The fact that firms in oligopolies are interdependent means that the actions of one firm have a significant effect on the other firms in the market. Oligopoly is a market structure in which a few large firms dominate the industry.
The interdependence of firms in an oligopoly means that they must carefully consider the decisions of other firms when making decisions about their own business. Oligopoly is characterized by a few large firms dominating the market. The actions of one firm can have a significant impact on other firms in the market.
For example, if one firm decides to reduce the price of its product, it may trigger a price war in which other firms also lower their prices. This can lead to reduced profits for all firms in the market. Therefore, firms in an oligopoly must be very strategic in their decision-making to avoid negative consequences for their business.
Read more about Oligopoly here:
https://brainly.com/question/18686878
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the lowest court in the tiered structure of the state court systems in nearly every state: Trial Court
On december 31, 2014 approximately ________ adults were under active parole supervisiion
Answer:
bro what is this a multi choice answer or just what
How should we evaluate a candidate's performance in a debate?
Answer:
A political debate is a confrontation of ideas between two or more candidates for a certain position, where both try to convince the electorate to vote for them. Electoral debates, such as the one recently held between President Trump, candidate of the Republican Party, and Joe Biden, candidate of the Democratic Party, are especially important.
To determine who is the candidate who has best developed his performance in the debate, the power of conviction that this has had in front of the voters must be evaluated, as well as the dominance of the debated topics and, especially, his prevalence against the other candidate on the discussed issues.
The performance of a candidate in a debate can be evaluated based on the power of conviction and the dominance that a candidate has over others.
Debate refers to the formal discussion regarding a particular issue in a legislative assembly or in a public meeting.In a debate, the arguments of the opposition will be put forward and can end with a vote. It should be noted that a political debate occurs between the candidates who want to hold certain political post whereby they're give their ideas and convince the people to vote for them.In conclusion, the performance of a candidate can be evaluated based on how much candidate was able to convince the electorates.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/13674408
Illicit cocaine comes to the US primarily from...
a. South America
b. North America
c. Europe
d. Australia
Illicit cocaine primarily comes to the United States from South America. The correct option is a.
Specifically, the majority of the cocaine that enters the US is produced in the Andean region of South America, which includes countries such as Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia.
Cocaine is typically smuggled into the US via various routes, including by land through Mexico or by sea through the Caribbean or Pacific.
Colombia has historically been the largest producer of cocaine in the world, and a significant amount of the cocaine that enters the US is produced there.
The Colombian drug cartels have long been involved in the production, trafficking, and distribution of cocaine, and have established sophisticated networks to transport the drug across borders.
In recent years, there has been a surge in cocaine production in Peru and Bolivia, leading to increased smuggling of cocaine from those countries into the US as well.
In addition to South America, cocaine can also be produced in other regions such as Central America and Mexico, but these countries primarily serve as transit points for cocaine en route to the US.
To know more about illicit cocaine, refer to the link :
https://brainly.com/question/29871091#
#SPJ11
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Answer:
An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.
Explanation:
the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.
have a good day
o conveys to a and his heirs as long as the property is not used for commercial purposes, otherwise to b and his heirs.
Based on the information provided, it seems that there is a legal agreement or deed in which the owner of the property, represented by "o," has conveyed ownership of the property to two parties: "a" and "b," and their respective heirs. However, there is a condition attached to this conveyance, namely that the property can only be used for non-commercial purposes.
If "a" and their heirs continue to use the property for non-commercial purposes, they will retain ownership. However, if they decide to use the property for commercial purposes, ownership will automatically transfer to "b" and their heirs. It is important to note that this type of arrangement is known as a "conditional conveyance" and is often used in real estate transactions to ensure that the property is used for a specific purpose or in a particular way.
In this case, the terms you've mentioned are: O, A, B, commercial purposes, and heirs. O conveys the property to A and his heirs, but with a specific condition: the property must not be used for commercial purposes. This condition needs to be respected by A and his heirs to maintain ownership of the property. If the condition is violated, meaning the property is used for commercial purposes, the ownership will transfer to B and his heirs.
This type of conveyance ensures that the property remains in non-commercial use, and if not, it will be passed on to the designated alternative owner (B and his heirs).
To know more legal agreement, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/4702081#
#SP11
Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. What is this seminar probably trying to do
If Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. This seminar probably trying to do: A. the Bureau of Economics.
What is the Bureau of Economics?The Bureau of Economics can be defined as an agency whose roles is to provide the necessary information or data that will help to promote an economy and this data provided are often useful and accurate.
Based on the scenario the seminar is probably trying to do the Bureau of Economics so as to enables Estelle acquire knowledge that will help to become her own boss.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Bureau of Economics here:https://brainly.com/question/1391135
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Eileen works for the federal government and would like to find a report about the effectiveness of a recent FTC-created consumer education program designed to help families better meet their monthly rent payments. Which branch of the FTC should she contact first about finding such a report?
the Bureau of Economics
the Bureau of Competition
the Bureau of Consumer Protection
the Bureau of Housing and Development
following a proper hearing and due process, the commission may impose administrative fines on a licensee. all of the following are true statements about administrative fines on a licensee except:
The specific laws and regulations governing administrative fines may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the licensing authority. Therefore, it is always advisable to refer to the relevant laws and regulations applicable in a specific context.
Administrative fines can be imposed on a licensee after a proper hearing and due process. However, there are some statements about administrative fines that are not true. Here are some possible exceptions:
1. Administrative fines are never imposed: This statement is false. Administrative fines can indeed be imposed on a licensee, but only after following a proper hearing and due process.
2. Administrative fines are always imposed immediately: This statement is false. After a proper hearing and due process, the commission has the authority to impose administrative fines on a licensee. However, the timing of the imposition may vary depending on the circumstances of the case.
3. Administrative fines are only imposed for minor violations: This statement is false. Administrative fines can be imposed on a licensee for both minor and major violations. The severity of the violation determines the amount of the fine, with major violations typically resulting in higher fines.
4. Administrative fines can be waived by the commission: This statement is true. In some cases, the commission may have the discretion to waive or reduce the administrative fines imposed on a licensee. This could be due to factors such as the licensee's cooperation, previous compliance record, or mitigating circumstances.
It is important to note that the specific laws and regulations governing administrative fines may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the licensing authority. Therefore, it is always advisable to refer to the relevant laws and regulations applicable in a specific context.
Learn more about laws and regulations from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/13458836
#SPJ11
List the two pieces of legislation relevant to use
in the workplace
Answer:
the two pieces of legislation relevant to use
in the workplace are listed below:
●The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
●The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.
Which of the following are types of public buildings used for polling places? Select all that apply.
fire stations
prisons
libraries
schools
court houses
37.)Which of the following statements is NOT accurate with respect to judicial notice?
a) a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute
b) judicial notice promotes trial efficiency
c) judicial notice is treated differently with respect to civil and criminal trials
d) judicial notice is only appropriate during the prosecutors case in chief
38.)Tom Markell is stopped by the police while driving his automobile on his way home from
work. It turns out that there are tow other passengers in the car, Jay and Larry. The police
observe a handgun on the floor of the interior of the automobile. All three occupants of the
vehicle state, "what gun..I didn't know there was a gun in the vehicle. As the prosecutor
on the case, can all three occupants of the vehicle be charged with criminal possession of a weapon?
a) yes, under the theory of judicial notice
b) yes, under the open view presumption under the law
none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
c) no, none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
d) no, it is pure speculation that any of the occupants of the vehicle possessed the firearm
Answer:
Explanation:
37.)Which of the following statements is NOT accurate with respect to judicial notice?
a) a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute
b) judicial notice promotes trial efficiency
c) judicial notice is treated differently with respect to civil and criminal trials
d) judicial notice is only appropriate during the prosecutors case in chief
38.)Tom Markell is stopped by the police while driving his automobile on his way home from
work. It turns out that there are tow other passengers in the car, Jay and Larry. The police
observe a handgun on the floor of the interior of the automobile. All three occupants of the
vehicle state, "what gun..I didn't know there was a gun in the vehicle. As the prosecutor
on the case, can all three occupants of the vehicle be charged with criminal possession of a weapon?
a) yes, under the theory of judicial notice
b) yes, under the open view presumption under the law
none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
c) no, none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
d) no, it is pure speculation that any of the occupants of the vehicle
que es la economia colonial y sus caracterizticas?
Answer:
Elements of pilgrim economy Colonial economy was trade situated (for example creation of money crops, mineral. It was shady in nature, that is Africans were profoundly taken advantage of. It went connected at the hip with estrangement of (Africans were distanced from their territory which was utilized by the Europeans).
Hope this helped! :D
Question 1
1. The granting of civil liberties (fundamental rights) protects the rights of:
O A. Federal government
B. State government
O C. Private Individuals
O D. Public institutions, State and Federal governments
Answer:
C us the correct answere
Are those groups comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime?
Cybercriminal Organizations are comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime.
Cybercrime is any criminal activity that targets or uses a computer, computer network, or connected device. Most cybercrime is perpetrated by cybercriminals or hackers looking to make money. However, sometimes cybercrime aims to damage computers and networks for reasons other than profit. Cybercrime is a crime involving computers and networks.
Your computer may have been used in a crime or targeted. Cybercrime can put your personal security and financial well-being at risk. Fraud and identity theft (although the increasing use of malware, hacking, or phishing has made it an example of both "computer-targeted" and "computer-as-a-tool" crimes) Information warfare. Phishing - Betrug. spam.
Learn more about cybercrime here
https://brainly.com/question/13109173
#SPJ4
The federal system outlined in the new constitution containedA.only an executive, who was elected by all the people.B.one main center of power, with three subsidiary branches that can make suggestions.C.two branches, with both branches having equal power.D.three branches, in which each branch has the power to restrain the other branches.
The federal system outlined in the new constitution contained three branches, in which each branch has the power to restrain the other branches.
Hence, the correct option is D.
Federalism divides power between a central and individual state governments. In a federal system of government, the three branches of government are legislative, executive and judicial. They are designed to restrain each other.
This is called system of checks and balances. The general idea is that each branch serves as check on the power of others. This system helps to ensure that no single branch of government becomes too powerful, and that the government remains accountable to the people.
To know more about federal system here:
https://brainly.com/question/17110989
#SPJ4
Uses the Internet to resolve disputes
The resolution of disputes with the assistance of organizations that offer dispute-resolution services via the Internet.
When outside help is needed to resolve a dispute, there are a number of Web sites that offer _________. _____ may be best for resolving small- to medium-sized business liability claims, which may not be worth the expense of litigation or traditional ADR
The resolution of disputes with the assistance of organizations that offer dispute-resolution services via the Internet. When outside help is needed to resolve a dispute, there are a number of Web sites that offer online dispute resolution(ODR) may be best for resolving small- to medium-sized business liability claims, which may not be worth the expense of litigation or traditional ADR.
ODR is a digital space, where public facing disputes can be resolved by the parties through the usage of internet. While ODR refers to wide case of alternative dispute resolution that takes advantage of the availability and development of internet excess. ODR is one of the type of alternate dispute resolution which solves disputes between two parties before going to the court. It is considered as an easier and faster way to solve solve civil disputes without the involvement of the jury and court proceedings. ODR is slightly different from ADR in the usage of internet, it solves disputes outside of court with the help of technology and alternate dispute resolution.
To know more about "dispute-resolution" visit-
brainly.com/question/24660107
#SPJ4
Find a news about uncertainty law in Indonesia and add
a conclusion into it (Dont Plagarism pls)
The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.
The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.
As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.
To learn more about Indonesia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31792781
#SPJ4
Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.
In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.
Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.
To know more about law:
brainly.com/question/30133385
#SPJ4
What is the last step in the process of getting a bill passed into law?
A. reviewing it in committee
B. sending it to the other house
C. approving it by a vote
D. sending it to the president
Answer:
"D"
Explanation:
After both the House and Senate have approved a bill in identical form, the bill is sent to the President. Please mark brainliest if my answer helped, thanks!
Which diagram correctly arranges systems of government in order from least powerful to most powerful?
A. Constitutional, Authoritarian, Anarchy
B. Authoritarian, Anarchy, Constitutional
C. Totalitarian, Constitutional, Authoritarian
D. Anarchy, Authoritarian, Totalitarian
Anarchy, Authoritarian, and totalitarianism correctly arrange systems of government in order from least powerful to most powerful. Thus option D is correct.
What is government?The group of people who make up a municipal unit's or an institution's regulatory agency. An organized population is governed by a system or group of individuals, typically a state. The government often consists of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the situation of its broad integrative definition.
Anarchy is a condition of disarray brought on by a lack of respect for or disregard for authority or other governing mechanisms.
Authoritarianism is supporting or imposing slavish submission to authority, particularly that of the government, somewhere at expense of human freedom.
Totalitarianism is a kind of government that demands total submission to authority and is autocratic and centralized.
Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about the government, Here:
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ5
John Jones is on trial for murder. Because his potential punishment is the death penalty, his case has to proceed in two separate phases. The first phase is the
The first phase is the guilt phase.
In John Jones' murder trial, due to the potential punishment of the death penalty, the case is required to proceed in two separate phases. The first phase, known as the guilt phase, focuses on determining the defendant's guilt or innocence. During this phase, the prosecution presents evidence, witnesses, and arguments to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that John Jones is guilty of the crime he is accused of. The defense, in turn, presents counterarguments and evidence to establish doubt or challenge the prosecution's case. The purpose of the guilt phase is to determine the defendant's culpability before proceeding to the second phase, which addresses the appropriate punishment if the defendant is found guilty.For more questions on guilt phase:
https://brainly.com/question/11112205
#SPJ8
PLEASE HELPP!!!What appellate judges look for when they review a case is
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
An appellate court which is also referred to as an appeals court is a court of law that is given the power to change the lower court decision.
The things that an appellate judges look for when they review a case include whether there was a legal mistake during the trial court that was made and also whether the judgement given by the judge was based on the fact that there was a mistake made.
According to the text, the establishment of the American Law Institute (ALI) was a result of
When the techniques used on injured soldiers began to be applied to civilian trauma patients, both physicians and politicians started treating traumatic deaths as an abnormality, for many of the newest technologies that were applied to EMS produced immediate, quantifiable benefits. True False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
When the techniques used on injured soldiers began to be applied to civilian trauma patients, both physicians and politicians started treating traumatic deaths as an abnormality.
This however led to the development of a new technology. The technology was thereby applied to EMS and there was a great change as it produced immediate, quantifiable benefits.
nevermind this might be considered cheating but i honestly just want some insight on anti federalist
Answer:
We know that a federalist is someone who supports a government system in which states are under the "control" of central power. Anti-federalists are the opposite. They oppose a central government, and it's mostly in fear that the government will become too powerful. They believe a strong central government could get in the way of rights and individual freedom.
Explanation:
what action was authorized by the lend-lease act?
Answer:ok
Explanation:
jeremy waldron argues that drone warfare is neither ethical or effective because it
According to Jeremy Waldron, drone warfare is deemed unethical and ineffective due to specific reasons.
Jeremy Waldron criticizes drone warfare, asserting that it is both unethical and ineffective based on his arguments. Ethically, Waldron argues that drone strikes violate principles of proportionality, discriminate against innocent civilians, and lack transparency and accountability.
He raises concerns about the erosion of moral and legal standards in warfare due to the use of unmanned drones. In terms of effectiveness, Waldron contends that drone strikes may not achieve the intended objectives, fuel anti-Western sentiments, and perpetuate cycles of violence.
He questions the accuracy and reliability of drone technology and highlights the potential for unintended consequences, such as civilian casualties and the destabilization of regions. Waldron's stance suggests a need for a reevaluation of the ethical and strategic implications of drone warfare.
Learn more about Drone here: brainly.com/question/28545683
#SPJ11
an attorney works as in-house counsel for a large international corporation and has daily contact with higher-level executives and managers. one day, a senior executive mentions casually to the attorney that he has offered lucrative stock options, worth millions of dollars, to a foreign government official who has agreed to give the corporation an exclusive contract to provide certain goods and services to the foreign state. the executive seems to think this is normal and good for the company, but the attorney believes it constitutes bribery of foreign officials, which would violate the foreign corrupt practices act (fcpa) and could subject the corporation to enormous fines and penalties. the attorney explains her concerns to the executive, including that the executive could face personal criminal charges in addition to bringing liability on the corporation, and she reminds him that she represents the corporation, not him personally. the executive is dismissive of her concerns, even though she approaches him several times about the matter.
According to the given case, an attorney works as in-house counsel for a large international corporation and has daily contact with higher-level executives and managers.
One day, a senior executive mentions casually to the attorney that he has offered lucrative stock options, worth millions of dollars, to a foreign government official who has agreed to give the corporation an exclusive contract to provide certain goods and services to the foreign state. The executive seems to think this is normal and good for the company, but the attorney believes it constitutes bribery of foreign officials, which would violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and could subject the corporation to enormous fines and penalties.
The attorney explains her concerns to the executive, including that the executive could face personal criminal charges in addition to bringing liability on the corporation, and she reminds him that she represents the corporation, not him personally. The executive is dismissive of her concerns, even though she approaches him several times about the matter.The attorney's ethical responsibilities are clearly defined in the given scenario. The attorney is responsible for representing the corporation and its interests.
She is not responsible for the senior executive's personal interests. Therefore, the attorney must take steps to protect the corporation from any wrongdoing. The attorney must raise her concerns with the corporation's management and ensure that they take appropriate action to remedy the situation. If the senior executive continues to ignore her concerns, she must take steps to escalate the issue to higher management or the board of directors.
The attorney must also be aware of her ethical responsibilities and obligations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and ensure that the corporation complies with all relevant laws and regulations.
For more such questions on executives
https://brainly.com/question/18510919
#SPJ11
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Which passage from the Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution?
A.Most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions. The U.S. Constitution didn't even do that. What it did do was say that the Constitution was the "supreme law of the land" and was superior to state laws and constitutions.
B.Some of these were in the Magna Carta, and others were in the English Bill of Rights, which had been written fewer than 100 years before America's revolution. The rights in these documents were citizens' only protection from a government that could be both abusive and unpredictable and over which citizens had almost no control.
C.The Bill of Rights was a gesture of goodwill that was meant to bring everyone together around the new Constitution. Above all, the goal was to see the United States become a nation of unified people.
D.So not only did the Constitution fail to protect individual rights, but it also overruled the protections in state constitutions. It seemed that a bill of rights would be needed to ensure that the federal government could not overstep its bounds.
The Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution is that, most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions.
The supporters of the Constitution, who were the Federalists, thought that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and even dangerous. So, the authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for the ratification of the Constitution without Bill of Rights.
Federalists argued that the Constitution was not in need of a Bill of Rights, as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ1
What if somebody accidentally gives me the wrong answer? Wouldn’t I NOT be learning? And wouldn’t it be a waste of my points?
Answer:
yup that happenes sometime..
Explanation: