find the number shows 5 by 7 is 125​

Answer (assuming it can be in slope-intercept form):

\(y = -\frac{5}{4} x-7\)  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) First, find the slope of the line by using the slope formula, \(m = \frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\). Substitute the x and y values of the given points into the formula and solve:

\(m = \frac{(3)-(-7)}{(-8)-(0)}\\m = \frac{3+7}{-8-0} \\m = \frac{10}{-8} \\m = -\frac{5}{4}\)

So, the slope is \(-\frac{5}{4}\).

2) Now, use the point-slope formula \(y-y_1 = m (x-x_1)\) to write the equation of the line in point-slope form. Substitute real values for the \(m\), \(x_1\), and \(y_1\) in the formula.

Since \(m\) represents the slope, substitute \(-\frac{5}{4}\) in its place. Since \(x_1\) and \(y_1\) represent the x and y values of one point the line intersects, choose any one of the given points (either one is fine, it will equal the same thing at the end) and substitute its x and y values into the formula as well. (I chose (0, -7), as seen below.) Then, isolate y to put the equation in slope-intercept form and find the following answer:

\(y-(-7) = -\frac{5}{4} (x-(0))\\y + 7 = -\frac{5}{4} x\\y = -\frac{5}{4} x-7\)

Answer:

6x^2 + 17x + 5

Step-by-step explanation:

(2x + 5)(3x + 1)

= 6x^2 + 2x + 15x + 5

= 6x^2 + 17x + 5

The expression (2x+5)(3x+1) is a product of two binomials. To expand this product, we multiply each term in the first binomial by each term in the second binomial, using the distributive property of multiplication.

When we multiply 2x by 3x, we get 6x^2.

Then we multiply 2x by 1, which gives us 2x.

Next, we multiply 5 by 3x, which gives us 15x.

Finally, we multiply 5 by 1, which gives us 5.

Putting these terms together gives us the expanded form of the expression:

(2x+5)(3x+1) = 6x^2 + 2x + 15x + 5

Simplifying, we can add the 2x and 15x terms to get 17x, giving us the final simplified expression:

(2x+5)(3x+1) = 6x^2 + 17x + 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is how I would work this one out :

Treat the first 4 deposits as an annuity due...calculate the value at the end of the year , then calculate that amount compounded quarterly for 39 more years:

Annuity due:    FV =  A [ ( (1+i)^n -1)  / i ] (1 +i) ]      where i = .015/4 = .0125

                                                                                 n = 4 ( one year)

                                                                                 and   a = 450

     plug in the numbers to find FV = $ 1856.96 at the end of year one.

then use this 'deposit ' compounded quarterly for 39 more years  (n = 156)

  $ 1856.96 ( 1 + .0125)^156 =  $ 12895.17

The model F is identifiable, and the true value of μ can be estimated from the observed measurements X1, X2, ..., Xn.

To formulate the constant-mean model for the determinations X1, X2, ..., Xn, we can start by considering the individual measurements and their relationship to the true value of the physical constant μ.

Let's denote the true value of the physical constant as μ. The measurements X1, X2, ..., Xn are biased and overestimate μ on average by 0.1 units. This means that each measurement can be modeled as:

Xi = μ + εi + 0.1

where Xi is the i-th measurement, εi represents the measurement error, and 0.1 represents the bias.

The measurement errors ε1, ε2, ..., εn are assumed to be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) normal random variables with variance σ².

Therefore, we can specify the common distribution Gε for the measurement errors as:

Gε ~ N(0, σ²)

Now, let's determine the distribution of the measurements X1, X2, ..., Xn. Using the constant-mean model, we can express each measurement Xi in terms of the true value μ, the measurement error εi, and the bias term 0.1.

Xi = μ + εi + 0.1

The measurements X1, X2, ..., Xn are also assumed to be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables.

Therefore, the common distribution F for the measurements can be specified as:

F ~ N(μ + 0.1, σ²)

Here, the parameter of interest is μ, the true value of the physical constant. The parameter space for μ depends on the specific context and constraints of the problem.

Identifiability refers to the property of being able to uniquely determine the parameters of a statistical model from the observed data.

In this case, model F is identifiable because the true value of the physical constant μ can be estimated by subtracting the known bias of 0.1 from the observed measurements. Even if the bias term β (unknown positive bias) is included, it can be absorbed into the estimation of μ as long as it remains constant across all measurements.

Therefore, model F is identifiable, and the true value of μ can be estimated from the observed measurements X1, X2, ..., Xn.

Learn more about random variables here:

https://brainly.com/question/14356285

#SPJ11

On solving the provided question, we can say that equation is  z = x-u/p => z = 300-348/80 = 0.65, The z score for a per - day expense of $400 is 0.65

A mathematical equation is a formula that joins two statements and uses the equal symbol (=) to indicate equality. A mathematical statement that establishes the equality of two mathematical expressions is known as an equation in algebra. For instance, in the equation 3x + 5 = 14, the equal sign places the variables 3x + 5 and 14 apart. The relationship between the two sentences on either side of a letter is described by a mathematical formula. Often, there is only one variable, which also serves as the symbol. for instance, 2x – 4 = 2.

The z score for a $400 per day charge is 0.65, but around 84.13% of hotels cost more than $268.

The z score is used to calculate how many standard deviations above or below the mean the raw score is. Giving the z score are:

equation is

z = x-u/p

u = mean, x = raw score, p standard deviation

z = 300-348/80 = 0.65

The z score for a per - day expense of $400 is 0.65

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

Answer:

a rectangle with 2 yards and 3 yards

Step-by-step explanation:

12 yards and 23 yards

x and 2x - 1

------------------------------------

2 and 3 = x and 2x - 1

2 and 2(2) - 1 = 2 and 3

I might be wrong.

Answer:

x≤6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: x<6

Step-by-step explanation:

closed circle line going left from 6

Question:

Find the probability of getting a doublet in a throw of a pair of dice.

Answer:

The probability is 1 out of 6.

Explanation:

There are a total of 6 possibilities that you get a doublet, which is {1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {5, 5}, and {6, 6}.

The total possibilities of throwing a dice are 6 possibilities for the first dice, and 6 possibilities for the second dice. Which results in a total of 6 × 6 = 36 possibilities available.

Probability = Possibilities of getting doublet ÷ Total possibilities = 6 ÷ 36 = 1 ÷ 6.

Hopefully this answer will help you.

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

6 times 8=48

Answer:

It is a function

Step-by-step explanation:

The x-values do not repeat so it is a function.

On a sequence diagram, a message does represent a service request. A sequence diagram is a type of interaction diagram in Unified Modeling Language (UML) .So the answer to your Question is True.

UML illustrates the interactions between objects or components within a system over a specific period of time. It visualizes the flow of messages between objects to depict the order of and the timing of these interactions. In a sequence diagram, messages are used to represent communication between objects. Messages can be synchronous, where the sender waits for a response before proceeding, or asynchronous, where the sender does not wait for a response. In the context of a service-oriented architecture, a message can represent a service request being sent from one object or component to another. By using messages to represent service requests, sequence diagrams provide a clear and visual representation of the interactions and flow of information within a system. They help in understanding the sequence of steps involved in a process and the dependencies between different components or objects.

Learn more about Unified Modeling Language (UML)  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30504439

#SPJ11

The transformation of the given image follows the pattern; Reflection across the x-axis, then translation by 2 units downwards, the reflection across the y-axis.

From the given first image, we see that it is in the first quadrant but by the second image, we see that it is now mirrored along the horizontal axis. Thus, we can say that it is reflected across the x-axis.

After reflection, across the x-axis, we see that it was translated down by 2 units.

The last transformation is that we see it is now in quadrant 3 which means it was now reflected across the y-axis.

The transformation of the given image follows the pattern; Reflection across the x-axis, then translation by 2 units downwards, the reflection across the y-axis.

Read more about Transformation Reflection at; https://brainly.com/question/4289712

#SPJ1

The equivalent expression of \(\frac{\frac 2x - \frac 4y}{-\frac 5y + \frac 3x}\) is \(\frac {2(y - 2x)}{ 3y-5x}\)

The complete question is in the attached image

We have:

\(\frac{\frac 2x - \frac 4y}{-\frac 5y + \frac 3x}\)

Take the LCM

\(\frac{\frac {2y - 4x}{xy}}{\frac{-5x + 3y}{xy}}\)

Divide through by xy

\(\frac {2y - 4x}{-5x + 3y}\)

Rewrite as:

\(\frac {2y - 4x}{ 3y-5x}\)

Factor out 2

\(\frac {2(y - 2x)}{ 3y-5x}\)

Hence, the equivalent expression of \(\frac{\frac 2x - \frac 4y}{-\frac 5y + \frac 3x}\) is \(\frac {2(y - 2x)}{ 3y-5x}\)

Read more about equivalent expression at:

https://brainly.com/question/24734894

#SPJ1

Therefore, after using three-fourths of the rice in the box, 4 and 1/4 cups of rice remained.

To find the number of cups of rice that remained in the box, we need to calculate three-fourths (3/4) of the total amount of rice in the box.

The total amount of rice in the box is given as five and two-thirds cups. To work with a fraction, we can convert the mixed number to an improper fraction:

5 and 2/3 = (5 * 3 + 2) / 3 = 17/3 cups

Now, we can find three-fourths (3/4) of 17/3:

(3/4) * (17/3) = (3 * 17) / (4 * 3) = 51/12 = 4 and 3/12 = 4 and 1/4 cups

Therefore, after using three-fourths of the rice in the box, 4 and 1/4 cups of rice remained.

Learn more about three-fourths here

https://brainly.com/question/16953584

#SPJ11

Answer:

LJ = CB

Therefore, CJ is 50km

Angle(x)=42 degrees

Arc(WV)=2*Angle(x)

Arc(WV)=2*42°=84°

Answer:

112.5°

in pretty sure that's the answer

By Pythagorean , Eli's home is thus roughly **11.4 miles** from Salem when viewed from a straight line.

A fundamental relationship between a right triangle's three sides in Euclidean geometry is known as the Pythagorean theorem. The hypotenuse is the side that forms the right angle, and the rule says that the square of its length is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides. In other words, if the hypotenuse is length c and the legs of a right triangle are lengths a and b, then a²+ b² = c² .

Call Yardley Y, Salem S, and Eli's home E. As far as we are aware, Y is located 7 miles from E and 9 miles from S.

We can check that the distance between Eli's house and Salem is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with Yardley as one of the vertices because Eli's house is located due west of Yardley and due south of Salem. The Pythagorean theorem can be used to determine this distance.

Eli's home is 11.4 miles from Salem at a distance of√(7 + 9 ) = √(130).

√(130) = 11.4miles

Eli's home is thus roughly **11.4 miles** from Salem when viewed from a straight line.

To know more about Pythagorean theorem visit:

brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ1

Answer:

Up left, down right

Step-by-step explanation:

First, polynomials with odd degrees will have end behaviors in two different directions.

Since the leading coefficient is negative, the end behavior will be up left and down right.

So, the end behavior is up left, down right.

The end behavior of a 9th-degree polynomial with negative leading coefficients is up left, downright.

We have to determine

The end behavior of a 9th-degree polynomial with a negative leading coefficient??

If the leading coefficient is negative and the exponent of the leading term is even, the graph falls to the left and right.

The equation of the 9th-degree polynomial is;

\(\rm x^9+3x^8+4x^7+x^6+x^5+9x^3+2x^2+x+1=0\)

The degree of the polynomial is 9 which is odd.

Hence, the end behavior of a 9th-degree polynomial with negative leading coefficients is up left, downright.

To know more about Polynomial click the link given below.

https://brainly.com/question/17822016

The probability of the sets are solved and

a) n(P U Q) = 85%

b) n(P ∩ Q) = 20%

c) n(only P) = 35%

d) n(only Q) = 30%

Given data ,

P and are the subsets of universal set U

And , n (p) = 55% n (Q) = 50% and n(PUO)complement = 15%

Now , we'll use the formula for the union and intersection of sets:

n(P U Q) = n(P) + n(Q) - n(P ∩ Q)

n(P ∩ Q) = n(P) + n(Q) - n(P U Q)

n(only P) = n(P) - n(P ∩ Q)

n(only Q) = n(Q) - n(P ∩ Q)

We're given that:

n(P) = 55%

n(Q) = 50%

n(P U Q)' = 15%

To find n(P U Q), we'll use the complement rule:

n(P U Q) = 100% - n(P U Q)'

n(P U Q) = 100% - 15%

n(P U Q) = 85%

Now we can substitute the values into the formulas above:

(i)

n(P U Q) = n(P) + n(Q) - n(P ∩ Q)

n(P ∩ Q) = n(P) + n(Q) - n(P U Q)

n(P ∩ Q) = 55% + 50% - 85%

n(P ∩ Q) = 20%

(ii)

n(P ∩ Q) = 20%

(iii) n(only P) = n(P) - n(P ∩ Q)

n(only P) = 55% - 20%

n(only P) = 35%

(iv)

n(only Q) = n(Q) - n(P ∩ Q)

n(only Q) = 50% - 20%

n(only Q) = 30%

Hence , the probability is solved

To learn more about probability click :

https://brainly.com/question/17089724

#SPJ1

a.  The maximum distance between the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna, when the receiving antenna is at ground level, is approximately 30,955 meters.

b. The maximum distance between the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna, when the receiving antenna height is increased to 50 m, is still approximately 30,955 meters.

a. To calculate the maximum distance between the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna when the receiving antenna is at ground level (height = 0), we can use the formula for the horizon distance:

d = √((2 * h * R) + h^2)

where:

d is the maximum distance between the antennas,

h is the height of the transmitting antenna, and

R is the radius of the Earth.

Height of the transmitting antenna, h = 75 m

Height of the receiving antenna, h = 0 m

Radius of the Earth, R ≈ 6,371,000 meters

Substituting the values into the formula:

d = √((2 * 75 * 6,371,000) + 75^2)

d ≈ √((957,150,000) + 5,625)

d ≈ √(957,155,625)

d ≈ 30,955 meters (approximately)

Therefore, the maximum distance between the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna, when the receiving antenna is at ground level, is approximately 30,955 meters.

b. Now, if the height of the receiving antenna is increased to 50 m, we can calculate the new maximum distance using the same formula.

Height of the transmitting antenna, h = 75 m

Height of the receiving antenna, h = 50 m

Radius of the Earth, R ≈ 6,371,000 meters

Substituting the values into the formula:

d = √((2 * 75 * 6,371,000) + 75^2)

d ≈ √((957,150,000) + 5,625)

d ≈ √(957,155,625)

d ≈ 30,955 meters (approximately)

Therefore, the maximum distance between the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna, when the receiving antenna height is increased to 50 m, is still approximately 30,955 meters. The height of the receiving antenna does not affect the maximum distance in a LOS scenario.

Your question is incomplete but most probably your full question was

Consider A LOS Transmitting Antenna With A Height Of 75 M.

A. Calculate The Maximum Distance Between The Transmitting Antenna And The Receiving Antenna If The Receiving Antenna Is At Ground Level.

B. If Now, The Receiving Antenna Height Is Increased To 50 M, Calculate The Maximum Distance Possible For LOS Transmission.

Learn more about transmitters here

brainly.com/question/13721041

#SPJ11

If the sample has the same mix of people, in the same proportions, as the population being studied then sociologists know if the sample they are using is representative. So the option c is correct.

No subject is off-limits when sociologists use the sociological lens and start asking questions. Every facet of human behaviour has the potential to be studied. Sociologists cast doubt on the society that people have built and inhabit. They observe behavioral patterns as individuals navigate that world.

Sociologists have uncovered workplace patterns that have revolutionized industries, family patterns that have educated parents, and educational patterns that have supported structural changes in classrooms by using sociological methodologies, methodical research, and a scholarly interpretive approach.

To learn more about Sociology link is here

brainly.com/question/25099331

#SPJ4

The complete question is;

How do sociologists know if the sample they are using is representative?

a. If the people in the sample freely volunteered to serve as representatives

b. If the sample has an even number, decided by the researcher, of people from several different categories or backgrounds

c. If the sample has the same mix of people, in the same proportions, as the population being studied

d. If the participants have been interviewed to reveal possible bias.

Let us first draw the diagram given to understand the given information in the problem: The diagram above shows a quadrilateral ABCD, and point E is on segment AB. We are required to find the ratio of AB to BC and the ratio of AD to DC. To calculate the ratios in geometry:

Calculation of Ratio of AB to BC

In ΔABC, AB and BC are the sides that we want to find the ratio of. We can use the following formula to calculate the ratio of AB to BC:

Ratio of AB to BC = AB / BC

Using the diagram, we can see that AB = 7

and BC = 6. Substituting these values in the formula above, we get:

Ratio of AB to BC = AB / BC

= 7 / 6 = 1.1667

Rounding to the hundredths place, we get:

Ratio of AB to BC = 1.17

Calculation of Ratio of AD to DC

In ΔADC, AD and DC are the sides that we want to find the ratio of. We can use the following formula to calculate the ratio of AD to DC:

Ratio of AD to DC = AD / DC

Using the diagram, we can see that AD = 7

and DC = 11. Substituting these values in the formula above, we get:

Ratio of AD to DC = AD / DC

= 7 / 11 = 0.6364

Rounding to the hundredths place, we get:

Ratio of AD to DC = 0.64

Notice that the ratio of AB to BC is greater than 1, while the ratio of AD to DC is less than 1. Also, the sum of these ratios is greater than 1 (1.17 + 0.64 = 1.81). These observations indicate that the quadrilateral ABCD is not a parallelogram.

To know more about parallelogram visit:

brainly.com/question/28854514

#SPJ11

MANY SOLUTIONS

If you eliminate the x's you have 4 left so both 4 are equal to each other and so it is many solutions because if you have two variable or numbers equal to each other it is many solutions

-x+4=-x+4

+x. +x

4=4

The recurrence relation that describes a function with the same asymptotic growth as f(n), defined by the recurrence relation, is f(n) = f(n-1) + g(n), where g(n) is any function that grows slower than or at the same rate as f(n).

In this recurrence relation, f(n) represents the function being described, f(n-1) represents the previous term in the sequence, and g(n) represents the additional term being added at each step.

By choosing a g(n) that grows slower than or at the same rate as f(n), we ensure that the additional term does not significantly affect the overall growth of the function.

This results in both f(n) and the given recurrence relation having the same asymptotic growth.

It is important to note that the exact form of g(n) is not specified in the question, so there are multiple possible answers that would satisfy the condition of having the same asymptotic growth.

To know more about function visit;

brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

The ordered pair that is a solution to the inequality:

y > (1/4)*x + 5

is (4, 7)

Here we have the inequality:

y > (1/4)*x + 5

To check if an ordered pair is a solution, we just need to replace the values of the ordered pair on the inequality and see if it is true.

For example, for (12, 8)

We will get:

8 > (1/4)*12 + 5

8 > 3 + 5

8 > 8

This is false, so (12, 8) is not a solution.

The pair that is a solution is:

(4, 7)

7 > (1/4)*4 + 5

7 > 1  + 5

7 > 6

This is true.

Learn more about inequalities:

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1