legal complaints charging organizations with discrimination have largely been eliminated due to the passage of a number of laws in the u.s. prohibiting discrimination against protected classes

Answer:

Age requirements : they must be up to a particular age. They must be embers of my class and they must have spent a certain time in that class. They must be aware of the things that the class need.

Hope this helps and pls mark as brainliest :)

A testimonial evidence on a simple note simply refers to an evidence which is provided by witnesses who first take an oath or affirmation that they will tell the truth.

In a real fact, an evidence is an available information indicating whether a belief or proposition is valid or invalid

So therefore, a testimonial evidence on a simple note simply refers to an evidence which is provided by witnesses who first take an oath or affirmation that they will tell the truth.

Learn more about evidence:

https://brainly.com/question/375033

#SPJ1

Answer:

Preliminary hearing.

Explanation:

A preliminary hearing in criminal litigation is commonly referred to as a prelim and is the legal process of a "trial before the trial" of an accused or the defendant.

This simply means that, at the preliminary hearing, the judge using the "probable cause" legal standard, decides whether there is enough evidence to warrant the defendant to stand trial but not to determine whether he or she is guilty or innocent of the crime. Thus, no jury is present or required at this phase of trial because the defendant isn't entitled to any at the preliminary hearing.

Additionally, during the preliminary hearing phase of a trial, evidence is given in the attempt to convince the judge that there is enough evidence to go to trial. A prosecutor on behalf of the government may call witnesses to testify against the defendant and even present physical evidence to the judge, so that the case may go to trial while the defense counsel will work towards having the case dismissed by cross examining the government witnesses and disputing any evidence presented.

The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.

The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.

To know more about genocide visit:

brainly.com/question/32013150

#SPJ11

Here's the sample response:

If the first pond contains chemicals, then it will have fewer frogs because the chemicals will kill the frogs before they can lay eggs.

Here's my response that will get you a 100%:

If the first pond contains chemicals, less frogs will be present because the chemicals can destroy the frogs until they can lay eggs.

The structure and operations of Congress are designed to reflect the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives. This means that the legislative branch is responsible for creating laws that govern the nation, while the executive branch is responsible for carrying out those laws. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the law and ensuring that it is applied fairly and evenly.

Congress is made up of two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each state has a certain number of representatives based on its population, while each senator represents an entire state. Representatives are elected to two-year terms, while senators are elected to six-year terms. This staggered election cycle ensures that one chamber is always up for reelection, providing voters with a constant opportunity to hold their representatives accountable.The Constitution grants Congress a number of specific powers, including the power to tax, borrow money, declare war, and regulate interstate commerce. In addition, Congress has the power to pass any law necessary and proper for carrying out its other constitutional powers. This expansive view of congressional authority was affirmed by the Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), which held that Congress has implied powers in addition to its express powers. The structure of Congress thus reflects the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives. The separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches ensures that no one branch becomes too powerful, while the staggered election cycles provide voters with a way to hold their representatives accountable.

Learn more about Congress here

https://brainly.com/question/4736734

#SPJ4

The response is lying about earning a medal of honor from the military.

Explanation:

The Stolen Value Law makes it a federal criminal to falsely claim to have received a military medal or award; if the act involves the highest honors of the military, it carries a sentence of up to one year in jail. The FBI maintains a close eye out since it is against the law to purchase, sell, or falsely possess a Medal of Honor in the United States. The recipient or a designee are the only people who are permitted to own a Medal of Honor, according to Sanborn. Only when someone makes a false claim about a specific military decoration, such as the Purple Heart, Bronze Star, or a few others, in order to profit financially or otherwise directly from a crime is it against the law. Someone making a fake military claim

To learn more about 'law' refer to

https://brainly.com/question/11658910

#SPJ4

Answer:

paralegals are more involved with actual technicalities of the low.

Explanation:

whereas are is legal assistance under take border tasks

Answer:

Your answer is C. Hormonal!

Explanation:

Me and other brainly dudes confirmed this answer for this question.

Please mark Brainliest! Have a nice day :)

A public area represents works whose intellectual property rights have been extended or works that have been released by means of the author's false.

The definition of an intellectual is a person greater inquisitive about logic as opposed to emotions. An example of an intellectual is a scientist.

When matters are perceived intellectually, then they are looked at from the aware mind and ordinary awareness, because of this a quantifiable, logical, outside angle concerning a number of mental "doing" = questioning, comparing, concluding, reasoning and planning.

Intellectual skills seek advice from the ways of questioning and problem-fixing utilized by experts in a discipline. A fashionable highbrow skill is vital to all fields of taking a look at is essential wondering. highbrow capacity consists of memory, verbal comprehension, reasoning, analysis, hassle-fixing, and reasoning abilities.

Learn more about Intellectual here:

https://brainly.com/question/1078532

#SPJ4

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

When people hear something they like to instantly believe that thing and start hating them.

Answer:

Police officers, construction workers, [ and school crossing guards have in common that: they all must sometimes work near traffic AND they are all at higher risk from impaired drivers. ]

The  law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.

The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.

Therefore, option C is correct.

Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:

https://brainly.com/question/5481344

#SPJ1

The Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000 is a set of guidelines and procedures for Virginia state agencies and the administrative processes they follow.

The Act outlines the methods for developing, adopting, and implementing regulations, as well as hearing and decision-making procedures.

The Virginia Administrative Process Act is a set of state laws that govern the operations of Virginia's administrative agencies.

The Act establishes the procedures that state agencies must follow in adopting, developing, and implementing rules and regulations. The Act was enacted in 1981 and is designed to ensure that state agencies operate in a fair and open manner.

It outlines the procedures for public participation in the development of regulations, including opportunities for public comment, public hearings, and judicial review.

It also outlines the methods for enforcing agency decisions and appeals to those decisions.

In summary, the Virginia Administrative Process Act provides a structured process for state agencies to follow in conducting their affairs, ensuring that they operate in an open and fair manner that is consistent with the principles of democratic government.

To know more about Virginia Administrative Process refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20338178#

#SPJ11

The highest level of policy is often referred to as "macro-level policy" and is typically created first.

Macro-level policy refers to policies that are formulated at the highest level of government or governance. These policies are broad in scope, overarching, and set the fundamental direction and principles for other policies to follow. They often address major societal issues, long-term goals, and national or regional priorities. Macro-level policies are typically created first because they lay the foundation for more specific policies that are developed at lower levels of government or within specific sectors. These policies provide a framework and guidance for subsequent policy development and implementation.

Examples of macro-level policies include constitutional provisions, national development plans, major legislative acts, and strategic policy documents issued by the highest levels of government. They shape the overall policy agenda, establish priorities, and define the vision for governance. Other levels of policy, such as meso-level (sector-specific) or micro-level (implementation and operational) policies, are developed based on and aligned with the macro-level policies. By establishing the highest level of policy first, governments can ensure coherence, consistency, and alignment in policy development across different sectors and levels of government, thereby fostering effective governance and policy implementation.

Learn more about Macro-level here: https://brainly.com/question/31677972

#SPJ11

Yes, an agreement to work for a person for the lifetime of that person subject to the statute of frauds as If it is possible that a contract with an uncertain completion date will be finished within a year, it is not subject to the Statute of Frauds.

A legal principle known as the statute of frauds mandates that certain kinds of contracts must be executed in writing in order to be legally binding. State laws include statutes of frauds. The statutes of fraud vary from state to state, but they are all constrained. Only some types of oral contracts are covered by statutes of fraud.

Ordinarily, an enforceable contract can be either written or oral, but in some cases, statutes of frauds specify two key conditions that must be met for certain oral contracts in order for them to be upheld. A contract that is subject to a statute of frauds will not be enforceable unless it is documented in writing. It's not necessary for the writing to be an official contract.

Learn more about Statute of Frauds at:

brainly.com/question/29607080

#SPJ4

The term "unauthorized practice of law" refers to when a person, not licensed or authorized to practice law, engages in activities that require legal expertise. In the context of CPA s (Certified Public Accountants), they are experts in accounting and financial matters, but not in law. If a CPA provides legal advice or represents clients in legal matters without proper licensing, they would be engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, which can lead to penalties and disciplinary actions.

The term "unauthorized practice of law" refers to individuals who are not licensed attorneys but still engage in activities that are typically reserved for lawyers. This can include giving legal advice, representing clients in court, or drafting legal documents. For CPA s, the line between what constitutes legal advice and financial advice can be blurry. While CPA s can offer guidance on financial matters, they must be careful not to cross over into providing legal advice, which could be considered unauthorized practice of law. It is important for CPA s to stay within the scope of their licensure and seek legal counsel if necessary to avoid any potential legal consequences.

learn more about unauthorized

https://brainly.com/question/26210364

#SPJ11

A prima facie case exists where there seems to be sufficient evidence to convict the defendant.

In legal terms, a prima facie case refers to the establishment of a set of facts that, if taken as true, would support a legal claim or accusation. It means that on the surface, there appears to be enough evidence to suggest that the defendant may be guilty of the alleged offense.

It simply indicates that there is enough initial evidence to proceed with a trial or further legal proceedings. The burden of proof ultimately rests on the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Learn more about defendant, here:

https://brainly.com/question/33436163

#SPJ4

Answer:

c

Explanation:

In order to determine whether someone is considered an employee, there are several factors that need to be considered.

These factors can vary depending on the specific laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in question, but some common factors include:

Control: An employee is typically subject to the direction and control of their employer in terms of how, when, and where they perform their work. This means that the employer has the right to direct and supervise the employee's work, and may provide specific instructions or guidelines for how tasks should be completed.

Compensation: Employees are generally compensated on a regular basis (such as weekly or biweekly) and may receive benefits such as health insurance or retirement contributions. The employer is typically responsible for withholding taxes from the employee's pay and paying their portion of payroll taxes.

Benefits and Perks: Employees may also receive additional benefits and perks such as paid vacation time or sick leave, access to company resources like a company vehicle, computer or tools, and may have access to additional training opportunities.

Duration: The relationship between an employee and employer is usually of a long-term nature, and the employee is expected to continue working for the employer for an indefinite period of time. However, there are also temporary or seasonal employment contracts, which may have a pre-determined time period.

Integration: Employees are usually an integral part of the employer's business operations and are expected to perform tasks that are critical to the functioning of the business. Employees often have a specific job title, and a clear job description with a set of expectations.

Exclusivity: An employee is generally expected to work exclusively for the employer and not to engage in work for other employers at the same time.

Based on these factors, it is possible to determine whether someone is an employee or not. However, it is important to note that the determination can be complex and may require consideration of additional factors or legal precedent. In conclusion, the status of an employee can be determined based on a variety of factors including control, compensation, benefits and perks, duration, integration, and exclusivity. However, the determination can be complex and may depend on specific laws and regulations in the jurisdiction in question.

To know more about compensation:

https://brainly.com/question/28250225

#SPJ4

Single-member districts are those with only one representative in the legislature. The opposite of single member districts is multi-member districts. Many electoral systems, like runoff voting and range plurality, employ single member districts.

Members of the lower house of parliament of India are chosen from single-member districts, whereas those of the upper house are chosen from multi-member districts. The president of Singapore is chosen from districts with both single and multiple members.

Single-member districts are used to conduct the elections for the State Board of Education's (SBOE) members.

Therefore, every choice relating to public education, including graduation standards and textbook adoptions, will undoubtedly be influenced by Texas voters.

For such more question on Single-member

https://brainly.com/question/26529616

#SPJ4

Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly.

Contract frustration refers to the breach of contract for non-performance without the fault of either party to the contract.

This implies that the obliging party cannot perform and fulfill the contractual obligations because of the occurrence of a fundamental event, making it impracticable or impossible.

Thus, Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly, thereby necessitating the formation of a new contract.

Learn more about the frustration of contracts at https://brainly.com/question/27415360

#SPJ1

The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 has an impact on lobbyists because it strengthens the public disclosure requirements for lobbying activity and funding, places stricter restrictions on gifts for members of Congress and their staff, and mandates the disclosure of earmarks in spending bills.

Lobbying is forbidden right away after leaving office, certain actions are forbidden, and contributions must be reported. Certain acts are prohibited, such as lobbying immediately after leaving an office. Disclosure of contributions is also required. The Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) mandates the disclosure of paid lobbyists' attempts to influence decisions made by the executive and legislative branches of the federal government.

Paying a policy maker to cast a vote in your favor or rewarding him or her with valued considerations after a vote is the most plainly unethical (and unlawful) behavior involved with lobbying. People and groups with money would always prevail if this behavior were permitted. Some states have laws that restrict the use of public funds for lobbying or outright forbid state agencies from hiring lobbyists with the help of taxpayer money. Some governments mandate that specific agencies have a designated lobbyist or a role akin to a lobbyist on staff. These states take the opposite tack.

Learn more about lobbyists visit: brainly.com/question/509906

#SPJ4

La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.

Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta  etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.

Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.

A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.

Judge is trying to unlocking the cage and handle the issue by using the ""great writ"" for all habeas corpus in order to to grant chimpanzees rights because the team wants to make a good history in courtroom, by attempting and improving all the animals' legal law with position to provide all rights to them.

The DNA of a chimpanzee suits for almost 98% with the DNA of a human. Does this suggest that they ought to be entitled to the identical rights As of these days the principle query to decide whether or not you've got got a proper or now no longer is: are you a human being? In Unlocking the Cage.

D.A. Pennebaker and documentary veteran Chris Hegedus observe Steven Wise in his notable mission to interrupt down the prison wall that separates animals from human beings. His crew’s, the Nonhuman Rights Project, goal is to convert an animal, extra specific ‘’non-human’’ animals, e.g. chimpanzees, whales, elephants, from a ‘’thing’’ and not using a rights to someone that has prison safety and prison personhood. Wise and his crew are making records through submitting the primary court cases to acquire this goal.

Learn more about chimpanzees visit: brainly.com/question/29507886

#SPJ4