The separation of powers within the federal government ensures that

decisions made are in the best interest of the country
the executive branch will remain the most powerful branch of government
the states will be able to function independently of one another
foreign countries will not be able to interfere with our government

It is false that Chavín de Huantar, which flourished in the years 850 to 200 BC, is located in Southern Spain.

Chavín de Huantar is indeed located in the central highlands of Peru in South America. It was a significant ceremonial and cultural center of the ancient Chavín civilization that existed from approximately 850 to 200 BC. The site is renowned for its impressive architecture, intricate stone carvings, and religious artifacts, which reflect the advanced artistic and architectural skills of the Chavín people. Chavín de Huantar served as a pilgrimage site and a hub for religious and cultural activities, attracting people from different regions and playing a central role in the spread of Chavín influence throughout the Andean region. The site's importance in understanding the ancient civilizations of the Americas makes it a significant archaeological site.

To know more about Chavín de Huantar,

https://brainly.com/question/31750674

#SPJ11

False. Chavín de Huantar is not located in Southern Spain. It is an archaeological site located in Peru, specifically in the Andean highlands.

Chavín de Huantar was a prominent ceremonial and religious center of the Chavín civilization, which thrived between 850 and 200 BC. The site is known for its impressive architecture, intricate stone carvings, and artistic expressions that represent the religious and cultural practices of the ancient Chavín people.

The location of Chavín de Huantar in Peru makes it an important archaeological site for understanding the pre-Columbian history and civilization of the region, rather than being situated in Southern Spain.

Learn more about Chavín de Huantar

https://brainly.com/question/11283753

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

onstitutional Design of the Senate, 1787

The framers of the Constitution created the United States Senate to protect the rights of individual states and safeguard minority opinion in a system of government designed to give greater power to the national government. They modeled the Senate on governors' councils of the colonial era and on the state senates that had evolved since independence. The framers intended the Senate to be an independent body of responsible citizens who would share power with the president and the House of Representatives. James Madison, paraphrasing Edmund Randolph, explained in his notes that the Senate's role was "first to protect the people against their rulers [and] secondly to protect the people against the transient impressions into which they themselves might be led."

To balance power between the large and small states, the Constitution's framers agreed that states would be represented equally in the Senate and in proportion to their populations in the House. Further preserving the authority of individual states, they provided that state legislatures would elect senators. To guarantee senators' independence from short-term political pressures, the framers designed a six-year Senate term, three times as long as that of popularly elected members of the House of Representatives. Madison reasoned that longer terms would provide stability. "If it not be a firm body," he concluded, "the other branch being more numerous, and coming immediately from the people, will overwhelm it." Responding to fears that a six-year Senate term would produce an unreachable aristocracy in the Senate, the framers specified that one-third of the members' terms would expire every two years, leaving two-thirds of the members in office. This combined the principles of continuity and rotation in office.

In the early weeks of the Constitutional Convention, the participants had tentatively decided to give the Senate sole power to make treaties and to appoint federal judges and ambassadors. As the convention drew to a close, however, they moved to divide these powers between the Senate and the president, following Gouverneur Morris' reasoning that "As the president was to nominate, there would be responsibility, and as the Senate was to concur, there would be security." Due to the concern of individual states that other states might combine against them, by a simple majority vote, for commercial or economic gain, approval of a treaty would require a two-thirds vote. In dealing with nominations, the framers believed that senators—as statewide officials—would be uniquely qualified to identify suitable candidates for federal judicial posts and would confirm them along with cabinet secretaries and other key federal officials, by a simple majority vote.

Organizing the New Government, 1789–1794

The United States Senate convened for the first time on March 4, 1789, in an elegant second-floor chamber of New York City's newly remodeled Federal Hall. Only eight of the 22 eligible members (from the 11 states that had already ratified the Constitution) were present on that day. On April 6, 12 members were present to establish a quorum and the Senate got down to work. As its first item of business, the Senate elected New Hampshire's John Langdon president pro tempore and invited the House of Representatives to its Chamber to count the electoral ballots for president and vice president. On April 21 John Adams took his oath as vice president, thereby assuming his responsibility under the Constitution to serve as the Senate's president and presiding officer. Nine days later, House members again crowded into the Senate Chamber to witness George Washington's inauguration.

In its early weeks, the Senate turned to various organizational matters. Members appointed a six-member staff, including a doorkeeper, a secretary, a chaplain, and two clerks. Temporary committees were established to formulate a code of rules that would guide the Senate's proceedings, and to draft legislation to give shape to the government's judicial branch. The Senate divided its members into three equal and sectionally balanced classes, with the terms to expire at two, four, and six-year intervals. As new states entered the Union, their senators would be assigned to two of the three classes.

Yes, it is a due process that Traficant is expelled from the House, it was not right for House members to pressure delay to resign and the act of concealing the source of any campaign contribution is seen as illegal.

He is was an politician whose also served as a member of the United States House of Representatives from Ohio.

He was expelled from the House on number of conviction that includes taking bribes, filing false tax returns, racketeering etc

He stands as the second member since the Civil War to be expelled from the House on corruption charges.

Read more about House members

brainly.com/question/25965873

#SPJ1

Answer:

D: the northeastern part

Explanation:

The map being shown is presented below. If you have any questions be sure to comment below. E2021, have a great day.

Answer: Imprisoned

Explanation:

Austin was imprisoned in Mexico City due to the letter he wrote to the people of Texas.

Answer:

united States citizens

Answer:

the reformation

Explanation:

Thomas Day was a prominent African American furniture craftsman in the 19th century, and his connection to NCCU is through the university's art museum, which houses some of his notable works.

Thomas Day, born in 1801, was a highly skilled furniture maker based in North Carolina. He was known for his distinct designs and became one of the most successful African American craftsmen of his time.

His connection to North Carolina Central University (NCCU) lies in the NCCU Art Museum, which is dedicated to showcasing African American art and culture.

The museum holds a collection of Thomas Day's exceptional furniture pieces, allowing visitors to appreciate and learn about his significant contribution to American art and history.

Day's work not only symbolizes the artistic prowess of African Americans but also serves as a testament to their resilience and success in a predominantly white society during the 19th century.

To know more about North Carolina click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/4724180#

#SPJ11

The answer is The Libertarian Party, The Libertarian Party believes that the federal government should be very small, and that its only purpose is to protect freedom and property.

The U.S. Federal Government is divided into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. This ensures a separation of powers. Each arm of government has its own authority and duties, including collaborating with other branches, to ensure that the government is effective and that individuals' rights are respected.

Any group of people sharing a country, state, city, or local community must abide by specific laws. A government is a set of laws and the individuals who create and enforce them.

To know more about Government visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

Answer:

During the Indian freedom struggle, the politics of the radicals within the Congress was different from that of the moderate leaders in terms of their goals and methods.

The moderate leaders, who dominated the Congress until the early 1900s, sought to achieve limited self-government for India within the framework of the British Empire. They believed in using constitutional means, such as petitions, protests, and negotiations, to achieve their goals. They were largely composed of lawyers, journalists, and intellectuals who were educated in the West, and they tended to be cautious and moderate in their approach.

In contrast, the radicals, who emerged as a significant force in the Congress in the early 1900s, were more militant in their approach and sought to achieve complete independence for India. They believed in using more direct action, such as boycotts, strikes, and civil disobedience, to achieve their goals. They tended to be more nationalist and less Westernized than the moderate leaders, and were often drawn from the ranks of students, workers, and peasants.

Overall, the radicals were more willing to challenge the British authorities directly and to take risks to achieve their goals, while the moderates tended to be more cautious and focused on achieving incremental change through negotiation and compromise. However, both groups were committed to the goal of Indian independence and worked together to achieve it, albeit through different means and methods.

Answer:

B and D

Explanation:

It's right

Answer:

b and d

Explanation:

e d g e n u i t y 2020

Answer:

The Double V campaign helped tremendously the plight of black Americans. Blacks everywhere were discriminated against based on their color, and the armed forces at this time was no exception. If blacks were allowed entrance into the army, they were only given menial jobs such as cooks or stewards.

Hope this helps!

The expensive cost of spices was a major motivation for Europeans to explore the seas.

In the late 1400s, the demand for spices had increased significantly in Europe due to changing culinary tastes and the desire to preserve food as well as use spices in religious ceremonies. However, these spices were hard to come by in Europe due to the high cost of trading with the Middle East.

Thus, Europeans began to explore the seas in search of new trade routes that would provide them with more direct and cost-effective access to these spices. This exploration eventually led to the discovery of the Americas and the establishment of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. By opening up these new trade routes, Europeans were able to buy spices from the Americas at much lower prices, thus reducing the expensive cost of spices that had previously motivated them to explore the seas.

For more questions like Europeans click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/1675395

#SPJ4

Answer: C: Soviet Union

Explanation:

Answer:

the correct answer is C.

Explanation:

Answer:It was important because the United States was trying to improve itself by acquiring skilled labor.

Explanation:

In the 19th and 20th century, there were certain requirements of immigrants before they could be allowed into the United States such as:

they had to be physically fit

they had to be mentally fit

they had to have good morals

Another requirement that was important was that of literacy. The United States was a young nation and was trying to make its mark on the planet. For that reason, she needed skilled labor.

Skilled labor would improve industry and develop the United States. We can therefore conclude that the immigration officers wanted to know if a person was literate so that they would be more willing to welcome them.

It is true that it was in Gaul where Caesar first made a reputation for himself as a military commander.

Plutarch did indeed write about Caesar's reputation being exaggerated and undeserved, but it is important to note that this opinion was not universally held. Many other ancient writers, such as Julius Caesar himself in his own Commentaries on the Gallic Wars, praised his military skill and accomplishments in Gaul. Regardless of differing opinions, it cannot be denied that Caesar's conquest of Gaul was a significant military achievement that cemented his place in history.

It is true that Julius Caesar first made a reputation for himself as a military commander in Gaul. However, according to Plutarch, Caesar's reputation for greatness was exaggerated and undeserved. Plutarch, a Greek biographer, believed that Caesar's accomplishments were not as significant as they were portrayed. Nonetheless, Caesar did have considerable success in Gaul and expanded the Roman territory through his conquests.

To know more about military commander visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/635461

#SPJ11

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a Russian author and critic, was known for his powerful dissent against the Soviet system.

Solzhenitsyn was born in Russia in 1918 and grew up in a family that had a strong commitment to the Orthodox Christian faith. He fought in World War II and was imprisoned for his criticism of the Soviet regime under Stalin's rule. Solzhenitsyn's work exposed the failings of the Soviet system, earning him a Nobel Prize in literature in 1970 for his book The Gulag Archipelago.

Solzhenitsyn's work was often highly critical of the Soviet regime, and he spent years in exile for his views. In 1974, he was expelled from the Soviet Union and moved to the United States. There, he continued to speak out against the Soviet system, using his platform as a writer to educate people about the failings of the Soviet system.

Learn more about Soviet system: https://brainly.com/question/1310325

#SPJ11

Answer:

a d e

Explanation:

got it right also please mark branliest thanks and have a great day

Answer:

A D E

Explanation:

Just did the assignment. Hope it helps :)

Answer:

One important factor that contributed to Europeans being able to conquer the Aztec and Inca peoples was their possession of far superior weapons and military technology.

The Aztecs and Incas, while advanced civilizations in their own right, were still fighting with weapons like clubs, spears and archaic armor when the Spanish conquistadors arrived. The Europeans, on the other hand, had guns, cannons and steel swords - weapons and armor made from superior materials.

When the Spanish conquistadors, along with their horses, guns and cannons first confronted the Aztecs and Incas, the native populations had never seen anything like it. The advanced European weaponry and military equipment gave the conquistadors a huge tactical advantage that the Aztecs and Incas could not match.

The Aztecs and Incas were also unfamiliar with and undisciplined against the tactics of cavalry and artillery that the Spanish employed. This, combined with the psychological impact of seemingly magical weapons like guns that could kill at a distance, contributed to the Spanish being able to conquer the Aztec and Inca civilizations relatively quickly despite being vastly outnumbered.

So in summary, the technological and military gap between the relatively primitive weapons of the Aztecs and Incas and the far advanced weaponry of the European conquistadors was an important factor that helped enable the Spanish conquest by giving them a decisive edge on the battlefield.

European liberalization promotes competition, leading to efficiency, innovation, consumer choice, and improved products and services.

The process of removing barriers and fostering competition on the European market is known as "European liberalization." It has had a significant impact on a number of industries, including transportation, energy, and telecommunications. Market liberalization in Europe has increased efficiency, innovation, and consumer choice by allowing for competition. It has promoted investment, sparked the entry of new players and lowered the cost of goods and services.

A more integrated European market has been made possible by liberalization's facilitation of international trade and regulatory harmonization. The anticipation of competition even before it occurs is referred to as the pre competitive effect of liberalization. This effect motivates current businesses to enhance their goods and services, make research and development investments, and implement more effective business procedures in order to remain competitive.

Learn more about European liberalization at:

brainly.com/question/13082255

#SPJ4

a) The conflict between religion and science in American society during the 1920s can be exemplified by the Scopes Monkey Trial. The trial was a court case held in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, where a high school biology teacher named John Scopes was accused of violating the Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in schools. The case became a national spectacle and pitted proponents of evolution against those who believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Although Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, the trial brought the issue of evolution to the forefront of American public discourse and highlighted the tensions between science and religion.

b) One development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition was the rise of organized crime. Prohibition, which banned the sale and consumption of alcohol, was enacted in 1919 with the ratification of the 18th Amendment. However, the law was widely flouted, and many people continued to drink and buy alcohol illegally. Organized crime syndicates, such as the mafia, saw an opportunity to profit from the demand for alcohol and began to smuggle and sell it on a large scale. This led to an increase in violence and corruption, and many Americans began to view prohibition as a failure.

c) An important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods was the introduction of quotas. The Immigration Act of 1924 established a quota system that limited the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from each country. The quotas were based on the percentage of each nationality that was already present in the United States in 1890, which favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe and restricted those from Southern and Eastern Europe. This marked a departure from earlier policies that had favored open immigration and reflected a growing nativist sentiment in American society.

For more such questions on American society

https://brainly.com/question/13323062

#SPJ11

The sectional crisis of California in 1850 was a result of the ongoing debate between the North and South over the issue of slavery. California's admission as a free state upset the balance of power in Congress and sparked further tensions between the two regions.

The sectional crisis of California in 1850 resulted from the state's application for admission to the Union as a free state. This threatened to upset the balance between free and slave states, intensifying tensions between the North and South. In response, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850, which included key provisions such as admitting California as a free state, the Fugitive Slave Act, and the ability for residents of New Mexico and Utah territories to decide on slavery through popular sovereignty. While the compromise temporarily eased tensions, it ultimately failed to resolve the underlying sectional issues, paving the way for the American Civil War.

Learn more about slavery here:

https://brainly.com/question/29458540

#SPJ11

Immediately prior to the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, the United States was governed under the Articles of Confederation.

The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States and were in effect from 1781 to 1789. They were adopted by the Second Continental Congress in 1777 and ratified by the states in 1781.

The Articles of Confederation established a decentralized form of government that granted limited powers to the central government. Under this system, the states retained most of the authority, while the national government had limited powers to handle issues such as foreign relations and defense.

However, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses that became apparent over time. The central government lacked the power to levy taxes, regulate commerce, and enforce laws. It also faced challenges in maintaining a strong military and resolving disputes between states.

These weaknesses prompted the need for a stronger central government, leading to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution, adopted in 1787 and ratified in 1788, replaced the Articles of Confederation and established a more centralized and balanced system of government.

In conclusion, the United States was governed under the Articles of Confederation immediately prior to the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution but proved to have significant limitations, eventually leading to the development of the more robust and comprehensive U.S. Constitution.

To know more about Articles of Confederation, visit

https://brainly.com/question/28386696

#SPJ11

Gandhi's tactics of civil disobedience affect the British in: Successful boycott of British cloth (source of British wealth), sale of British cloth in India dropped sharply and British struggled to keep trains running, factories operating, and overcrowded jails from bursting.

So, the correct answer is A, B and C

Gandhi's tactics of civil disobedience significantly impacted the British rule in India. By promoting the successful boycott of British cloth, a major source of British wealth, Gandhi weakened their economic power.

The sale of British cloth in India dropped sharply, further straining their financial resources.

Additionally, Gandhi's tactics disrupted everyday life, with the British struggling to maintain essential services like trains and factories.

The increasing number of protestors also led to overcrowded jails, making it difficult for the British to maintain control.

Overall, Gandhi's civil disobedience tactics exposed the vulnerabilities of British rule, ultimately contributing to India's independence movement.

Hence,the answer of the question is A, B and C

Learn more about Gandhi at https://brainly.com/question/14180919

#SPJ11

During the Warring States period, various states in China engaged in conflicts and wars. Eventually, one state emerged victorious and unified China.

The Warring States period in ancient China was characterized by intense competition and warfare among multiple states vying for power and control. This period lasted from the 5th century BCE to the 3rd century BCE.

The unification of China was a complex process that involved military conquests, political maneuvering, and socio-economic changes. It brought about a new era of imperial rule and left a lasting impact on the political, social, and cultural development of China.

For more questions on conflicts

https://brainly.com/question/32663176

#SPJ8

Complete Question:

What do you understand by ''warring states were defeated and China unifies''.

It is a short story that teaches a lesson. It is an example or oral tradition because it can be passed down from generation to generation by word of mouth.

In the late nineteenth century, social Darwinists argued that people who failed economically in the United States did so because they were not fit enough to survive and compete in a capitalist society, according to the principles of "survival of the fittest" and natural selection.

The social Darwinists argued that people who failed economically in the United States did so because they were biologically inferior.

They believed that the laws of natural selection applied to society as well as nature, and that the weak and poor were doomed to fail because they were not fit to survive in a competitive society.

Social Darwinism was used to justify laissez-faire capitalism, which meant that the government should not interfere in the economy or society.

This allowed the wealthy to become even wealthier, while the poor remained poor. Social Darwinism was a flawed and harmful ideology that perpetuated inequality and discrimination.

For such more question on United States:

https://brainly.com/question/21148283

#SPJ11

Answer:

B.expansion into global markets

The task of rebuilding Europe and Asia after World War II played a significant role in the emergence of the intense global rivalry between the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union.

The war left behind massive destruction in Europe. Millions of people had been murdered or displaced, and entire towns and cities had been destroyed.

With the Marshall Plan, which provided billions of dollars in aid to help rebuild European economies and infrastructure, the United States saw an opportunity to rebuild Europe.

However, the Soviet Union perceived this as a threat to its power in the region and feared that a strong, economically thriving Europe would challenge Soviet dominance.

The situation was similar throughout Asia. In contrast to China, which was embroiled in a civil war between Nationalists and Communists, Japan had been vanquished and was now under American occupation.\

For such more question on United States:

https://brainly.com/question/21148283

#SPJ11