Answers
International law is a set of laws and rules that regulates relations between states, international organizations, and individuals. It includes various treaties, agreements, conventions, and customary practices.
The following are the conducts and entities that are covered by international law:
1. States: The most significant actors in international law are states. States are recognized as legal entities in international law. States have rights and responsibilities under international law.
2. International Organizations: International organizations, including the United Nations, the International Criminal Court, and the World Trade Organization, are also covered by international law.
3. Individuals: Individuals can be held responsible under international law for committing serious crimes such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
4. Non-State Actors: International law covers non-state actors such as multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations, and armed groups. These actors are increasingly playing important roles in international affairs, and they are subject to international law as well.
5. Territory: International law governs the relations between states concerning territory. It includes rules on state sovereignty, the acquisition and loss of territory, and boundary disputes.
6. International human rights: International law regulates the conduct of states towards their own citizens. It sets standards for the protection of human rights, including civil and political rights, and economic, social, and cultural rights.
7. International humanitarian law: International humanitarian law, also known as the law of war, governs the conduct of states and individuals during armed conflicts. It seeks to limit the effects of armed conflicts on civilians and other non-combatants.
To know more about International law visit: brainly.com/question/14724822
#SPJ11
Related Questions
in criminal law the term corpus delicti most generally means
Answers
In criminal law, the term corpus delicti most generally means the body of evidence that proves a crime has been committed.
The phrase is derived from Latin and means "the body of the crime". It refers to the physical evidence that demonstrates the commission of a crime, such as the victim's body in a homicide case or the stolen property in a burglary case.
In order for a defendant to be convicted of a crime, the prosecution must establish the corpus delicti. This means that they must prove that a crime has occurred and that the defendant is responsible for it. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to establish the corpus delicti beyond a reasonable doubt.
In some cases, establishing the corpus delicti can be difficult. For example, if there is no body in a homicide case, the prosecution may need to rely on circumstantial evidence to prove that a murder has occurred. However, without physical evidence, it may be challenging to establish the corpus delicti.
Overall, the term corpus delicti is an essential concept in criminal law, as it serves as the foundation for establishing the guilt of a defendant. Without it, a conviction cannot be secured.
To know more about criminal law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32272183
#SPJ11
What does it mean when our court system is identified as a dual court system?
Answers
Answer:
dual court system the division of the courts into two separate systems, one federal and one state,
Which of the following is not one of the goals of the modern criminal justice system?
a. to control crime
b. to enforce society's shared moral code
c. to provide and maintain justice
d. to prevent crime
Answers
To enforce society's shared moral code is not one of the goals of the modern criminal justice system.
The correct answer is Option B.
One of the primary reasons for the existence of any criminal justice system lies in the goal of maintaining justice and peace in the society.
The justice system seeks to convict a wrongdoer and punish him/her for the actions that caused harm to another party.
By imposing such a punishment, the victim gains a sense of satisfaction, loosely termed, or justice for the wrong done to her.
The term "criminal justice" refers to the governmental organisations in charge of upholding the law, deciding cases of criminal activity, and punishing offenders.
The criminal justice system is fundamentally a tool for social control since society views some behaviours as so harmful and hazardous that it either carefully regulates their use or outright forbids them.
To know more about criminal justice system, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28784358
#SPJ4
Larry, who is deaf, purchased several items at a large chain discount store. One of the items was a large inflated doll for his daughter. Larry went to a cash register near a store entrance to pay for his goods. The doll was so large that the sales clerk could not find a bag to hold it. With the doll under his arm and his other purchases in bags held in both hands, Larry left the store. As he did so, a store employee stationed at the door to welcome people in and conduct security screens of those leaving, noticed the unbagged doll. The employee was instructed to stop and check the receipt of any party leaving the store with an unbagged item. As a consequence, she asked Larry to stop. When he did not, she shouted at him to stop. Finally, she yelled, “Stop thief,” and gave chase. Other store personnel joined in and threw Larry down onto the asphalt in the parking lot. Larry finally was able to make the store personnel understand he was deaf and that he had the receipt in his pocket. Upon seeing the receipt they let him go with apologies. Although he was embarrassed, his clothes torn, and his skin scraped, Larry accepted the apologies and left. Now he is reconsidering. Would it be ethical for Larry to bring suit against the discount store? Does Larry owe a duty to bring suit? If so, to whom and for what?
Answers
Answer from Chapter 5 Civil Law and Procedure
liability for statements made during the actual trial or hearing. Similarly, liability for defamatory statements about public officials or prominent personalities does not exist unless the statements were made with malice. That means the statement when issued was known to be false or was made with a reckless disregard for its probable falsehood. Invasion of Privacy People are entitled to keep personal matters private. This is the right to privacy. Congress has stated that the right of privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United States. Invasion of privacy is a tort defined as the uninvited intrusion into an individual s personal relationships and activities in a way likely to cause shame or mental suffering in an ordinary person. An invasion of privacy also can result from unnecessary publicity regarding personal matters. So, unlike the law regarding the tort of defamation, publication of even a true statement about someone may be an invasion of privacy. This is because, as the U.S. Supreme Court put it, you should be protected when you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Thus, two-way mirrors result of the slanderous remark. Exceptions to this occur in cases where the oral statements are to the effect that the plaintiff committed a serious crime, has a loathsome disease, or injures someone in his or her profession or business. In libel cases, you are presumed to have suffered a loss, and so these damages do not have to be shown to the court. Exceptions are made to the law of defamation in order to encourage open discussion of issues of public concern. For example, legislators statements, even those made with malice, are immune from liability if made during legislative meetings. Judges, lawyers, jurors, witnesses, and other parties in judicial proceedings are also immune from What are some situations related to the right to privacy that affect your life? BLEND IMAGES 5-2 Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Strict Liability 87
drug court, domestic violence court, teen court and reentry court are all examples of
Answers
Drug court, domestic violence court, teen court, and reentry court are all examples of specialized court programs that have been established to address specific legal issues and populations. Drug courts are designed to provide alternative sentencing options for non-violent drug offenders, with an emphasis on treatment and rehabilitation.
Domestic violence courts focus on cases involving intimate partner violence, providing victims with resources and support while holding offenders accountable for their actions. Teen courts are typically run by youth volunteers and offer a restorative justice approach for minor offenses committed by young people. Reentry courts assist individuals who have been released from prison in transitioning back into society, with a focus on reducing recidivism rates through support and services. These specialized court programs recognize the unique needs and challenges faced by certain populations and aim to provide a more effective and just legal system.
To know more about Court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29865285
#SPJ11
A certiorari pool describes the
a.method used to appoint the chief justice.
b.nickname for the water fountain in the courtyard of the Supreme Court building.
c.computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court selects its cases each year.
d.practice by which Supreme Court law clerks work together to evaluate each petition.
Answers
Certiorari pool refers to the computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court of the United States selects the cases it will hear each year. Therefore the correct option is option C.
The certiorari pool is made up of legal clerks from each of the justices who screen the thousands of petitions filed each term and recommend which matters should be heard by the Court. The use of the certiorari pool has been criticised for lowering the number of cases heard by the Court and limiting the variety of problems presented for consideration.
The certiorari pool is a procedure utilised by the United States Supreme Court to help manage the huge number of certiorari petitions (requests for the Court to review a lower court decision) that are filed each year.
For such more question on Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
2. in which box on your w-2 can you find your...
a) wages and income
b) taxes withheld?
a. a) wages and income = box 2
b) taxes withheld = box 1
b. a) wages and income = box 1
b) taxes withheld = not provided on w-2 form
c. a) wages and income = box 2
b) taxes withheld = box 3
d. a) wages and income = box 1
b) taxes withheld = box 2
Answers
The W-2 box for wages income and taxes withheld is d. wages and income = box 1, taxes withheld = box 2.
What is W-2 boxes?W-2 boxes is the box that contain information about income or wages and tax in W-2 form. There are 14 box with different information.
Since the option only provide box 1 to box 3, so we only need to know the information in these three texts, which is:
Box 1 contains information about employee wages, tips, prizes, and other form of compensation.Box 2 contains information about total federal income tax withheld from tax year paycheck.Box 3 contains information about employee wages subject to Social Security tax.Thus, the wages and income can be find in box 1 and the taxes withheld can be find in box 2. So, the correct option is d.
Learn more about W-2 here:
brainly.com/question/25396013
#SPJ4
How do customs used in jrotc demonstrate respect for our nation and the jrotc program?.
Answers
Because they educate us to respect those who have served the country in higher positions, JROTC customs show respect for our country and the JROTC program. They exhibit adherence to the program's guidelines as well.
Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps is referred to as JROTC. It is a course that instructs pupils on leadership, diversity, and high school manners. Salutations, standing in positions consistent with rank, the use of titles, reporting techniques, etc. are examples of customs, which are ways of conducting business.
These traditions are significant because they foster respect for elders who have more years of national service. They exhibit adherence to the program's rules as well in business.
Here are more details regarding JROTC:
brainly.com/question/885973
#SPJ4
The american law institute established the law model penal code to unife criminal law across tge 50 states. how many staes have adopted the entire code
Answers
As per the cutoff in September 2021, not all 50 states in the United States have adopted the entire Model Penal Code (MPC) The entire Model Penal Code (MPC) was established by the American Law Institute (ALI).
The MPC is a comprehensive model code that seeks to harmonize criminal laws across jurisdictions and provide a framework for the revision and development of criminal statutes.
Whereas the MPC has been persuasive in forming criminal laws and has been received in shifting degrees by diverse states, it is vital to note that the selection of the complete code isn't widespread. A few states have received parts or areas of the MPC, whereas others have not received it at all.
The degree of appropriation and joining of the MPC's provisions shifts from state to state, and there's no definitive number of states that have embraced the whole code. A few states may have consolidated considerable parcels of the MPC into their criminal statutes, whereas others have made more restricted appropriations or alterations.
To learn about Model Penal Code visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31667549
#SPJ4
A tool mark depicting only the size of the tool used and shows no detailed characteristics is of no evidentiary value.
True
False
Answers
Answer:fasle
Explanation:
What was a major effect of the U.S. dollar becoming a substitute for gold in
international currency markets?
A. The world suffered the worst economic crisis since the Great
Depression.
B. Growing demand for U.S. dollars led the country to abandon the
gold standard
C. The U.S. dollar quickly lost its value and was replaced by other
foreign currencies.
D. Standards of living rose substantially in most European developing
countries.
Answers
The major effect of the U.S. dollar becoming a substitute for gold in
international currency markets is because of the growing demand for U.S. dollars led the country to abandon the
gold standard.
The U.S. dollar was known to be the official reserve currency of the world in 1944.The decision came about by a delegation from 44 Allied countries called the Bretton Woods Agreement.
The gold standard is known as a monetary system where a country's currency or paper money has a value when connected to gold.
The U.S. had to allow foreign governments to exchange dollars for gold until 1971, when President Richard Nixon ended the practice to stop foreigners from pipping U.S. gold reserves.
Learn more from
https://brainly.com/question/21900958
Answer:
Growing demand for U.S. dollars led the country to abandon the gold standard.
Explanation:
juvenile means what?
Answers
Answer: A "juvenile" is a person who has not attained his eighteenth birthday, and "juvenile delinquency" is the violation of a law of the United States committed by a person prior to his eighteenth birthday which would have been a crime if committed by an adult.
please give brainlest if this helps!
one purpose of law is to provide for ________ in human events.
Answers
One goal of legislation is to make provisions for predictability in human events.
The law accomplishes a variety of goals. The basic four of them are preserving order, setting standards, defending liberties, and settling disputes. Predictability is desirable because it allows persons who are subject to the law to use earlier instances as a legal compass to steer their behaviour in line with the law when they know that new cases will be treated similarly to previous ones. The goal of law is to provide order in society so that its citizens can advance and flourish with some sense of future security. Laws are made by the state.
The government uses the might of the state to execute penalties for disobedience of state laws. Nothing that is not enforceable is law.
Read more about purpose law at
https://brainly.com/question/28494063
#SPJ4
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was developed by the U.S. to assess the effects a significant federal action will have on the environment, and seek to mitigate this impact. This concept has been adopted by many developed and some developing nations. Which of the following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA?
Group of answer choices
To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts.
To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferrable.
To collect data to deny the project form moving forward.
Answers
The following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA: option (D) correct To collect data to deny the project from moving forward. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is the method for determining how the environment may be influenced by a proposed activity or project.
EIA is used to forecast environmental effects at an early stage in project planning and design, and to identify ways to minimize adverse effects and improve positive effects. The four major aspects of an EIA are: To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts. To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferable. To collect data to help make a decision.
To know more about Environmental Impact Assessment visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16326960
#SPJ11
Question
What are the two major political parties in the
U.S.?
Answers
Define the elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment and explain what they mean.
Determine why the founding fathers included a provision in the Bill of Rights pertaining to search and seizure.
Consider DUI checkpoints. Should DUI checkpoints be legal given the provisions of search and seizure as defined by the Bill of Rights?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The elements of this amendment are:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effectsAgainst unreasonable searches and seizuresShall not be violatedWarrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The founding fathers included this provision in the Bill of Rights because they believed that individual liberties, including privacy, were important and needed protection from the government.
Regarding DUI checkpoints, the legality of these checkpoints is a matter of debate and has been challenged in court. The Supreme Court has ruled that DUI checkpoints are constitutional as long as they are reasonable and minimally intrusive. However, this is a complex issue and the specific circumstances of each checkpoint must be evaluated to determine whether it violates the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Example:
Let's consider the following example to understand the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Imagine that a police officer suspects that a particular person is involved in drug trafficking. The officer wants to search the person's house for evidence. However, without a warrant, the search would be considered an unreasonable one and would violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
To obtain a warrant, the officer must show probable cause that the person is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of that activity can be found in the person's house. The warrant must also describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. In this case, the warrant would specify the address of the person's house and the items the officer is looking for, such as drugs, drug paraphernalia, or money related to drug sales.
If the warrant is properly obtained, the search is considered reasonable and the evidence found can be used in court. However, if the warrant is not based on probable cause or does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, the evidence found during the search may be considered inadmissible in court.
In the context of DUI checkpoints, a similar analysis would be performed to determine whether the checkpoint is reasonable and minimally intrusive, and whether it meets the Fourth Amendment's requirements. The specific circumstances, such as the location, time, and duration of the checkpoint, would be considered to determine if the checkpoint is reasonable and does not violate an individual's constitutional rights.
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. If you have any additional questions, please let me know or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment relate to the protection of individuals from oppressive government searches and seizures. The founding fathers included a clause in the Bill of Rights on this subject for the protection of citizens and for the protection of the inherent freedoms of man.
What are the freedoms of law?It corresponds to a series of characteristics arranged in the universal declaration of rights that aims to protect man and his rights to social and civil freedom, that is, the possibility of not being oppressed, violated or suffering any threat to his integrity.
Therefore, the US Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, DUI verification being legal and determined by its reasonableness and examination of the circumstances.
Find out more about Search and Seizure on:
https://brainly.com/question/30280195
#SPJ1
Jurisdiction over a defendant is referred to as subject matter jurisdiction. True or False
Answers
It is False that Jurisdiction over a defendant is not referred to as subject matter jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction is the authority that a court has to hear a particular type of case based on the subject matter of the case.
Jurisdiction over a defendant, on the other hand, is referred to as personal jurisdiction or territorial jurisdiction.Personal jurisdiction is the court’s power over the defendant, which is acquired by providing the defendant with notice of the proceedings and affording the defendant an opportunity to be heard. Personal jurisdiction may be obtained in a number of ways, including through the defendant’s presence in the state, through the defendant’s consent to jurisdiction, or through the defendant’s contacts with the state.Territorial jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to hear cases that arise within a particular geographic area, such as a state or county. Territorial jurisdiction is established by statute or constitution and is based on the geographic location of the events that gave rise to the case.In conclusion, subject matter jurisdiction and personal or territorial jurisdiction are different types of jurisdiction that are important for courts to have in order to hear and decide cases.
to know about Jurisdiction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?
A> It allows elected officials to hide and delete emails on private servers and was passed by the Clinton
administration. B It is a law that gives United States citizens the right to access some information collected by the Federal
Government.
C. None of these statements are correct.
D. • It was repealed in 2005.
E. O It applies to all governmental agencies including the Federal Government, state governments, and
municipalities.
Answers
The correct statement regarding the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is it is a law that gives United States citizens the right to access some information collected by the Federal Government. Option b is correct.
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is a law that gives United States citizens the right to access information held by the federal government. This act was signed into law on July 4, 1966, by President Lyndon Johnson.
The Freedom of Information Act is one of the most important pieces of legislation in the country because it allows people to keep the government accountable for its actions and hold public officials responsible for their decisions. FOIA applies to all governmental agencies including the Federal Government, state governments, and municipalities.
Therefore, b is correct.
Learn more about Freedom of Information Act https://brainly.com/question/510696
#SPJ11
Rhianna owns a two-thirds interest in the ANTI Partnership and a 75-percent interest in the LOUD Partnership. In the current year, ANTI sells property to LOUD at a loss of $10,000. Later in the same year, LOUD sells the same property to an unrelated party for a $2,000 gain.
What is the amount of gain or loss recognized by ANTI and LOUD on the sale of this property?
Answers
The sale to LOUD resulted in a loss of $6,667 for ANTI. With an adjusted basis of $6,667 and a gain of $2,000, LOUD realised a gain of $2,000 on the transaction.
What profit or loss is expected to be recorded when the equipment is sold?The carrying value of an asset is its initial purchase price less all accrued depreciation and any cumulative impairment charges. Remove this carrying sum from the asset's sale price. It is a gain if the remainder is positive. It is a loss if the remaining is negative.
How do you record a sale's gain or loss?Debit assets by recording depreciation and cash received. The original cost and any profits from the sale are taken into account. as asset credit. You can also record losses as debit. If done correctly, credit and debit cancel out.
To know more about resulted visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29670723
#SPJ1
In 2028, the Republican Party controls the U.S. Senate and
the Democratic Party controls the U.S. House of
Representatives. Each party hopes its candidate can win
the presidential election, giving the party more of a say in
the country's policies. It's a close race in the end, 51
percent of Americans vote for Republican candidate Ted
Torres. Former U.S. senator Rosa Marcus, the Democratic
candidate, receives 5 more electoral votes than Torres -
just enough for her to reach a total of 270 electoral votes.
According to the rules of the Electoral College, Marcus will win the election.
What adjustment to the Electoral College would change this outcome?
Answers
Answer:
A. All states splitting their electoral college votes between candidates based on what percentage of the Popular vote won.
Explanation:
Since Torres has the popular vote he would have the advantage to gain more electoral votes, but even with than, it doesn't guarantee a win in face:
Democratic Popular vote comes mainly from the State of California, and the NorthEast Section of the United States, the rest of the state follow alone, to give them more votes, although this is happening Marcus could still pickup several states, and electoral votes, even if Torres has more votes, not to mention safe states.
the which of the following Suggests that al
Solution to all social problems, including crime
traps formation of human beings, mutual deppe-
reduction of class structures. the Creats
ammunities of caring people and unie
Social Justice ?
A Radical theory
B British or left realism
C Peacemaking Crminology
D Femmist theory
Answers
Answer:
U bot
Explanation:
u suck at fortnite if u dont friend me and lets one v one
Benol9
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
Answers
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
When Justice Lewis Powell stated that racial and ethnic distinctions require the most “exacting judicial examination,” he meant these qualities required
Answers
exceptionally neutral evaluation.
extremely precise consideration.
swiftly determined punishment.
By law, all apartment buildings in New Jersey must have smoke alarms in the ceilings. Mary suffers smoke inhalation because the smoke alarm in her apartment building was not yet installed. To win a negligence action against the building owner, Mary would have to prove: Group of answer choices injury and causation. a breach of that duty. that the law exists. a duty existed toward her.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is "A". Injury and Causation.
Explanation:
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities. In the past three years, it has issued over $2 billion in securities, and $1 billion of those securities are in the hands of the public. This very large enterprise:
Answers
Answer:
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities, based on all these facts about this company, that is it has issued a lot of money to the public. it is a very large enterprise which is considered to be a "well-known seasoned issuer" and this company is subject to a less restrictive registration proceedings compared to other companies.
____ are groups who participate in armed rebellion against some established authority, government, or administration with the hope that those in power will retreat or pull out
Answers
Answer: The groups who participate in armed rebellion against an established authority, government, or administration with the hope that those in power will retreat or pull out are called "insurgents."
Insurgency is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that has been the subject of much debate and analysis in the field of law and international relations. Insurgents are groups or individuals who seek to challenge the authority of an established government or administration through the use of armed rebellion or other forms of violent resistance.
Insurgency can take many forms, ranging from small-scale, localized movements to large-scale, organized rebellions that span entire countries or regions. Insurgents often see themselves as fighting for a just cause, whether that be political, social, or economic, and believe that the use of force is necessary to achieve their goals.
From a legal perspective, the status of insurgents is complex and controversial. International law does not explicitly recognize insurgents as a distinct category of actors, and the legal status of insurgents can vary depending on the specific circumstances of the conflict in question.
In some cases, insurgents may be considered to be combatants and therefore entitled to the protections of the laws of war. This may be the case if the insurgents meet certain criteria, such as wearing distinctive uniforms, carrying their weapons openly, and operating under a command structure.
However, in other cases, insurgents may be considered to be civilians who have taken up arms against the government, in which case they would not be entitled to the same protections as combatants. Additionally, the use of tactics such as terrorism or targeting civilians can lead to insurgents being classified as criminals rather than combatants.
In any case, the use of insurgency as a tactic is generally seen as a last resort, to be employed only when all other means of achieving political or social change have been exhausted. Insurgency is often accompanied by significant human suffering and can have a profound impact on the stability and security of the affected region or country.
What factors can affect the likelihood of someone voting or not?
Answers
Answer:
being under pressure could be one
Explanation:
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answers
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
What is the fifth amendment?
Answers
Answer:
The Fifth Amendment secures the right to a grand jury in criminal trials, prohibits “double jeopardy,” and provides protection against self-incrimination.
Explanation:
can students get Married To school Teachers
Answers
They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)