Ensure the authenticity and integrity of the information they supply, and preserve their data and privacy.
Which word best encapsulates integrity?Honesty, honor, and probity are a few words that frequently describe integrity. All of these terms refer to "uprightness of character or deed," but integrity implies trustworthiness and incorruptibility to the point that one is unable to be unfaithful to a trust, responsibility, or commitment.
What does integrity in the workplace look like?Be Willing to Work Hard
Another illustration of integrity in the job is when you are working while on business time; you aren't watching from the sidelines and demanding that others complete the task for you. Even individuals in prominent positions ought to be aware that if you are never willing to do some work yourself, you will lose the respect of your subordinates.
To know more about integrity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12881972
#SPJ1
When the total revenues in the federal government are greater than the total expenses in a given year, the budget:.
When the total revenues in the federal government are greater than the total expenses in a given year, the budget is in a budget deficit and this is because the government spends more than it collects in revenue
What is a Budget Deficit?This refers to the economic and financial term that is used in order to discuss the situation when expenses exceed the revenue of a given or particular country and have a direct effect on the financial health of the country in question.
Hence, it can be seen that in a situation when the total revenues in the federal government are greater than the total expenses in a given year, it is said that there is a budget deficit and this means that there needs to be financial analysis in order to correct this financial anomaly in order to balance the economy of the country, especially in a fiscal year.
Read more about budget deficit here:
https://brainly.com/question/26010226
#SPJ1
In 2001 12-year-old Lionel Tate who was try doesn't adult was convicted of killing a six-year-old girl by practicing wrestling moves on her he was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole if the same crime occurred today would Lionel have been sentenced to death instead
No, even if the same crime had happened today he could not be sentenced to death if he was 12 years old.
Lionel Alexander Tate is the youngest American citizen ever sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, though this sentence was eventually overturned. In January 2001, when Tate was 12, he was convicted of first-degree murder for the 1999 battering death of six-year-old Tiffany Eunick.
The reason being, Lionel was not of competent age and he was tried as an adult as it was an exceptional case. Therefore, he could not be given death sentence even today as the judge at that time also took harshest of measures to treat him as an adult for a murder trial.
To know more about Murder Trial:
brainly.com/question/28289356
#SPJ1
List four (4) exceptions for obtaining a search warrant to search a house, car, or person. For each exception given, provide a brief example.
Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.
(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.
(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.
(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.
Como as palavras estão organizadas nas estrofes?como são as letras que compõem o poema?
Olá. Primeiramente, é importante ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens". Esse não é o servidor brasileiro e sim o americano, por isso perguntas em português s´´o podem ser respondidas dessa forma.
Em segundo lugar, você não apresentou nenhum texto, o que dificulta que a sua pergunta seja respondida. Entretanto, eu posso te ajudar, afirmando que dentro das estrofes de um poema, as palavras sãpo organizadas em versos. O conjunto de versos, forma uma estrofe.
Em relação as letras, só é possivel determinar com elas são, depois que a leitura do texto for feita, mas podemos afirmar que na maioria dos casos, as letras maiusculas são usadas apenas no inivio do verso, enquanto as letras minusculas são usadas em todos os versos.
The Constitution limits the executive branch from declaring war by giving that power to
the judicial branch.
the legislative branch.
the leader of the Senate.
the leader of the House.
Answer: The Legislative branch
Explanation: Just trust me bro
Answer: The answer is:
B: the legislative branch.
Explanation:
Edge 2023
Hope :}
Don't trust random people on the internet.
Which of the following statements correctly describe how a rate law is determined?
The value of k can be calculated from a single experiment once the reaction orders are known.
If there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually.
The rate law is determined by measuring the initial reaction rate for different reactant concentrations.
The correct statement that describes how a rate law is determined is "b. If there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually."
What is the rate law?The rate law is the formula that describes how the concentration of reactants changes with time. The rate law is expressed in terms of the rate of a chemical reaction and is determined by measuring the rate of a reaction over a range of concentrations of the reactants involved. Usually, the rate law can be expressed in the form of the equation as shown below:
Rate = k[A]^x [B]^y
Where A and B are reactants in the reaction, k is the rate constant and y are the reaction orders concerning reactants A and B, respectively.
How is the rate law determined?The rate law can be determined by following the steps below:
1. Measure the initial rate of reaction: Measure the rate of the reaction at the beginning of the reaction to determine the initial rate. The initial rate is determined by measuring the rate at which the reactants are consumed or products are formed.
2. Measure the rate of reaction for different concentrations: Determine the rate of reaction at different concentrations of reactants. The rate of reaction is measured as a function of the reactant concentrations.
3.Plug in rate data into the rate law equation: Plug the rate data obtained from the experiments into the rate law equation to determine the rate constant and the reaction orders concerning the reactants involved. Therefore, if there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually.
Thus option b which is "If there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually" is the right answer that describes how a rate law is determined.
Learn more about Rate Law at: https://brainly.com/question/16981791
#SPJ11
information taken directly from an existing classified source
Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of information extraction.
Classified information is often collected by governments for various reasons. It can be used to monitor terrorist activities, develop new weapons, or even spy on foreign governments. It is also important for the government to keep certain information private, such as diplomatic negotiations and trade agreements. In addition, classified information can be used to help inform decision-making and protect citizens from harm.
Businesses also use classified information to protect their interests. Companies use classified information to protect their trade secrets and proprietary technology. This helps them stay ahead of their competitors and maintain a competitive edge. For example, a company may have access to classified information that could allow them to develop a new product before their competitors, giving them a huge advantage in the market.
Learn more about stated verbatim at : https://brainly.com/question/30142714
#SPJ4
Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of ______
A tenant properly filed a complaint under state law against his landlord in federal district court under diversity jurisdiction, alleging that the landlord's negligence in failing to repair the stairs in a common area of the apartment building resulted in the tenant falling and sustaining significant injuries. After the landlord served his answer, the tenant moved for summary judgment. In support of his motion, the tenant submitted affidavits from three other tenants in which each stated that she had told the landlord prior to the accident that the stairs needed to be fixed. In opposition to the motion, the landlord submitted an affidavit from the maintenance worker employed by the landlord, stating that the stairs were in good condition on the day of the tenant's accident.
How should the court rule on the motion for summary judgment?
In the situation portrayed above, it may be stated that the court will grant the motion in the interest of the plaintiff, i.e., the tenant.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve complaints against their landlords, the tenants usually have an upper hand in getting the motion granted by the court in their favors more often than not. Thus, the court readily grants motion in such cases.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
WILL GIVE THANKS PLUS BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP ME!!
5. Which step in the progression of a case may include movement of a case through
local, state and federal jurisdictions?
A. Sentencing
B. Deliberations
C. Trial
D. Appeals
if i get into a fight and the cameras only see me swinging bc he hit in the classroom and since i have a history of gettin into fights.and to advoid getting more than 4 days of iss.do i get my parents to bring it up or wait for the school to bring it up.bc the fight happened in the morning and i called my parents to explain.a teacher wrote down my name but the adminstrative didnt call me or my parents in.what do i do.
The full story is that he wouldnt give me and my friend's stuff back.but then we got it(without force)then as we was walking out to go to the next class.he pulled my hair and pushed me(in the class room)so the cameras didnt catch it.he ran and i got mad so i chased after him and started beating him up while he tried to leave.then as he turned,i punched him one last time,the teacher saw me.asked for my name and his name.i gave it to her,she said do better choice,but im pretty sure shes gonna report it because she has too.i called my parents explained.
Connect each type of case on the left with a court that would most likely hold jurisdiction to hear
that case.
a person who wants to dispute a
traffic court
speeding ticket
a company declaring bankruptcy
juvenile court
a company that wants to appeal a case
involving two different states
bankruptcy court
a couple getting divorced
US Supreme Court
a crime by a 12-year-old girl
family court
Answer:
a) Traffic court: a person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket
b) Bankruptcy court: a company declaring bankruptcy
c) US supreme court: a company that wants to appeal a case involving two different states
d) Family court: a couple getting divorce
e) Juvenile court: a crime by a 12-year-old girl
Explanation:
a) Traffic court: a person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket
A Traffic court is court used for the handling of cases regarding traffic cases.
b) Bankruptcy court: a company declaring bankruptcy
A bankruptcy court is a type of federal court that deals with matters relating to bankruptcy.
c) US supreme court: a company that wants to appeal a case involving two different states
The supreme court is the highest federal court having jurisdiction over all federal and state court cases that involve a point of federal law, and original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases.
d) Family court: a couple getting divorced
The family court us a court to where matters relating to family law are handled.
e) Juvenile court: a crime by a 12-year-old girl
Juvenile Court is a court that deals with under-age defendants who violate any federal, state or municipal law, and any child who is abused, neglected or dependent.
The case and the court that would most likely hold jurisdiction to hear about it
A person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket.Traffic courtA company declaring bankruptcy.Bankruptcy court A company that wants to appeal a case involving two different states.US supreme courtA couple getting divorce.Family courtA crime by a 12-year-old girl.Juvenile courtTherefore,
Traffic court deals with traffic cases.Bankruptcy court settles issues relating to bankruptcyFamily court handles family matters.Juvenile court deals with cases relating to underage childrenUS supreme Court handles issues between states.Learn more about court:
https://brainly.com/question/15818332
Suppose that, under a new city ordinance, police officers would have a choice when it comes to dealing with persons possessing less than four ounces of marijuana. relying on their discretion, officers could (a) arrest the offender, leading to possible jail time; or (b) write the offender a ticket, treating the infraction like a traffic violation. would this be a just and fair policy? would it make it easier or more difficult for police officers to protect the community? why or why not?
Under the proposed city ordinance, police officers would have discretion when dealing with individuals possessing less than four ounces of marijuana. They could either (a) arrest the offender, leading to possible jail time or (b) write the offender a ticket, treating the infraction like a traffic violation.
Whether this policy is just and fair depends on various factors, such as the potential for unequal treatment, the prioritization of law enforcement resources, and the impacts on the community. On one hand, allowing officer discretion could lead to inconsistencies and potential biases in how offenders are treated. On the other hand, treating minor marijuana possession as a traffic violation could reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and allow officers to focus on more serious crimes.
As for the impact on police officers protecting the community, this policy could make it easier for them to allocate resources more effectively and concentrate on higher-priority issues. However, if discretion is not applied consistently and fairly, it could create mistrust and tensions within the community. Ultimately, the success of this policy would depend on how effectively it is implemented and monitored.
To know more about the Illegality of Marijuana Possession- https://brainly.com/question/29800924
#SPJ11
In addition to the general provisions of the Common Rule (the federal regulations for protecting research subjects), FERPA, PPRA, and Subpart D of the federal regulations become govern research’s regulations in the public schools. Those three options are included.
In addition to the general provisions of the Common Rule, FERPA, PPRA, and Subpart D of the federal regulations become governing research regulations in public schools.
FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act): FERPA is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. It applies to all educational institutions that receive funds from the U.S. Department of Education. When conducting research in public schools, researchers must comply with FERPA regulations to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of student records.
PPRA (Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment): PPRA is a federal law that governs the administration of surveys, analyses, or evaluations in public schools that collect personal information from students. It requires parental consent and provides certain rights to parents regarding the use of their child's personal information. When conducting research involving surveys, analyses, or evaluations in public schools, researchers must comply with PPRA regulations to protect the rights of students and their parents.
Subpart D of the federal regulations: Subpart D of the federal regulations refers to the regulations implemented by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) specifically for research involving children. These regulations provide additional protections for children participating in research. When conducting research involving children in public schools, researchers must comply with Subpart D regulations in addition to the general provisions of the Common Rule.
In public schools, in addition to the general provisions of the Common Rule, researchers must also comply with FERPA to protect student privacy, PPRA to protect student and parental rights, and Subpart D of the federal regulations to provide additional protections for children participating in research. These regulations ensure that research conducted in public schools follows ethical guidelines and safeguards the rights and privacy of students and their families.
To know more about FERPA ,visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28083828
#SPJ11
Are these statements true or false? Give your opinions and explain the reason why:
1. Offers to enter into commercial contracts terminate when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
2. When the offeree replies that a part of the offer is accepted, the offeree shall be deemed to have made a new offer.
3. Remedy of fines and remedy of damages shall be applied concurrently
4. Time when written contracts are entered into is at the time when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
5. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of damages shall not be applied
6. The parties agreed that the fine level accounts for 8% of the contract value. This agreement is contrary to the provisions of law
7. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of fines shall be applied
8. Every contract for purchase and sale of goods between traders and traders is commercial contract.
9. The subjects of commercial contract for purchase and sale are the signers of contract
10. The aggrieved party shall bear the burden of proof of loss when requesting the breaching party to pay for damages.
Answer:
sorry I didn't have the answer ok I needed the points
Which of the following was a former name for the FBI?
The Division of Investigation
The United States Bureau of Investigation
the US Secret Service
The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
Answer:
B The United States Bureau of Investigation
Explanation:
Answer:
all of them
A. the US Secret Service
B. The United States Bureau of Investigation
C. The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
D. The Division of Investigation
Explanation:
According to the law, crimes are statutory offenses; this essentially means that:
A. courts may assess punitive damages in order to punish the wrongdoer.
B. the prevention of crime should include deterrence and rehabilitation.
C. it must be proved that the crime is dangerous or detrimental to society
D. a behavior is not a crime unless a state legislature has criminalized it.
E. individuals do not approve of the action being criminalized.
D. According to the law, crimes are statutory offenses, which essentially means that a behavior is not a crime unless a state legislature has criminalized it.
Statutory offenses refer to offenses that are defined and prohibited by law. It means that an act can only be considered a crime if it has been expressly defined as such by the legislature. This is in contrast to common law offenses, which are offenses that have been developed over time by courts based on judicial decisions.
The concept of statutory offenses is an important one in criminal law, as it helps to ensure that individuals are only punished for behavior that has been specifically prohibited by the legislature. This helps to prevent arbitrary or unjust prosecutions, and ensures that individuals are only held accountable for behavior that is clearly defined as criminal under the law.
Therefore, option D is the correct answer.
Learn more about statutory offenses here:
https://brainly.com/question/15520015
#SPJ11
Which consequences can victims of identity theft face? check all that apply.which person is a victim of identity theft?
1. difficulty getting a loan or credit card
2. an increase in debt
3. difficulty keeping assets
4. a loss of money
5. difficulty landing a new job
Victims of identity theft can face a variety of consequences, including difficulty getting a loan or credit card, an increase in debt, difficulty keeping assets, a loss of money, and difficulty landing a new job.
Identity theft occurs when someone steals another person's personal information and uses it for their own gain. This can result in the victim experiencing financial losses, which can affect their ability to obtain credit, maintain assets, and secure employment. For example, if a victim's credit score is negatively impacted by the identity theft, they may struggle to get approved for loans or credit cards. Additionally, the victim may face increased debt if the thief opens accounts or makes purchases in their name. The victim may also have difficulty keeping their assets if the thief gains access to their bank accounts or other financial information. Finally, the victim may experience a loss of money if the thief drains their accounts or makes fraudulent purchases. victims of identity theft can face a range of negative consequences, including financial losses and difficulties obtaining credit, keeping assets, and finding employment. It is important for individuals to take steps to protect their personal information and monitor their accounts for signs of fraudulent activity.
to know about identity theft visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19215076
#SPJ11
Which of the following explains why the Federal Aviation Administration and the United States Maritime Administration work closely with the U.S. Customs Agency?
Responses
to create specific regulations for weight loads on air and sea transports
to design entry and exit points out of the country to control air and sea flow
to prevent oil spills and other environmental disasters
to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
To know more about Crime Prevention:
brainly.com/question/14495855
#SPJ1
Answer: The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
Explanation: This answer has been confirmed correct.
A buyer entered into a written contract with a seller to purchase his commercial property for $100,000. The contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed, and made no mention of easements or reservations. The closing was set for November 25, three months from the signing of the contract. Shortly thereafter, the buyer obtained a survey of the property, which revealed that the city had an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Because this actually enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not mention it to the seller. Subsequently, the buyer found a better location for her business. On November 1, the buyer notified the seller that she no longer intended to purchase the property. The seller told her that he intended to hold her to her contract. At closing, the buyer refused to tender the purchase price, claiming that the seller's title is unmarketable and citing the sidewalk easement as proof of that fact. In a suit for specific performance, will the seller likely prevail? A: Yes, because the contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed. B: Yes, because the buyer was aware of the visible easement and it enhanced the value of the property. C: No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders title unmarketable. D: No, because the buyer gave the seller sufficient notice of her change in plans and yet he made no effort to try to find another purchaser.
No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.
The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.
Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.
The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.
Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32959753
#SPJ11
Sublinha a sílaba tônica de cada palavra abaixo e acentue Também ninguém armazéms alguém parabéns além refém Vintém
Answer:
Também, ninguém, armazéms, alguém, parabéns, além, refém, Vintém.
Explanation:
Silaba tônica é silaba que tem o som mais forte e mais longo dentro de uma palavra. Você pode identificar a sílaba tônica pronunciando as palavras em voz alta e nalisando qual das sílabas você pronunciou com mais força e qual delas possui um som mais longo. quando a palavra possui assento, como as apresentadas na sua pergunta, a sílaba que possui o acento é a sílaba tônica.
Espero que essa resposta tenha te ajudado. Entretanto, é preciso ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português nesse site, fora do campo "World Languagens" como você fez agora. Isso porque esse não é o site brasileiro, mas sim o site estadunidense. Se você postar pergntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens", a sua pergunta pode ser excluída sem resposta.
Who has the right-of-way at a four-way stop?
Answer:
If 2 or even more cars reach a 4 stop junction at the same moment, the automobile to the right seems to have the right of way after halting. Red light is flashing - It really should be interpreted as a stop sign; halt and yield to vehicles travelling in the adjoining road.
Create a fact-file showing different Jewish ideas about Shekhinah
In Judaism, there are many different conceptions of God. Judaism traditionally claims that Yahweh, the national god of the Israelites and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, freed the Israelites from slavery in Egypt and gave them the Torah at Mount Sinai. Jews have historically held a monotheistic view of God.
The Hebrew word Shekhinah, which is translated as "dwelling" or "settling" in English, refers to God's apparent physical presence in a location. All Abrahamic religions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, embrace this idea. Jews hold that when they are praying together or studying the Torah, they can feel the presence of God.
To learn more about Jews, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/26777786
#SPJ1
1. For you doses “morally right and wrong” mean that which is commanded by God or Allah, or does it mean that which maximizes pleasure?
8. Law enforcement/police calls are
______based upon_____
by urgency and dispatched
priority levels and responder availability.
All crimes are investigated by the police.
True
False
Answer:
the answer is false.
Explanation: Not all crimes are reported, and even so, if they are deemed non important, nothing will happen
How does the exchange rate for a country's currency affect its terms of
trade?
A. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade,
B. Favorable terms of trade are required for a country to trade wh
wealthy partners
C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to
deteriorating terms of trade,
D. Deteriorating terms of trade prevent a country from using its
currency for trade,
Answer:
A. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade
Explanation:
Just got it right!
The exchange rate of a nation's currency affects the trading terms in such a way that the greater exchange rate leads to favorable trade between countries.
Option A is the correct answer.
What is meant by trading?Trading is the acquisition or disposal of goods or services by the countries with the outside countries.
The exchange rate is the rate that is used to convert the value of one currency into the value of the foreign currency. If the rate is higher, then the trading between the countries is more favorable whereas the trading becomes unfavorable if the rate is lower.
Therefore, the higher rate of exchange provides favorable trade which considers one of the effects of the exchange rate over trade.
Learn more about the exchange rate in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/13717814
#SPJ2
i need a reflection of civil contracts
Answer:
A contract is an agreement between at least two natural or legal persons – the parties, or more specifically contractors – about what they will do with each other or for each other – the performance to be delivered – or not.
Contracts must be distinguished from obligations: an agreement creates an obligation, but the reverse is not always the case. If someone inflicts damage on another, this may result in an obligation to compensate it.
Sometimes a contract has a predetermined term, the period for which it applies. These must in principle be fulfilled. If the other party does not fulfill an agreement, it can, if necessary, be enforced through the courts.
In the “Little Albert” experiment, psychologist John Watson conditioned a(n) ____________.
A.
lab rat to fear an infant
B.
infant to fear Santa Claus
C.
infant to fear a lab rat
D.
lab rat to fear loud noises
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Infant to fear a lab rat
Explanation:
The Little Albert Experiment expressed that traditional conditioning the relationship of a particular incentive or behavior with an irrelevant incentive or behavior works in human beings. In the research, psychologist John Watson was able to condition an earlier unafraid baby to become afraid of a rat.
Please give Brainliest :)
Why might Justice Gorsuch think that this issue is more appropriately decided by Congress rather than the Court, or as he phrases it, for the Court to exercise "judicial modesty?" Harris Funeral Home V EEOC
Justice Gorsuch's perspective on the issue in the Harris Funeral Home v. EEOC case, where the Court considered the application of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to transgender individuals, is based on his judicial philosophy of "judicial modesty".
Here are some reasons why he might think the issue is more appropriately decided by Congress:
1. Separation of Powers: Justice Gorsuch may emphasize the principle of separation of powers and the role of each branch of government. He might believe that policy decisions, such as expanding the scope of protected classes under employment discrimination laws, are best left to the legislative branch, which is responsible for making and amending laws.
2. Legislative Intent: Gorsuch may argue that interpreting Title VII to encompass protections for transgender individuals goes beyond the original intent of the lawmakers who drafted and enacted the legislation. He might advocate for a strict interpretation of the statute based on its text and the historical context in which it was passed.
3. Democratic Process: Justice Gorsuch may emphasize the importance of the democratic process and the role of elected representatives in shaping and amending laws. By deferring to Congress, he may argue that policy decisions should be made through the democratic process, allowing for public debate, input, and accountability.
4. Judicial Restraint: Gorsuch's approach may reflect a broader commitment to judicial restraint, where he believes that courts should avoid overreaching and instead defer to the elected branches of government. He may argue that the Court should exercise restraint and avoid substituting its own policy preferences for those of the legislature.
In summary, Justice Gorsuch's perspective on the Harris Funeral Home v. EEOC case and his call for "judicial modesty" likely stem from his beliefs about the separation of powers, the original intent of legislation, the democratic process, and the importance of judicial restraint. He may view the issue as one that is more appropriately addressed and resolved through the legislative process rather than through judicial interpretation.
Learn more about judicial here:
https://brainly.com/question/31455232
#SPJ11
Mary Jones has a property with no road frontage. She has an access right of way across the property of her neighbor Bob Smith for ingress, egress, and regress. Who has the dominant tenement in this situation?
a. Mary Jones
b. Bob Smith
c. they are both dominant tenements
d. there is no dominant tenement in this example
Mary Jones has a property with no road frontage. She has access right of way across the property of her neighbor Bob Smith for ingress, egress, and regress. Mary has the dominant tenement, She gains a benefit over Bob Smith's property.
Mary Jones was an American transgender prostitute and soldier. According to The Sun, she wore "dashing suits of masculine clothing" during the day, but she dressed femininely and wore a vaginal prosthesis at night to solicit sexual services from men and obtain money.
One of the most famous labor activists of the 19th century, Mary Harris Jones (aka "Mother Jones") was a self-proclaimed "hell hunter" for economic justice. She was so flamboyant that a US lawyer once called her "the most dangerous woman in America".
She came from a poor family, the daughter of a weaver who lived in Hangeli Pennant. She was born in December 1784. Her parents were devout Calvinist Methodists, and she converted to Christianity at the age of eight. After she learned how to read at a school organized by Thomas Charles, her ardent desire to own her own Bible grew.
Learn more about Mary Jones here
https://brainly.com/question/16501687
#SPJ4