questions about causality are usually phrased in the form of

Answer:

D) a more informed society is considered one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech. The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, which has helped promote the exchange of ideas and opinions, and has allowed individuals to express their views and challenge the status quo without fear of retribution. This has led to a more diverse and informed society, where a wide range of viewpoints and opinions are expressed and debated, contributing to a more robust democracy.

If a person fails to claim depreciation, the most important consequence is that he lose the greatest tax benefit.

If a person has claimed incorrect amount of depreciation he can do the catchup adjustment, in order to correct the improper depreciation in the previous years.

Even if, the taxpayer has failed to claim depreciation entirely, he can do the following:

1) File an amended return.

2) The taxpayer can increase the basis of the property by the amount of depreciation that should have been claimed.

3) He/she can file form 3155 to change the accounting policy.

4) In the current year, he can file form 4562 to include the unclaimed depreciation in this year.

To know more about depreciation: https://brainly.com/question/28588335

Answer:

One of the findings was that it was possible to see that prisons were able to reduce the level of violence against women.

Explanation:

The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment sought to stipulate which punishment was most effective in decreasing cases of domestic violence. For this, they will observe the effects of arrests, mediations and separations in incidents of domestic violence, applied to a group of offenders convicted of this type of crime. During the evaluation of the results, it was observed that prisons were more effective in decreasing the rate of repeated domestic violence against women, as offenders who were arrested had the lowest rate of recidivism of domestic violence, in contrast to other punishments.

Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary has the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws and nominate Justices to the Supreme Court.

Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary does not have the power to create legislation. That authority is granted to the legislative branch of government, specifically Congress. The judiciary's primary role is to interpret and apply the law, including the Constitution. They have the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws, which means they can determine whether a law complies with the provisions of the Constitution. This power is known as judicial review. Additionally, the judiciary does not enforce laws using police powers. Law enforcement falls under the executive branch, which includes agencies such as the police and the Department of Justice. However, the judiciary does play a role in interpreting laws and ensuring their enforcement through the adjudication of cases. The President, as part of the executive branch, has the authority to nominate Justices to the Supreme Court, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.

For more such question on Supreme Court

https://brainly.com/question/31448958

#SPJ

Answer:

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor encouraged her staff to enjoy whitewater rafting, Mexican take-out brunch and tours of the Smithsonian. Justice Stephen Breyer loves to read French manuscripts and cultivated his distaste for footnotes during his clerkship to Arthur Goldberg. Such details were plentiful as Professor John Feerick introduced Justice O'Connor and her former colleague Justice Breyer to a well-heeled audience of lawyers and law students at Fordham Law School yesterday morning.

The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.

Sally Rider, Director of the William Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona, kicked things off with a series of questions. Why, she asked O'Connor, did she decide to convene this conference on judicial independence in the first place?

O'Connor said she remembered seeing  "Impeach Earl Warren" signs in New Mexico and Arizona when she was growing up, and said that in her final years on the Supreme Court, attacks on judges increased, including proposals for mass impeachments of judges involved in the Terri Schiavo case, or proposals to cut judicial terms short, or a particularly disconcerting movement towards "Jail4Judges," a campaign to allow citizen panels to review rulings from the bench, with the ability to even imprison—as the name tantalizingly implies—those who made bad decisions. These developments were "very depressing," she said, and so she decided to use her retirement to call attention to these attacks on judges.

"An independent judiciary is an essential bedrock principle, and we're losing it."  The reason was in part the fact that civics and government are not a requirement for high school graduation. "One third of Americans can't name the three branches of government, but two thirds can name a judge on American Idol!"

Money has been pouring in to state judicial elections in recent years, including races for State Supreme Court justices. A 2004 campaign for a seat on the Illinois Supreme Court brought in a record-setting $9.3 million in political contributions, including hundreds of thousands of dollars from State Farm, a company with a case pending before the court. And just recently,  Wisconsin voters were subjected to over 11,000 televised campaign ads in the weeks before their state's Supreme Court race, over ninety percent of which were purchased by special interest groups (racking up a bill of well over 3.6 million dollars). Said O'Connor, "We put cash in the courtrooms, and it's just wrong." She then pointed to the room of lawyers and students. "You should take this seriously." (A later panel backed up O'Connor's concerns. New York Times legal correspondent Adam Liptak, Brennan Center attorney James Sample and Professor Michael Dimino discussed evidence that judges tend to rule in favor of their campaign contributors.)

She went on. "No other nation in the world elects judges." She pointed to Georgina Woods, the chief justice of Ghana, sitting in the front row, as if to illustrate her point.

"Why are we tolerating this? What are we going to do about it?" Then, seeming to remember that the initial question posed to her several minutes before was "why did you convene this conference," she added, "That's why," and sat back in her chair. The audience laughed and applauded.

Breyer took the floor next. Keeping state courts impartial is a major issue, but try talking about it with people "and they're asleep after five minutes." He recounted a trip to Russia he had made when serving as an appellate judge for the First Circuit after he was appointed by Carter. Meeting with Russian judges from across the country, he was surprised to hear their accounts of "telephone justice," when the party boss calls and tells judges which way to vote. "They asked me, ‘do you have telephone justice in the United States,' and I had to explain to them that no, the President wouldn't call you. He'd be crazy to do that."

Explanation:

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

The commercial disparagement is a type of 'tort' in which a person makes some derogatory statement against the business or a person causing them harm. It is also known as business disparagement.

Though it can be hard for the plaintiff to prove commercial disparagement yet certain parameters or prerequisites are laid in the law which can be shown as proof. One of the prerequisites is to show financial loss occurred due to the slander or libel. The plaintiff can show his/her financial losses occurred after the libel is traded in the market.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Answer:

It would be a violation of the person's sixth amendment and fifth amendment rights!

Explanation:

It would not be a violation of their first amendment or their second amendment. Sixth amendment violation because the cop did not inform the person of the accused crimes. Fifth amendment violation because the cop did not provide information to the accused of their constitutional rights.

Answer:

A french revolution

Explanation:

I just know the answe

It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.

A bankruptcy filings is a procedure that help a person to discard their debt or makes a plan to repay their debts.

Bankrupted Individual debts are wiped out with your filing's court approval which can take a few months or may need continuous payments on those balances throughout the repayment plan.

In conclusion, It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.

Read more about bankruptcy filing

brainly.com/question/26392690

The South African Constitution has a Bill of Rights that protects all people. This means that people living with HIV/AIDS have the same rights as any other person. No employer can require that a job applicant have an HIV test before they are employed.Nov 8, 2

The three ways  South African laws ensure that people living with HIV/AIDS are not discriminated against are as follows:

The HIV/AIDS Act of South Africa provides for:

Thus, South African law has always taken special care of those living with HIV/AIDS.

Learn more about HIV/AIDS in South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/5181745

Answer:

law i think

Explanation:

if not its more

True. The iran-contra scandal was about the sale of illegal arms by the president's staff.

The Iran-Contra scandal refers to a political controversy that emerged in the 1980s during the Reagan administration. It involved the secret sale of weapons to Iran, despite an arms embargo, and the diversion of funds from those sales to support Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The scandal revealed a complex web of illegal activities, including arms dealing, covert operations, and the violation of congressional mandates. Members of the president's staff, including National Security Council (NSC) officials, were implicated in orchestrating and carrying out these activities. The scandal had significant political repercussions and led to investigations, hearings, and legal consequences for those involved.

learn more about "President's staff":-https://brainly.com/question/29613793

#SPJ11

Answer: guilty vedect

The Law of Demand implies that the quantity demanded of a commodity will decrease as its price increases,

According to the Law of Demand, when all other demand-influencing factors stay constant, a commodity's quantity desired will drop as its price rises and vice versa. In other words, the amount that customers desire and the cost of an item or service are inversely related. It is an essential principle of economics that customers' actions alter in reaction to price fluctuations. Typically, it is represented graphically as a downward-sloping demand curve, with the amount desired shown on the horizontal axis and the price of the commodity or service on the vertical axis.

It is predicated on idea that customers are rational and would want to get the most utility or enjoyment out of buying products and using services. When an item or service's price rises, it becomes relatively more costly in comparison to other goods or services, and customers may decide to demand fewer of them in favor of more affordable alternatives.

Read more about Law of Demand on:

https://brainly.com/question/30703626

#SPJ4

Kalia should consider applying to a government-run correctional facility as they offer better training, higher salaries, and typically do not house as many special needs or high-profile inmates as private facilities

Based on Kalia's preferences, she should consider applying to a government-run facility. Government-run correctional facilities typically offer better training for correctional officers and have more strict hiring processes compared to private facilities. Also, government-run facilities are more likely to have higher salaries and benefits packages. Additionally, private run correctional facilities often house more special needs inmates and high profile inmates, which Kalia prefers not to work with. In contrast, government-run facilities are more likely to have separate facilities for these types of inmates, giving Kalia the opportunity to work in a regular facility with a more general inmate population. Therefore, a government-run facility would be a better fit for Kalia's career goals and preferences.

Learn more on correctional facility here;

https://brainly.com/question/6705028

#SPJ1

The phenomenon illustrated here is the use of political framing.

The use of different terms to refer to the same tax law, such as "death tax" by Republicans and "inheritance tax" by Democrats, demonstrates the phenomenon of political framing. Political framing is the strategic use of language and terminology to shape public perception and influence attitudes towards specific issues or policies. In this case, both parties are using different names to frame the tax law in a way that aligns with their respective political ideologies and agendas.

By labeling it as the "death tax," Republicans aim to emphasize the negative impact of the tax on individuals and families, suggesting that it is an unfair burden placed on inheritances and estates. This framing appeals to conservative values of limited government intervention and lower taxes. On the other hand, Democrats refer to it as the "inheritance tax" to emphasize the idea of wealth distribution and fairness. This framing aligns with their belief in a progressive tax system that targets the wealthy and redistributes resources to benefit society as a whole.

Political framing plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing policy debates. The choice of language can evoke specific emotions, values, and beliefs, ultimately swaying public support or opposition to a particular issue. It highlights the power of rhetoric and the importance of understanding how political actors use framing techniques to advance their agendas.

Learn more death tax
brainly.com/question/14395021

Answer: You cannot go straight ahead. You must turn left or right.

Explanation:

Due to the arrows pointing both ways you must turn left or right. This will be placed in intersections.

When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.

A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.

Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.

On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.

know more about intermediary here:

https://brainly.com/question/29732040

#SPJ8

The United States (federal) Supreme Court has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction due to the system of federalism.The answer is B.

In the United States, the federal system is based on the separation of power between the central government and the state governments. Under this system, courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal law, state law, or both. The United States Supreme Court has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction due to its power of judicial review.

It is the only court in the United States with the power to interpret the Constitution and to review federal and state laws to determine if they are constitutional. The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, which means that it hears appeals from lower courts and can overrule their decisions.The answer is B.

To know more about jurisdiction, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714#

#SPJ11

The direction of the courts has been towards more individual protections and less government powers. So, The correct answer is Option B.

This means that the courts are placing a greater emphasis on ensuring that the rights of the accused are protected, and that the government does not have too much power to restrict these rights.

One example of this trend is the Supreme Court's decision in the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona. This case established the Miranda warning, which informs suspects of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning.

This warning is now required to be read to all suspects in police custody, and is an example of the courts moving towards more individual protections.

To read more about legal system, visit- https://brainly.com/question/1894269

#SPJ11

Answer:

it is how you characterize your self

The law of piercing the corporate veil has been developed through B. common law in order to provide protection to the creditors of corporations.

The law of piercing the corporate veil has been developed through common law in order to provide protection to the creditors of corporations. This law allows creditors to hold shareholders or officers of a corporation personally liable for the debts of the corporation in certain situations, such as when the corporation is being used to commit fraud or when the corporation is not properly maintained as a separate legal entity. The purpose of this law is to prevent corporations from using their legal status to avoid paying debts owed to creditors. By piercing the corporate veil, creditors can go after the personal assets of those involved in the corporation in order to satisfy outstanding debts.
To know more about corporate veil visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31544959

#SPJ11

Answer:

operation and administration

Explanation:

Many departments are divided into two major divisions: administration and operations.

The statement, "Arkansas State Law allows motorists to use a "rolling-stop" at a stop sign if there is no opposing-traffic" is false because state-law do not allow motorists to use a "rolling-stop".

Arkansas "State-Law" does not allow motorists to use a "rolling stop" at a stop sign, even if there is no opposing traffic.

According to the Arkansas Code , "Every driver of a vehicle shall stop at every stop sign or stop line," which means that a complete-stop is required at every stop sign, regardless of whether there is opposing traffic or not.

The Failure to come to a complete stop at a stop sign can result in a traffic-violation, and a driver may be subject to fines, points on their driver's license, and other penalties.

So, it is important for motorists to follow the traffic-laws and regulations in their state or country, to help ensure the safety of all drivers and pedestrians on the road.

Therefore, the statement is False.

Learn more about Motorist here

https://brainly.com/question/15043457

#SPJ4

It's important to understand the various consumer laws that protect individual privacy. While I cannot provide a 200-word response, I can give you a concise answer that covers the essential information. Among the current consumer privacy laws, some notable examples include:

1. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union: This law strengthens data protection and privacy for individuals within the EU and the European Economic Area (EEA).

2. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States: This law grants California residents the right to access, delete, and opt-out of the sale of their personal information.

3. The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada: This law governs the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information in the course of commercial activities.

4. The Data Protection Act (DPA) in the United Kingdom: This law regulates the processing of personal data relating to individuals in the UK.

Please note that these are just a few examples of current consumer privacy laws, and there may be other national or regional regulations in place. To identify which of these is not a current consumer law that protects individual privacy, you would need to provide a list of options or specific laws to compare.

Learn more about law here:

https://brainly.com/question/6534668

#SPJ11

According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.

What is criminal?

The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.

According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.

Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.

Learn more about on criminal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/23059652

#SPJ1