Identify each pair of angles as corresponding, alternate interior, alternate exterior, consecutiveinterior, vertical, or adjacent.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Congruent are angles that are in identical angles. For example the orange colors are congruent because both of the angles are across each other, and because of them being crossed they are both the same degrees making the congruent, same with the blue but instead of being across eachother they are in the angle to the left of the parallel lines that are the same degrees as well.

The height of the cannonball not equal to 0 when time equals 0 because initial height of the cannonball is above the ground

From the graph, we have the y-intercept to be

y-intercept = (0, y), where y > 0

This means that the graph starts above the origin

This in other words mean that the initial height of the cannonball is above the ground (e.g. it could be on a building)

Hence, the height of the cannonball not equal to 0 when time equals 0 because initial height of the cannonball is above the ground

In this case, the domain is from t = 0 till the ball lands on the floor, while the range is from the initial height of the cannonball till the maximum height

Read more about domain and range at

https://brainly.com/question/2264373

#SPJ1

The value x in the secant line using the Intersecting theorem is 4.

Intersecting secants theorem states that " If two secant line segments are drawn to a circle from an exterior point, then the product of the measures of one of secant line segment and its external secant line segment is the same or equal to the product of the measures of the other secant line segment and its external line secant segment.

From the figure:

First sectant line segment = ( x - 1 ) + 5

External line segment of the first secant line = 5

Second sectant line segment = ( x + 2 ) + 4

External line segment of the second secant line = 4

Using the Intersecting secants theorem:

5( ( x - 1 ) + 5 ) = 4( ( x + 2 ) + 4 )

Solve for x:

5( x - 1 + 5 ) = 4( x + 2 + 4 )

5( x + 4 ) = 4( x + 6 )

5x + 20 = 4x + 24

5x - 4x = 24 - 20

x = 4

Therefore, the value of x is 4.

Option C) 4 is the correct answer.

Learn more about Intersecting secants theorem here: brainly.com/question/30242636

#SPJ1

Answer:

(8, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

(4, 1)+(4, 1)+(4, 1)=(12, 3)

(4, 1)+(4, 1)=(8, 2)

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

(8.2)

Answer:

7/8x ≥ 14

Step-by-step explanation:

(sum means addition in case you forgot)

You would start by writing 7/8x + 20 ≥ 34

You would then subtract 20 from both sides to isolate the variable x.

You would then have 7/8x ≥  14

Answer:

f(-5)=7

Step-by-step explanation:

Because y=f(x) so f(-5) means x=-5.

Now you look at the graph, we can see at x=-5 , y=7. So f(-5)=7

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Go to - 5 along the x axis.

When you hit the blue, go straight across until you hit the number on the y axis.

That number is 7

After 300 trials, the experimental probabilities may not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, with more trials, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities for closer alignment.

To examine whether experimental probabilities after 300 trials align closely with theoretical probabilities, let's consider an example of flipping a fair coin.

Theoretical probability: When flipping a fair coin, the theoretical probability of obtaining heads or tails is 0.5 each. This assumes that the coin is unbiased and has an equal chance of landing on either side.

Experimental probability: After conducting 300 trials of flipping the coin, we record the outcomes and calculate the experimental probabilities. Let's assume that heads occurred 160 times and tails occurred 140 times.

Experimental probability of heads: 160/300 = 0.5333

Experimental probability of tails: 140/300 = 0.4667

Comparing the experimental probabilities to the theoretical probabilities, we can observe that the experimental probability of heads is slightly higher than the theoretical probability, while the experimental probability of tails is slightly lower.

In this particular example, the experimental probabilities after 300 trials do not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, it is important to note that these differences can be attributed to sampling variability, as the experimental outcomes are subject to random fluctuations.

To draw a more definitive conclusion about the alignment between experimental and theoretical probabilities, a larger number of trials would need to be conducted. As the number of trials increases, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities, providing a closer alignment between the two.

For more such information on: probabilities

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ8  

The question probable may be:

Do experimental probabilities after 300 trials tend to align closely with theoretical probabilities? Consider an example scenario and calculate both the theoretical and experimental probabilities to determine if they are close.

Answer:

  C. RP = 4.5

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know what condition is sufficient to show ∆ABC ~ ∆QPR, given  three sides and 2 angles in ∆ABC, and 2 sides in ∆QPR.

Similarity can be shown if all three sides are proportional, or if two angles are congruent.

The offered answer choices only list one angle, so none of those will work. The answer choice that makes the third side of ∆QPR be in the same proportion as the corresponding side of ∆ABC is the condition of interest.

  C. RP = 4.5

__

Additional comment

The side ratios in the two triangles are ...

  AB : BC : CA = 10 : 9 : 6

  QP : PR : RQ = 5 : PR : 3

For these ratios to be the same, PR must be half of BC, just as the other segments in ∆QPR are half their counterparts in ∆ABC.

The critical values t₀ for a two-sample t-test is ± 2.0.6

To find the critical values t₀ for a two-sample t-test to test the claim that the population means are equal (i.e., µ₁ = µ₂), we need to use the following formula:

t₀ = ± t_(α/2, df)

where t_(α/2, df) is the critical t-value with α/2 area in the right tail and df degrees of freedom.

The degrees of freedom are calculated as:

df = (s₁²/n₁ + s₂²/n₂)² / [(s₁²/n₁)²/(n₁-1) + (s₂²/n₂)²/(n₂-1)]

n₁ = 14, n₂ = 12, X₁ = 6,X₂ = 7, s₁ = 2.5 and s₂ = 2.8

α = 0.05 (two-tailed)

First, we need to calculate the degrees of freedom:

df = (s₁²/n₁ + s₂²/n₂)² / [(s₁²/n₁)²/(n₁-1) + (s₂²/n₂)²/(n₂-1)]

= (2.5²/14 + 2.8²/12)² / [(2.5²/14)²/13 + (2.8²/12)²/11]

= 24.27

Since this is a two-tailed test with α = 0.05, we need to find the t-value with an area of 0.025 in each tail and df = 24.27.

From a t-distribution table, we find:

t_(0.025, 24.27) = 2.0639 (rounded to four decimal places)

Finally, we can calculate the critical values t₀:

t₀ = ± t_(α/2, df) = ± 2.0639

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/30218856

#SPJ1

Ana will spend K23.94 for 21 days.

To calculate how much Ana will spend for 21 days, we need to determine the cost per day and then multiply it by the total number of days.

Since Ana spends K8.00 per week, we can find the daily cost by dividing the weekly cost by the number of days in a week.

Cost per day = K8.00 / 7 days = K1.14 (rounded to two decimal places)

Now, we can calculate how much Ana will spend for 21 days by multiplying the cost per day by the total number of days.

Total spending = K1.14 * 21 days = K23.94

Therefore, Ana will spend approximately K23.94 for 21 days.

It's important to note that we rounded the cost per day to two decimal places. In real-life scenarios, Ana may have to pay the nearest whole currency amount per day. Therefore, the actual total spending might differ slightly depending on the rounding or any variations in the daily cost.

know more about cost here:

https://brainly.com/question/2292799

#SPJ8

The required number of nickels and dimes is given as 12 and 9 respectively.

The process in mathematics to operate and interpret the function to make the function or expression simple or more understandable is called simplifying and the process is called simplification.

here,
Given a system of the equation,
n + d = 21
n = 21 - d - - - - - (1)
0.05n + 0.10d = 1.50 -----(2)
Substitute n in the above equation,
0.05[21 - d] + 0.10d = 1.50
1.05 - 0.05d + 0.10 d = 1.50
0.05d = 0.45
d = 0.45/0.05
d = 9
Now, put d in equation 1,
n = 21 - 9
n = 12

Thus, the required number of nickels and dimes is given as 12 and 9 respectively.

Learn more about simplification here:

https://brainly.com/question/12501526

#SPJ1

Answer:

There are two solutions

1: -7/4

2: -1

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

Brain-List?

The two-way anova does not fit the third assumption in the posed question.

Analysis of variance is a collection of statistical models and their associated estimation procedures used to analyze the differences among means. ANOVA was developed by the statistician Ronald Fisher. The two-way analysis of variance is an extension to the one-way analysis of variance. There are two independent variables (hence the name two-way).

It's assumptions include -

1. The populations from which the samples were obtained must be normally or approximately normally distributed.

2. The samples must be independent.

3. The variances of the populations must be equal.

4. The groups must have the same sample size.

Hence, the third assumption in the question does not apply to the two-way anova.

To know more about ANOVA , go to https://brainly.com/question/29132965

#SPJ4

Solution,

Given data=15,8,11,16,10,5,10

Highest score= 16

lowest score= 5

Range=highest score- lowest score

=16-5

=11

Answer:

\(10\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data =

\(15 \: \: 8 \: \: 11 \: \: 16 \: \: 10 \: \: 5 \: \: 10\)

\(range = height \: \: - \: lowest \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: score \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: score \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 15 \: \: \: \: \: - \: \: \: \: 5 \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 10\)

hope this helps

brainliest appreciated

good luck! have a nice day!

Answer:

x = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Subtract 5 from both sides.

Step 2: Check if solution is correct.

Therefore, x = 5.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x+5=10           start with basic equation

-5      -5           subtract 5 from both sides

x=5              left with your answer

:)

Answer:

neHfzrusufsfisjfsjgdjtxktxkthkdkgdkgigcktxiyxkgxtixitzkfxkfxit

Step-by-step explanation:

mekhhggggggggggty

Answer:

d=9

Step-by-step explanation:

42 km is 2 of the 3 legs

51 is the total triathlon

51 - 42 = 9

Answer:

I cant understand that question thanku

Answer:

32 ftEach base floor tile is 5ft and there's 4 tiles so 5x4=20

Next,there are 4 walls each wall is 3ft 3x4=12

Now you add your answers which is 20+12=32

Hope that helps

Convert them all into decimals. Percent is just 0.--, and the fraction you can calculate out which gives: 0.625=5/8,0.64=64%

5/8

64%

0.65

Therefore, the missing expression in Step 1 is [-8 - 1] + (2 + 3).

In order to find the missing expression in Step 1, let's analyze the given steps and the final expression.

Step 1: ?

Step 2: -9 + 2 + 3

Step 3: -7 + 3

To find the missing expression in Step 1, we need to work backwards from Step 3 to Step 1.

In Step 3, the expression "-7 + 3" gives us a result of -4.

In Step 2, the expression "-9 + 2 + 3" gives us a result of -4.

So, the missing expression in Step 1 should also evaluate to -4 when performed correctly.

Let's check the available options:

[-10 + -1 + 2] + (2 + 3) = -11 + 2 + 5 = -4

[-8 - 1] + (2 + 3) = -9 + 5 = -4

[-10 + 1] + (2 + 3) = -9 + 5 = -4

[8 + 1] + (2 + 3) = 9 + 5 = 14

Out of the given options, only option 2, [-8 - 1] + (2 + 3), correctly evaluates to -4. Therefore, the missing expression in Step 1 is [-8 - 1] + (2 + 3).

For more questions on missing expression

https://brainly.com/question/14581389

#SPJ8

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

For a general parabola ...

  y = ax² +bx +c

The first derivative is ...

  y' = 2ax +b

and the second derivative is ...

  y'' = 2a

The second derivative is a (non-zero) constant, so there is no point of inflection. The sign of the second derivative (the sign of 'a') tells you whether the graph opens upward (a>0) or downward (a<0).

The first derivative is 0 where ...

  y' = 0 = 2ax +b

  x = -b/(2a) . . . . . extreme point of the graph

Whether this point is a maximum (a<0) or a minimum (a>0) depends on the sign of 'a'.

The value of the function at the extreme is ...

  y = a(-b/2a)² +b(-b/2a) +c = b²/(4a) -b²/(2a) +c

  y = c -b²/(4a)

So, the extremum is ...

  (x, y) = (-b/(2a), c -b²/(4a)) . . . . . vertex of the parabola

__

1. We have a=5, b=7, c=3.

  First derivative: f'(x) = 10x +7

  Second derivative: f''(x) = 10 . . . . graph opens upward

  Zeros: the discriminant b² -4ac is 7²-4(5)(3) = -11, so no real zeros

  Vertex: (-7/10, 3 -49/20) = (-0.7, 0.55) . . . minimum

__

2. We have a=-1, b=-5, c=5/2.

  First derivative: f'(x) = -2x -5

  Second derivative: f''(x) = -2 . . . . graph opens downward

  Zeros: found from the quadratic formula: x = (-b±√(b²-4ac))/(2a)

     x = (-(-5) ±√((-5)² -4(-1)(5/2)))/(2(-1)) = (5 ±√35)/2 ≈ {-5.458, 0.458}

  Vertex: (-5/2, 5/2-25/-4) = (-5/2, 35/4) = (-2.5, 8.75) . . . maximum

Answer:

I think your answer is 180.

Step-by-step explanation: I am not 100% sure so sorry if I am wrong.

Answer:

x= 10

Step-by-step explanation:

We know because of the vertical angle theorem that the angle 30 and 3x are equal to each other, because of this we can set them equal to each other and solve. 30=3x --> 30/3=10

Answer:

3 and 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1st and last one just did the question and it was right

The range of the given equation is [-1, infinity).

We are given that;

Equation  y= underroot(x+5​)

Now,

The domain of this equation is the set of x values that make the expression under the square root non-negative.

That is, x+5 >= 0, or x >= -5. So the domain is [-5, infinity).

The range of this equation is the set of y values that are obtained by plugging in the domain values into the equation. Since the square root function is always non-negative, and we are subtracting 1 from it, the smallest possible value of y is -1, when x = -5. As x increases, y also increases, and there is no upper bound for y.

Therefore, by the range the answer will be [-1, infinity).

Learn more about the domain and range of the function:

brainly.com/question/2264373

#SPJ1

The coordinates of each points are:

A = (-0.5, -5)

B = (0.8, -1.8)

C = (-2.6, -2.2)

D = (-1.5, -8.9)

E = (2.5, -6.5)

F = (-1.5, 3.1)

G = (-2.4, 4.1)

H = (1.5, 3)

I = (2.7, 1.5)

J = (-1.5, 0)

K = (-6.5, 0)

We have,

The coordinates of each point are in an ordered form.

i.e

(x, y)

x is the x-axis value.

y is the y-axis value.

Thus,

A = (-0.5, -5)

B = (0.8, -1.8)

C = (-2.6, -2.2)

D = (-1.5, -8.9)

E = (2.5, -6.5)

F = (-1.5, 3.1)

G = (-2.4, 4.1)

H = (1.5, 3)

I = (2.7, 1.5)

J = (-1.5, 0)

K = (-6.5, 0)

Learn more about coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/13118993

#SPJ1

Answer:

64cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

( 4 x 4 x 4) cm x cm x cm