exponential distribution the percentage for the cost of items are as follows,

Cost of items less than $1 is 21.82%.

Cost of items More than $4 is 15.03%

Cost of items Between $2 and $3 is 21.05%

Cost of items 40th percentile is $2.333

60 percent of the items cost more than is $4.11.

learn more about percentage here

brainly.com/question/15062275

#SPJ4

Answer:

1/18

Step-by-step explanation:

\(( {2}^{ - 3} \times {16}^{ \frac{1}{2} } ) \div ( {81}^{ \frac{3}{4} } \times {27}^{ - \frac{1}{3} } ) \\ \\ =( {2}^{ - 3} \times {2}^{ \frac{4 \times 1}{2} } ) \div ( {3}^{ \frac{4 \times 3}{4} } \times {3}^{ - \frac{3 \times 1}{3} } ) \\ \\=( {2}^{ - 3} \times {2}^{ 2} ) \div ( {3}^{ 3 } \times {3}^{ - 1 } ) \\ \\=( {2}^{ - 3 + 2} ) \div ( {3}^{ 3 - 1 } ) \\ \\ = {2}^{ - 1} \div {3}^{2} \\ \\ = \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{9} \\ \\ = \frac{1}{18} \)

Answer:

25

Step-by-step explanation:

ez thanks for the fr3e points

Have a good day bro cya)

Answer:

179 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

From the information given, you know that the total cost of the long distance service is equal to 7 plus the result of multiplying 0.7 for the number of minutes:

Total cost=7+0.07x, where x is the amount of minutes.

Now, you can replace the total cost with 19.53 that is the amount Ali was billed and solve for x:

19.53=7+0.07x

19.53-7=0.07x

12.53=0.07x

x=12.53/0.07

x=179

According to this, the answer is that Ali was billed for 179 minutes.

Answer:

21 candles

Step-by-step explanation:

$82÷$4=20.5

So... He can't sell 20.5 candles, it has to be a whole number. so 21

21×$4=$84

Thanks, bye. Plzz mark brainlist.

In constructing 95% confidence intervals for the difference in means, we expect that, over the long run, the correct answer will be option A, i.e., % of the time, the difference in population means will fall inside the confidence interval.

Confidence intervals are a statistical tool used to estimate population parameters based on sample data. In constructing a 95% confidence interval, we expect that in 95% of all possible samples, the true population parameter will fall within the calculated interval. In other words, if we were to repeat the sampling process many times and construct a confidence interval for each sample, we would expect that about 95% of these intervals would contain the true population parameter. Therefore, we can say that there is a 95% probability that the true population parameter lies within the calculated interval. For the difference in means, this means that there is a 95% chance that the true difference in population means falls within the confidence interval, and only a 5% chance that it falls outside the interval.

Learn more about sampling here:

https://brainly.com/question/31890671

#SPJ11

Answer:

Volume is 9.428 cu.cm

It is asked for nearest tenth so it would be 10 cu.cm

Answer:

number is - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

let the number be n then 4 times the sum of the number and 2 is 4(n + 2)

4(n + 2) = 2n

4n + 8 = 2n ( subtract 2n from both sides )

2n + 8 = 0 ( subtract 8 from both sides )

2n = - 8 ( divide both sides by 2 )

n = - 4

the number is - 4

\(\textsf{Hi Brainy User, I'm Here to Help you!}\)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

\(\textsf{Let the number be t.}\)

\(\textsf{The Sum means adding two numbers together.}\)

\(\textsf{Then,}\)

\(\textsf{4 times the sum of a number and 2 = 4 times t+2 = 4(t+2).}\)

\(\textsf{Remember to write the parentheses when you're multiplying something times}\\\textsf{a sum or a difference.}\)

\(\textsf{You know how to write "is equal to", don't you? It's =}\)

\(\therefore\\\textsf{4(t+2)=}\)

\(\textsf{Next, twice the number is written as 2t.}\)

\(\textsf{\textbf{Our expression looks like this:}}\)

\(\Large\boldsymbol{\rm{4(t+2)=2t}}\)

\(\textsf{Now let's find the number: }\)

\(\Large\begin{gathered} \sf{4(t+2)=2t}\\\sf{4t+8=2t}\\\sf{4t-2t=-8}\\\sf{2t=-8}\\\sf{t=-4} \end{gathered}\)

\(\ddot\smile\)

\(\Large\overbrace{\underbrace{\boldsymbol{\rm{Reflection - RoSe}}}}^\star_\star\)

a) If the confidence level had been 90% instead of 98%, the new confidence interval would be (0.325, 0.475).

b) If the sample size had been 255 instead of 170, the new confidence interval would be (0.292, 0.508).

c) If the confidence level had been 99% instead of 98%, the new confidence interval would be (0.304, 0.496).

a) First, we find the mean of the original confidence interval:

Mean = (Lower Limit + Upper Limit) / 2 = (0.313 + 0.487) / 2 = 0.4

Margin of Error = (Upper Limit - Mean) = (0.487 - 0.4) / 2 = 0.0435

New Margin of Error = Margin of Error * \((Z_{90} / Z_{98})\)

where \(Z_{90}\) is the critical value for a 90% confidence level, and \(Z_{98}\) is the critical value for a 98% confidence level.

From the standard normal distribution table, we find:

\(Z_{90}\) ≈ 1.645

\(Z_{98}\) ≈ 2.326

New Margin of Error = 0.0435 * (1.645 / 2.326) ≈ 0.0306

Finally, we construct the new confidence interval using the adjusted margin of error:

New Confidence Interval = (Mean - New Margin of Error, Mean + New Margin of Error)

                     = (0.4 - 0.0306, 0.4 + 0.0306)

                     ≈ (0.3694, 0.4306)

Therefore, the new confidence interval at a 90% confidence level would be approximately (0.369, 0.431) when rounded to three decimal places.

b) Standard Error = \(\sqrt{(p_{hat} * (1 - p_{hat})) / n}\)

where \(p_{hat}\) is the sample proportion and n is the sample size.

Given that the sample size increases to 255 while the sample proportion remains the same, the new sample proportion is:

\(p_{hat}\) = 68 / 255 ≈ 0.267

Standard Error = sqrt((0.267 * (1 - 0.267)) / 255) ≈ 0.028

For a 98% confidence level, the critical value is \(Z_{98}\) ≈ 2.326.

New Margin of Error = \(Z_{98}\) * Standard Error = 2.326 * 0.028 ≈ 0.065

New Confidence Interval = (\(p_{hat}\) - New Margin of Error, \(p_{hat}\) + New Margin of Error)

                     = (0.267 - 0.065, 0.267 + 0.065)

                     ≈ (0.202, 0.332)

Therefore, the new confidence interval with a sample size of 255 would be approximately (0.202, 0.332) when rounded to three decimal places.

c) From the standard normal distribution table, we find:

\(Z_{99}\) ≈ 2.576

New Margin of Error = Margin of Error * (\(Z_{99}\) / \(Z_{98}\)) = 0.0435 * (2.576 / 2.326) ≈ 0.0482

New Confidence Interval = (Mean - New Margin of Error, Mean + New Margin of Error)

                     = (0.4 - 0.0482, 0.4 + 0.0482)

                     ≈ (0.3518, 0.4482)

Therefore, the new confidence interval at a 99% confidence level would be approximately (0.352, 0.448) when rounded to three decimal places.

To know more about confidence level, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/9386257

#SPJ4

To compute the probability of selecting a certain number of white or black balls from the urn after a certain number of trials, we can use the concept of conditional probability. This involves finding the probability of an event given that another event has occurred.

where P(W_n+1 = k | W_n = j, B_n = m) is the conditional probability of selecting k white balls in the (n+1)th trial, given that there are j white balls and m black balls in the urn after the nth trial.

P(W_n+1 = k | W_n = j) is the probability of selecting k white balls in the (n+1)th trial, given that there are j white balls in the urn after the nth trial. P(W_n = j, B_n = m) is the joint probability of having j white balls and m black balls in the urn after the nth trial. P(B_n = m) is the probability of having m black balls in the urn after the nth trial.

Using the above equation and the fact that the urn initially contains 5 white and 7 black balls, we can compute the probabilities of selecting a certain number of white or black balls after any number of trials. For example, after 10 trials, the probability of having 7 white balls and 9 black balls in the urn is approximately 0.055.

After 50 trials, the probability of having more white balls than black balls in the urn is approximately 0.989. This indicates that over time, the number of white balls in the urn will tend to dominate the number of black balls.

Overall, the probabilities of selecting white or black balls from the urn after a certain number of trials can be computed using conditional probability. As the number of trials increases, the distribution of white and black balls in the urn will tend to shift towards more white balls due to the replacement process.

For more details about probability click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11