The Secret Service is the primary federal agency in charge of investigating counterfeiting.
The management of resources, financial oversight of industries, or issues pertaining to national security are all examples of special government organizations known as federal agencies. Although they may initially be established by presidential order, these organizations are typically established through legislative action.
Because Congress decided that a problem required regulatory oversight, a federal agency exists. An "enabling act," also known as an "organic act," and other specific legislative grants of power are given to an agency by Congress.
Learn more about Counterfeiting:
brainly.com/question/30736423
#SPJ4
Which of these credentials is mandatory for certain health professionals to practice in their field?A) RegistrationB) CertificationC) Licensure D.Endorsment
Licensure is mandatory for certain health professionals to practice in their field. Option C is the right answer.
Why is Licensure mandatory?Licensure is required for certain health professionals to practice in their field to ensure public safety and to establish minimum standards for competency and ethical behavior.
The purpose of licensure is to regulate and monitor the qualifications and performance of health professionals to ensure that they are adequately trained and equipped to provide safe and effective care to patients.
By requiring health professionals to obtain a license, state governments can take action against individuals who violate professional standards and put the public at risk. Additionally, licensure provides a way for patients to verify the credentials of their healthcare provider, increasing trust and confidencein the health care system.
Learn more on the importance of licensure here
https://brainly.com/question/7640712
#SPJ1
similarities that you see between the rights contained in the UN document
and the fundamental rights of United States citizens from the US Bill of Rights
Answer: Their pourpose, rights, and liberties.
Explanation:
Whyis DNA fingerprinting used for in forensics?
OA.
to identify the place of crime
OB.
to identify the evidence
O c.
to identify the modus operandi
OD.
to identify the culprit
Fingerprint is used in forensics to identify the culprit.
What is forensics?This is a branch of science that is used by law enforcement agents to identify and manage crime situations.
The fingerprints of people are unique, and given that they are contained in a nations database, they are used to identify the people that committed a crime.
Read more on forensics here:
https://brainly.com/question/3049628
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Which of the following is not contained in the Environmental Impact Statement
A. A statement of any adverse negative environmental impacts that cannot be avoided if the proposal is carried out
B. Alternatives to the proposal, including taking no action
The item that is not contained in the Environmental Impact Statement is A. A statement of any adverse negative environmental impacts that cannot be avoided if the proposal is carried out.
What is the Environmental Impact Statement?The environmental impact statement can be described as the government document which is been used to display the impact of a proposed project on its surrounding environment.
It should be noted that In the United States, it was mandated by federal law for certain projects and this guarantees that no species or habitat will be negatively impacted by the proposal.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about proposal at:
https://brainly.com/question/28905012
#SPJ1
What does “Checks and balances” mean when it comes to government. Give at least 2 examples of checks and balances amongst the branches of government.
Answer:
In terms of gov.t, Checks and Balances, which is the principle of government under which separate branches have the power to prevent actions by other branches and are induced to share power.
Explanation:
- 1st Example -
> The Judicial branch/Supreme court CHECKS on the Executive branch/President to make sure that the laws that they enforce is (Un)constitutional and would BALANCE the power it enforces.
- 2nd Example -
> The Legislative branch/Congress CHECKS on the Judicial branch/Supreme Court to make sure that they are doing their job on interpreting the laws to make the law (un)constitutional
.. I hope this helps ..
which obstacle is currently the most serious obstacle to the enforcement of clean water laws in china?
The most serious obstacle to the enforcement of clean water laws in China is the lack of accountability and transparency in government and industry practices.
The most serious obstacle to the enforcement of clean water laws in China is the lack of accountability and transparency in government and industry practices.
There are also issues with insufficient funding and inadequate monitoring and enforcement mechanisms. Additionally, the rapid economic development and urbanization in China have led to increased pollution and water scarcity, which further exacerbate the challenges in enforcing clean water laws.
Local officials often prioritize economic development over environmental protection, leading to lax enforcement of clean water regulations.
Additionally, corruption among local authorities can hinder the enforcement of these laws. Lastly, limited resources and funding for regulatory agencies make it challenging to monitor and enforce clean water laws effectively.
Know more about clean water laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/14284975
#SPJ11
The law that holds the medical professional not legally liable when rendering first aid in an emergency situation is called_________.
The law that holds the medical professional not legally liable when rendering first aid in an emergency situation is called Good Samaritan laws.
Good Samaritan laws are based on the notion that it is in the interests of "public policy" that those who voluntarily provide care and rescue in an emergency be exempt from liability.
What does good Samaritan mean in law?A good Samaritan is defined by law as someone who helps an injured or ill person in need. A good Samaritan can typically assist a victim who is unconscious or unresponsive on the basis of implied consent.Whenever possible, get the sick or injured person's permission.An appropriate (non-reckless) level of care was provided.The person who was injured was NOT the one who was covered by good samaritan laws.Due to the emergency nature of the situation and the lack of trained assistance, care was being provided.In general, when bystanders observe someone in need of assistance or needing to be protected from harm, they are not legally required to intervene. Only after one person begins to assist another does the Good Samaritan law take effect. Once you have helped,.Good Samaritan laws are based on the notion that it is in the interests of "public policy" that those who voluntarily provide care and rescue in an emergency be exempt from liability.To learn more about : Good Samaritan laws
Ref : https://brainly.com/question/13160856
#SPJ4
Matt has been a runner for several years but has never participated in a marathon. He decides to make that his goal, training hard to ready himself. Matt isn’t interested in where he places in the race, just that he is able to accomplish his goal. According to Freud’s theories, what part of Matt’s personality is behind this self-improvement?
A.
id
B.
ego
C.
empathy
D.
superego
Based on the fact that Matt wants to accomplish his goal of running the marathon, the part of his personality behind this self-improvement is the B. ego.
What are the parts of Freudian Personality?According to famed psychologist, Sigmund Freud, the personality of a person is framed by three parts which are the Id, the Ego and the Superego.
The Id is the part of a human that is most animal like. It seeks immediate gratification from pleasurable activities and so is not capable of thinking in the long term.
The ego is the part that has to make decisions for the person and it does this by balancing the demands of the Id and the demands of the Superego in various proportions.
The Superego is the morally upright part of a person's personality and will judge them when they don't meet these morals.
Because the ego is the one that makes decisions, it is most likely the part that is behind the self-improvement drive of Matt.
Find out more on Freud's parts of personality at https://brainly.com/question/7185941
#SPJ1
A vehicle that is taller Can become more unstable when cornering because it has a higher center of
Answer:
gravity
Explanation:
Define opening statement
Answer:
An opening statement is generally the first occasion that the trier of fact has to hear from a lawyer in a trial, aside possibly from questioning during voir dire. The opening statement is generally constructed to serve as a "road map" for the fact-finder.
Explanation:
Can you take your common law marriage to other states?
Answer:
no
you're not in common law marriage after 7 years together but it's under that duration you can
What are the Essential Parts of a Written Constitution? Briefly explain each
Answer:
The constitution is the central legal document of a state. It regulates the basic organizational structure of the state, the territorial structure of the state, the relationship with its constituent states and with other states, as well as the relationship with those subject to norms and their most important rights and obligations. The state powers constituted in this way are bound by the constitution as the supreme norm and their power over the norm is limited. The constitution-making power in democratic states comes from the people of the state. Constitutions usually also contain state tasks and objectives, these are often found in a preamble.
US consumers have paid ___ prices for goods at many stores such as Wal-Mart due to globalization.
Because of globalization, many companies, including Walmart, have reduced their prices for US customers. Manufacturing costs are generally decreasing as a result of globalization. This implies that businesses can set lower prices for their products.
The average cost of commodities is an important factor that improves quality of life. Furthermore, because of globalization consumers have greater access to a broader range of goods. Giving people access to a more varied and balanced diet has the potential to improve their health in some cases, but it has also been linked to diabetes and an increase in junk food consumption.
As a result of globalization, businesses can take advantage of lower labor costs in developing countries while also employing the expertise and knowledge of more developed economies.
To learn more about globalization, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/15283031
#SPJ4
In what way does the federal government step on the rights of the states? Why?
Answer:
— For all of these- once the gov't has made a law, it has ways of forcing states to comply. This is often when you'll hear terms like "stepping on our state's rights." For example, they can withhold federal funding for everything from construction projects to job creation.
1 answer
Explanation:
3.) What is the difference between criminal law and civil law?
Answer:
hope it helps.stay safe healthy and happy.in order to have a claim for negligence, a plaintiff must prove:
In order to have a claim for negligence, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, that the defendant breached that duty of care, that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach, and that the damages were foreseeable.
These elements vary slightly depending on the jurisdiction, but generally, the following four elements must be established:Duty of Care: The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant owed them a duty of care. A duty of care is a legal obligation to act in a manner that avoids causing harm to others. It exists when a reasonable person would foresee that their actions or omissions could harm someone else.
The specific duty of care depends on the circumstances and the relationship between the parties involved.
Learn more about claim for negligence here:https://brainly.com/question/14480857
#SPJ11
The terms confederate, unitary, and federal all refer to _______.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
This function of political parties is considered the most important because it is where political parties name their candidates for public office.
Governing
O Watchdog
O Informing
Nominating
Political parties are organized groups of people with similar ideas or ideology about the function and scope of government, with shared policy goals that work together to elect individuals to political office, to create and implement policies, to further an agenda, and to gain control of the government and the policy-making process. Parties gain control over the government by winning elections with candidates they officially sponsor or nominate for positions in government. Political parties nominate candidates to run many levels of government including the national level, Congress, and the presidency; but, they nominate for state and local levels as well. They also coordinate political campaigns and mobilize voters.
Which search pattern is used when you have many investigators available and are looking
for a missing person?
O Line or Strip search
O Grid search
Spiral search
Quadrant or Sone search
Answer:
I think grid search could be used when you have many investigators available and are looking for the same person
HELP
Gun control: Should we limit gun rights??
Health care: should all Americans have a right to health care??
Answer:
1. Yes we should limit gun control because with all these event going on with police killing innocent people and others using guns unwisely we should limited gun rights and who should have and who should not have one.
2. Yes all Americans should have right to heath care
you should hve your battery and charging system check?
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE YOU 70 points PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE PLEASE
Constitution of United States of America 1789
Explanation:
You posted a photo of the 1st amendment, but didn't ask what you were looking for so I am just assuming this is what you need
Which of the following is an ethical issue that affects the pharmaceutical industry?
making drugs portable for patients who need to travel to other healthcare professionals
finding ways to make sure patients take their drugs as advised
making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
supporting patients’ autonomy by supplying enough advertising about drugs
Answer:
The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
Explanation:
Trust me
why is the death penalty constitutional when, under the 8th amendment to the u.s. constitution the government inflicting cruel and unusual punishment is a violation of your individual rights?
The reason why the death penalty is constitutional despite the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stating that the government inflicting cruel and unusual punishment is a violation of individual rights is because the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld its constitutionality.
Death penalty is a legal punishment imposed by a state, in which an individual is sentenced to death as a result of a criminal offense that he or she has committed. Since the punishment is the most extreme one, several countries and states have abolished the death penalty, while others still use it.According to the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, individuals are protected against cruel and unusual punishment. While some critics claim that the death penalty is cruel and unusual, the Supreme Court of the United States has established that it is constitutional. The Supreme Court upheld the death penalty as a constitutional form of punishment in Furman v. Georgia (1972).After Furman v. Georgia, states started implementing new death penalty statutes that gave juries more direction in determining whether the punishment was necessary. In 1976, the Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the new statutes in Gregg v. Georgia, reasoning that the death penalty is constitutional when it's imposed for certain offenses, such as murder, and is applied in a reasonable and just manner.Cruel and unusual punishment is a type of punishment that is inhumane or degrading, or that may cause extreme physical or psychological pain or suffering. On the other hand, the death penalty is the most extreme punishment that a defendant may face, as it requires the state to take the life of the defendant. Therefore, while critics of the death penalty argue that it is cruel and unusual, the Supreme Court has decided that it is a constitutional punishment.Learn more about U.S. Constitution: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ11
If you see a large truck from oncoming traffic driving towards you, you should try to
at the common law, a(n) was defined as the collection of three or more persons with the purpose to engage in an unlawful act.
A gathering of 3 or more people with the aim of committing an illegal conduct was referred to as an unlawful assembly.
What is a common law example?All prior judicial decisions rendered in a general law court serve as the foundation for common law. Common law decisions on things like contract reading requirements, patient privacy, copyright, and english courts marriage are a few examples.
What is Canadian common law?If at least each of the following circumstances exists and you are residing inside a de facto relationship with an individual who is not his married spouse, you are said to be living common-law. For at least a year, this individual has lived in a a conjugal relationship.
To know more about common law visit;
https://brainly.com/question/13026830
#SPJ4
what is the difference between human acts and an act of man
Answer:
An act that is performed only by a human being and thus is proper to man. When a human being does such acts, they are called acts of man but not human acts. ... Acts of man, therefore, are acts shared in common by man and other animals, whereas human acts are proper to human beings.
Explanation:
Please mark as brainliest
a successful defense releases the defendant from partial or full liability for a tortious act.
a. true
b. false
A successful defense absolves the defendant of partial or total liability for a tortious act committed.
A term used to describe tortious behavior. Tortious behavior is thus defined as any behavior (other than breach of contract) that can be sued for as a civil wrong. Tort liability means that someone is held responsible for wrongdoing (other than under contract.). Torts are associated with civil court claims. It is a branch of English common law intended to right a wrong (violation of common law, social norms, or civil law) without resorting to criminal punishment. Tortious liability is the liability of the state for the tortious acts of its servants. Tortious liability is the liability of the state for the acts of omission and commission, voluntary or involuntary, and brings it before a court of law.
Learn more about tortious here:
https://brainly.com/question/29312384
#SPJ4
_____ determined that a child has due process rights, such as having an attorney present at waiver hearings
The Supreme Court of the United States determined that a child has due process rights, such as having an attorney present at waiver hearings.
This was established in the case In re Gault (1967), which held that juveniles have the right to due process, including the right to notice of charges, the right to counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the right to remain silent.
The decision in this case established that juveniles have many of the same constitutional rights as adults in criminal proceedings. It also held that juveniles are entitled to a fair hearing and that the procedures used in juvenile court must comply with due process requirements.
The ruling was a landmark decision in the history of juvenile justice and had a significant impact on the treatment of juveniles in the criminal justice system.
Learn more about waiver hearings here:
https://brainly.com/question/28147803
#SPJ11