How much of a following distance should you keep with those big vehicles, such as trailers and industrial vehicles?
Select one:
O a. 200 feet minimum
O b. 300 feet minimum
O c. 400 feet minimum
O d. It's up to the driver

The society cannot ask much of criminal court because they guided by laws.

Criminal courts is an international court that handles cases of people who have committed criminal offenses.

They have the authority to punish and pass judgement over any offender of Law.

The society cannot influence the judgement as there are punishment for every offence committed such as genocide and war crimes.

Therefore, the society cannot ask much of criminal court because they guided by laws.

Learn more on criminal law and offense here,

https://brainly.com/question/493036

Answer:

State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:

Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.

Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.

Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.

Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.

Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.

Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.

It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.

hey, i hope that helped :)

could you pop me as brainliest pls :)

Gerrymandering is the practice of redrawing election districts to favour a certain political party. Although the magnitude and effect may not be shocking, they often are.

I am aware of gerrymandering, which is the act of influencing an election constituency's borders in order to favour one political party or organisation over another. This is done to make sure that the ruling party can continue to win most of the elections.

This did not come as a surprise to me considering that gerrymandering has long been a contentious topic in many nations, including the US. Even yet, the amount to which it is applied and the effects it has on representation and democracy may be surprising.

Learn more about Gerrymandering:

https://brainly.com/question/29553293

#SPJ1

People are concerned about the S-7 Bill because it gives law enforcement excessive influence over people's privacy. For example, if S-7 becomes law, a Canadian customs officer might demand that a traveler's digital device be searched based on "reasonable general suspicion" that the Customs Act may be violated.

Senate Bill S-7 (An Act to Amend the Customs Act and the Preclearance Act) has slipped under most Canadians' attention, and it, like so many other measures this year, is intent on intruding on Canadian rights. In this instance, privacy.

While S-7 appears to be a quiet parliamentary housekeeping bill on the surface, it contains provisions that will result in catastrophic breaches of privacy for Canadians traveling abroad.

Learn more about Bills:
https://brainly.com/question/11510660
#SPJ1

Explanation:

The 28% rule states that you should spend 28% or less of your monthly gross income on your mortgage payment I hope that help

Jurors may be questioned about their backgrounds, jobs, and families in addition to those that are directly related to the current trial. Prior to voir dire, jurors are frequently asked to complete a survey, and specific questions for particular jurors may touch on the data that was given

To Learn more About voir dire Refer To:

https://brainly.com/question/14315930

#SPJ1

Many who have experienced meditation say that they have more control over the resolution the statements best explains that sentiment is meditation is confidential.

To learn more about meditation from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/19069324

#SPJ13

Answer:

Explanation:

The first king of Nepal was King Prithvi Narayan Shah. He was born on January 11, 1723, and ruled from 1768 until his death in 1775. King Prithvi Narayan Shah was the founder of the modern Kingdom of Nepal and the Shah dynasty, which ruled Nepal until 2008 when the country became a federal democratic republic. He is widely regarded as a unifying figure and is credited with the unification of Nepal and the establishment of Nepal as a sovereign kingdom.

Answer:

The United States Court of Federal Claims is a court of record with national jurisdiction. The United States Court of Federal Claims was recreated in October 1982 by the Federal Courts Improvement Act pursuant to Article 1 of the United States Constitution.

Explanation:

i think

Answer:

Between 50 km/h to 70km/h

Explanation:

Not all construction zones have the same speed limit. That's why it's important to pay attention to signs leading up to the area. Generally, construction zone speed limits will be between 50 km/h to 70km/h on highways.

Answer:

B no is correct answer.

Explanation:

May this help you l think

Answer:

1. Personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements.

2. Standard operating procedures (SOPs).

3. Fire department policies and procedures.

4. Local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

5. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards.

6. Incident reports.

7. Training records.

8. Medical records.

9. Safety reports.

10. Investigative reports.

Answer:

D). Federal Bureau of investigation and the military.

Explanation:

The two departments which possess the entire authority to control the law enforcement in the state are 'FBI(Federal Bureau of Investigation) and the military.' FBI is characterized as the supreme law enforcement authority in the United States which ensures that the law is strictly enforced in the state and arrest the violators while the military enforces military law and looks after the national defense and maintains national peace and security. Thus, option D is the correct answer.

Answer:

I believe they should not have a term limit. Supreme Court Justice's are chosen with care and delicacy. They are chose very precisely. Choosing a Justice is one of the most important actions that the U.S. president can do. A Supreme Court Justice can end its working as a Supreme Court Justice by retiring, resigning, or being removed from office.

But I don't think that they should have term limits because sticking someone random in there all the time could mess things up very much. They could think different. They might not have the right mindset for the people. And the president takes a lot precautions when selecting a Supreme Court Justice, doing that every four years for example would be a lot of work.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :}

Pls mark brainliest :P

And have an amazing day <3

Answer:

Let's start off with the 13th Amendment, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except for crime, shall exist in the United States.

The 14th amendment those born here are under the jurisdiction hereof, no state shall make laws that abridge these liberties.

African American's still faced systematic racism. Even though, on paper, they were "free". Furthermore, slaves were neglected by union soldiers and were victims of the disease. The leading cause of their fate was starvation. Remember, that they were subhuman (meaning they were not seen as a human). In many ways, it was sad, that many saw slavery as an institution and clung to the notion that evolution had to be true because they resembled their evolutionary state/characteristic.

Explanation:

This should give you something to elaborate on.

The principle of American democracy that is most closely associated with the expansion of voting rights is C. popular sovereignty.

The fundamental principle of popular sovereignty prevails whereby the government's power source is derived from people’s consent, hence recognizing that individuals hold ultimate political authority hence in democratic systems allowing for active participation options such as voting.

Over the years with America expanding its voter registry to include all race genders and property owners regardless of status from solely white male landowners. These transformations have paved way towards creating a genuinely democratic society echoing pervasive principles of democracy through the increased levels of enfranchisement endorsement pivotal points.

Find out more on popular sovereignty at https://brainly.com/question/28745095

#SPJ1

You cannot legally own a argentavis magnificens.

One of the largest flying birds ever to live was Argentavis magnificens. Argentavis is still regarded as the largest flying bird in history, but Pelagornis sandersi, which was reported in 2014 and is thought to have had wings about 20% longer than Argentavis', likely outgrew it in wingspan.

An extinct species known from three sites in the Epecuén and Andalhualá Formations in central and northwest Argentina is known as A. magnificens, also known as the Giant Teratorn.

In conclusion, you cannot legally own a argentavis magnificens. It's just like having a dinosaur which isn't possible.

Learn more about legal on:

https://brainly.com/question/6837890

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Rate is a number. So the poverty rate is how many peeople are in poverty each year.

The maximum amount you should ever owe on the card is $90.

If your credit limit is $300 and you don't pay off your card balance in full each month, it is generally recommended to keep your credit utilization ratio below 30%. The credit utilization ratio is the percentage of your available credit that you are using.

To calculate the maximum amount you should owe on the card, multiply your credit limit by 0.30 (30%):

$300 * 0.30 = $90

Based on this calculation, the maximum amount you should ever owe on the card is $90. This ensures that your credit utilization ratio remains below 30%, which is considered a good practice for maintaining a healthy credit score.

It's important to note that carrying a high balance on your credit card can lead to increased interest charges and potential negative effects on your credit score.

It's generally advisable to pay off your credit card balance in full each month to avoid accruing interest and to maintain good financial habits.

For such more question on card:

https://brainly.com/question/29587937

#SPJ8

Answer: There are three main eras of policing in U.S. history: the Political Era, the Reform Era, and The Community Era.

It is more challenging to defend a strict liability tort because the  damages claimed by the plaintiff are impossible to measure. The last option is correct.

A tort is defined as an act or omission that causes hurt or harm to another and constitutes a civil wrong for which courts impose liability. Strict responsibility in tort law is the imposition of duty on a party without a finding of fault (such as carelessness or tortious intent). The claimant merely needs to show that the tort happened and that the respondent was at fault.

The fault of a defendant is irrelevant in a strict liability lawsuit. However, a plaintiff must demonstrate that there were injuries or damages sustained and that those injuries or damages were sustained as a result of the defendant's hazardous or intrinsically dangerous activities.

Thus, the damages claimed by the plaintiff are impossible to measure in a tort law involving strict liability.

To learn more on tort, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2669139

#SPJ1

The hardest to see motorcyclists : All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them. Option D is the correct answer.

Motorcyclists can be difficult to see in various situations, and it is essential for drivers to be vigilant and actively look for them. Here's an explanation for each option:

a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head-on, they take up so little of your visual field: Motorcycles have a narrower profile compared to other vehicles, making them less visible when approaching from the opposite direction. Due to their smaller size, they can be easily overlooked, especially if drivers are not actively scanning for them.

b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes: Motorcycles can be particularly challenging to spot on the freeway due to the high volume of traffic and frequent lane changes. The quick maneuverability of motorcycles allows them to navigate through traffic, but this also increases the risk of being overlooked by drivers who are not attentive or fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.

c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot: Motorcycles can easily fall into a driver's blind spot, which is an area not visible in the rear-view or side mirrors. It is crucial for drivers to check their blind spots by turning their heads and using proper mirror adjustment to ensure they are aware of any motorcyclists in their vicinity.

Option D is the correct answer.

For such more question on motorcyclists:

https://brainly.com/question/27196118

#SPJ8

Explanation:

The Indian Act, which was enacted in 1876 and has since been amended, allows the government to control most aspects of aboriginal life: Indian status, land, resources, wills, education, band administration and so on. Inuit and Métis are not governed by this law.

Answer:

The Indian Act a Canadian act of Parliament that concerns registered Indians, their bands, and the system of Indian reserves and allows the government to control most aspects of aboriginal life: Indian status, land, resources, wills, education, band administration and so on.

Explanation:

pls vote brainliest

The wedding party is the primary of the single proprietorship if a sole proprietorship was engaged by the wedding party to cater their wedding and handled everything by an employee.

In this instance, the sole proprietorship is a corporation, and the worker is a partner in the corporation. The corporation's shareholders are responsible for the tainted cake if the sole proprietorship is a corporation and one of its employees poisons the cake.

In a sole proprietorship, the owner of the business is solely responsible for all of the company's debts and owns all of its assets. Legally, there is no distinction between a sole proprietorship and a sole proprietor; both are just one person.

To Know more about company's debts

https://brainly.com/question/23986667

#SPJ1

Answer:

The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:

They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.

It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.

A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.

The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.

The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.

A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

https://brainly.com/question/32247683

#SPJ12

Answer:

(1) whether the theory or technique in question can be and has been tested (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication                     (3) its known or potential error rate

Explanation:

-Lack of trust between public and private sector

-Differences in goals and priorities

-Legal and regulatory constraints

-Lack of transparency and accountability

-Complexity of project financing and risk sharing

-Inefficiencies in procurement and project management processes

-Lack of appropriate investment climate

-Difficulty in measuring and ensuring return on investment.

Write a short note on public-private partnerships.

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are cooperative agreements between government entities and private sector companies aimed at delivering public services and infrastructure. PPPs aim to maximize value for money, transfer risk from the public sector to the private sector, and increase efficiency and innovation in the delivery of public services.

Hence, the answer is,

-Lack of trust between public and private sector

-Differences in goals and priorities

-Legal and regulatory constraints

-Lack of transparency and accountability

-Complexity of project financing and risk sharing

-Inefficiencies in procurement and project management processes

-Lack of appropriate investment climate

-Difficulty in measuring and ensuring return on investment.

To learn more about public-private partnerships, follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/29793109

#SPJ1