pls help ❤️❤️❤️❤️ it will make my day!

Using the provided coordinates and the scaling factor, The answer is option b. B'(-4.5, 0), M'(-4.5, 4.5), S'(4.5, -27).

In mathematics, a transformation refers to a function or a mapping that takes an input and produces an output. The input and output can be geometric shapes, vectors, or functions, and the transformation can change their position, size, or shape. Examples of transformations include translation, rotation, scaling, and reflection. In physics and engineering, transformation also refer to mathematical operations used to change a system's variables from one set of coordinates to another set of coordinates.

Scaling refers to the process of enlarging or reducing an object in size, either uniformly or non-uniformly. In mathematics, scaling is often represented by a scaling factor, which is a number used to multiply the coordinates of the object. Scaling can be applied to geometric shapes, vectors, and functions, and it can be done in one or multiple dimensions. Uniform scaling means that the object is scaled by the same factor in all dimensions. Non-uniform scaling means that the object is scaled by different factors in different dimensions.

B(-1, 0), M(-1, 1), and S(1, -6)

scaling factor (k) = 4.5

after scaling,

B'(-4.5, 0), M'(-4.5, 4.5), S'(4.5, -27)

To learn more about transformations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11709244

#SPJ1

Answer:

Greater probability of gray than black = 3/25

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Total block = 5 x 5 = 25

Number of black blocks = 6

Number of gray blocks = 9

Find:

Greater probability of gray than black

Computation:

Greater probability of gray than black = Probability of gray - Probability of black

Greater probability of gray than black = 9/25 - 6/25

Greater probability of gray than black = 3/25

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

5/18 = 0.2777 = 0.27° so when you divided thd no. it is 0.277777 and 7 is repeat .

If joseph sells his home,  profit will he make = (a)  $79720

What is profit and its example?

Profit earned on the house if he sells = $79720

Amount paid by Joseph for his home = $105000

His house has increased its property value by 2.0% every year

So, Property cost after 20 years :

\(Cost = 105000 * (1.02)^{20}\)

Cost = 105000 × 1.4859

Cost = 156020

Also, Due to renovations and improvements to the house, the property cost is increased by $28700

So, Total cost of the house after 20 years = 156020 + 28700

                                                                     = $184720

So, Profit earned on the house if he sells = 184720 - 105000

                                                                      = $79720

Learn more about profit

brainly.com/question/2412020

#SPJ4

Answer:a)  $79720

Step-by-step explanation:edge

Answer:

i need brainliest

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A, C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

220 automóviles

Step-by-step explanation:

Aquí, queremos saber la cantidad de autos que ingresarán al garaje cuando esté completamente ocupado.

De la pregunta, nos dicen que hay 3 pisos. Para el 1er piso, hay 5 filas de 20 lugares.

El número total de autos que pueden estar en esto será 5 * 20 = 100 autos.

Para el segundo y tercer piso, tenemos 4 filas de 15 cada una.

El número total de autos aquí será 2 (15 * 4) = 2 * 60 = 120 autos

El número total de automóviles cuando está completamente ocupado es, por tanto, = 100 + 120 = 220 automóviles

Answer:

the first one is b

the second one is c

Step-by-step explanation:

have a great day :D

Answer:

y=x+3 and y=2.5x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

First one- The table is going +1 for every x so the x is just 1.  Because the table starts at 4 if you look for the 0 or the y intercept you'll get 3. y=x+3

Second One-  Table starts at 0 which is 1 so you know the y intercept.  The table is adding 2.5 for every x so x= 2.5   y=2.5x+1

Answer:

50 and 160

Step-by-step explanation:

good

Answer/Step-by-step explanation:

10 x 5 = 50

10 x 5 is the same as Ten 5's or Five 10's

5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 50

10+10+10+10+10=50

Thurs, 10 x 5 = 50

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

40 + 120 =160

 120        

+  40       < 20 + 40 = 60>

---------        < 100 + 60 > = 160

 160

[RevyBreeze]

Answer:

-1

Step-by-step explanation:

When a line is perpendicular to another line, it means that the line is going through the other line. So that means they have the opposite slope or the reciprocal of the first line and you change the sign to become opposite.

y=x-4 ---> find reciprocal of x

y=-1x-4

slope= -1

Answer:

slope = -1

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the reliability of the bank loan processing system with backup components, we can use the concept of series-parallel system reliability.

In the original system, the three components are connected in series. To calculate the overall reliability of the system, we multiply the reliabilities of the individual components:

R_system = R_1 * R_2 * R_3 = 0.82 * 0.991 * 0.98 ≈ 0.801

So, the reliability of the bank loan processing system without backup components is approximately 0.801.

Now, if each of the three components has a backup with a reliability of 0.80, we have a parallel configuration between the original components and their backups. In a parallel system, the overall reliability is calculated as 1 minus the product of the complement of individual reliabilities.

Let's calculate the reliability of each component with the backup:

R_1_with_backup = 1 - (1 - R_1) * (1 - 0.80) = 1 - (1 - 0.82) * (1 - 0.80) ≈ 0.984

R_2_with_backup = 1 - (1 - R_2) * (1 - 0.80) = 1 - (1 - 0.991) * (1 - 0.80) ≈ 0.9988

R_3_with_backup = 1 - (1 - R_3) * (1 - 0.80) = 1 - (1 - 0.98) * (1 - 0.80) ≈ 0.9992

Now, we calculate the overall reliability of the system with the backups:

R_system_with_backup = R_1_with_backup * R_2_with_backup * R_3_with_backup ≈ 0.984 * 0.9988 * 0.9992 ≈ 0.981

Therefore, the reliability of the bank loan processing system with backup components is approximately 0.981.

Comparing the two scenarios, we can see that introducing backup components with a reliability of 0.80 has improved the overall reliability of the system. The total reliability increased from 0.801 (without backups) to 0.981 (with backups). Having backup components in a parallel configuration provides redundancy and increases the system's ability to withstand failures, resulting in higher reliability.

Learn more about approximately here:

https://brainly.com/question/31695967

#SPJ11

The area of a rhombus can be found by multiplying the length of one of its sides by the height of a perpendicular line from the center to a side.

The height of the rhombus is the distance from the center of the rhombus to one of its sides, perpendicular to that side.

The formula for the area of a rhombus can be written as A = s*h, where A is the area, s is the length of one of the sides of the rhombus, and h is the height of the rhombus.

It's important to note that this method of finding the area of a rhombus without diagonals can only be used when the rhombus is a regular polygon, a polygon with all sides and angles congruent. When the rhombus is not a regular polygon, then you can find the area by using the diagonals.

Additionally, it's important to mention that a rhombus can be defined as a parallelogram with all sides congruent or a square with its angles not 90 degrees.

To know more about area of a rhombus on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/12783973#

#SPJ11

In the given public good provision game, player 1's expected payoff for contributing and not contributing depends on player 2's cutoff point (C*₂). When player 1 contributes, their payoff is v - C₁ if C₁ < C*₂, and 0 if C₁ ≥ C*₂. When player 1 does not contribute, their payoff is always 0.

In this public good provision game, player 1's decision to contribute or not contribute depends on their private cost, C₁, and player 2's cutoff point, C*₂. If player 1 contributes, they incur a cost of C₁ but gain access to the public good valued at v dollars. However, if C₁ is greater than or equal to C*₂, player 1's expected payoff for contributing would be 0 since player 2 would not contribute.

On the other hand, if player 1 does not contribute, their expected payoff is always 0, as they neither incur any cost nor receive any benefit from the public good. Therefore, player 1's expected payoff for not contributing is constant, irrespective of the cutoff point.

To determine player 1's expected payoff for contributing, we consider the case when C₁ is less than C*₂. In this scenario, player 2 contributes to the public good, allowing both players to consume it. Player 1's payoff would then be v - C₁, which represents the value of the public good minus their cost of contribution. However, if C₁ is greater than or equal to C*₂, player 1's contribution would be futile, as player 2 would not contribute. In this case, player 1's expected payoff for contributing would be 0, as they would not gain access to the public good.

In summary, player 1's expected payoff for contributing is v - C₁ if C₁ < C*₂, and 0 if C₁ ≥ C*₂. On the other hand, player 1's expected payoff for not contributing is always 0. Therefore, when C₁ is low, player 1 would prefer to contribute, as long as the cost of contribution is less than player 2's cutoff point.

Learn more about public good provision game

brainly.com/question/32069754

#SPJ11

The correct answer is that the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To calculate the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000, we can use the standard deviation and assume a normal distribution.

We are given that the average cash flow is $14,000 with a standard deviation of $5,000. These values are necessary to calculate the probability.

The probability of a cash flow falling within a certain range can be determined by converting the values to z-scores, which represent the number of standard deviations away from the mean.

First, we calculate the z-score for $16,000 using the formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the cash flow value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Plugging in the values, we get z1 = (16,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z1 = 2,000 / 5,000 = 0.4.

Next, we calculate the z-score for $19,000: z2 = (19,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z2 = 5,000 / 5,000 = 1.

Now that we have the z-scores, we can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the corresponding probabilities.

Subtracting the probability corresponding to the lower z-score from the probability corresponding to the higher z-score will give us the probability of the cash flow falling between $16,000 and $19,000.

Looking up the z-scores in a standard normal distribution table or using a calculator, we find the probability for z1 is 0.6554 and the probability for z2 is 0.8413.

Therefore, the probability of the cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is 0.8413 - 0.6554 = 0.1859, which is approximately 18.59%.

So, the correct answer is that the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The probability of a cash flow between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To calculate the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000, we can use the standard deviation and assume a normal distribution.

We are given that the average cash flow is $14,000 with a standard deviation of $5,000. These values are necessary to calculate the probability.

The probability of a cash flow falling within a certain range can be determined by converting the values to z-scores, which represent the number of standard deviations away from the mean.

First, we calculate the z-score for $16,000 using the formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the cash flow value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Plugging in the values, we get z1 = (16,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z1 = 2,000 / 5,000 = 0.4.

Next, we calculate the z-score for $19,000: z2 = (19,000 - 14,000) / 5,000.

z2 = 5,000 / 5,000 = 1.

Now that we have the z-scores, we can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the corresponding probabilities.

Subtracting the probability corresponding to the lower z-score from the probability corresponding to the higher z-score will give us the probability of the cash flow falling between $16,000 and $19,000.

Looking up the z-scores in a standard normal distribution table or using a calculator, we find the probability for z1 is 0.6554 and the probability for z2 is 0.8413.

Therefore, the probability of the cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is 0.8413 - 0.6554 = 0.1859, which is approximately 18.59%.

So, the correct answer is that the probability of a cash flow being between $16,000 and $19,000 is approximately 18.59%.

To learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

First, let's calculate the monthly interest rate (i), which is the APR divided by 12 months:

i = APR / 12 months

i = 5.3% / 12

i = 0.00442 or 0.442%

Next, let's calculate the number of months (n) for the mortgage, which is 15 years multiplied by 12 months:

n = 15 years x 12 months/year

n = 180 months

Now, let's calculate the monthly payment (PMT) using the following formula:

PMT = P * i / \((1 - (1 + i)^(-n)\))

where P is the principal amount, i is the monthly interest rate, and n is the number of months.

PMT = $325,000 * 0.00442 / (1 - \((1 + 0.00442)^(-180)\)

PMT = $2,613.67 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Now, let's create the amortization table for the first two months:

Month | Payment | Interest | Principal | Remaining Balance

1 | $2,613.67 | $1,431.25 | $1,182.42 | $323,817.58

2 | $2,613.67 | $1,428.60 | $1,185.07 | $322,632.51

For each month, the Payment column shows the fixed monthly payment, the Interest column shows the calculated interest based on the remaining balance multiplied by the monthly interest rate, the Principal column shows the portion of the payment that goes towards reducing the principal, and the Remaining Balance column shows the remaining balance after subtracting the principal payment from the previous remaining balance.

The amortization table will continue in this manner for the remaining months until the mortgage is paid off.

Learn more about “ monthly interest rate “ visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/11916359

#SPJ4

The interest and principal amounts for the first payment are:

Interest = $325,000 * 0.0044167 = $1,426.25

Principal = $2,549.67 - $1,426.25 = $1,123.42

Balance = $325,000 - $1,123.42 = $323,876.58

For the second payment, we start with the new balance of $323,876.58 and apply the formulas again:

Interest = $323,876.58 * 0.0044167 = $1,420.47

Principal = $2,549.67 - $1,420.47 = $1,129.20

Balance = $323,876.58 - $1,129.20 = $322,747.38

To complete the two-month amortization table, we need to calculate the monthly payment, as well as the principal and interest amounts for each payment.

The formula for calculating a fixed-rate mortgage payment is:

\(Payment = P * r * (1 + r)^n / [(1 + r)^n - 1]\)

Where:

P = Principal amount borrowed

r = Monthly interest rate

n = Total number of payments

First, let's calculate the monthly interest rate.

Since the APR is an annual rate, we need to divide it by 12 to get the monthly rate:

Monthly interest rate = 5.3% / 12 = 0.0044167

Next, we need to calculate the total number of payments.

Since this is a 15-year mortgage, and we're completing a two-month amortization table, the total number of payments is:

Total number of payments = 15 years * 12 months per year = 180

Number of payments for two months = 2

Now we can plug these values into the formula to calculate the monthly payment:

Payment = \($325,000 * 0.0044167 * (1 + 0.0044167)^180 / [(1 + 0.0044167)^180 - 1]\)

= $2,549.67

So the monthly payment is $2,549.67

Now we can use this value to complete the two-month amortization table:

Payment Interest Principal Balance

Month 1 $1,426.25 $1,123.42 $323,876.58

Month 2 $1,420.47 $1,129.20 $322,747.38

To calculate the interest and principal amounts for each payment, we use the following formulas:

Interest = Balance * Monthly interest rate

Principal = Payment - Interest

Balance = Balance - Principal

We start with the initial balance of $325,000 and apply the formulas for each payment.

The interest and principal amounts for the first payment are:

Interest = $325,000 * 0.0044167 = $1,426.25

Principal = $2,549.67 - $1,426.25 = $1,123.42

Balance = $325,000 - $1,123.42 = $323,876.58

For the second payment, we start with the new balance of $323,876.58 and apply the formulas again:

Interest = $323,876.58 * 0.0044167 = $1,420.47

Principal = $2,549.67 - $1,420.47 = $1,129.20

Balance = $323,876.58 - $1,129.20 = $322,747.38

And so on, for each subsequent payment.

For similar question on amortization.

https://brainly.com/question/29485954

#SPJ11

Answer:

135.5

hope this helps :)

To assess the likelihood of the sample results given the population proportion, we can use statistical inference and conduct a hypothesis test.

In this case, we compare the observed sample proportion to the assumed population proportion.

Define the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (Ha). In this case, the null hypothesis is that the population proportion is equal to 0.49, and the alternative hypothesis is that the population proportion is not equal to 0.49.

Calculate the test statistic using the formula: test statistic = (sample proportion - assumed population proportion) / standard error of the sample proportion.

Compute the standard error of the sample proportion using the formula: standard error = sqrt[(assumed population proportion * (1 - assumed population proportion)) / sample size].

Determine the p-value associated with the test statistic. This represents the probability of observing a sample proportion as extreme or more extreme than the observed proportion, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

Compare the p-value to a predetermined significance level (e.g., 0.05) to make a decision. If the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the observed sample proportion is significantly different from the assumed population proportion.

Based on the result, select the appropriate answer choice that describes the likelihood of a wrong call in the election if exit polling alone is considered.

To learn more about  standard error click here:

brainly.com/question/13179711

#SPJ11

Answer:

(x - 4) is a factor

Step-by-step explanation:

If x - 4 is a factor, then x should be 4.

By substituting:

= 4² - 6(4) + 8

= 16 - 24 + 8

= 0

pls like and mark as brainliest!

Answer:

x >= 5

Step-by-step explanation:

x is greater than or equal to 5

\(17-31=31-17\quad :\quad \mathrm{False}\)

\(17-31=31-17\)

\(-14=14\)

\(\mathrm{The\:sides\:are\:not\:equal}\)

False

Answer:

No, he is not correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtracting 17 from 31 would be 14 but subtracting 31 from 17 would be -14 ( minus 14)

Hope this helps...

Answer:

Dang they deleted my last answer

Step-by-step explanation:

I wonder why people ACTUALLY report stuff like this....

Answer:

thanks

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

i took algebra and i know.

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x - 36

Step-by-step explanation:

If this question is complete, then;

3x - 12 - 2(x+12)

3x -12 - 2x - 24

x - 36

Answer: Hope this helps you.

3(x − 4) − 2x − 24

3(x − 4) − 2(x + 12)

x − 36

Step-by-step explanation:

I looked up your question and I found the choices. (I highlighted the correct ones for you.)

3x − 12 − 2x + 24

3(x − 4) − 2x − 24

3(x − 4) − 2(x + 12)

3(x + 4) − 2(x + 12)

x + 12

x − 36

First of all I will evaluate the distribute property

3x − 12 − 2(x + 12) = 3x − 12 − 2x - 12

This eliminates our first option

3x − 12 − 2x - 12 ≠ 3x − 12 − 2x + 24

And clarifies option 2.

3x − 12 − 2x - 12 ≠ 3x − 12 − 2x + 24

Now to speed the process up 3x-12 is equal to 3x - 3*4, which is also equal to  3(x − 4) − 2(x + 12) which makes the third option correct, and the fourth option wrong.

Now the last 2 is just the answer, so I am going to solve the equation

3x − 12 − 2(x + 12)  (complete distribute property)

3x − 12 − 2x - 24  (now I will do like terms)

1x - 36 (1x = x)

x - 36

This means the last option is the correct one and the 2nd last option is wrong.

Meaning the correct options are:

3(x − 4) − 2x − 24

3(x − 4) − 2(x + 12)

x − 36

No, the ratios 10:12 and 1:21 are not form a proportion.

A relationship that is always in the same ratio and quantity which vary directly with each other is called the proportional.

Given that;

The ratios are,

⇒ 10 : 12 and 1 : 21

We know that;

Two ratio are form a proportional when both are in same quantity or in a a same ratio.

Here, The ratios are,

⇒ 10 : 12 and 1 : 21

Clearly, We get;

10 / 12 = 5 / 6

1 / 21 = 1  21

Thus,

1 / 21 ≠ 5 /6

1 : 21 ≠ 10 : 12

Therefore, The ratios 10:12 and 1:21 are not form a proportion.

Learn more about the proportion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/870035

#SPJ9

The Maclaurin series expansion for f(x) = xe^9x is given, and the associated radius of convergence R is determined.

To find the Maclaurin series for f(x) = xe^9x, we need to calculate its derivatives and evaluate them at x = 0. Then we can express the series using the general form of a Maclaurin series:

f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + f''(0)x^2/2! + f'''(0)x^3/3! + ...

First, let's find the derivatives of f(x):

f'(x) = e^9x + 9xe^9x

f''(x) = 18e^9x + 81xe^9x

f'''(x) = 162e^9x + 243xe^9x

...

Now, evaluating the derivatives at x = 0:

f(0) = 0

f'(0) = 1

f''(0) = 18

f'''(0) = 162

...

Substituting these values into the Maclaurin series expression:

f(x) = 0 + 1x + (18/2!)x^2 + (162/3!)x^3 + ...

Simplifying the coefficients: f(x) = x + 9x^2 + 9x^3/2 + 3x^4/4 + ...

The associated radius of convergence R for the Maclaurin series can be determined using the ratio test or by analyzing the properties of the function. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the specific value of R.

LEARN MORE ABOUT Maclaurin series here: brainly.com/question/31745715

#SPJ11

Answer:

number of $8 sold= 200

Number of $10 tickets sold= $150

Number of $12 tickets sold = $50

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the quantity of $8 ticket be represented as  x

Let the quantity of $10 ticket be represented as  y

Let the quantity of $12 ticket be represented as  z

Such that total tikets sold = 400 can be represented as x+y+z= 400

Prices of$8, $10 and $12 gave a total income of $3,700  such that it can be represented as

8x +10y + 12z =$3,700

Also given that combined number of $8 and $10 priced tickets sold was 7 times the number of $12 tickets sold, we have that

x+y = 7z

Giving us the equations to solve to  be

x+y+z= 400------ equation 1

8x +10y + 12z =$3,700---- equation 2

x+y = 7z------equation 3

Step 2- solving

Putting equation 3 i n equation 1, we have that

7z+z = 400

8z= 400

z= 400/8= 50

also puting the value of z= 50 in equation 1

x+y+z= 400

x+y+50= 400

x+y = 350---- equation 4

putting z= 50 into equaton 2 and solving out

8x +10y + 12z =$3,700

8x +10y + 12x 50 =$3,700

8x +10y + 600 =$3,700

8x +10y =3,700 - 600

8x +10y=3,100---------equation 5

Multiplying equation 4 by 8  and subtracting from equation 5

8x +10y=3,100

-8x+8y= 2,800

2y=300

y= 300/2

y=150

to find x, when y= 150 using equation 4

x+y = 350

x= 350-150

x= 200

Therefore number of $8 sold= 200

Number of $10 tickets sold= $150

Number of $12 tickets sold = $50

Answer:

The length, l, of the ladder is 100 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

The given scenario forms a right triangle in which the length of ladder is hypotenuse, the distance between the foot of the ladder and the wall is base(as shown in attached diagram) We have to find length of ladder(l)

For this purpose trigonometric ratios can be used. The ratio which includes both base and hypotenuse of triangle is cos θ where θ = 60°

So,

\(cos\ 60 = \frac{50}{l}\)

The value of cos 60 is 1/2 or 0.5

So,

\(0.5 = \frac{50}{l}\\l = \frac{50}{0.5}\\l = 100\)

Hence,

The length, l, of the ladder is 100 meters