The issue of unemployment and declining wages on the west coast led to Dawes, Homestead act of the legislative actions.
Industrialization created low-wage, low-skill jobs with workers who can be replaced easily. overproduction leading to low prices for products and debt for farmers. Schools promoted the employment and study of diverse languages. Schools allowed for various legislative actions culture groups to measure more closely.
Knights of Labor were members were skilled and unskilled workers, rallied for shorter work days, equal legislative actions get men and ladies, and to finish child labor. Its founding marked the start of union activism within the era.
The Knights however declined in status thanks to being associated to the Haymarket bombing, and therefore the legislative actions proven fact that they allowed in unskilled workers, giving the skilled workers a sense of superiority. Americanization Movement. This movement was sponsored by the govt. and anxious citizens.
learn more about legislative actions: https://brainly.com/question/11821265
#SPJ4
evaluate to what the religious organizations have or currently supporting communities affected by human trafficking
Trafficking Prevention and Intervention Organizations
1. CAST-Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking
2. Center for Human Trafficking Awareness
3. Justice Planning Management Associates
If this helped, please give it brainliest!
Como as palavras estão organizadas nas estrofes?como são as letras que compõem o poema?
Olá. Primeiramente, é importante ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens". Esse não é o servidor brasileiro e sim o americano, por isso perguntas em português s´´o podem ser respondidas dessa forma.
Em segundo lugar, você não apresentou nenhum texto, o que dificulta que a sua pergunta seja respondida. Entretanto, eu posso te ajudar, afirmando que dentro das estrofes de um poema, as palavras sãpo organizadas em versos. O conjunto de versos, forma uma estrofe.
Em relação as letras, só é possivel determinar com elas são, depois que a leitura do texto for feita, mas podemos afirmar que na maioria dos casos, as letras maiusculas são usadas apenas no inivio do verso, enquanto as letras minusculas são usadas em todos os versos.
does the peremptory challenge damage the fairness of the jury system? Why does it result in increased us of the death penalty?
Yes, the peremptory challenge damage the fairness of the jury system. The peremptory challenges have been used to exclude members of minority groups, particularly African Americans, from juries in criminal cases, particularly in death penalty cases.
What is the peremptory challenge?The peremptory challenge was known as a tool in jury selection that enables lawyers to excuse jurors without a reason for doing so..
The use of peremptory challenges has been criticized as damaging to the fairness of the jury system, based on the fact that it can result in the exclusion of jurors based on racial, ethnic, or other biases, rather than on their qualifications or ability to be impartial.
Therefore yes the peremptory challenge damage the fairness of the jury system.
Learn more about peremptory challenge here:https://brainly.com/question/30362467
#SPJ1
Please describe the Growth and Development Law of children
Answer:
The Growth and Development Law of Children refers to the principle that outlines the expected patterns of physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional changes that occur in children as they progress from infancy to adulthood. This law highlights the systematic and predictable nature of child development and provides a framework for understanding and monitoring children's growth in various areas.
The law recognizes that children's growth and development occur in a sequential and continuous manner, with each stage building upon the previous one. It emphasizes that development is influenced by a combination of genetic factors and environmental influences, including family, culture, and societal norms.
According to this law, children typically follow specific milestones and progress through different stages of development. These stages include infancy, early childhood, middle childhood, adolescence, and eventually adulthood. Each stage is associated with unique physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional characteristics and challenges.
The Growth and Development Law of Children helps guide parents, caregivers, educators, and professionals in understanding age-appropriate expectations for children. It informs decisions regarding education, healthcare, and interventions to support children's optimal growth and development.
It is important to note that while the Growth and Development Law provides a general framework, every child is unique and may exhibit variations in their individual development. Additionally, cultural and contextual factors can influence the pace and expression of development. Therefore, the law serves as a guide but should be applied flexibly to accommodate individual differences and cultural diversity.
Explanation:
The Growth and Development Law of children refers to the predictable patterns and sequences of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial changes that occur during childhood.
The Growth and Development Law of children encompasses various principles and theories that help understand the sequential and progressive nature of child development.
It highlights that children typically progress through a series of stages, each with unique characteristics and milestones. This includes physical growth, such as increases in height, weight, and motor skills, as well as cognitive development, such as language acquisition, problem-solving abilities, and moral reasoning.
Psychosocial development covers emotional and social aspects, including the formation of attachments, self-identity, and the ability to interact with others.
These laws are based on extensive research and observations, such as Jean Piaget's cognitive development theory and Erik Erikson's psychosocial stages of development.
Understanding the Growth and Development Law of children is crucial for parents, educators, and healthcare professionals as it helps guide appropriate expectations, support optimal development, and identify any potential delays or challenges that may require intervention.
To know more about cognitive refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28147250#
#SPJ11
another word for the subject gym
Answer:
pe, pshys Ed, osyhcial education
Answer:
Physical Education, Health, P.E., etc.
What are the benefits and drawbacks of ID requirements for voting?
Voter identity cards have the following benefits:
a trustworthy method of identification.a declaration that a voter is legitimately registered.To increase confidence that the voter is who he or she claims to be, the ballot may include many identifying elements, such as a portrait, signature, fingerprints, etc.drawbacks
Either the government, the electorate, or both must foot the enormous costs. The proportion of eligible voters who receive an identification card will inevitably drop if the cost is passed on to the voter. may be created to address low literacy ratesWhat are the more drawbacks of id?
When many voters lack a fixed address, an effective means of identification may be used.enables voting in places where the voter might not be directly recognizedcan be distributed alongside campaign materials for voter educationThe card may disappear.To learn more about voter id refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13895279
#SPJ2
2. Explain how juvenile courts developed?
Answer:
by to many issues
Explanation:
Should it be more difficult or easier to impeach public officials and why
Answer:
it indeed should be harder.
Explanation:
So every people can be sure who they need to choose and vote
All of the following are factors in U.S. federal sentencing guidelines with respect to business executives except: A. the presence of a conspiracy to prevent discovery of the crime. B. the failure to cooperate with prosecutors. C. the monetary value of the crime. D. the use of structured financial transactions to hide the crime. E. the use of technology to commit the crime.
Despite its best attempts to prevent unethical activity, the corporation can still be held liable if an employee's activities violate corporate policy.
What gave rise to the federal sentencing recommendations for businesses?The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 established sentencing guidelines. The United States Sentencing Commission, which tried to end inequities in sentencing for similar crimes, was established around the same time as this statute.
Which of the following federal sentencing guidelines applies to American businesses?Corporations, partnerships, labor unions, pension funds, trusts, non-profit organizations, and governmental bodies are all subject to the FSGO. The FSGO imposes fines, probation, public announcements of conviction, and restitution as punishments. The FSGO also has clauses that can significantly lessen fines. Despite its best attempts to prevent unethical activity, the corporation can still be held liable if an employee's activities violate corporate policy.
To know more about FSGO visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/13078022
#SPJ4
Which is an effect of the Identity Theft and Assumption Deference Act of 1998? Allows federal agencies to fight identity theft Classifies identity theft as a misdemeanor Establishes identity theft as a state crime Prevents victims from seeking restitution
Answer:
Allows federal agencies to fight identity theft
Explanation:
The effects that Identity Theft and Assumption Deference Act of 1998 to the nation is that; A:Allows federal agencies to fight identity theft .
Identity Theft and Assumption Deference Act can be regarded as an act that was put in place to give room for federal government agency to be able to fight identity theft.It was raised in 1998, and makes the theft of personal information as an an unlawful act as well as a federal crime in the United States.The penalities for this is up to twenty-five years imprisonment or maximum fine of $250,000.
Therefore, option A is right.
Learn more at:
https://brainly.com/question/16404649?referrer=searchResults
Rich and Archie sign an agreement in which Archie agrees to deliver ten cases of champagne in 5 days. The parties negotiated and meant to say in the written agreement, delivery in 50 days. If the evidence is clear that the two parties intended to agree to 50 days, the courts will probably
Answer:
Reform the contract
Explanation:
Contract reformation means that both parties, in this case, Rich and Archie, ask the courts to rewrite the contract or make a change in a specific part of the contract to express what both of the parties want. Then, Rich and Archie would agree that Archie has to deliver ten cases of champagne in 50 days, not 5.
(0)
The Age Discrimination Act of 1967 (ADEA) typically applies to employers who have 20 or more employees and protects workers who are 40 years of age and older. Note that in the United States, people under the age of 40 are not in a protected class due to age. With the advancement toward retirement of the baby-boom generation (those people born in 1941 through 1962), the incidences of age discrimination are increasing. Age discrimination can occur when someone is not hired due to being perceived as "too old" to offer long-term benefits to an organization (disparate treatment), or by posting a recruitment notice that "recent high school graduates needed for entry-level positions" stops an entire group of older individuals from having access to a job (disparate impact). Despite the law, however, courts often support the case made by employers against age discrimination, which has created the perception by many business leaders that they do not really need to worry about age discrimination. Loopholes, defenses, and the clause, "reasonable factors other than age" (RFOA), have heightened that perception. Note that RFOA only applies to disparate impact, not disparate treatment.
Consider the following scenario:
Rachella Ramirez is the Marketing VP for Sunbright T-Shirt LLC (STS). The company makes trendy t-shirts and sells them in mall kiosks, on Amazon, and on Woot.com, throughout the U.S. STS has 250 employees and is rapidly growing. However, the "new product line" division is struggling, and Rachella feels it is due to too many older employees who are not up on the new trends of their customers. She decides to do a few things to fix the problem. Here are her actions:
She creates 20 job openings in the new product division. She then directs her recruiting specialist to post the jobs on Indeed, Monster, and on a garment association website, stating that STS is looking for "recent college graduates with product design, marketing, or fashion design" degrees to help design new t-shirts.
She sends a note to the current department head of the product design team to downgrade all of his over 55 employees’ performance reviews this year so that none achieve more than a 3 on a 5-point scale.
She is overheard by two employees, who are over 55, talking on the phone to the CEO, saying: "I know—that product design team is a real problem. When do you think these baby boomers will ever start retiring?" Then, after a pause: "Don’t worry—I have this figured out."
She puts together a voluntary early retirement package for all workers who are 55 and over, and who have worked for the company for more than 10 years, and sends it out to all of those workers. For each of the workers who does not take the offer, she works with HR to start them on performance plans as a result of their lowered performance evaluations.
By Day 3
Post a thoughtful and scholarly response based on and supported by your required readings, media, and research this week that addresses the following:
Identify the elements of age discrimination as provided in the Age Discrimination Employment Act (ADEA) and explain whether those elements exist in this scenario.
Identify instances of Rachella’s behavior which could be considered disparate impact and which might be considered disparate treatment.
Briefly explain how this situation might result in a lawsuit.
Several aspects of age discrimination as defined by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) can be seen in this situation:
1. Age restriction: Employees 40 years of age and older are covered by the ADEA. In this instance, Rachella specifically targets workers over the age of 55, who are considered to be in the protected age group.
Examples of Rachella's actions that can be deemed to have a discriminatory impact include:
learn more about Employment Act (ADEA) here :
https://brainly.com/question/19620677
#SPJ11
should chase be able to enforce the waiver clause (under ucc 9-403), prohibiting burning lake tire from raising defenses against chase?
Under UCC 9-403, a party who has waived a right or defense may still assert it if the waiver was not intended to be binding or if the other party had no knowledge of the waiver.
Therefore, whether Chase can enforce the waiver clause prohibiting Burning Lake Tire from raising defenses against Chase will depend on whether Chase's waiver was intended to be binding and whether Burning Lake Tire had knowledge of the waiver.
If Chase's waiver was clearly communicated to Burning Lake Tire and Burning Lake Tire had knowledge of the waiver, then Chase may be able to enforce the waiver clause and prohibit Burning Lake Tire from raising defenses against Chase. However, if Burning Lake Tire did not have knowledge of the waiver or if the waiver was not intended to be binding, then Chase may not be able to enforce the waiver clause.
It is important to consult with a licensed attorney who is familiar with UCC 9-403 and the specific facts and circumstances of your case to determine whether Chase can enforce the waiver clause prohibiting Burning Lake Tire from raising defenses against Chase.
Learn more about UCC visit :brainly.com/question/20235251
#SPJ11
What are civil liberties and civil rights ?.
Since they deal with legal protections, civil rights are not included in the Bill of Rights. One civil right is the ability to vote. On the other hand, a civil liberty refers to individual liberties that are shielded from governmental interference, such as those that are enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
A civil right is the freedom from discrimination based on factors like gender, colour, handicap, etc. Additionally, they had the freedom to practice their own religion. Any guaranteed freedom or right, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the freedom of speech, is referred to as a civil liberty. The rights listed in the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, and regulations as civil rights and civil liberties include the freedom from discrimination based on race, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information, as well as the freedom of speech, the free exercise of religion, and the right to a fair trial. Think of our freedom of speech as an example of a civil liberties freedom that is protected by the Constitution, whereas civil rights are legal protections against discrimination for individuals. You're allowed to keep mute.
Learn more about civil liberty here
https://brainly.com/question/509851
#SPJ4
Which of the following advocates would support the protection of personal freedoms and civil rights?
a. individual-rights advocates
b. public-order advocates
c. states'-rights advocates
d. crime-control advocates
The individual-rights advocates would support the protection of personal freedoms and civil rights. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is advocates ?
Defend, debate, and support someone's unique idea is what the word "advocate" refers to. Typically, lawyers use the term "advocate." A person with the right to represent a party in court is known as an advocate.
Advocates for individual rights mean defending the human and legal rights of people. Advocates for individual rights include those for civil rights, economic rights, social rights, political rights, cultural rights, etc.
Therefore, option (a) individual-rights advocates is correct.
Learn more about on advocates, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8994455
#SPJ2
A dead body of an elderly gentleman was discovered in an abandoned building. Blowfly pupae were found on the body. A missing person’s report was filed for an elderly gentleman who had wandered away from home just two days before. The body found was similar in age, height, and weight to the missing person. Could this possibly be the same person as the person described in the missing person’s report? Explain your answer.
Answer:
It is possible although unlikely due to the fact that blowfly pupae were already found on the body. Pupae generally set in around 18-24 days after death. Possible if there were factors present that increased the rate of decomp drastically
According to the case, the evidence of pupa was he found in the 8 to 12 days. It was the search of the record on the police station of the missing person report.
What is report?The term report on the police station on the missing, abusing, and violent and the other cases was the report. It was the formal report on the address the case on the police station. It was at least 24 hours in the day to register the report.
According to the case, pupa was at least 8 to 12 days as the found on the missing person dead body search on location and the inquiry. It was the evidence on the police station as lat two days of the report on the missing person. But, based on arthropod evidence, the man in the derelict building could not be the same man who was described missing.
As a result, the conclusion of the case are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on report, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14969693
#SPJ3
T/F Today, most jurisdictions maintain separate courts of equity and courts of law.
Against this background consider the following set of facts:
In 2004 the Khumalos sold their farm to Peter and Jenny, a couple who are married in community
of property. There are two homesteads on the farm. A right of habitatio was reserved over the
smaller homestead on the farm in favour of the Khumalos for as long as they lived. This right
was duly registered against the title deed of the farm of Peter and Jenny. Peter and Jenny moved
into the bigger homestead but made life unbearable for the Khumalos. As a result of Peter and
Jenny’s ill-mannered behaviour the Khumalos decided to leave the smaller homestead in which
they lived. After a few years the Khumalos wish to return to the smaller homestead on the farm.
During an appointment with their attorney, the Khumalos described themselves as pensioners
who are struggling to make ends meet on their small state pension. The attorney promised to
consider their legal position and to provide them with and opinion, but the Khumalos decided to
return to the smaller homestead while Peter and Jenny were on holiday. Upon their return, Peter
and Jenny find the Khumalos in the smaller homestead. They were not impressed and decided
to make their lives unbearable again. Peter and Jenny decided that the smaller homestead
needs to be redeveloped for a period of two years. Their argument was that the homestead was
severely dilapidated and was extremely hazardous and uninhabitable to occupy. Many planning
and negotiations took place between Peter and Jenny and the Khumalos. At first, the Khumalo’s
refused because according to them there was nothing wrong with the state of the smaller
homestead.
The Khumalos eventually consented to the removal of the roof tiles and also to move out of the
smaller homestead, however they did not agree on the date on which they would be vacating
the homestead. Peter and Jenny assisted by private contractors removed the roof tiles while the
Khumalos were still inside. During this process most of the roof tiles cracked to such an extent
that that they could not be used again. The Khumalos realised that they have to move out of the
homestead immediately, although they were not satisfied to do so. After moving out, they
approach their attorney who advised them to institute the spoliation remedy immediately. The
Khumalos however inform the attorney that Peter and Jenny told them that they will not be
successful with the spoliation remedy since they agreed to move out of the homestead and
furthermore that it is impossible to restore control because the roof tiles were broken.
Against this background answer the following questions:
question 1
Is the spoliation remedy the correct or incorrect remedy for the Khumalos to institute against
Peter and Jenny to have their control of the smaller homestead restored? Motivate your answer.
question 2
Will the Khumalos succeed with the spoliation remedy? Keep in mind that they consented to the
removal of the roof tiles and to moving out of the homestead and that the roof tiles were
damaged. Fully substantiate your answer. In your answer refer to the requirements to succeed
with the spoliation remedy as well as the nature and purpose of the spoliation remedy. (7)
Explanation:
Answer to Question 1:
The spoliation remedy is the correct remedy for the Khumalos to institute against Peter and Jenny to have their control of the smaller homestead restored. The spoliation remedy is a legal action that a person can take to regain possession of property that has been taken from them unlawfully or through force. In this case, Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles and thus deprived the Khumalos of their control of the smaller homestead without their consent. This amounts to spoliation, which is a violation of the Khumalos' possession rights. Therefore, the Khumalos have the right to institute the spoliation remedy to regain possession of the smaller homestead.
Answer to Question 2:
It is likely that the Khumalos will succeed with the spoliation remedy. The spoliation remedy is based on the principle that no person should be allowed to take the law into their own hands and that the courts will protect a person's possession rights. In order to succeed with the spoliation remedy, the Khumalos will have to prove the following:
They were in peaceful and undisturbed control of the smaller homestead before Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles.
Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles without their consent and thereby unlawfully deprived them of their control of the smaller homestead.
The Khumalos acted promptly in instituting the spoliation remedy once they became aware of the spoliation.
In this case, it is clear that the Khumalos were in peaceful and undisturbed control of the smaller homestead before Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles. They did not consent to the removal of the roof tiles and were thus unlawfully deprived of their control of the smaller homestead. They also acted promptly in instituting the spoliation remedy once they became aware of the spoliation. Therefore, it is likely that they will succeed with the spoliation remedy.
The fact that the roof tiles were damaged may not be relevant to the Khumalos' right to regain control of the smaller homestead. The spoliation remedy is not concerned with the condition of the property that has been spoliated, but rather with the principle that possession should not be taken unlawfully. The nature and purpose of the spoliation remedy is to protect a person's possession rights and to prevent the unlawful taking of property.
Find a news about uncertainty law in Indonesia and add
a conclusion into it (Dont Plagarism pls)
The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.
The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.
As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.
To learn more about Indonesia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31792781
#SPJ4
Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.
In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.
Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.
To know more about law:
brainly.com/question/30133385
#SPJ4
The Executive Branch states that the Governor of Texas is elected every 4 years
at the same time as the President of the United States. *
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
All of the following are criminal penalties the District Court of Maryland might impose if a person is found guilty of impaired driving except:
a) loss of job.
b) community service.
c) arrest.
d) jail time.
Answer:
a) loss of job
Explanation:
Loss of job is not a criminal penalty that a court can impose. The other options listed (community service, arrest, and jail time) are all possible criminal penalties for impaired driving, depending on the severity of the offense and other factors.
Which of the following entities are responsible for implementing
guidelines or requirements for ethical and/or consenting research
experiments? Select all that apply.
IRB
ONIJ
DAS
OIRS
Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
What are IRB ethical guidelines?Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
People with expertise and training in non-scientific fields, people with expertise and training in scientific fields, and members of the community who might serve as subjects for research studies make up the Institutional Review Board (IRB), a committee.
An IRB has the power to approve, demand changes are made (to secure approval), or disapprove research in accordance with FDA regulations. The rights and welfare of human research subjects are safeguarded in large part by this group review.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a) IRB.
To learn more about IRB refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8905808
#SPJ4
is the property of being physically or mentally capable.
A . Grit
B. Individualism
C. Self confidence
D. Strength
Answer:
D.Strength
ALL done
Officers Jack and Daniels witness a suspect breaking into a parked car on the Bellevue College campus and observe him removing a purse from the front seat. The suspect then runs down the street and the officers follow him. The suspect then runs into a neighboring apartment and refuses to allow the officers into his apartment, claiming that they need a search warrant. Is the suspect correct
Answer:
The suspect is not correct.
Explanation:
It is true that police officers can only enter an apartment with a search warrant. However, federal law makes an exception for cases of flagrante delicto where the police have to chase a suspect and he enters an apartment to seek shelter, as shown in the above question. In that case, the police could, in fact, enter the apartment even without the search warrant and make the arrest of the miscreant.
the most common form of consequence-oriented reasoning is known as
Answer:
the fathers of utilitarianism.
Explanation:
utilitarianism the most common form of consequence oriented reasoning, in which the good resides in the promotion of happiness or the greatest net increase of pleasure over pain.
Answer:
Utilitarianism
Explanation:
#18
Match the following court systems with the
characteristics of the system listed below.
1.Usually organizes
trial courts by
municipal
jurisdiction or
county
A. Federal court system
B. Individual state court system
2.Its Supreme Court
is the court of final
resort for the entire
land.
A. Federal court system
B. Individual state court system
3.Its Supreme Court
is the court of final
resort for a
particular
geographic area.
A. Federal court system
B. Individual state court system
Answer:
The correct answers are:
1.) B.
2.) A.
3.) B.
Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
a) Only with respect to Criminal Procedural Rights.
b) Only with respect to Civil Liberties.
c) They cannot provide fewer rights to individuals.
d) They can provide fewer rights to individuals.
Carly files a complaint against delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on.
Carly files a complaint against delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on the corporation's registered agent.
Complaints could also be shared among FCC bureaus and offices for further review and possible investigation. The court fee is Rs 5,000 and also the demand draft should be within the name of The Registrar, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
File a complaint together with your local consumer protection office or the state agency that regulates the corporation. Notify the higher Business Bureau (BBB) in your area about your problem. One good option is to file a complaint with the higher Business Bureau (BBB).
The BBB helps consumers settle disputes associated with sales, contracts, customer service, complaint warranties, billings, and refunds per annum. It accepts complaints whether or not the corporation that's harmed you doesn't belong to the higher Business Bureau.
learn more about complaint: https://brainly.com/question/24821518
#SPJ4
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take place at a local restaurant. the officer obtained a search warrant for the restaurant and arrived with other uniformed officers to search the premises. while conducting the search, the officer searched several of the customers. while searching one of the restaurant's regular customers, the officer felt an object in the customer's pocket and pulled out a container filled with heroin. the customer was arrested and later convicted of possession of heroin. a state statute permits officers executing a search warrant to search persons on the premises if the officers reasonably expect danger to themselves or a risk of disposal or concealment of anything described in the warrant. if the customer challenges his conviction on the ground that his fourth amendment rights were violated, will he be successful?
Answer:
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take pla
Explanation:
Which situation would not be considered a civil law case?
a. A married couple getting divorced.
b. An employee steals products from their employer.
c. A customer slips on a wet floor inside a restaurant.
Answer:
A civil case is when a person or business claims to have been harmed by the actions of another person or business.
Explanation:
so it should be b