The Articles of Confederation laid the groundwork for America’s future political structure by establishing a government with a weak central government and strong state governments.
The Articles also set up a unicameral legislature, or Congress, with limited powers. Finally, the Articles provided for a system of checks and balances that limited the power of the central government and gave the states more control over their own affairs.
These features of the Articles of Confederation would become the basis for the Constitution of the United States and the federal system of government that we have today.
To learn more about Articles of Confederation link is here
brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
Ralph is a landlord who owns several apartment buildings. Which of these actions does the federal Fair Housing Act prohibit Ralph from taking?
A. Establishing a "no pets" policy for one of his apartment buildings
B. Evicting a female tenant who's found to be distributing illegal drugs
C. Refusing to show, sell, or rent property to smokers
D. Threatening to evict a couple because they filed a complaint of harassment against him
The answer to the given student question is that the federal Fair Housing Act prohibits Ralph from refusing to show, sell, or rent property to smokers.
What is the Fair Housing Act?
The Fair Housing Act is a federal law in the United States that was passed in 1968. The act prohibits discrimination in housing transactions based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, and familial status. The law is aimed at providing equal opportunities to everyone in the United States housing market.
What actions does the federal Fair Housing Act prohibit Ralph from taking?
The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits Ralph from refusing to show, sell, or rent property to smokers. This is because smoking is not included among the seven protected classes in the Fair Housing Act.The act prohibits any sort of discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, and familial status. This means that Ralph cannot establish a "no pets" policy for one of his apartment buildings, cannot evict a female tenant who's found to be distributing illegal drugs, and cannot threaten to evict a couple because they filed a complaint of harassment against him.
To know more about federal law:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ11
A very serious crime that has a maximum possible sentence of more than one year in prison and that may have the death penalty it is called a ?
Answer:
A felony crime
if thomas jefferson lived in the seventeenth century, what would he have feared most?
If Thomas Jefferson had lived in the seventeenth century, he would have likely feared the lack of individual freedoms and rights. During that time period, monarchs had absolute power and the common people had little say in government.
This type of rule went against Jefferson's beliefs in democracy and the importance of the individual. He believed that all individuals should have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Additionally, Jefferson would have likely feared the lack of scientific and technological advancements. He was a proponent of education and believed in the power of knowledge. Without the advancements made in the following centuries, Jefferson may have feared that society would be stagnant and unable to progress.
Overall, Jefferson's fears would have likely centered around the lack of individual rights and freedoms, as well as the lack of progress and innovation in society.
Thomas Jefferson, if he had lived in the seventeenth century, would have likely feared the unchecked power of absolute monarchies and religious intolerance. At that time, many European nations were ruled by kings and queens who held complete authority over their people. This would have concerned Jefferson, as he was a strong advocate for democracy, individual rights, and limited government power.
Additionally, the seventeenth century was marked by religious conflicts and persecution. As a proponent of religious freedom and the separation of church and state, Jefferson would have been deeply troubled by the widespread religious intolerance and the use of state power to enforce religious beliefs. This fear would have further fueled his commitment to securing the rights of individuals and promoting a government that protects its citizens' freedoms, rather than controlling their lives.
To know more about thomas visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7493920
#SPJ11
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge whether someone had broken a law?
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.
what is the purpose of chain of custody? group of answer choices to document who has been in control of the evidence item from the time it was initially seized until it is presented in the trial as evidence, to ensure that only one person can handle the evidence for a specific case. to document the attorney responsible for contracting the named forensic examiner to a specific case. to document any errors that occur while processing the evidence.
The purpose of chain of custody is to document who has been in control of the evidence item from the time it was initially seized until it is presented in the trial as evidence.
Chain of custody is a crucial process in the legal system that ensures the integrity and reliability of evidence. It involves creating a documented trail that tracks the handling, storage, and transfer of evidence from the moment it is collected to its presentation in court. The chain of custody provides a record of each person who has had custody of the evidence, including law enforcement officials, forensic experts, and others involved in its handling.
By maintaining a strict chain of custody, it becomes possible to demonstrate that the evidence has not been tampered with, altered, or contaminated, which is essential for establishing its authenticity and admissibility in court. This process helps protect the rights of all parties involved and ensures a fair legal proceeding.
To know more about chain of custody
brainly.com/question/30562375
#SPJ11
what are some new approaches to law making today that help the average American?
Mobile Internet. Interfaces, formats, sensors and apps will evolve as mobile computing devices dominate internet connectivity. ...
Artificial Intelligence. ...
Virtual and augmented reality. ...
Cloud technology. ...
Internet of Things. ...
Advanced robotics. ...
Biometric technology. ...
3D printing.
Democratic vs Republican view on gun control
how can the principle of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims
Answer:
The officials should research the crime area and they should also get the statements from the person who killed. Until all the investigation is completed, they should treat the person as neither criminal nor victim. ... In principles of Ubuntu, a victim should be treated with broad humanity and ethics
Explanation:
Which of the following might make you suspect that an ID is fake?
•The ID feels thinner or thicker than usual.
•Fuzzy printing or different font on the birth date.
•Bar codes or magnetic strips on the back will not scan.
•All of the above.
The following would possibly make you think that an ID is fake: it is probably thinner or thicker, printed with fuzzy bar codes, or bar code strips on back.
What is an ID?Identityentification is the impulsive part of our psyche which responds at once and at once to fundamental urges, needs, and desires. The persona of the new child is all identityentification, and best of all, it expands an ego and super-ego.
From the above rationalization, it's clear that alternative D, all of the above, is the right alternative.
Learn more about ID, refer to:
brainly.com/question/4774641
#SPJ2
pls help
If a business has not made a profit,
a. it doesn't have to pay income tax.
b. it cannot pay its employees.
c. it has no capital to put back into the business.
d. both a and c
The owner of the property has the right to establish
certain rules on their property that may or may not be
part of the criminal code.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
owner of the land has the right to make rules and kick people off the land if they dont listen to the rules
True, the owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Thus option (a) is correct.
What is criminal code?The criminal code or criminal law is a system of laws that is concerned with crimes and the punishment for the persons who commit crimes.
The criminal prosecution involves the government to decide whether to punish an individual for either an act or an omission.
The most of the state has its own criminal code. In a criminal prosecution or proceedings , the burden of proof lies with the government and has to establish every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
The owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about criminal code here:
https://brainly.com/question/24706076
#SPJ2
How representative is Congress? Most legislators are white, upper-middle-class males, although this group is a very small part of our entire population.Can these people really represent women, minorities, and poor citizens? expl
Which of the following explanations for United States foreign policy debates after September 11, 2001, could the situation described in the excerpt best be used to support?
Russell Hardin, political scientist, "Civil Liberties in the Era of Mass Terrorism," Journal of Ethics, 2004
The reasons for US foreign policy debates are the contentious national security efforts to combat terrorism. The choice B is correct.
U.S. foreign policy places a strong emphasis on safeguarding human rights and promoting democracy and freedom around the world. The three most important objectives of American foreign policy are world peace, prosperity, and security. Security, or the safeguarding of American interests and citizens, is a constant concern; however, over its long history, the United States has attempted to achieve security in various ways.
Under the Constitution, the Leader of the US decides U.S. international strategy. The President's chief foreign affairs advisor is the Secretary of State, who was appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Learn more about U.S.foreign policy :
brainly.com/question/27710490
#SPJ4
Complete question as follows :
Which of the following explanations for United States foreign policy debates after September 11, 2001, could the situation described in the excerpt best be used to support?
A. Some people asserted that the United States should return to isolationism.
B. The national security efforts to prevent terrorism were controversial.
C. The decision to go to war in Iraq deeply divided the American people.
D. Some people argued that fossil fuel dependence undercut national security.
What did the passage of the kansas-nebraska act, the supreme court's dred scott decision, and john brown's raid on harpers ferry have in common?
Slavery's growth into the western territories was addressed by John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry and the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision.
What do they have in common?This bloody struggle, which ravaged Kansas, gave national attention to John Brown, who would escalate sectional tensions over slavery to unprecedented heights in 1859 with his Harpers Ferry Raid, an effort to incite a huge slave uprising.
Prior to Brown's invasion, the United States Supreme Court had added fuel to the flames of sectionalism in 1857 with its decision in the Dred Scott case, which included an enslaved person who claimed freedom on the grounds that he had been taken to live in free territory.
Check out the link below to learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act;
https://brainly.com/question/14315904
#SPJ4
all of the following are aspects of the political/legal segment of the general environment except: a. attitudes and values. b. taxation laws. c. antitrust laws. d. deregulation philosophies.
Option B is correct.
Taxation laws. A collection of rules known as tax law controls the tax that people must pay to the government.
Which seven general environment parts are there?PESTEL is a framework that considers all environmental elements that may have an influence on an organization, including political, economic, sociocultural, technical, environmental, and legal ones.
Which area of the broader environment describes the type and trajectory of the economy in which a business competes or may compete?Given their potential implications across international borders and the fact that many businesses compete in international marketplaces, demographic categories are frequently studied on a global scale. The economy in which a business competes or may compete is discussed in this section, along with its nature and direction.
To know more about Taxation laws visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12956626
#SPJ1
steven, a prosecutor, has decided to bring three other felony charges against brian, in addition to the burglary he was originally arrested for. what is he engaging in?
Steven, a prosecutor, has decided to bring three other felony charges against Brian, in addition to the burglary he was originally arrested for. He is engaging in Horizontal overcharging.
A single defendant is unfairly the target of a "horizontal" overcharging of accusations. Every technical criminal transaction in which he took part may result in a separate accusation being brought against him, or the prosecution could break up a single criminal transaction into several component charges.
In legal parlance, "tacking on" extra charges that the prosecutor is aware he cannot support is known as overcharging. It is used to give the prosecutor more leverage while negotiating a plea deal. All of the charges in cases of horizontal overcharging may be true, yet the defendant cannot be found guilty and sentenced on all of the charges. In order to reduce the number and severity of charges, the defense attorney should begin objecting to the overcharging as soon as they can.
Learn more about Guilty here:
https://brainly.com/question/8193162
#SPJ4
Research four databases and describe how these databases would help you investigate this case.
There are a lot of databases that can be used to investigate a particular case, but the four that are most commonly used are the Criminal Justice Abstracts, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, JSTOR, and ProQuest.
These databases are useful for a variety of reasons. Let us take a look at each of these databases and what they offer:
1. Criminal Justice Abstracts
The Criminal Justice Abstracts is a database that is designed to help researchers find scholarly articles, reports, books, and more on topics related to criminal justice.
2. National Criminal Justice Reference Service
The National Criminal Justice Reference Service is a comprehensive database that provides access to resources related to criminal justice.
3. JSTOR
JSTOR is a database that provides access to academic articles, books, and other resources on a variety of topics.
4. ProQuest
ProQuest is a database that provides access to a variety of scholarly resources, including academic articles, books, and more.
In conclusion, these databases are all useful resources for those who are investigating a particular case. They provide access to a wide range of materials that can be used to support research and analysis.
To know more about databases visit :
https://brainly.com/question/6447559
#SPJ11
Whom should mrs Hightower sue for damages? Why?
Answer/Explanation:
Hightower should sue Mr. Grant because he is the father of the child who caused the mess on the floor and maid Mrs. Hightower fall.
the plaintiff in a negligence case was injured in a car accident with the defendant. the plaintiff's attorney retained a physician to examine the plaintiff and to testify regarding the plaintiff's injuries. after the physician examined the plaintiff, the plaintiff's attorney discussed the physician's findings with the physician. the plaintiff's attorney and the physician also discussed what the physician should include in the expert witness report that will be provided to the defendant. the defendant then conducted a deposition of the physician. during the deposition, the defendant's attorney asked the physician to describe what was said in his conversations with the plaintiff's attorney. the plaintiff's attorney objected to those questions. are the defendant's questions regarding the plaintiff's attorney's discussions with the physician properly subject to discovery?
plaintiff's attorney's discussions with the physician properly subject to discovery is depended on the jurisdiction and the rules of evidence.
In some countries, conversations between a lawyer and an expert witness they have hired are protected by the attorney-client privilege. The defendant wouldn't be able to learn the communication's contents in that situation. The communications between a lawyer and an expert witness that the lawyer has retained, however, are not protected by the attorney-client privilege in some countries. The defendant could then learn what was communicated in that scenario.
As a result of the "work product doctrine," which protects an attorney's work and includes communications with expert witnesses, the defendant in this case would not be able to learn what was said in the correspondence.
The court may nonetheless order disclosure of the communication even though the attorney-client privilege is in effect if the information is required for a just conclusion to the matter and cannot be learned in any other way. Therefore, it would rely on the particular jurisdiction and the facts of the case to determine whether the defendant's inquiries about the conversation the plaintiff's attorney had with the doctor are appropriately subject to discovery.
To learn more about attorney
brainly.com/question/22471236
#SPJ4
safety belts are required to be properly secured about which persons in an aircraft and when?
Answer:
during takeoff and landing, and while en route.
Explanation:
Safety belts are required to be properly secured around all occupants of an aircraft during takeoff, landing, and turbulent conditions. This includes both passengers and crew members.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations mandate that passengers must be briefed on the use of safety belts prior to takeoff and landing. The briefing should include instructions on how to properly fasten and unfasten the belt, as well as the importance of keeping it securely fastened during the entire flight.
In addition to safety belts, some aircraft may also be equipped with shoulder harnesses or other restraint systems. These may be required for certain types of aircraft or for certain phases of flight, such as during takeoff and landing. The specific requirements for safety restraints will vary depending on the type of aircraft and the applicable regulations. However, the primary goal of all safety restraint systems is to keep occupants safe and secure during the flight.
To know more about safety belts click here
brainly.com/question/28985216
#SPJ11
Question #9
You are preparing to park your car and you notice that you are near a
railroad crossing. You must not park
Choose an answer:
O A. Within 25 feet of a railroad crossing.
OB. Within 35 feet of a railroad crossing.
OC. Within 50 feet of a railroad crossing.
Answer:
The answer is C) 50 feet
Chapter 3 discussion A*
Officer P, a university police officer, received information that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. This information was conveyed
to Officer P by an anonymous caller to the officer's cell phone. Officer P knew the suspect in question and had similar suspicions. Officer P
immediately went to the dormitory and stopped the student as he was leaving the building. Officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found
drugs.
Were these actions valid? Justify your answer.
anak and valid external courcer ARA in text citations and references are required. For full credit, you
Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.
What is validity?
Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.
In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.
The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.
By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.
Learn more about validity, here
https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ1
define the main concepts of citizenship?
Answer:
A citizen is a participatory member of a political community. Citizenship is gained by meeting the legal requirements of a national, state, or local government. A nation grants certain rights and privileges to its citizens. In return, citizens are expected to obey their country's laws and defend it against its enemies.
Define the Office of Civil Rights, and its responsibility as it relates to HIPAA.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards, in concert with its enforcement of the Privacy Rule, and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.
how juvenile processes are handled differently in federal courts. In your personal view, should juveniles be prosecuted in federal or state courts
Answer: both
Explanation:
It would only make sense because it depends on the crime if it such thing as murder it should be federal because it such a huge crime if it small such as shoplifting it should be state because it such a small crime it would be reasonable to have the state decided
The is useful when the most common value of a data set is required.
Answer:
The Mode is useful when the most common value of a data set is required.
Step By Step:
In statistics, the Mode is the most commonly observed value in a set of data.
On a lease with option to purchase, can your landlord sale the house to someone els?
Answer:
"Lease Option
Both prohibit the landlord from selling the property to anyone else during the lease term and give the tenant the option to purchase at the end. ... A lease purchase agreement commits both parties to the sale barring breach of contract or the buyer's inability to secure a mortgage."
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
If a state were to have the majority of its productive capacity in the public sector, this would most likely indicate the existence of a(n):
Answer: D. social market system.
Explanation:
I'm a social market system, the economy runs as an amalgamation of two economic policies being the capitalist system and the socialist system.
The goal of this is to improve the welfare of humans whilst still encouraging competition. As a result, most of the country's productive sector will be in the public sector where the government tries to institute it's ideals of trying to improve the general welfare of the people.
According to the English bill of rights, who makes laws regarding taxation?
which type of will involves serious risks of invalidity that the form is out of date with respect to current law?
A will that specifies an executor or an exception has a significant risk of being declared invalid since the form is no longer lawful under the law. Option (d) is Correct.
The person in charge of running the operations of a decedent's probate estate is known as the executor (for men) or executrix (for women). The chosen word is the same as the personal representative. It can be a smart idea to name a family member as executor if you believe they can handle the responsibility. Examples include naming a grandchild who is an adult, a niece or nephew, or one of your offspring.
A woman who has been charged with carrying out a final will and testament's instructions is known as an executrix. Both an executrix and an executor are accountable for the same things. The executor's primary responsibility is to follow out the deceased's instructions for managing their affairs and wishes. If there was no prior appointment, the executor is chosen either by the testator—the person who creates the will—or by the court.
Learn more about law visit: brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Which type of will involves serious risks of invalidity and may not reflect the provisions of current law?
A. marital share
B. statutory
C. formal
D. exemption trust
E. living