Evaluate the following integrals ∫^4_2 In(13x)/x dt
Evaluate ∫^4_2 1/(2x-3)^3/2 dx

By utilizing the law of the sines and Heron's formula, we find that the approximate area of the triangle is approximately 73.1 square centimeters. (Correct choice: A)

Prior to using Heron's formula, we must find the lengths of the missing sides by law of the sines:

A = 180° - 95° - 35°

A = 50°

\(b = 14\,cm \times \frac{\sin 35^{\circ}}{\sin 50^{\circ}}\)

b ≈ 10.483 cm

\(c = 14\,cm \times \frac{\sin 95^{\circ}}{\sin 50^{\circ}}\)

c ≈ 18.206 cm

Now, we proceed to calculate the area of the triangle:

s = 0.5 · (14 cm + 10.483 cm + 18.206 cm)

s = 21.345 cm

\(A = \sqrt{(21.345\, cm) \cdot (21.345\, cm - 14\,cm)\cdot (21.345\, cm - 10.483\,cm)\cdot (21.345\,cm - 18.206\,cm)}\)

A ≈ 73.113 cm²

By utilizing the law of the sines and Heron's formula, we find that the approximate area of the triangle is approximately 73.1 square centimeters. (Correct choice: A)

To learn more on triangles: https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

The range of the distribution is the parameter that is required to convert a computer-generated random variable into a uniform random variable. Below are more than 100 words explaining this in detail:A uniform random variable is a random variable with a probability distribution function that is uniform across all possible values.

The probability density function of a uniform distribution is constant over the range of values of the variable. Therefore, it has equal probability of taking any value within the range of values that it is defined.The process of converting a computer-generated random variable into a uniform random variable is known as uniform random number generation. The process of uniform random number generation is an important aspect of computer simulation and statistical analysis of data.

It is used to generate random numbers that follow a uniform distribution, which is a common distribution in many applications.The range of the distribution is the parameter that is required to convert a computer-generated random variable into a uniform random variable. This is because the range of the distribution defines the possible values that the variable can take. By mapping the computer-generated random variable to the range of the uniform distribution, we can convert it into a uniform random variable.

To know more about variable visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ11

The probability that the two chosen tiles differ with respect to all three properties is found as 1/24.

Let the probability of the each material be given as;

There is a probability of  1/2 that the tiles will differ in material (wood or plastic).

There is a probability of 1/3 that the tiles will differ in color (r, y or b)

There is a probability of 1/4 that tiles will differ in shape (t, s, p or c)

Thus,

Total probability (two tiles differ with respect to all three properties):

= 1/2  *  1/3  *  1/4

= 1/24

Thus, the probability that the two chosen tiles differ with respect to all three properties is found as 1/24.

To know more about the probability, here

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

Engineers can be held most morally blameworthy for foreseeable harms resulting from technological innovations, engineers have a responsibility to anticipate the potential consequences of their work,

and to take steps to mitigate those consequences. If they fail to do so, and their work results in harm, they can be held morally blameworthy. When engineers develop new technologies, they have a responsibility to consider the potential consequences of their work.

They need to think about how their technology could be used, and whether it could be used to harm people or the environment.

They also need to consider how their technology could be misused, and what steps they can take to prevent misuse.

If engineers fail to consider the potential consequences of their work, and their work results in harm, they can be held morally blameworthy. This is because they have a duty to protect the public from harm, and they have failed to fulfill that duty.

For example, engineers who develop new weapons systems have a responsibility to consider the potential consequences of their work. They need to think about how their weapons could be used,

and whether they could be used to kill or injure innocent people. They also need to consider how their weapons could be misused, and what steps they can take to prevent misuse.

If engineers fail to consider the potential consequences of their work, and their weapons are used to kill or injure innocent people, they can be held morally blameworthy. This is because they have a duty to protect the public from harm, and they have failed to fulfill that duty.

It is important to note that engineers cannot be held morally blameworthy for unforeseeable harms. This is because they did not have the opportunity to anticipate the harm, and they could not have taken steps to prevent it.

For example, engineers who develop new medical treatments cannot be held morally blameworthy if the treatments have unforeseen side effects. This is because the engineers did not have the opportunity to anticipate the side effects, and they could not have taken steps to prevent them.

In conclusion, engineers can be held morally blameworthy for foreseeable harms resulting from technological innovations.

This is because they have a responsibility to anticipate the potential consequences of their work, and to take steps to mitigate those consequences.

To know more about  Engineers click here

brainly.com/question/30592664

#SPJ11

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

its composite

Answer:

Composite

Step-by-step explanation:

70 is a composite number as it has factors other than 1 and itself.

mark me brainlist pls im first

Answer:

I believe its 20 Lawns.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

504

Step-by-step explanation:

use pemdas

multiply 8 and 7 first then u have 56 so multiply it by 9

The expression 9x (8x7) can be rewritten as (9x8) x7 or 72x7 by using the associative law of multiplication. This law states that the way numbers are grouped doesn't affect the result of multiplication.

The question asks to rewrite 9x (8x7) using the associative law of multiplication. The associative law of multiplication, in basic terms, states that the way in which numbers are grouped in multiplication does not change the result.

To apply this law to the given expression, we just need to change the grouping of the numbers. Instead of grouping (8x7) together, we could group (9x8) together. So, the content loaded rewrite of 9x (8x7) using the associative law of multiplication would be: (9x8) x7 or we can write it as 72x7.

This does not change the result of the multiplication, thus demonstrating the associative property. This is a helpful principle to understand, as it is commonly applied in a variety of mathematical operations and can simplify complex equations.

https://brainly.com/question/35585926

#SPJ2

Answer:

-2/5

Step-by-step explanation:

2/5 + -4/5 becomes 2/5-4/5

2/5-4/5= -2/5

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Q= 6x+1

R= -7x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

The quotient is (6x + 1) and the remainder is (-7x + 1).

We know that if x = a is one of the roots of a given polynomial x - a = 0 is a factor of the given polynomial.

To confirm if x - a = 0 is a factor of a polynomial we replace f(x) with f(a) and if the remainder is zero then it is confirmed that x - a = 0 is a factor.

Given A cubic polynomial 24x³ - 14x² + 20x + 6 divided by 4x² - 3x + 5.

So, (24x³ - 14x² + 20x + 6)/(4x² - 3x + 5).

= (4x² - 3x + 5)(6x + 1) + (-7x + 1)/(4x² - 3x + 5) in rhe form N = DQ + R.

The same applies to the division of polynomials.

learn more about polynomials here :

https://brainly.com/question/28824872

#SPJ6

A triangle is a three-edged polygon with three vertices. It is a fundamental form in geometry. Using the ASA congruency the triangles are congruent.

A triangle is a three-edged polygon with three vertices. It is a fundamental form in geometry. The sum of all the angles of a triangle is always equal to 180°.

For the two of the given triangles ΔACY and ΔDXB,

Since the measure of the two angles and one side of the two triangles are equal, therefore, using the ASA congruency the triangles are congruent.

Learn more about Triangle:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

Area models are used to visually represent multiplication problems by partitioning the given dimensions into smaller units. Each area model consists of a collection of polygons that fill the entire area. To determine the polygon group to which Jessalyn's area models belong, we need to identify the common polygons used in all three models. Answer : the area models of 3 x 3, 4 x 6, and 7 x 2 all belong to the polygon group of rectangles.

1. Examine the three given multiplication problems: 3 x 3, 4 x 6, and 7 x 2.

2. Draw area models for each of the multiplication problems. For example, for 3 x 3, Jessalyn would draw a 3x3 grid divided into squares.

3. Analyze the polygons used in the area models. In each model, the polygons used will be rectangles.

4. Since rectangles are common to all three area models, the polygon group to which Jessalyn's area models belong is the group of rectangles.

5. Rectangles are quadrilaterals with four right angles, and all sides opposite to each other are congruent.

6. Therefore, the area models of 3 x 3, 4 x 6, and 7 x 2 all belong to the polygon group of rectangles.

Learn more about congruent : brainly.com/question/30596171

#SPJ11

Note that assuming that the instrument used was exogenous, one can conclude about the endogeneity of an explanatory variable if the OLS and 2SLS estimates are significantly different: "The explanatory variable is endogenous and therefore 2SLS should be considered." (Option C)

Two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression analysis is a statistical approach used in structural equation analysis. The OLS approach has been extended using this methodology. It is employed when the error terms of the dependent variable are associated with the independent variables.

The ordinary least squares (OLS) approach is a linear regression methodology used to estimate a model's unknown parameters. The strategy is based on reducing the sum of squared residuals between the expected and actual values.

2SLS is utilized as an alternate strategy when we encounter endogeneity Problems in OLS. Endogeneity arises when the explanatory variable correlates with the error word. Then we utilize 2SLS, which employs an instrumental variable. The outcome will be different because if there is endogeneity in the model, OLS will produce biased results.

Learn more about OLS:
https://brainly.com/question/29834077
#SPJ1

Full Question:
What can we conclude about the endogeneity of an explanatory variable if the OLS and 2SLS estimates are significantly different? Assume that the instrument used was exogenous. Select one:

a. The explanatory variable is not endogenous and therefore using 2SLS is ill-advised.

b. The explanatory variable is not endogenous and therefore OLS should not be used.

c. The explanatory variable is endogenous and therefore using 2SLS should be considered.

d. The explanatory variable is endogenous and therefore OLS should be used.

The height the anchor begins to drop is 17.5 m

Since a Naval Carrier dropped anchor off the coast. The massive anchor drops at 3.5 m/s and will be 52.5 meters under the surface of the water after 20 seconds.

Let

The total height the anchor drops is thus H = h + h'

Now, the total height the anchor drops H = vt where

So, equating both equations, we have

vt = h + h'

Making h subject of the formula, we have that

h = vt - h'

Given that

Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have that

h = vt - h'

h = 3.5 m/s × 20 s - 52.5 m

h = 70 m - 52.5 m

h = 17.5 m

So, the anchor drops 17.5 m

Learn more about height anchor drops here:

https://brainly.com/question/28706489

#SPJ1

Answer:

the rate of change is 3x(slope)

The given linear time-invariant (LTI) system is described by a third-order linear constant coefficient differential equation. To determine the frequency response of the system, we can take the Laplace transform of the differential equation and solve in the Laplace domain

(a) To find the frequency response, we start by taking the Laplace transform of the given differential equation. Let \(Y(s)\) and \(X(s)\) represent the Laplace transforms of \(y(t)\) and \(x(t)\) respectively. By applying the Laplace transform, we obtain:

\[2s^3Y(s) + 4s^2Y(s) + 10sY(s) = 5X(s) + 2sX(s)\]

Simplifying the equation, we get:

\[Y(s) = \frac{5X(s) + 2sX(s)}{2s^3 + 4s^2 + 10s}\]

This equation represents the transfer function of the system in the Laplace domain. To obtain the frequency response, we substitute \(s = j\omega\) into the transfer function, where \(\omega\) represents the angular frequency.

(b) To approximate the Bode plot, we analyze the frequency response at low and high frequencies. At low frequencies (\(\omega \to 0\)), the terms involving \(s\) dominate, and the transfer function can be approximated as:

\[Y(j\omega) \approx \frac{2j\omega X(j\omega)}{2j\omega}\]

Simplifying, we find that the low-frequency gain is 1, indicating that the system passes low-frequency signals without significant attenuation.

At high frequencies (\(\omega \to \infty\)), the terms involving \(s\) become negligible compared to the constant term. Thus, the transfer function can be approximated as:

\[Y(j\omega) \approx \frac{5X(j\omega)}{10j\omega}\]

In this approximation, the gain decreases by -20 dB/decade, indicating that the system attenuates high-frequency signals.

The cutoff frequencies of the system can be determined from the Bode plot where the gain decreases by -3 dB. These frequencies represent the boundary between the passband and stopband of the system.

know more abput Laplace transform :brainly.com/question/30759963

#SPJ11

The scientific standard which jane evaluates based on the condition above is falsifiability.

It may appear that Jane is attempting to measure test-retest reliability, that is, a correlation between the first scores and those a year later. But without control over variables that could affect the second scores, there is there is hardly a strong argument for the reliability of her test. Moreover, some of the couples may not be together after a year has passed.

Falsifiability or refutability is the probability that a statement can be falsified or proven false through observation or physical testing. Something that can be falsified does not mean that it is wrong, but it means that if the statement is wrong, then the error can be shown.

The claim that "it is not true that humans live forever" cannot be falsified because it is impossible to prove wrong. In theory, one would have to observe a human living forever to falsify that claim. On the other hand, "all humans live forever" is falsifiable because the death of a single human being can disprove the statement false (excluding metaphysical statements about the soul, which cannot be falsified).

Falsifiability, especially testability, is an important notion in science and philosophy of science. This thought was popularized by Karl Popper. Popper stated that a hypothesis, proposition, or theory is scientific if it can be falsified. Falsifiability is an important (but not sufficient) criterion for scientific ideas. He also stated that statements that cannot be falsified are unscientific.

Learn more about falsifiability at https://brainly.com/question/17370873.

#SPJ4

Answer:

30%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

512 ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

It should be straightforward.

It's a rectangle with sides 32+8=40 and 8+8 = 16

Use formula A=wl

A=40 x 16 = 640 ft^2

now we have to deduct the remaining two squares. 8 x 8 = 64 x 2 = 128

640-128 = 512 ft^2

Answer:

64π²

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula is πr². Just put 8 into r.

Can I have Brainliest?

Frequency = 14

Probability = 0.28

The sample size is given to be 50

Frequency must sum to 50

Let the missing frequency be x

6 + x + 22 + 8 = 50

x + 36 = 50

x = 50 - 36 = 14

The corresponding probability for the frequency above is:

14/50 = 0.28

Frequency = 14

Probability = 0.28

Maya achievements in mathematics were closely related to astronomy.

How were Maya achievements closely related to astronomy?

The Maya civilization made advancements in both mathematics and astronomy and these two fields were intricately interconnected in their culture. The Maya developed a highly sophisticated numerical system  which allowed them to perform complex calculations and create precise astronomical predictions.

They meticulously observed celestial bodies and recorded their movements, developing calendars and astronomical tables that aided in agricultural planning, religious rituals, and governance. By studying the stars, planets and celestial events, the Maya not only expanded their understanding of the universe but also used mathematical principles to navigate time and space.

Read more about maya achievements

brainly.com/question/2950645

#SPJ4

If you double the amount of fluid ounces, the amount of cups also double

There is proportional relationship between the number of fluid ounces and the number of cups. So, the number of cups would change by the same factor as the number of fluid ounces.

The donation is proportional to the dinner bill

The donation for a dinner bill of $50 is $9

If there are 8 fluid ounces in one cup

8 : 1 = 16 : x

8/1 = 16/x

8 × x = 16 × 1

8x = 16

x = 16/8

x = 2

The difference between weight = 1

The difference between cost = $0.68 - $0.47

= $0.21

$0.89 - $0.68

= $0.21

$1.10 - $0.89

= $0.21

Cost of mailing 6-ounce letter

1 : 0.47 = 6 : x

1/0.47 = 6/x

1 × x = 6 × 0.47

x = $2.82

The donation for a dinner bill $50 is

Dinner bill : donation

25 : 4.50 = 50 : x

25/4.50 = 50/x

25 × x = 50 × 4.50

25x = 225

x = 225/25

x =$ 9

Therefore, there is a proportional relationship between two quantities if there is an equal change in the values of both quantities.

Read more on proportional relationship:

https://brainly.com/question/12242745

#SPJ1

Answer:

Tell me you address right now!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

I am gonna call police for help!

Answer:

$16.11

Step-by-step explanation:

10.74÷6

times the number you get by 3

add that number to 10.74

I hope this helps you...

The statement that proves that angle XWY is equal to angle ZYW is

A. If two parallels are cut by a transverse, then alternate interior angles are congruent

Alternate interior angles are a pair of angles that are formed on opposite sides of a transversal line when two parallel lines are intersected by the transversal.

When a transversal intersects two parallel lines, it creates eight angles. Among these angles, the alternate interior angles are located on the inside of the parallel lines and on opposite sides of the transversal.

In a parallelogram, the two opposite sides are parallel to each other hence the line crossing them will lead to formation of alternate interior angles

Learn more about alternate interior angles at

https://brainly.com/question/20344743

#SPJ1

Answer:

x

x

are the same

Step-by-step explanation:

when you plug in g(x) into f(x)

f(x)=16((1/4)(x)^.5)==x

then vice versa

g(x)=(1/4)((16x^2)^.5)==x

They are the same and, therefore, inverses of each other.