please solve geometry question

Perimeter = 2(8 cm + 6 cm) = 2(14 cm) = 28 cm. We can calculate it in the following manner.

The perimeter of the rectangular piece of cardboard is the sum of all four sides. Using the given measurements of 8 cm by 6 cm, we can calculate the perimeter as follows:

Perimeter = 2(Length + Width)
Perimeter = 2(8 cm + 6 cm)
Perimeter = 2(14 cm)
Perimeter = 28 cm

Therefore, the perimeter of the rectangular piece of cardboard is 28 cm.
Hi! To calculate the perimeter of a rectangular piece of cardboard with measurements 8 cm by 6 cm, you can use the formula: Perimeter = 2(Length + Width). In this case, the length is 8 cm and the width is 6 cm.

Your answer: Perimeter = 2(8 cm + 6 cm) = 2(14 cm) = 28 cm.

Visit here to learn more about perimeter brainly.com/question/6465134

#SPJ11

Una caja de ahorros ofrece a sus clientes un interés simple del 8% anual por una imposición de 18.000 € durante 5 años. de los Interés es = 7,200 €

Interés = Principal × Tasa de interés × Tiempo

Dado que el principal es de 18.000 €, la tasa de interés es del 8% anual y el tiempo es de 5 años, podemos sustituir estos valores en la fórmula:

Interés = 18,000 € × 0.08 × 5

Interés = 7,200 €

Por lo tanto, el importe de los intereses generados en ese tiempo es de 7.200 €. Esto significa que al finalizar los 5 años, el cliente habrá obtenido 7.200 € adicionales como resultado de la imposición de 18.000 € con una tasa de interés del 8% anual. Es importante tener en cuenta que este cálculo se basa en la suposición de que el interés es simple y no se acumula ni se reinvierte.

For more such questions on  intereses

https://brainly.com/question/31608291

#SPJ8

Answer:

After 3 years you will get 23820.32rs.

Answer:

No solution is possible from the information provided.

Step-by-step explanation:

Walking is not safe on the path whenever rabbits have been seen in the area, and berries are ripe along the path. This is formalized by using the →(if-then) and ∧(logical and) operators.

Given information and corresponding atomic propositions:

We need to formalize the given statements in terms of atomic propositions r, b, and w, which are defined as follows:

r: Rabbits have been seen in the area.

b: Berries are ripe along the path.

w: Walking on the path is safe.

Now, let us formalize each of the given statements in terms of these atomic propositions:

a) Berries are ripe along the path, but rabbits have not been seen in the area.

b: Rabbits have not been seen in the area, and walking on the path is safe, but berries are ripe along the path.

c: If berries are ripe along the path, then walking is safe if and only if rabbits have not been seen in the area.

d: It is not safe to walk along the path, but rabbits have not been seen in the area, and the berries along the path are ripe.

e) For walking on the path to be safe, it is necessary but not sufficient that berries not be ripe along the path and for rabbits not to have been seen in the area.

Walking is not safe on the path whenever rabbits have been seen in the area, and berries are ripe along the path.

The formalizations in terms of atomic propositions are:

a) b ∧ ¬r.b) ¬r ∧ w ∧

b.c) (b → w) ∧ (¬r → w).

d) ¬w ∧ ¬r ∧

b.e) (¬r ∧ ¬b) → w.b ∧

Berries are ripe along the path, but rabbits have not been seen in the area.

This is formalized by using the ∧(logical and) operator.

(¬r ∧ ¬b) → w: It means For walking on the path to be safe, it is necessary but not sufficient that berries not be ripe along the path and for rabbits not to have been seen in the area.

For more related questions on area:

https://brainly.com/question/1631786

#SPJ8

Answer: 10^10

Step-by-step explanation:

A set of treatment and control groups for a retrospective study on the effects of endocrine disruptors on humans a group of children with mothers exposed to PCBs during pregnancy and a group of children who were exposed to DDT after they were born (option c).

In a retrospective study, researchers investigate the effects of endocrine disruptors on humans by analyzing past data and observing correlations. To ensure reliable findings, it is crucial to establish appropriate treatment and control groups. These groups are designed to compare individuals who have been exposed to different levels or types of endocrine disruptors, allowing researchers to assess the effects accurately. Let's explore the potential treatment and control groups for such a study.

A group of children with mothers exposed to PCBs during pregnancy and a group of children who were exposed to DDT after they were born:

In this case, the treatment group would consist of children whose mothers were exposed to PCBs during pregnancy. The control group, on the other hand, would include children who were exposed to DDT after birth. PCBs and DDT are both endocrine disruptors, but by comparing these two groups, researchers can examine the effects of prenatal exposure (PCBs) versus postnatal exposure (DDT).

Hence the correct option is (c).

To know more about retrospective study here

https://brainly.com/question/31565063

#SPJ4

Complete Question

Which could be a set of treatment and control groups for a retrospective study on the effects of endocrine disruptors on humans?

(a) A group of farmers that are planning to spray crops with atrazine and a group of farmers that are planning to use organic pesticides,

(b) A group of construction workers that have been exposed to asbestos and a group of construction workers that have been exposed to PCBs,

(c) A group of children with mothers exposed to PCBs during pregnancy and a group of children who were exposed to DDT after they were born,

(d) Members of a town that was downwind of a commercial farm that sprayed pesticides and members of a town that was downwind of an organic farm,

(e) Humans raised when DDT was used and humans raised after DDT was no longer used.

Answer: She can make 72 cupcakes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I can help you dude if any trouble (:

The Square-1 is a Cubic twisty puzzle.

It is similar to the 3x3 Rubik's cube, but due to the way the pieces are cut and designed can shapeshift. It is even governed by the WCA, and uniquely the only shapeshifting puzzle in the WCA.

It's probably the hardest WCA puzzle to learn how to solve due to the restrictions in its turning and its unique design.Square-1 became an official WCA event in 2007. It is a shape-shifting puzzle with a middle slice that you can use to interchange pieces.

X-Man Volt has long been the best square-1 on the market. However, Yu-Xin has rolled out a new budget square-1, which is fully magnetic.

To know more about Cubic Twisty Puzzle,

brainly.com/question/47896

#SPJ4

Starting with the given equation:

log2 (x – 3) = 2 - log2 (x)

We can simplify the right-hand side by using the rule that states:

loga (b) - loga (c) = loga (b/c)

Applying this rule, we get:

log2 (x – 3) = log2 (4/x)

Now, we can use the fact that loga (b) = logc (b) / logc (a) to rewrite the equation as:

log2 (x – 3) = log2 (4) - log2 (x)

log2 (x – 3) + log2 (x) = log2 (4)

Using the rule loga (b) + loga (c) = loga (b*c), we can simplify:

log2 [(x – 3) * x] = log2 (4)

Simplifying further:

x^2 – 3x = 4

Rearranging:

x^2 – 3x – 4 = 0

Factoring:

(x – 4)(x + 1) = 0

Therefore, x = 4 or x = -1. However, we need to check if these values satisfy the original equation.

For x = 4:

log2 (4 – 3) = 2 - log2 (4)

log2 (1) = 2 - 2

0 = 0

This is true, so x = 4 is a solution.

For x = -1:

log2 (-1 – 3) = 2 - log2 (-1)

log2 (-4) is undefined, so x = -1 is not a solution.

Therefore, the only solution is x = 4.

Visit here to learn more about simplify brainly.com/question/17579585

#SPJ11

Answer:

If 1 pint is equal to 2 cups, then 5 pints would equal _5_ cups.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use a ratio to solve:

pints : cups

  1      :   2

  2     :   4

  3     :   6

  4     :   8

  5     :   10

There would be 10 cups in 5 pints.

Answer:

The answer is "\((x + 8)^2 = 58\)"

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the equation is:\(x^2+16x=-6\)

by adding and subtracting 64 then:

\(x^2 + 16x + 64 = -6 + 64\\\\x^2 + 2\times x\times 8 + 64 = -6 + 64\\\\ (x + 8)(x + 8) = 58\\\\ (x + 8)2 = 58\)

In a perfectly competitive market, when the price is greater than the minimum average total cost for all firms, it indicates that the firms are experiencing economic profits. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. In a perfectly competitive market, there are numerous firms producing a homogeneous product with free entry and exit for new firms.

2. The demand curve for each firm is perfectly elastic (horizontal), which means that firms can sell any quantity of the product at the market price without affecting the price.

3. The average total cost (ATC) includes both the average variable cost (AVC) and the average fixed cost (AFC). The ATC curve is U-shaped, with the minimum ATC representing the lowest average cost per unit.

4. When the market price is greater than the minimum ATC, it means that the firms are covering all their variable and fixed costs, with additional revenue left over as profit.

5. In this scenario, the firms are earning economic profits, which can be calculated by subtracting the ATC from the market price and multiplying the result by the quantity produced.

6. Economic profits attract new firms to enter the market, leading to increased competition. This, in turn, drives down the market price, reducing economic profits.

7. Over time, as more firms enter and exit the market, the price will eventually reach a point where it is equal to the minimum ATC. This is the long-run equilibrium, where firms earn zero economic profits, covering all their costs but not earning any additional profit.

To summarize, in a perfectly competitive market, when the price is greater than the minimum average total cost for all firms, it indicates that the firms are experiencing economic profits. These profits will attract new firms to enter the market, which will eventually lead to the price falling to the minimum ATC in the long-run equilibrium.

More on minimum : https://brainly.com/question/2437551

#SPJ11

To find the optimal solution, we need to determine the feasible region by graphing the given constraints and identify the corner points where the constraints intersect. However, to provide a numerical solution, we can use a linear programming solver.

Using a linear programming solver, we can input the objective function C = 7x + 9y and the constraints 6x + 8y ≤ 15 and 9x + 8y ≤ 19, along with the non-negativity constraints x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0. The solver will then calculate the optimal values of x and y that maximize the objective function C.

The optimal values of x and y will depend on the specific values of the constraints, and the resulting values may not be whole numbers. Therefore, rounding the answers to three decimal places will provide the desired level of precision. The linear programming solver will provide the optimal values of x and y that maximize the objective function C.

Learn more about Linear Programming here

https://brainly.com/question/29405467

#SPJ11

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation: c and d are not aligned unlike the rest of them.

Answer:

y = − 20

x = none

Step-by-step explanation:

There is no X intercepts

-32 + 12 = 20

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the first term be a-d, second term be a and third term be a+d

d is the common difference

If each term, starting with the 3rd term, is found by multiplying the previous two terms then:

a(a-d) = a+d

a²+ad-a-d = 0

a(a+d)-1(a+d) = 0

(a+d)(a-1) = 0

a-1 = 0

a= 1

a+d = 0

1+d = 0

d = 0-1

d = -1

Get the sixth term

nth term of a sequence is expressed as

Tn = a+(n-1)d

T6 = 1+(6-1)(-1)

T6 = 1+5(-1)

T6 = 1-5

T6 = -4

Get the third term T3

T3 = a+2d

T3 = 1+2(-1)

T3 = 1-2

T3 = -1

difference between the 6th and 3rd terms in the sequence is expressed as;

Difference = T6-T3

Difference = -4-(-1)

Difference = -4+1

Difference = -3

Answer:

A. 6m - 3p - 16

Step-by-step explanation:

The general equation for a circle is \((x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2\), where \((h,k)\) is the centre of the circle and \(r\) is the radius.

First, we can determine the centre of the circle.

( _ , _ )

The point directly on top is (4,7). Because it lies on the same vertical line as the centre, they have the same x-coordinate.

(4, _ )

The point directly to the right of it is (7,4). Because it lies on the same horizontal line as the centre, they have the same y-coordinate.

(4,4)

Therefore, the centre of the circle is (4,4). Plug this into the general equation:

\((x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2\\(x-4)^2+(y-4)^2=r^2\)

Now, we can determine the radius of the circle.

To do this, we can calculate the distance between the centre of the circle and one of the given points that lie on the circumference.

The centre is (4,4), and one of the points is (4,7). Because they only have a difference of 3 units in the y-direction (and none in the x-direction), this means that the radius is 3 units. Plug this into the general equation:

\((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2=r^2\\(x-4)^2+(y-4)^2=3^2\\(x-4)^2+(y-4)^2=9\)

\((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2=9\)

This does not make sense as x is a discrete variable, so it cannot take on a value of 3.5.

A binomial variable is a discrete variable, meaning it can only take on certain values. In this case, x can take on values from 0 to 10 (inclusive). Since 3.5 is not one of these values, it does not make sense to calculate the probability that x equals 3.5.

This does not make sense as x is a discrete variable, so it cannot take on a value of 3.5.

A binomial variable is a discrete variable, meaning it can only take on certain values that are determined by the given parameters. For example, if the binomial variable x is defined as the number of heads in 10 flips of a coin, then x can only take on values from 0 to 10 (inclusive). Since 3.5 is not one of these values, it does not make sense to calculate the probability that x equals 3.5.

Learn more about variable here

https://brainly.com/question/29430246

#SPJ4

Answer:

We have this equation:

\(3(y+3)+7(2y-8)-(y-1)=0​\)

First, we do the parenthesis:

\(3y+9+14y-56-(y-1)=0\\\)

When there is a minus (-) in front of a parenthesis, all signs change inside it:

\(3y+9+14y-56-y+1)=0\\\)

Now we operate:

\(16y-46=0\)

We add 46 on both sides:

\(16y - 46 + 46 = 0 +46\)

\(16y = 46\)

And divide 16 on both sides:

\(\frac{16y}{16}=\frac{46}{16}\)

\(\bol{x = \frac{46}{16}}\) = \(\frac{23}{8}\)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3(y+3)+7(2y-8)-(y-1)=0​

3y + 9 + 14y - 56 - y + 1 = 0

16y - 46 = 0

16y - 46 + 46 = 0 + 46

16y = 46

16y/16 = 46/16

y = 23/8

Answer:

x + y = 6000

0.03x + 0.05y = 220

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Total principal amount = $6000

Account A:

Let principal = x

Rate = 3% = 0.03

Account B:

Let principal = y

Rate = 5% = 0.05

Interest earned at after one year = $220

Amount invested :

x + y = 6000

Simple interest = principal x rate x time

Interest earned

(x * 0.03 * 1 ) + (y * 0.05 * 1) = $220

0.03x + 0.05y = 220

The null hypothesis for the single factor ANOVA states that all means are equally true.

The null hypothesis for a single-factor ANOVA (analysis of variance) states that all means are equal.

The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, suggests that at least one of the means is different from the others.

The purpose of the ANOVA test is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there are significant differences between the means. A statistical formula used to compare variances across the means (or average) of different groups.

Hence, the statement is true .

To know more about null hypothesis click here :

https://brainly.com/question/30821298

#SPJ4

the answer is (D) XY = 11 mm, YZ = 12 mm, XZ = 28 mm would NOT form a triangle with vertices X, Y, and Z.

How to solve the question?

To determine whether a triangle can be formed using the given side lengths, we need to apply the Triangle Inequality Theorem, which states that the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side.

Let's check each option:

A. XY = 11 mm, YZ = 12 mm, XZ = 18 mm

To form a triangle, we need to check whether the sum of any two sides is greater than the third side. Let's check:

XY + YZ = 11 mm + 12 mm = 23 mm > XZ = 18 mm

YZ + XZ = 12 mm + 18 mm = 30 mm > XY = 11 mm

XY + XZ = 11 mm + 18 mm = 29 mm > YZ = 12 mm

All the combinations are greater than the third side, so a triangle can be formed with these side lengths.

B. XY = 16 mm, YZ = 12 mm, XZ = 23 mm

Let's check whether the sum of any two sides is greater than the third side:

XY + YZ = 16 mm + 12 mm = 28 mm > XZ = 23 mm

YZ + XZ = 12 mm + 23 mm = 35 mm > XY = 16 mm

XY + XZ = 16 mm + 23 mm = 39 mm > YZ = 12 mm

Again, all the combinations are greater than the third side, so a triangle can be formed with these side lengths.

C. XY = 16 mm, YZ = 17 mm, XZ = 18 mm

Let's check whether the sum of any two sides is greater than the third side:

XY + YZ = 16 mm + 17 mm = 33 mm > XZ = 18 mm

YZ + XZ = 17 mm + 18 mm = 35 mm > XY = 16 mm

XY + XZ = 16 mm + 18 mm = 34 mm > YZ = 17 mm

All the combinations are greater than the third side, so a triangle can be formed with these side lengths.

D. XY = 11 mm, YZ = 12 mm, XZ = 28 mm

Let's check whether the sum of any two sides is greater than the third side:

XY + YZ = 11 mm + 12 mm = 23 mm < XZ = 28 mm

YZ + XZ = 12 mm + 28 mm = 40 mm > XY = 11 mm

XY + XZ = 11 mm + 28 mm = 39 mm > YZ = 12 mm

The first combination is less than the third side, so a triangle cannot be formed with these side lengths.

Therefore, the answer is (D) XY = 11 mm, YZ = 12 mm, XZ = 28 mm would NOT form a triangle with vertices X, Y, and Z.

To know more about triangles visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/17335144

#SPJ1

Answer:

3 is the answer pls like me it is the correct one ty

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9^2 + x^2 = 12^2

x^2 = 144 - 81

x^2 = 63

x = √63 = 3√7 or 8

hope that answers your question

Answer:

9^2 + x^2 = 12^2

x^2 = 144 - 81

x^2 = 63

x = √63 = 3√7 or 8

hope that answers your question

Step-by-step explanation:

is wine sir jacque the a beauty for the universe and

Answer:

x=100

y=40

Step-by-step explanation:

~ First I made 500 into a number where it can be divisable by 3. 5x40=200

500-200=300, 300 divided by 3 equals 100

Answer:

D. 96

Step-by-step explanation: