T-Mobile is not on the same network as AT&T. There are three major cellular networks in the country. AT&T and T-Mobile are two of these three networks; Verizon is third.
Why the merger of AT & T and T-Mobile was blocked?
The merger between AT&T and T-Mobile USA mobile operators was blocked by the Department of Justice on Wednesday saying that keeping these giant companies separate would keep competition in the wireless industry and help save American workers' jobs.
Thus, to save American workers' jobs, FTC blocked the 2011 merger between at&t and t-mobile.
Learn more about AT & T and T-Mobile here:
https://brainly.com/question/917245
#SPJ1
kasen was tackled hard during a very physical football game, but he did not feel any pain until the post-game celebration party. which of the following best explains this phenomenon?
Psychological factors, such as distraction, can diminish pain sensations but once the distraction is over, the pain due to hitting of football can come back
Football refers to a group of team sports that, in varied degrees, involve kicking a ball in order to score goals. Without qualification, the term "football" generally refers to the variety of the game that is most common in the context in which it is used.
Football, commonly known as associations football or soccer, is a sport during which two teams of eleven players attempt to advance the ball into the goal of the other team by employing any portion of their bodies other than their hands and arms. Only the goalie is allowed to handle the ball, and only within the immediately surrounding the goal that is designated as that of the penalty area. The team with the most total goals wins.
Learn more about football here:
https://brainly.com/question/29477881
#SPJ4
which of the following is not protocol if a parent feels and education record is inaccurate or misleading?
If a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading, one of the protocol unavailable is the school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.
What should the school district not do when a parent feels such?When a parent feels that an education record is inaccurate or misleading, it is essential for the school district to address their concerns and investigate the matter appropriately.
Disregarding claims without merit is not an appropriate protocol as it disregards the parent's right to have their concerns heard and potentially rectify any inaccuracies or misleading information in the education record.
Read more about protocol
brainly.com/question/28195072
#SPJ1
true/false. death is a dignitary who, when he comes announced, is to be received with formal manifestations of respect, even by those most familiar with him. in the code of military etiquette silence and fixity are forms of deference
True. Even even those who are most familiar with him, death is a dignitary who should be welcomed with ceremonial displays of respect when he is announced.
Silence and rigidity are examples of deference in the military's code of conduct. The majority of "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" maintains a steady tone, but there are a few instances, like this passage from the story's second paragraph, where the tone briefly changes.
The Union soldiers are preparing for Farquhar's hanging in a silent and formal manner until this quotation, which illustrates Bierce's love of aphorisms and epigrams, is said. There is a ceremonial quality to the ceremony, and the soldiers take their roles seriously. Their silent attention, says Bierce.
Learn more about dignitary Visit: brainly.com/question/15381362
#SPJ4
explain what non-violent direct action is and why it can be so successful.
Answer:
Nonviolent direct action may include sit-ins, strikes, street blockades, sabotage, and counter-economics. Violent direct action may include political violence, assault, arson and property destruction.
Explanation:
Answer:
Martin Luther King Jr.'s decision to utilize nonviolence was based on religious principles. In fact, King discovered the use of nonviolent action as a political tool through learning about Gandhi's success in India.
King's approach was specifically Christian in orientation, drawing on his own status as a minister and the centrality of the Church in the lives of the Montgomery, Alabama, African-Americans who were the first protestors he led. His speeches utilized the inspirational crescendo structure of African-American sermonizing and he typically used biblical themes in them. This provided a deeper source of unity than the specific issue at hand and his able lieutenants were drawn from the rolls of black preachers.
King's methods were "step-wise." The King Center lists six:
Step One. Information gathering
Step Two. Education
Step Three. Personal commitment
Step Four. Negotiations
Step Five. Direct action
Step Six. Reconciliation
Creating opportunities for resolution without confrontation and ensuring that both proponents and adversaries have sufficiently accurate information to make decisions both about the issue and the process.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
What is an example of contractionary economic policy?
A) Lowering the interest rate at which banks borrow money
B) Increases to the corporate tax rate
C) Executive orders that reduce regulations on businesses
D) Spending programs aimed at repairing infrastructure
Answer: B
Explanation: Increases to the corporate tax rate
Under authority delegated from Congress, the Federal Communications Commission puts out new administrative rules that regulate the practices of Internet Service Providers as they relate to consumer privacy. Assume that Congress overturns these rules under the Congressional Review Act, but that Governor Steel of Ohio thinks that the rules have merit. Acting under his authority as Governor, he issues an executive order telling Ohio Internet Service Providers to adhere to the now voided federal guidelines and ignore Congress’s actions. In response, Congress passes a new law called the "Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights" that contradicts Ohio's approach. Which law wins?
Group of answer choices
a) Neither law wins; when laws conflict, both are automatically void under the Preemption Clause.
b) Governor Steel’s executive order wins, since executive actions always trump Congressional rulemaking under the Preemption Clause
c) Congress wins, since federal law trump contrary state executive actions under the Preemption Clause
d) It is impossible to say under the facts provided
Congress wins, since federal law trumps contrary state executive actions under the Preemption Clause wins here. The correct option is c.
Federal law typically takes precedence over conflicting state laws or executive actions under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In this case, Governor Steel's executive order in Ohio is in conflict with a new law that Congress passed known as the "Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights." Thus the law passed by Congress would take precedence over the executive order.
By stating that conflicting state laws or actions take precedent over federal law, the Preemption Clause further solidifies this idea. As a result, the recently passed federal law would be viewed as incompatible with the Ohio executive order's attempt to enforce null and void federal regulations.
Although it is the job of the courts to interpret and apply the law in these situations, it is reasonable to infer that the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights passed by Congress would take precedence over the executive order signed by Ohio Governor Steel.
Learn more about federal law at:
brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ4
Give your own view on human trafficking in South Africa
Answer: Human trafficing is a harsh this that must be stopped that hurts many people and family as well.But trafficking is a reality in South Africa. ... This means victims are trafficked from here to other countries; foreign victims are moved through the country to other areas for exploitation, while foreign victims are brought to the country as their final destination. It is real and I pray it will be stopped!
Explanation:The University of Johannesburg reports that trafficking occurs at a slightly higher rate for girls than boys, with 55.5% of all trafficked people in South Africa being female, and 44.5% being male. It is estimated that more than three-quarters of all victims are between the ages of 12–25.
Human trafficking in South Africa occurs as a practice of forced labor and exploitation among exported and imported men, women, and children.
What do you mean by human trafficking?Human trafficking refers to the unlawful act of coercing people so that benefits can be received from their work or service.
Human trafficking in South Africa is a practice of forced labor and exploitation of trafficked men, women, and many children.
Learn more about human trafficking here:
https://brainly.com/question/24024401
#SPJ2
if ramona changes her will at age 88 to leave the bulk of her fortune to her home health care nurse instead of her children, what factor will the courts consider in judging whether or not her will is valid?
The factor that will be considered by the courts in judging whether or not her will is valid is undue influence.
Undue influence is excessive persuasion performed on someone that causes that someone to act (or refrain from doing a certain act) by overcoming that someone's free will. There are several things that much be considered before determining whether a result was produced by undue influence or not:
The influencer's authority over the victim.Victim's vulnerability.The tactics used by the influencer (intimidation, control, or other actions).In the case above, the courts must determine first whether Ramona's health care nurse is performing undue influence over Ramona before ruling.
Learn more about undue influence at https://brainly.com/question/14363378
#SPJ4
When you get pulled over and got a warning do they call the primary owner of the vehicle?
Answer:
No they will not call the primary owner.
Explanation:
That is there responsibility so if they drive in your car and get a warning or ticket it will go to there personal record not yours and they will not call the owner
Why do you think some people opposed new deal policies? check all of the boxes that apply.
Some people opposed new deal policies because they thought that the New Deal didn't provide enough economic opportunity.
They believed that there weren't enough economic opportunities offered by the New Deal. They believed that there was not enough wealth redistribution under the New Deal. They believed that the social services offered under the New Deal were insufficient.
People's opposition to the new deal measures was motivated by a variety of factors. Despite the fact that the new arrangement included a lot of advantages, some individuals felt that it did not go far enough in terms of assisting the populace. Additionally, they believed that the government shouldn't become involved in union-related matters.
To learn more about New deal visit: https://brainly.com/question/22480124
#SPJ4
Sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations. Why? Name three reasons for this in approximately 150 words.
The reason why sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations is because:
Quality recommendations will help them in building their case. It can help them to show their level of confidence on what is been presented. It can helps them to be able to know if a given estimate of the given effect is efficient.What is quality recommendation?A good recommendation instructs the reader by drawing on the author's own knowledge. Don't assume recommenders will remember the projects you worked on together.
Note that the strength of the evidence determines how confident one can be in the accuracy of an estimate of effect. The degree to which following an advice will result in more positive outcomes than negative ones is determined by the recommendation's strength.
Learn more about quality from
https://brainly.com/question/26491505
#SPJ1
Staff interaction in a childcare setting from which the child learns by example and instruction is known as
Answer:
Behavior modeling.
Explanation:
Behavior modeling is a therapeutic process that is focused on changing any undesirable negative behavior in an individual through the use of positive or negative consequence and biofeedback.
This simply means that, reinforcing desired behaviors in an individual while withholding reinforcement for any form of undesired behavior is achieved through the process of behavior modeling.
Behavior modeling is typically based on operant conditioning principles, through negative or positive reinforcement, undesirable behaviors developed by an individual are mainly replaced with more desirable ones.
Operant conditioning can be defined as an associative learning process which involves reinforcing the strength of a behavior.
Additionally, behavior modeling can also be used to correct human behaviors or disorders such as enuresis (bed-wetting), Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), generalized anxiety disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), phobias, etc.
Hence, staff interaction in a childcare setting from which the child learns by example and instruction is known as behavior modeling.
Which justices voted for the majority in Miranda v Arizona?
Chief Justice Earl Warren was the one that voted for the majority in Miranda v Arizona
What was the Miranda v Arizona case?
Miranda was given a 20–30 year prison term on each count after being convicted guilty of kidnapping. The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in getting the confession in response to an appeal.
Arizona (1966) (1966) The Supreme Court held in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) that imprisoned criminal suspects must be notified of their constitutional rights to an attorney and against self-incrimination prior to police questioning.
Read more on the Miranda V Arizona case https://brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ1
how many years has clarence thomas been on the supreme court
Clarence Thomas has been a Justice on the Supreme Court for a relatively long time, having been appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1991.
As of 2021, that means he has served on the Court for 30 years, which is a significant portion of his life and career.
Throughout his time on the Court, Justice Thomas has been known for his conservative views and his commitment to originalism, which is the idea that the Constitution should be interpreted based on its original meaning and intent.
He has also been involved in a number of high-profile cases during his tenure, including the Bush v. Gore case in 2000 and the recent case on the Affordable Care Act in 2012. So, to summarize, Clarence Thomas has been a Justice on the Supreme Court for 30 years, which is a long time by any measure.
Clarence Thomas has been on the Supreme Court for a certain number of years. Here is the step-by-step explanation to find out how many years:
1. Identify when Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court: He was appointed by President George H.W. Bush and took his seat on October 23, 1991.
2. Determine the current year: As of now, the current year is 2022.
3. Calculate the number of years Clarence Thomas has served on the Supreme Court: Subtract the year of his appointment (1991) from the current year (2022).
So, Clarence Thomas has been on the Supreme Court for 31 years.
Know more about the Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ11
the minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the workers' adjustment retraining and notification act of 1989 is
The minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1989 (WARN Act) is 60 days.
The minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1989 is 60 days. The WARN Act is a labor law in the United States that provides job security to workers by requiring that companies give their employees sufficient notice before layoffs or plant closings.
When a covered employer terminates employment of 50 or more workers at a single site of employment, the employer must give at least 60 days’ notice to the affected employees. Employees who are separated from employment are entitled to certain notice obligations under the WARN Act. The WARN Act also applies to plant closings and mass layoffs that occur in stages over a period of time, rather than all at once.
Learn more about Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification (WARN) Act of 1988: https://brainly.com/question/31088800
#SPJ11
What is another name for the first day of winter
Answer:
winter solstice that's all I have
Explanation:
enough
Answer:
Winter solstice
Explanation:
This astronomical event appears on calendars as the first day of winter—but meteorologists have already gotten a head start on the season.
Name at least 3 characteristics of black street gangs
Answer: violent, territorial, and predatory
Explanation: Black gangs have significantly evolved over the last 40 years, and trend analysis indicates that these gangs will continue to grow in both rural and urban areas. As gangs and gang membership increase, gangs will become more violent, territorial, and predatory in response to competition and rivalry.
Decide whether each
description fits trial courts only, appellate courts
only, or both, and write the letter of the description
in the correct part of the diagram. The first one is
done for you.
A. Hears civil cases
B. Might have a jury trial
C. Does not hear cases for the first time
D. Hears criminal cases
E. Reviews a verdict to look for mistakes
F. Usually has three-judge panels
G. Hears cases for the first time
H. Works with laws
1. what is the canada-china foreign investment promotion and protection agreement about? what are the main objectives of this treaty?
2. what is the canada-costa rica foreign investment promotion and _______.
Bilateral treaty promoting and protecting foreign investment between Canada and China, ensuring predictability, fair treatment, and dispute resolution are the main objectives of this treaty.
A bilateral agreement between Canada and China called the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) aims to encourage and safeguard foreign investment between the two nations. This treaty's main goals are to increase predictability and security for investors, ensure fairness and equity, ease the flow of capital, and create a process for resolving investment disputes.
A bilateral agreement called the Canada-Costa Rica Foreign Investment Promotion Agreement aims to encourage and facilitate foreign investment between Canada and Costa Rica. Its primary goals include fostering an environment that is conducive to investment, making sure that investments are protected and treated fairly, and setting up mechanisms for dispute resolution.
The agreement aims to promote economic cooperation, improve market access and give investors from both nations legal certainty and predictability. The provisions on non discrimination, expropriation compensation, and free fund transfers are among the rights and responsibilities of investors that are outlined in this document. The agreement aims to deepen economic ties and promote investment flows that benefit both Canada and Costa Rica.
Learn more about bilateral agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28214309
#SPJ4
recording a mortgage instrument in the public records is an example of which type of notice?
Answer:
Explanation:
Constructive
Recording a mortgage instrument in the public records is an example of constructive notice. Constructive notice refers to the legal concept that a person is deemed to have knowledge of information that has been made public or that could have been discovered through reasonable diligence.
In the case of a mortgage instrument, the act of recording it in the public records serves as constructive notice to the general public that the property is encumbered by a mortgage and that the mortgagee has a legal interest in the property. This notice is important because it protects the rights of the mortgagee in case of a dispute with other parties who may claim an interest in the property. In summary, recording a mortgage instrument in the public records provides constructive notice to the public, ensuring that all parties have a clear understanding of the legal interests in a property.
To know more about the notice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32162826
#SPJ11
Hello Dana Sides (Log out if this isn't you.)
Please answer the following questions for the Electronic Fund Transfers: Error Resolution - [opt 2] [C
"CONTINUE". You need to score at least 80% to pass the test.
1.
Alan's debit card has been stolen. What is his liability for $500 worth of purchases made?
O A. $50, if he notifies his financial institution within 2 days.
O B. He is responsible for the whole amount.
O C. $500, if he notifies his financial institution within 2 days.
O D. There is no liability.
2.
Tamara notified Acme Financial of a $125 unauthorized EFT. Acme gave her a provisional credit of $125 an
Acme take to resolve the error?
$500, if he notifies his financial institution within 2 days is his liability for $500 worth of purchases made. $448 per day is Acme take to resolve the error. Hence, option C is correct.
What is a financial institution?A company that deals with financial and monetary transactions such deposits, loans, investments, and currency exchange is known as a financial institution (FI).
Banks, trust and insurance businesses, credit unions, financing companies, securities firms, leasing companies, etc. are examples of financial institutions. In this regard, financial institutions are a significant part of the financial services industry.
Savings and demand deposit deposits are not accepted by the non-banking financial institution, which falls under the umbrella of financial institutions. A bank is a type of financial institution that offers loans and can receive deposits into various savings and demand deposit accounts.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about financial institution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29641948
#SPJ2
the ftc sued amazon, alleging the online giant tricked consumers into doing what?
The US Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Amazon.com Inc. on Wednesday, alleging that the company deceived customers into signing up for its Prime membership service and purposely made it difficult to unsubscribe.
The ftc sueing amazon, alleging the online giant.Amazon.com Inc. was sued by the US Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday on the grounds that it tricked customers into subscribing to its Prime membership service and purposefully made it difficult to cancel.
The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Amazon on Wednesday, the FTC's most aggressive move against the firm to date under the leadership of Lina Khan, accusing it of illegally pressuring customers to subscribe to its Prime membership and then making it difficult for them to abandon it.
The ftc and amazon here: https://brainly.com/question/14266241
#SPj1
summarize the history of civil rights law, including recent affirmative action decisions. have we made progress in actualizing the principle of equality in the law? why or why not?
Although the legalization of the equality principle has advanced much more work needs to be done to guarantee that everyone is treated equally and without any bias.
The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution were ratified during the Reconstruction Era after the Civil War which is when civil rights legislation in the United States first began. These amendments guaranteed voting rights for African American men and ended slavery. They also gave former slaves citizenship.
Racial discrimination persisted in American society despite these legal developments, especially in the fields of housing, education, and employment. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlawed discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in employment and public accommodations was not passed until the Civil Rights Movement gained traction in the middle of the 20th century.
Learn more about Civil Rights Act at:
brainly.com/question/517879
#SPJ4
When was the Constitution Act enacted?
A)1981
B)1982
C)1868
D)1867
What did the Constitution Act do?
A) Made Canada a fully independent nation
B) Unified the 10 provinces of Canada
C) Fully repatriated the constitution
D) Reorganized Canada into a federation
Answer:
i think it is B I'm not sure
a personal experience where you overcome your difficulties by by trying to pray namaz under all circumstances whatever our state.
Answer:
I want to share with you what we've learned about having faith in God through difficult times.
...
“I am Loved” 4-Week Bible Study Course
Experience confident joy as God's love renews your mind.
Find peace as god's love helps you let go of worry and fear.
Rediscover hope as God's love offers a new perspective on trials.Explanation:
Let God know exactly where you're failing to let go and let God handle the situation. Make your request before the Lord, and then leave it at His feet. Give it to God by turning it over to Him and trust that He will help you throughout the circumstances. Allow Him to exchange your worry and fear with His peace.Psalm 9:9-10 The Lord is a refuge for the oppressed, a stronghold in times of trouble. Psalm 34:10b Those who seek the Lord lack no good thing. Isaiah 26: 3-4 Those of steadfast mind you keep in peace—because they trust in you. Trust in the Lord forever, for in the Lord God you have an everlasting rock.
5-8 sentence summary of how Zootopia relates to law. Ty
Zootopia, an animated film produced by Disney, explores various themes related to law and society. The film is set in a world where anthropomorphic animals live in harmony, but tensions arise due to prejudices and stereotypes.
Here's a five to eight sentence summary of how Zootopia relates to law:
Zootopia portrays a society where laws play a crucial role in maintaining order and ensuring justice. The film highlights the challenges of enforcing and upholding the law in a diverse and multicultural society. The main character, Judy Hopps, a rabbit aspiring to become a police officer, faces discrimination and stereotypes as she tries to navigate the complexities of law enforcement. The film addresses issues of equality, fairness, and the importance of due process.
Additionally, Zootopia touches upon themes of social justice and the role of individuals in challenging systemic injustices. It promotes the idea that everyone should have equal rights and opportunities, regardless of their background or species.
Overall, Zootopia offers a thought-provoking exploration of law and its intersections with social issues, bias, justice, and equality. It encourages viewers to reflect on the importance of fairness, empathy, and the role of law in promoting a just and inclusive society.
Learn more about law enforcement here:
https://brainly.com/question/16812988
#SPJ11
Complete the following sentence.
The diverse roles of eligibility interviewers require these professionals to be knowledgeable, compassionate,
and___.
Answer:
Knowledgeable, compassionate, and responsible
Explanation:
Answer: diligent
Explanation:
i went through the notes
Under the contract dispute act cda, both the contractor and government parties are permitted to submit claims against each other.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, etc.
Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.
The contract dispute act (CDA) are responsible for performing oversight functions on all contracts in the United States of America.
Under the contract dispute act (CDA), both the contractor and government parties that enter into a contract are permitted to submit claims against each other.
In January 2001 a New York man attended a family birthday party at a Benihana restaurant, where chefs, while cooking at the table, routinely throw pieces of food for diners to catch with their mouths. The man wrenched his neck while ducking a piece of flying shrimp, requiring treatment by several doctors. By that summer, doctors determined surgery was necessary to treat numbness in his arm. Five months after surgery, he checked into the hospital with a high fever and died. The family sued Benihana for $10 million in damages, claiming that the fever was the result of surgery, which in turn was the result of the chef’s actions in throwing food at diners. Do you believe that Benihana should be liable for the man’s death? Why or why not?
Based on the information given, Benihana should not be liable for the man’s death because he had an underlying disease.
From the information given, Benihana isn't responsible. The man had a high fever. Also, his autopsy showed septicemia which is blood poisoning. He was as well suffering from gout.
The infection that he had could also have been due to exposure to dead animals which made him have septicemia. It should be noted that his death was not because of the neck wrenching that he had. Therefore, Benihana should not be liable for the man’s death.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25449412
Describe a situation where two different people might perceive a crime scene in different ways.
Answer:
a mur*** that can be seen as a suici** some people may think it was a mur*** some think it looks like a suici**.