Tips for healthly include all of following except

Appropriate linguistic expression is the right use of grammar. Below are my likes and dislike about the following:

Above are my likes and dislikes about the subjects mentioned. Appropriate linguistic expressions were also used to aptly describe them.

Subject + Verb + Object is the normal sequence.

Your preferences might differ but ensure that the rules of grammar are followed when writing your likes and dislikes.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/17391076

oops sorry my anwser was for chapter 7

Answer:

"Before last summer Maureen and I were best friends....At least I think we were. I don't know what happened exactly. As some people who get hit by trucks sometimes say,'I didn't see anything coming.'" When her best friend since the third grade starts acting as though Debbie doesn't exist, Debbie finds out the hard way that life can be a lonesome place. But in the end the heroine of this wryly funny coming-of-age story--a girl who lives in a house covered with stuff that is supposed to look like bricks but is just a fake brick pattern--discovers that even the hourly tragedies of junior high school can have silver linings, just as a house covered with Insul-Brick can protect a real home. This first novel shines--fun, engrossing, bittersweet, and wonderfully unpredictable.

Explanation:

In paragraph 6, Goldsmith's position differs from that of others in the conversation in that he believes that the government should not force companies to reduce their carbon emissions.

He contends that such a move would hurt the economy and impair the nation's ability to compete on the world market.

According to Goldsmith, the government should collaborate with businesses to create solutions that are both economically feasible and environmentally friendly rather than enacting rules.

This stands in contrast to some participants in the discussion who support harsher laws and fines to encourage businesses to cut their carbon emissions.

While some favor a more punitive approach, Goldsmith's strategy is more collaborative and centered on finding workable solutions.

To know more about carbon emissions,

https://brainly.com/question/7645609

#SPJ4

Answer:

D.)

Explanation:

It talks about denser swarms. Meaning that the population is getting poorer and poorer.

I would  describe the point of view in "A Wedding Gift is A Wedding Gift" to be written in third person omniscient point of view.

Third person omniscient is a point of view  can be described as the point of view which involves the process whereby the narrator knows everything about the events as well as the characters, and world in the story.

From the story, we can see that the  narrator  was able to go with the narrative from multiple character perspectives because he have the idea about the character and he can narrrate the story with the influence as well as the functions of each of the characters in the story.

In conclusion, the narrator was able to use the  third person omniscient point of viewin the story because he knows everything about the events as well as the characters in the story.

Therefore, the option D is correct.

Read more about point of view at:

https://brainly.com/question/13107415

#SPJ1

The central idea is that the War of 1812, by disrupting trade and leading to increased domestic production, triggered the Industrial Revolution in the United States, resulting in the growth of cities, harsh working conditions, and the negative effects of industrialization. In response, writers of the time sought solace and inspiration in nature and self-reflection.

Hi!

The adverb is modifying the word "make".

Adverbs are used to modify other adverbs, adjectives, or nouns. It also modifies it by telling when, where, how, under what conditions, why, and to what degree.

Hope this helps! Let me know if you need any other help! :0)

Answer:

C: Parallelism

Answer:

2. next week

3. last night

4. in the evening

5. last week

6. every morning

7. at the moment

8. yesterday

Explanation:

u just got to see if it makes sense or not

hope this helps

Explanation:

1. usually

2. next week

3. last night

4. in the evening

5. yesterday

6. every morning

7. at the moment

8. last week

Answer:

C - soldiers were left in a position of power without guidance or oversight.

Explanation

Answer:

It was a wonderful experience talking to him

Explanation:

Swift’s purpose in listing other ways to solve the issue of poverty is "to show that real reform is possible with reasonable sacrifice," as stated in option C.

The term purpose is used in literature to refer to an author's objective or goal. In the satirical essay "A Modest Proposal," Swift's general purpose is to criticize the wealthy for exploiting the poor in Ireland. In this particular passage, we have to find the purpose for his listing of other ways to solve the issue of poverty.

In the essay, Swift provides an absurd solution to poverty - for the wealthy to eat the children of the poor. However, in the passage we are analyzing here, he actually provides real solutions. His intention or purpose is to show that, with reasonable sacrifice, real reform is possible. By doing this, he provides a real solution in an ironic way.

Thus, option C is the correct answer when it comes to Swift's purpose in the passage.

Learn more about purpose here:

https://brainly.com/question/25871446

#SPJ1

Answer: third option

Explanation:

The paragraph is a creative story that uses all of the given words to describe a unique and versatile character.

What does versatility mean?
Versatility refers to the ability to adapt or be adapted to many different functions, activities, or situations. It can also refer to having a wide range of abilities or skills.

As an artist, Maria knew how important it was to convey the subtle emotions in her paintings. She spent hours devising the perfect color scheme to evoke the feeling she wanted to portray. But sometimes, she felt like it was all just a delusion, that no one could truly appreciate her art. That’s why she savored every compliment she received. It stimulated her creativity and reminded her of the unique vision she possessed. And while art may be subjective, Maria knew that emotions were universal. Her paintings were versatile enough to convey a range of feelings, from the most joyful to the most painful. She wanted her work to be vivid, to jump off the canvas and touch the viewer in a way that was indescribable but powerful. For Maria, creating art was not just a hobby or a career; it was a way of expressing herself and connecting with others on a deeper level.

To know more about paintings visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17815067
#SPJ1

Answer:

Nonverbal communication is the transfer of information through the use of body language including eye contact, facial expressions, gestures and more.

Example: Someone might cross their arms if they are feeling angry or nervous. Sitting still and paying attention in a meeting conveys respect and attention. Someone might slouch their shoulders if they feel tired, frustrated or disappointed. You might stand two to three feet away from a new contact to respect their boundaries. Looking away from someone and at the ground or your phone may convey disinterest or disrespect.

There are many forms of nonverbal communication, recognize that people communicate on many levels. Watch their facial expressions, eye contact, posture, hand and feet movements, body movement and placement, and appearance and passage as they walk toward you. Every gesture is communicating something if you listen with your eyes.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

I) Writing

Explanation:

All other options are spelt incorrectly except (I)

Answer: Writing

Explanation:

comming is spelled- coming

runing is spelled- running

puting is spelled putting

WRITING IS CORRECT!

For a character in the book who departs from "Dante the Poet's" narrative voice and journeys to a Christian afterlife, the term "Dante the Pilgrim" has become widely used among Commedia historians.

Yet despite its widespread use, the term "pilgrim" is still accepted by academics. The goal of this study is to refute the title using Dante's own meaning, which demonstrates a more complex grasp of the phrase than is often acknowledged by modern scholarship. Dante Alighieri turned into an Italian poet, author and philosopher. His Divine Comedy, at first called Comedìa and later christened Divina by Giovanni Boccaccio, is broadly taken into consideration one of the maximum vital poems of the Middle Ages and the best literary paintings withinside the Italian language. Dante is understood for setting up the usage of the vernacular in literature at a time while maximum poetry turned into written in Latin, which turned into available most effective to the maximum knowledgeable readers. His De vulgari eloquentia  turned into one of the first scholarly defenses of the vernacular.

His use of the Florentine dialect for works such as The New Life (1295) and Divine Comedy helped set up the cutting-edge standardized Italian language.

To know more about Dante, use the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/10807098

#SPJ1

A message that a text conveys about a topic is called a theme. Thus, option (c) is correct.

A literary work's overarching message or key insight is referred to as its theme. It is the main message that the author intends to get through to the reader. The characters, environment, plot, and symbolism are just a few examples of how themes can be conveyed. Themes might be common to all works, like love, death, or human nature, or they can be exclusive to a certain work or genre. They may be both implicit and explicit. Readings can be made more meaningful and relevant to readers' lives by identifying and delving into the themes in a piece of literature. In general, themes in literature provide authors with a platform to share their views, opinions, and viewpoints on a range of life and human experience-related topics.

To know more about Theme,click on the link :

https://brainly.com/question/12461958

#SPJ1

Answer:

hyperbole

Explanation:

how can you take baths with a man eating shark

As a human resources manager tasked with writing a memorandum to all employees regarding changes in the company's vacation policy, the necessary information that should be communicated in the memorandum, including effective dates, policy details, and any required actions from employees are: Effective Dates, Policy Details, Any Required Actions from Employees.

Effective Dates: The memorandum should clearly state the effective date of the new vacation policy. The date should be specific, indicating the date when the policy becomes effective.

Policy Details: The memorandum should clearly spell out the details of the new vacation policy, including the number of vacation days, sick days, and personal days employees will be entitled to and how vacation days are earned. It should also indicate whether employees will be allowed to carry over vacation days and how much time they are allowed to carry over.

Any Required Actions from Employees: The memorandum should clearly communicate any required actions employees should take in order to be in compliance with the new vacation policy.

For example, employees may be required to fill out new vacation request forms or submit requests for approval within a certain timeframe. Employees may also be required to attend a mandatory meeting or training session to learn about the new policy.

For more question on policy

https://brainly.com/question/21568324

#SPJ8

Answer:

a part of something that is left over when other parts have been completed, used, or dealt with.

Answer:

In mathematics, the remainder is the amount "left over" after performing some computation. In arithmetic, the remainder is the integer "left over" after dividing one integer by another to produce an integer quotient.

Explanation:

umm.. i don't know if this is what u mean remainder...

In the discourse surrounding fairness, it is often contended that "fair" and "equal" are not synonymous. This notion gains traction when considering the aftermath of the civil rights movement. Louis Menand, in his New Yorker article, elucidates the paradox that emerged: the eradication of racial discrimination inadvertently exacerbated the challenges of remedying its effects. This paradox led to the inception of affirmative action. Thus, it is imperative to explore the distinction between fairness and equality and assert that fairness does not always necessitate equal treatment. By examining specific evidence and perspectives, we can elucidate this distinction and substantiate the argument.

Fairness encompasses the notion of justice and equity, focusing on outcomes that address existing disparities and level the playing field. On the other hand, equality pertains to providing equal opportunities and treatment to all individuals, regardless of their backgrounds. While equality is a fundamental principle, it fails to consider the historical and systemic barriers that have impeded certain groups from achieving equal outcomes. By solely adhering to a strictly equal approach, we risk perpetuating existing inequalities and hindering progress.

Affirmative action serves as a prime example of how fairness necessitates deviation from strict equality. This policy seeks to redress historical disadvantages and promote inclusivity by considering factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic background in decision-making processes. By acknowledging the impact of past discrimination and taking proactive measures to rectify it, affirmative action embodies a fair approach that transcends strict equality. It recognizes that achieving true equality of opportunity may require deliberate actions to ensure equality of result.

Supporters of affirmative action point to empirical evidence demonstrating its positive impact. For instance, studies have shown that affirmative action policies in college admissions have led to increased diversity, creating enriched learning environments and promoting cross-cultural understanding. Moreover, they argue that affirmative action serves as a necessary corrective measure to counteract deeply rooted structural inequalities that persist in society.

However, critics argue that affirmative action can be perceived as reverse discrimination or as compromising merit-based systems. They contend that by considering factors such as race or gender, individuals who may be more qualified for a particular opportunity might be overlooked in favor of meeting diversity quotas. These concerns raise legitimate questions about striking the right balance between fairness and equality, and about finding alternative approaches that can effectively address historical disadvantages without sacrificing merit-based principles.

One potential alternative approach is adopting an equity-based perspective. Equity emphasizes tailoring resources and opportunities to individual needs, accounting for varying circumstances and systemic barriers. This approach acknowledges that fairness often requires targeted interventions to address specific inequalities effectively. By recognizing and addressing the root causes of disparities, equity-based measures can better align with the ultimate goal of achieving fairness and justice.

In conclusion, the distinction between fairness and equality is vital to understand the complexities of remedying historical injustices. While equality is an essential principle, fairness necessitates recognizing the historical disadvantages and barriers that certain groups face. Affirmative action, among other measures, exemplifies how fairness may require deviating from strict equality to achieve equitable outcomes. By considering specific evidence and perspectives, we can grasp the intricate nature of this distinction and advocate for a nuanced approach that acknowledges the importance of both fairness and equality in creating a just society.\(\)

Fairness and equality are two significant ideas that are frequently misunderstood. While equality entails treating everyone equally, fairness focuses on treating everyone equally, regardless of their unique circumstances.

It may occasionally go hand in hand. For instance, offering everyone the same chance to compete for a job is just and equal. Fairness and equality, however, may not always coincide.

For instance, although if it implies that the kid is not being treated precisely the same as other students, it could be fair to grant a student with a learning handicap additional time on a test.

Learn more about equality, here:

https://brainly.com/question/24905378

#SPJ2

Answer:

descriptive and inferential

The right adjectives that should fill the sentences are;

1. Taller than

2. Uncomfortable

3. Worse than

4. the least exciting

5. livelier

6. Unacceptable

Comparative adjectives are words used to compare two or more things to show how they are similar or different in degree or quality. They are formed by adding -er to the end of the adjective (for shorter adjectives) or by using "more" in front of the adjective (for longer adjectives) to indicate a comparison. For example:

Tall (adjective) => Taller (comparative adjective)

Interesting (adjective) => More interesting (comparative adjective)

Comparative adjectives are used to express differences and to make comparisons between two or more things. They help us to describe and evaluate the qualities of different things and to understand how they are similar or different from one another.

Learn more about adjectives here;

https://brainly.com/question/11385993

#SPJ1

The following are some examples of the conflicts in the text:

Character vs. self: The narrator must persuade himself that simply witnessing the Place of the Gods from a distance is insufficient.

2) Character vs. society: The priest's son who must uphold his father's religious beliefs must visit the Place of the Gods in order to find inner peace.

3) Character vs. self: The narrator temporarily withdraws out of terror for what he sees coming from the Place of the Gods.

Conflicts can arise from opposing interests, viewpoints, or even philosophical concepts. Conflicts will always occur in society since they might be caused by racial, ethnic, class, caste, political, or even global factors.

How can I tell what it was like you do not know. It was

there, in the red light, and they were too big to be

houses. It was there with the red light upon it, mighty and

ruined. I knew that in another moment the gods would

see me. I covered my eyes with my hands and crept

back into the forest.

Surely, that was enough to do, and live. Surely it was

enough to spend the night upon the cliff. The Forest

People themselves do not come near. Yet, all through

the night, I knew that I should have to cross the river and

walk in the places of the gods, although the gods ate me

up. My magic did not help me at all and yet there was a

fire in my bowels, a fire in my mind. When the sun rose, I

thought, "My journey has been clean. Now I will go home

from my journey." But, even as I thought so, I knew I

could not. If I went to the Place of the Gods, I would

Which conflicts occur in this passage? Select three

options.

Character vs. nature: The narrator must conquer the

challenges of the landscape to visit the Place of the

Gods.

Character vs. character: The narrator must face the

Forest People, since they live directly on the route to

the Place of the Gods.

Which conflict occurs in this passage ? Select three options.

O Character vs. self: The narrator must convince himself

that just seeing the Place of the Gods from a distance

is not enough.

Character vs. society: The narrator must go to the

Place of the Gods to satisfy his spirit because he is a

priest's son and must follow his father's teachings.

Character vs. self: The narrator is overwhelmed with fear of what he sees coming from the place of the gods and momentarily.

The conflicts that occurs in the passage are as follows;

1)Character vs. self: The narrator must convince himself that just seeing the Place of the Gods from a distance is not enough.

2) Character vs. society: The narrator must go to the Place of the Gods to satisfy his spirit because he is a priest’s son and must follow his father’s teachings.

3) Character vs. self: The narrator is overwhelmed with fear of what he sees coming from the Place of the Gods and momentarily retreats.

To learn more about conflicts from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/12132286

#SPJ9

Answer:

Character vs. self: The narrator must convince himself that just seeing the Place of the Gods from a distance is not enough.

Character vs. society: The narrator must go to the Place of the Gods to satisfy his spirit because he is a priest’s son and must follow his father’s teachings.

Character vs. self: The narrator is overwhelmed with fear of what he sees coming from the Place of the Gods and momentarily retreats.

Explanation:

The answer above is correct.

Answer:

Explanation:

"Tracking tags contain devices that keep a record of where each shark travels, how deep it swims, and any changes in water temperature." (paragraph 7)

"No one knows why the sharks dive so deep." (paragraph 9)

Answer: she has 2/8 days left to drive but im simplest form that is 1/4

Explanation: you subtract 3/8 from 5/8 because she already drove that far which leaves 2/8 and 2/8 in simplest form is 1/4

hope this helps

Answer:

A. How much information should the narrator have about the story?

Answer: A "How much information should the narrator have about the story?"

Explanation: