Elie wiesel was a writer who died in a concentration camp true or false

Plebeians feared many things, including social, economic, and political inequality.

The plebeians were the lower-class citizens of ancient Rome who were often excluded from many aspects of society, including political power and economic opportunities. As a result, they had many fears related to their social status and economic well-being. For example, they feared being unable to provide for themselves and their families, as they often had limited access to resources and opportunities. They also feared political repression and exclusion from government decision-making, as the patrician elite held most of the power in ancient Rome.

In addition to these immediate concerns, plebeians also feared the long-term consequences of their social and economic position. They worried that their lack of status and power would prevent them from ever achieving higher positions in society or passing on their wealth and status to their children. This fear of being stuck in a cycle of poverty and marginalization was a constant source of anxiety for many plebeians. Furthermore, plebeians also feared the wrath of the patrician elite, who held considerable power and often used it to maintain their own position at the expense of the lower classes. This fear of retribution kept many plebeians from speaking out against injustices or challenging the status quo, which only reinforced their subordinate position in society. Overall, the fears of the plebeians were rooted in their social, economic, and political inequality, as well as the systemic barriers that prevented them from achieving greater status and power. Despite these challenges, however, many plebeians continued to resist and fight for their rights and freedoms, paving the way for a more equitable and just society.

To know more about Plebeians visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15909404

#SPJ11

Explanation:

piece: the last supper

painted by: leonardo da vinci

Answer:

1. the last supper, leonardo da vinci

2. the sistine chapel, michelangelo

Explanation:

edge 22

Answer:

primary sources are the original material and usually are open to interpretation by the reader, whereas secondary sources are already interpreted. an example of a primary source could be a journal, speech, or book, while a secondary source could be textbooks or edited works/articles.

Explanation:

I don't know if there are specific answer choices so this may be wrong

Answer:

The Gospel of Wealth asserts that hard work and perseverance lead to wealth. Carnegie based his philosophy on the observation that the heirs of large fortunes frequently squandered them in riotous living rather than nurturing and growing them.

Explanation:

Although the early 1900s boll weevil invasion had a lot of negative impacts on the state of Georgia, it was crucial in boosting government supervision of the agriculture sector.

Infestation of Boll Weevils

Early in the 20th century, the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta and the state's cotton empire were under danger due to the boll weevil. Surprisingly, planters thought that keeping their place at the top of the Delta's racial and social hierarchy would be the best way to protect their cotton from the boll weevil.

At every step of its development, the boll weevil was reliant on cotton. The insects ate the fibers of the plant, lay their eggs in its squares, grew inside its enclosed buds, and hibernated on the fields' boundaries.

The egg, larva, pupa, and adult phases of the weevil's life cycle all took place inside the plant. Poisons were ineffective because the pest spent the majority of its life hidden inside the cotton plant's square, safe from insecticides that were only used on the crop's exterior.

To know more about the boll weevil, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/14493838
#SPJ4

Answer:  The Courtier was written by Baldassare Castiglione.

Explanation:

Also, Hope this was helpful for your first question on Brainly :)

Answer: B. People surrender some of their natural rights in exchange for the common good.

Answer:

Explanation:

The answer is A) They were considered fully equal to men.

Answer:

it D

Explanation:

Answer:What was the outcome of the Whiskey Rebellion?

The Whiskey Rebellion demonstrated that the new national government had the will and ability to suppress violent resistance to its laws, though the whiskey excise remained difficult to collect.

...

Whiskey Rebellion.

Date 1791–1794

Location primarily Western Pennsylvania

Result Government victory Armed resistance eliminated Minor tax evasion

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Check it on the internet

Answer:

They were extremely racist against black people.

Explanation:

None of the options provided are true concerning the Mexican-American War. The Mexican-American War was a conflict fought between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848.

Generally, It was not directly related to the Civil War, which occurred more than a decade later, from 1861 to 1865. The Civil War was a conflict between the Union (northern) states and the Confederacy (southern) states and did not involve Mexico.

The Mexican-American War was, however, significant in its own right, as it resulted in the United States gaining significant territories, including California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma.

Read more about  Mexican-American War

https://brainly.com/question/28226005

#SPJ1

CQ

Which of the following is true concerning the Mexican American War?

a. It was instrumental in developing military leaders for the Union Army in the Civil War

b. It was instrumental in developing new strategies for warfare to be used in the Civil War

c. It was instrumental in developing leaders for both sides in the Civil War

d. It was instrumental in developing soldiers for the Confederate Army in the Civil War

The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates held in 1858 between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, who were running for the U.S. Senate from Illinois. The main issue of the debates was slavery and its expansion into the western territories. Douglas was a proponent of popular sovereignty, which allowed the settlers of a territory to decide whether or not to allow slavery, while Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery into the territories. The debates were widely covered in the press and helped to raise the profile of both candidates, as well as to bring the issue of slavery to the forefront of national politics.

In the first debate, Lincoln argued that the Founders had intended to limit the spread of slavery and that the Missouri Compromise had established a precedent for keeping slavery out of the western territories. Douglas countered that popular sovereignty was the best way to resolve the slavery issue and accused Lincoln of being an abolitionist. In the second debate, Lincoln continued to argue against the extension of slavery and emphasized the moral wrongness of the institution. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's position as extreme and suggesting that it would lead to civil war.

In the fifth debate, Lincoln questioned Douglas's commitment to popular sovereignty and accused him of supporting the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, which had upheld the right to own slaves as property. Lincoln argued that the decision was a threat to the rights of free blacks and that it was the duty of Congress to prevent the spread of slavery. Douglas responded by defending theDred Scott decision and arguing that the Constitution protected property rights, including the right to own slaves. He also accused Lincoln of advocating for racial equality, which he believed was a dangerous and radical position.

In the final debate, Lincoln and Douglas clashed over the issue of citizenship for Black Americans. Lincoln argued that Black Americans were entitled to the same rights and protections as white citizens, while Douglas believed that citizenship should be determined by state law. Lincoln also criticized Douglas's position on popular sovereignty, arguing that it would only lead to more conflict and division over the issue of slavery. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's views on racial equality and accusing him of supporting the abolitionist movement.

Overall, the Lincoln-Douglas debates were a pivotal moment in American history, as they helped to shape the national debate over slavery and its extension into the western territories. The debates highlighted the stark differences between the two candidates on the issue of slavery and helped to galvanize public opinion on the issue. While Lincoln ultimately lost the Senate election to Douglas, the debates helped to establish him as a national figure and set the stage for his eventual election as President in 1860.

#SPJ1

Answer: they didn't like how trump was running the contrey

Explanation: did the quiz and got it right

The documentary "Commanding Heights-Episode 1" is based on the book “Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy” by Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw.

It's a deta She is known for her conservative policies and her efforts to privatize many public services.Ronald Reagan: Ronald Reagan was the President of the United States from 1981 to 1989. He is known for his conservative policies and his efforts to reduce government intervention in the economy.John Maynard Keynes: John Maynard Keynes was an economist who advocated for government intervention in the economy. His theories helped shape economic policy in many countries during the 20th century.

The fall of the Berlin Wall: The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 is one of the key events highlighted in the documentary. The fall of the wall marked the end of the Cold War and the beginning of a new era of globalization.The Asian financial crisis: The Asian financial crisis of 1997 is another key event highlighted in the documentary. The crisis highlighted the risks of globalization and the importance of regulation in the world economy.

Learn more about Heights-Episode here:https://brainly.com/question/28122539

#SPJ11

Answer:

chloride oxide is the relationship between Greek mythology

chloride oxide is the relationship between Greek mythology

Answer:

New Orleans

best of luck :D

If the Philippines were annexed, America would be in a position to control trade with China and the rest of Asia.

Thus according to Carnegie, this was the reason why many American were interested in conquering the Philippines.

To learn more Philippines, refer: https://brainly.com/question/25696589

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Option C homo hablis is the correct answer

Answer:

a

Explanation:

i took the test

Answer:

It means one of the secrets of success is the ability to understand people well. Which could also translate to having a high EQ (Emotional Quotient).

Explanation:

The success being talked about here is not only Financial but also Individual/Personal success (i.e when a person is generally happy and feels fulfilled).

Seeing things from the other person's view point helps you to understand why he/she behaves thinks and reacts to things the way they do. When you understand other people's emotions as well as your own, you : are able to make better, objective and intentional decisions in every aspect of your life, whether personal or at the workplace; become more confident; and have healthier relationships. This brings all-round success.

Cahokia and Teotihuacán are two ancient civilizations that have left behind fascinating archaeological sites, yet they still hold many mysteries and unanswered questions. Here are some of the mysteries surrounding Cahokia and Teotihuacán:

1. Cahokia:

Cahokia, located near present-day St. Louis, Missouri, was once the largest city in North America during the Mississippian culture (900-1500 CE). Despite its prominence, there are still enigmatic aspects of Cahokia's civilization. One mystery revolves around the purpose and function of the massive earthen mounds found at the site. These mounds, such as Monk's Mound, were monumental structures that served various purposes, including ceremonial, residential, and administrative. However, the exact rituals and activities conducted on these mounds remain uncertain.

Another mystery is the decline and abandonment of Cahokia. By the 14th century, the city's population dwindled, and it was eventually abandoned. The reasons behind this decline are still debated among scholars. Possible factors include environmental changes, political instability, social conflicts, or the spread of diseases. Unraveling the specific causes of Cahokia's decline would shed light on the factors that shaped the fate of this once-thriving civilization.

2. Teotihuacán:

Teotihuacán, located near modern-day Mexico City, was one of the largest and most influential cities in ancient Mesoamerica. Its monumental architecture, including the Pyramid of the Sun and the Pyramid of the Moon, reflects the city's grandeur. However, much about Teotihuacán remains a mystery. One enigma is the identity of its rulers and the nature of its political organization. Despite extensive archaeological research, no clear evidence of kings or a centralized ruling system has been found.

Another mystery is the purpose and symbolism behind the elaborate murals and iconography found throughout the city. The meanings behind the intricate frescoes and carvings are still not fully understood, leaving room for interpretation and speculation.

Additionally, the collapse of Teotihuacán is another unresolved mystery. Around the 7th century CE, the city experienced a decline and eventual abandonment. The causes of this collapse, such as social unrest, environmental factors, or external invasions, are still subjects of ongoing research and debate.

Studying and uncovering the mysteries of Cahokia and Teotihuacán is an ongoing endeavor that involves archaeological investigations, interdisciplinary research, and the analysis of cultural and historical contexts. By piecing together the fragments of these ancient civilizations, we can gain a deeper understanding of their complexities and the factors that shaped their rise and fall

for more questions on .archaeological

https://brainly.com/question/928273

#SPJ8

Answer:

What? Why?

Explanation:

You know how we read the lives of other famous and important people? Yeah, if we didn't learn about their lives we would assume they just simply got successful. After reading about them you know all of the hardwork they've done and all the struggles they had to go through to get to where they are now.

We learn to shift our perspective by putting ourselves in the shoes of others.

We learn about who we are and who we want to be.

Paul of Tarsus, also known as Saint Paul, played a significant role in early Christianity, although he did not convert Constantine to Christianity nor create the office of the Pope.

Paul of Tarsus, also known as Saint Paul, played a significant role in early Christianity, although he did not convert Constantine to Christianity nor create the office of the Pope. Paul was a zealous persecutor of Christians before he experienced a dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus, which led him to become one of the most influential figures in the development of Christianity.
Paul traveled extensively throughout the Roman Empire, preaching the gospel and establishing churches, and his letters, which make up a significant portion of the New Testament, provide crucial theological insights and guidance for early Christian communities. Paul emphasized the importance of faith in Jesus Christ and the role of grace in salvation, and his teachings on the resurrection and the role of the church as the body of Christ continue to shape Christian doctrine and practice today.
While Constantine is often credited with legalizing Christianity and making it the official religion of the Roman Empire, it was not solely due to Paul's influence. Constantine's conversion is thought to have been influenced by a variety of factors, including political and military motivations, as well as his own personal spiritual journey. Likewise, the office of the Pope did not emerge until several centuries later, and was the result of a complex historical process rather than the work of a single individual.
Overall, Paul's contributions to early Christianity were immense, and his legacy continues to influence the faith to this day. His teachings on the nature of Christ, the importance of faith, and the role of the church helped to shape the theology and practice of Christianity in its formative years, and continue to be studied and debated by scholars and believers alike.

To know more about Christianity visit: https://brainly.com/question/11489285

#SPJ11

Answer:

June 28, 1914. Archduke Francis Ferdinand is assassinated.

July 28, 1914. Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia, beginning World War I.

August 2-7, 1914. Germany invades Luxembourg and Belgium. ...

August 10, 1914. Austria-Hungary invades Russia.

September 9, 1914. ...

February 18, 1915. ...

April 25, 1915. ...

May 7, 1915.

Explanation:

Lincolns approach is best bc I think the southern states would be bias bc slavery was how they payed for every thing