Peetyn Schmidt - Find the par, whole of percent homework
file Edit View Insert Format Slide Arrange Tools Add-ons Help Last edit was 3 days
ago
FA
Background
Layout
Theme
Transition
NE
FARINE PARTNER PRINE
What x2
18h
2
. a text
12 what
What
What
MANSON
Wes1
18h what
11
ia
what
we
IL
18
IR
16
18
1
12
1 What
I had
18
IA

The function is an exponential growth since it is increasing with time and k is positive

Given that at t =6, P = 167075

Then;

167075 =110.8e^6k

167075/110.8 = e^6k

1507.9 = e^6k

ln(1507.9) = 6k

k = ln(1507.9)/6

k = 1.2

Thus in the year 2020;

P = 110.8e^20(1.2)

P = 2.9 * 10^12

In the year 2025;

P = 110.8e^25(1.2)

P = 1.18 * 10^15

To reach 290,000

290,000 = 110.8e^1.2t

290000/110.8 = e^1.2t

2617.3 = e^1.2t

t = ln(2617.3 )/1.2

t = 7 years

Learn more about exponential:https://brainly.com/question/28596571

#SPJ1

Therefore, the unique value of c for this case is 1/2, which does not depend on p.

The Mean Value Theorem is a fundamental result in calculus that relates

f(b) - f(a) = f'(c) (b - a).

by the question.

We have, f(x) = x², where p > 1 and [a, b] = [0, 1].

Then, f(a) = f(0) = 0 and f(b) = f(1) = 1.

Also, f'(x) = 2x.

Now, by the Mean Value Theorem, there exists at least one number c in (a, b) such that:

f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a)

Substituting the values, we get:

1 - 0 = f'(c)(1-0)

1 = 2c

c = 1/2

To learn more about height:

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ1

x = 53/80 = 0.6625

​

if isn't right I have another equation

Answer:

13.25

Step-by-step explanation:

\(x - 7 \div 20 = 5 \div 16\)

by cross multiplying

16(x-7)=5(20)

16x-112=100

16x=100+112

16x=212

x=212 /16

×=13.25

if the question is this

The equation rearranged so that m is the independent variable is n = (9/11)m

To rearrange the equation -2m - 5n = 7m - 3n so that m is the independent variable, we need to isolate the term that contains m on one side of the equation. We can do this by adding 2m to both sides and then subtracting 3n from both sides. This gives us:

-2m - 5n + 2m = 7m - 3n + 2m - 3n

-5n = 9m - 6n

Now, we can further isolate the term containing m by subtracting 6n from both sides and then dividing both sides by 9:

-5n - 6n = 9m - 6n - 6n

-11n = 9m - 12n

-11n + 12n = 9m

n = (9/11)m

Therefore, the equation rearranged so that m is the independent variable is:

n = (9/11)m

This equation expresses n in terms of m, where m is the independent variable, and n depends on m. We can use this equation to determine the value of n for a given value of m.

To learn more about equation click on,

https://brainly.com/question/16453449

#SPJ1

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

The maintenance manager of a trucking firm wishes to create a regression model based on four explanatory variables: (1) annual miles travelled, (2) average load weight, (3) average driving speed, and (4) oil change interval to anticipate when the first engine overhaul will occur. Data have been acquired for a sample of 25 vehicles based on driver logs and onboard computers, Based on given information, description of asked questions are as follow-

a. The maintenance manager can estimate the time until the first engine overhaul by building a regression model using the four explanatory variables: annual miles driven, average load weight, average driving speed, and oil change interval. In regression analysis, the manager can use the sample data of 25 trucks to estimate the relationship between the explanatory variables and the time until the first engine overhaul. By fitting the data to a regression model, the manager can obtain the coefficients for each explanatory variable, indicating their impact on the time until the first engine overhaul.

This model can then be used to forecast the time until the first engine overhaul for future trucks based on their values for the explanatory variables.b-1. The competing hypotheses for testing the joint significance of the explanatory variables are as follows:

- Null hypothesis (H0): The coefficients of all four explanatory variables are equal to zero (no significant relationship).

- Alternative hypothesis (Ha): At least one of the coefficients of the explanatory variables is not equal to zero (significant relationship exists).

b-2. To determine the p-value for the test on joint significance, the manager needs to perform a statistical test, such as the F-test, to assess the overall significance of the explanatory variables. The p-value represents the probability of obtaining the observed test statistic or a more extreme value, assuming the null hypothesis is true. The specific p-value can be obtained from the F-distribution.

b-3. The conclusion to the test on joint significance depends on comparing the obtained p-value to the predetermined significance level (in this case, 10%). If the p-value is less than 0.10, the manager can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the explanatory variables have a joint significant effect on the time until the first engine overhaul. Conversely, if the p-value is greater than or equal to 0.10, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the explanatory variables do not have a joint significant effect.c-1. To assess the individual significance of the explanatory variables at the 10% significance level, the following competing hypotheses can be specified for each variable:

- Null hypothesis (H0): The coefficient of the individual explanatory variable is equal to zero (no significant relationship).

- Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The coefficient of the individual explanatory variable is not equal to zero (significant relationship exists).

c-2. To determine the p-values and conclusions for the tests on individual significance, the manager needs to perform separate statistical tests for each explanatory variable, such as t-tests. The p-value represents the probability of obtaining the observed test statistic or a more extreme value, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

If the p-value is less than 0.10, the manager can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the individual explanatory variable is significant. On the other hand, if the p-value is greater than or equal to 0.10, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the individual explanatory variable is not significant at the 10% significance level.

Learn more about Null hypothesis

https://brainly.com/question/30821298

#SPJ11

Answer:

*See attached image for the 5 points on the graph*

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Find 5 points to calculate inverse

We can use the vertex(-1,-4), 2 y-intercepts(0,-3) and (0,-5) and 2 more points (3,-2) and (3,-6)

Step 2: Find the inverse

You find the inverse when you swap the 'x' and 'y' so it would be

Vertex: (-4,-1)

y-intercept 1:(-3,0)

y-intercept 2:(-5,0)

Point 1: (-2,3)

Point 2: (-6,3)

Step 3: Graph

Graph the points on a graph and connect the points

The inverse of a graph is done by reflecting the graph across the line \(y = x\).

See attachment for the inverse graph.

From the given graph, we have the following 5 points.

\((x_1,y_1) = (8,-1)\)

\((x_2,y_2) = (3,-2)\)

\((x_3,y_3) = (-1,-4)\)

\((x_4,y_4) = (3,-6)\)

\((x_5,y_5) = (8,-7)\)

Reflect the above points across \(y = x\), to get the inverse function

\((x_1,y_1) = (-1,8)\)

\((x_2,y_2) = (-2,3)\)

\((x_3,y_3) = (-4,-1)\)

\((x_4,y_4) = (-6,3)\)

\((x_5,y_5) = (-7,8)\)

The inverse graph must pass through the above points

See attachment for the inverse graph

Read more about inverse graphs at:

https://brainly.com/question/11033643

by taking the quotient between the volume in the pot and the volume of each serving, we conclude that there are 12 servings.

The number of servings is given by the quotient between the volume in the pot and the volume of each serving, so we have:

N = (3/4)*/(1/16) = 12

So there are 12 servings in the pot.

If you want to learn more about quotients:

https://brainly.com/question/8952483

#SPJ1

Answer:

4/6 chance

Step-by-step explanation:

there is a 4/6 probability this will happen

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) What percentage of the adults exercise?

₹

(b) What percentage of the adults are vegetarian?

€

(c) What percentage of the adults who are vegetarian exercise? [ (d) Is there evidence that adults who are vegetarian tend to be exercisers more often than average?

Yes, because the percentage found in part (c) is much greater than the percentage found in part (a).

Yes, because the percentage found in part (c) is much greater than the percentage found in part ((b).

No, because the percentage found in part (c) is about the same as the percentage found in part ((a).

No, because the percentage found in part (c) is about the same as the percentage found in part ((b).

Answer:just hart me n I will help

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

162 ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

the formula for finding the area of a triangle is \(\frac{b*h}{2}\)

the base is 27 and the height is 12

\(\frac{27*12}{2}=\frac{324}{2} = 162\)

Translating the triangle DEF involves moving the triangle along the coordinate plane

The y-coordinate of point D after the translation (x, y) → (x + 6, y – 4) is 1

From the figure the coordinate of D is:

D = (-2.5,5)

The rule of translation is given as:

(x, y) → (x + 6, y – 4)

So, we have:

(x, y) → (-2.5 + 6, 5 – 4)

Evaluate the sum and the difference

(x, y) → (3.5, 1)

Remove the x-coordinate

y → 1

Hence, the y-coordinate of point D after the translation is 1

Read more about translation at:

https://brainly.com/question/11468584

Some part of the regression can be estimated precisely, but it is difficult to predict the effect of individual regressors when there is multicollinearity in the data.Multiple regression models require that variables be independent of one another, otherwise, multicollinearity will occur.

Consider the multiple regression model with two regressors X1 and X2, where both variables are determinants of the dependent variable. You first regress Y on X1 only and find no relationship. However when regressing Y on X1 and X2, the slope coefficient changes by a large amount.

This suggests that your first regression suffers from omitted variable bias. Imperfect multicollinearity implies that it will be difficult to estimate precisely one or more of the partial effects using the data at hand. Imperfect multicollinearity means that there is a strong correlation between the regressors, but they are not perfectly correlated.

As a result, some part of the regression can be estimated precisely, but it is difficult to predict the effect of individual regressors when there is multicollinearity in the data.Multiple regression models require that variables be independent of one another, otherwise, multicollinearity will occur.

When there is multicollinearity in the data, it means that two or more of the variables are highly correlated with one another. In other words, the data may contain redundant information, which can make it difficult to estimate the regression coefficients or partial effects.The dummy variable trap refers to a situation in which one of the variables is a perfect linear combination of the other variables.

This results in the model being unsolvable, and the coefficients cannot be estimated. Heteroskedasticity is the term used to describe when the variance of the residuals is not constant across all values of the independent variables. This means that the predictions of the model may be biased, and the standard errors of the coefficients may be incorrect.

For more such questions on multicollinearity, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/15856348

#SPJ8

ANSWER:

A. 337.5 miles

STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:

What we must do is calculate the distance in each section, when the speed and time vary, the sum of both section is the total distance:

Section 1:

Section 2:

The total distance is:

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

Odds AGAINST are 3 to5        then odds FOR are  2 to 5

    2/5   = .4 = 40%   chance of winning

Answer:

9 (*2)  − 4

Step-by-step explanation:

the *2 is the square unit

The size of the beetle in the photo can be calculated by multiplying the actual size of the beetle (15 mm) by the percentage increase (66%). The calculation is as follows: 15 mm x 66% = 9.9 mm. Therefore, the size of the beetle in the photo is 9.9 mm.

To understand this calculation better, it is helpful to break it down into its individual components. The actual size of the beetle is 15 mm, which is the size of the beetle before it is increased. The percentage increase is 66%, which means that the size of the beetle will be increased by 66% of its original size. The calculation then multiplies the actual size of the beetle (15 mm) by the percentage increase (66%) to determine the size of the beetle in the photo (9.9 mm).This calculation can be used to determine the size of any object in a photo that has been increased to a certain percentage of its original size. All that is needed is the actual size of the object and the percentage increase. The calculation can then be used to determine the size of the object in the photo.

Learn more about percentage here:

https://brainly.com/question/26352729

#SPJ1

Asking subject matter experts to rate each item in a test would be most helpful in strengthening the content validity of a test

Asking subject matter experts to rate each item in a test would be most helpful in strengthening the content validity of a test. Content validity refers to the extent to which a test accurately measures the specific content or domain it is intended to assess. By involving subject matter experts, who are knowledgeable and experienced in the domain being tested, in the evaluation of each test item, we can gather expert opinions on the relevance, representativeness, and alignment of the items with the intended content. Their input can help ensure that the items are appropriate and adequately cover the content area being assessed, thus enhancing the content validity of the test.

Know more about subject matter experts here:

https://brainly.com/question/31154372

#SPJ11

Answer: I believe he could wear 768 outfits

Step-by-step explanation: I had a similar question consisting of the same numbers.

Since we need to round up to the next integer, the required sample size for this experiment is 284 people for the confidence level.

To find the required sample size for NASA's experiment, we can use the following formula for the sample size estimation in a proportion experiment:

\(n = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / E^2\)

where:
- n is the sample size
- Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (85% in this case)
- p is the estimated population proportion (0.33)
- E is the margin of error (0.04)

First, we need to find the z-score for an 85% confidence level. We can look this up in a z-table, or use an online calculator. The z-score for an 85% confidence level is approximately 1.44.

Next, we can plug the values into the formula:
\(n = (1.44^2 * 0.33 * (1-0.33)) / 0.04^2\)
n ≈ (2.0736 * 0.33 * 0.67) / 0.0016
n ≈ 283.66

Since we need to round up to the next integer, the required sample size for this experiment is 284 people.

Learn more about confidence level here:

https://brainly.com/question/22851322

#SPJ11

Answer:

1 1/8

Step-by-step explanation:

2/8 + 7/8

Since the denominators are the same, we add the numerators

9/8

This is an improper fraction, so we can rewrite this

8/8+ 1/8

1 1/8

Answer:

\(\frac{1}{4}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope = \(\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\) where the given points are \((x_1,y_1)\) and \((x_2,y_2)\)

Plug the given points (80,20) and (120,30) into the equation

\(\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\\= \frac{30-20}{120-80}\\= \frac{10}{40}\\= \frac{1}{4}\)

Therefore, the slope of the line that passes through these points is \(\frac{1}{4}\).

I hope this helps!

The correct trigonometry expression are

sin 48 = a/c

tan 42 b/a

sin 42 = b/c

cos 48 = b/c

The correct expression is worked using SOH CAH TOA

Sin = opposite / hypotenuse - SOH

Cos = adjacent / hypotenuse - CAH

Tan = opposite / adjacent - TOA

The right angle triangle is labelled as follows

for angle 48

opposite = a

adjacent = b

hypotenuse = c

for angle 42

opposite = b

adjacent = a

hypotenuse = c

This help us to get the expressions as required

Learn more about Trigonometry here:

https://brainly.com/question/29402966

#SPJ1

The half-life of an isotope is the time by which there is a 50% probability that decay has occurred if Cobalt-60 has a half-life of 5.27 years then mean time to decay is 7.65 years , standard deviation of the decay time is 3.82 years , the 99th percentile is  36.4 years and  the mean and standard deviation of the total time the experiment will last is 6.61 years.

(a) The mean time to decay can be found using the formula: \(mean = half-life / ln(2)\).

Therefore, for cobalt-60 with a half-life of 5.27 years, the mean time to decay is:

\(mean = 5.27 / ln(2) \approx7.65 years\)

(b) The standard deviation of the decay time can be found using the formula:

standard deviation =    \(half-life /(\ sqrt{(ln(2))}).\)

Therefore, for cobalt-60 with a half-life of 5.27 years, the standard deviation of the decay time is:

standard deviation = \(5.27 / (\sqrt{(ln(2))}) \approx 3.82 years\)

(c) The 99th percentile can be found using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the exponential distribution. For cobalt-60 with a half-life of 5.27 years, the CDF is:

\(CDF(t) = 1 - e^{(-t/5.27)}\)

Setting the CDF equal to 0.99 and solving for t, we get:

\(0.99 = 1 - e^{(-t/5.27)}\)

\(e^{(-t/5.27)} = 0.01\)

\(-t/5.27 = ln(0.01)\)

\(t = -5.27 * ln(0.01)\)

\(t\approx 36.4 years\)

Therefore, the 99th percentile of the decay time for cobalt-60 is approximately 36.4 years.

(d) Three cobalt-60 atoms, then the total time the experiment will last is the sum of the decay times of each atom. Since the decay times are independent and identically distributed, the mean and standard deviation of the total time can be calculated by adding the means and variances of each individual decay time.

The mean of the total time is:

\(mean(total) = mean(atom1) + mean(atom2) + mean(atom3)\)

\(mean(total) = 7.65 + 7.65 + 7.65\)

\(mean(total) = 22.95 years\)

The variance of the total time is:

\(variance(total) = variance(atom1) + variance(atom2) + variance(atom3)\)

\(variance(total) = (3.82)^2 + (3.82)^2+ (3.82)^2\)

\(variance(total) \approx43.67 years\)

The standard deviation of the total time is the square root of the variance:

standard deviation(total) \(= \sqrt{(variance(total))}\)

\(standard deviation(total) \approx6.61 years\)

Therefore, the mean and standard deviation of the total time for observing three cobalt-60 atoms until they decay are approximately 22.95 years and 6.61 years, respectively.

To practice more questions about standard deviation:

https://brainly.com/question/12402189

#SPJ11