Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
Debates in the US Congress allow certain members of the Congress to state their objections to certain parts of a proposed bill.
Debates in the US congress allow members of congress to state their objection to certain parts of proposed bills. Option A is correct
What is Debates?A formal debate about a specific subject in a public gathering or legislative assembly during which opposing viewpoints are presented.
Debates in the US congress is a session where it comes a necessary two minutes of inquiry, followed by a three-minute speech in opposition (negation).
Following these opening remarks, the discussion alternates three-minute speeches in support of and against the proposed law, followed by one minute of questions.
Thus Debates in the US congress allow members of congress to state their objection to certain parts of proposed bills is main theme behind the debate introduction in Congress legislative assembly.
Learn more about Debates refer:
https://brainly.com/question/1695492
#SPJ5
what does it mean that are memories are reconstructed and made up of original and _____ events?
Answer:
Reconstructive memory refers to the idea that remembering the past reflects our attempts to reconstruct the events experienced previously
Explanation:
hope this help
What percentage of court cases in the United States are heard by federal courts?
A.
5 percent
B.
15 percent
C.
25 percent
D.
50 percent
Answer:
a
Explanation:
they wont reach the federal courts
The percentage of court cases in the United States are heard by federal courts is 5 percent. The correct option is a.
Trial courts, tribunals of appeals, as well as supreme courts are the three main kinds of courts. Whereas state courts hear nearly 99 percent of the legal proceedings in the United States, federal courts hear cases involving federal laws, treaties, or the United States Constitution, in addition to those to which the national government serves as a party.
If a civil case involves citizens from more than one state, or if an appeal from a lower court is filed, the case may be heard that the national level. The majority of federal cases of original jurisdiction are handled by lower federal courts (district and appellate courts).
Learn more about courts, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8433911
#SPJ2
easy way to learn question answer in exam
Answer:
what is this man is it question bro
My mother has just tested positive on coronavirus and she doesn't believe in it. what should I do
Answer:
slap her into believing itt
What make an action become terroristic?
Answer:
relating to or involving the use of unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT a basic element of communication?
A. Sender
B. Message
C. Thought process
D. Receiver
C thoughts are personal and if said outloud they become verbal messages but otherwise cannot comunicate with out people
Thought process, is not the basic element of communication. The other element are describe the communication. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is communication?The term communication refers to the exchange of thoughts, ideas, and messages that are shared between two or more people. Without language, a person can survive, but without communication, no one can survive. Communication is divided into two categories, such as interpersonal and intrapersonal.
According to the communication, was the effective are the desire the effect of the result. The element of communication is the perfectly encoding of the message are the decoding to the response are the perfectly to the feedback. The feedback is the response of the communication is the necessary but, it was not to include the thought process.
Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on communication, here:
https://brainly.com/question/22558440
#SPJ6
what is the difference between their there and they´re
Answer:
Their shows ownership,there is a location,and they're is short for they are.
Explanation:
Hope this helped Mark BRAINLIEST!!!
WILL GIVE BRAINLIST TO THE FIRST PERSON THAT GIVSE THE RIGHT ANSWER
Name one current faction in the Republican Party and one current faction in the Democratic Party.
Based on the political structure and information available, the current faction of the Republican Party is the Republican Study Committee while the current faction of the Democratic Party is the Blue Collar Caucus.
Factions in the Political PartyFactions in the political party is a term that is used to describe a group of people that has a common political purpose but differs in some areas relative to the rest of the entire party.
A faction within a political party is usually considered the fragmented sub-factions, that is "parties within a party," otherwise known as power blocs, or voting blocs.
Currently, the factions in the Republican Party include the following:the Republican Study Committeethe Freedom Caucusthe Republican Governance Group the Republican Liberty CaucusCurrently, the factions in the Democratic Party include the following:Blue Collar Caucus.Blue Dog Coalition New Democrat Coalition Congressional Progressive CaucusHence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various factions currently present in the Democratic and Republican parties.
Learn more about Factions in the Political Party here: https://brainly.com/question/27043477
#SPJ1
How is a proposed statute introduced in most state legislatures?
Answer:
Through committee
Explanation:
Answer:
One or more legislators sponsor a bill, which is then considered by a committee of legislators in the House of Representatives or the Senate (depending on the position of the sponsoring legislators).
Explanation:
I just took the test :)
fill in the blanks please
1. The basis for a divorce is irreconcilable differences.
2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of best interests of the child.
3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony.
4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family.
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se and not pay legal fees.
1. The basis for a collaborative divorce is the mutual agreement between the divorcing parties to work together in resolving their issues amicably and without litigation.
2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of the best interests of the child, considering factors such as the child's welfare, stability, and relationship with each parent.
3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony by facilitating communication, negotiation, and finding mutually agreeable solutions.
4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage by providing therapy, counseling, and guidance to improve communication, understanding, and relationship dynamics.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family, where both partners bring their own children from previous relationships into the new family unit.
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se, meaning they represent themselves in the legal process, without hiring an attorney. This option allows them to save on legal fees but requires them to navigate the legal proceedings and paperwork on their own.
Know more about the judge here:
https://brainly.com/question/30455267
#SPJ8
The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:
Directions: Fill in the blanks with the correct answer from the list below. Some terms be used more than once.
1 alimony
2 best interests of the child
3 blended family
4 child custody
5 child support
6 collaborative divorce
7 community property
8 covenant divorce
9 divorce
10 in loco parentis
11 irreconcilable differences
12-joint custody
13 kinship care
14 legal fees
15 marriage counselor
16 mediator
17 no-fault divorce
18 pro se
19 property division
20 separate property
21 Separation
22 stepparent
23 tender years doctrine
1. The basis for a ____ is ____
2. When a judge decides the issue of _____ the judge uses the standard of _____
3. A _____ helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of ___, ___, ____ and ____
4. A ____ helps married couples resolve the problems in their marriage.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a _______
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go _____ and not pay_____ .
As it relates to the policymaking process, what is the main idea of the cartoon below? Justify your answer with support and reasoning.
The main idea of the cartoon is that lobbyists have a significant influence on the policymaking process.
How to explain the informationThe cartoon shows a congressman speaking at a podium, saying "Nobody tells me what to do or say!" while holding a microphone labeled "Lobby." This suggests that the congressman is not making his own decisions about what to say, but is instead being influenced by the lobbyists who are paying for his microphone.
The cartoon is making a critical point about the role of lobbyists in the policymaking process. Lobbyists are paid to represent the interests of their clients, and they often have a lot of influence over the decisions that lawmakers make.
Learn more about policy on
https://brainly.com/question/3006046
#SPJ1
1. Do you think the adversarial system is the best method for solving disputes? Explain your
opinion.
ment will
2. Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: "It is better that ten
guilty persons go free than that one innocent person suffer conviction." Explain your
opinion.
3. In a criminal case, should a lawyer defend a client he or she knows is guilty? Would you
defend someone you know to be guilty? Explain your opinion.
4. What reasons can you give to excuse the following people from serving on a jury; clergy,
attorneys, physicians, police officers, and convicted felons? Should everyone be required to
serve on a jury. Explain your opinion.
5. If you were a defense attorney questioning jurors at a voir dire in a murder trial, what
quesrions would you ask a potential juror?
6. For what reasons might an attorney use a peremptory challenge?
Answer: In some cases , it can be, if the defendant ( the person being advocated) is not able to defend ones self within their testimony, or having the ability to do so, the adversarial system can be a good place holder. But I will say there are multiple disadvantages and flaws in this type of system. In this system there is no actual evidence presented . For that reason many people can get away with infractions, and crimes because of the adversarial system.
Explanation:
personally, I think the truth can be found even without evidence, But I am highly skeptical about the fact that this sort of system would actually prove who is Innocent and who Is the criminal through no thorough or decisive evidence. I rest my case.
Marbury v. Madison, How does it relate to the Constitution?
Explanation:
strengthen the federal judiciary by establishing for it the power of judicial review
When is it hardest to see motorcyclists?
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head on, they take up so little of your visual field.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot.
d. All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them.
The hardest to see motorcyclists : All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them. Option D is the correct answer.
Motorcyclists can be difficult to see in various situations, and it is essential for drivers to be vigilant and actively look for them. Here's an explanation for each option:
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head-on, they take up so little of your visual field: Motorcycles have a narrower profile compared to other vehicles, making them less visible when approaching from the opposite direction. Due to their smaller size, they can be easily overlooked, especially if drivers are not actively scanning for them.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes: Motorcycles can be particularly challenging to spot on the freeway due to the high volume of traffic and frequent lane changes. The quick maneuverability of motorcycles allows them to navigate through traffic, but this also increases the risk of being overlooked by drivers who are not attentive or fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot: Motorcycles can easily fall into a driver's blind spot, which is an area not visible in the rear-view or side mirrors. It is crucial for drivers to check their blind spots by turning their heads and using proper mirror adjustment to ensure they are aware of any motorcyclists in their vicinity.
Option D is the correct answer.
For such more question on motorcyclists:
https://brainly.com/question/27196118
#SPJ8
What was to be added for the Anti-Federalists to ratify
the Constitution? Why did they want this added?
Please help!:)
explain five relationship between separation of power and checks and balances
The relationship between the separation of powers and checks and balances is Mutual Restraint, Legislative Oversight, Judicial Review, Appointment and Confirmation, and Lawmaking Process.
The separation of powers is the division of government authority into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial, each with distinct functions and responsibilities. Checks and balances, on the other hand, refer to the system that ensures no single branch becomes too powerful by providing mechanisms for the branches to restrain or oversee one another.
Here are five key relationships between these concepts:
Mutual Restraint: The separation of powers creates independent branches that can act as a check on the others. For example, the legislative branch can pass laws, but the executive branch can veto them. This ensures that no single branch can dominate or misuse its authority.Legislative Oversight: The separation of powers grants the legislative branch the power to oversee the executive branch through mechanisms such as hearings and investigations. This enables Congress to hold the executive branch accountable for its actions and decisions.Judicial Review: The judiciary, as part of the separation of powers, has the authority to interpret and apply laws. Through judicial review, the courts can check the actions of the legislative and executive branches to ensure they align with the Constitution and established legal principles.Appointment and Confirmation: The separation of powers requires the cooperation of different branches in the appointment and confirmation process. For instance, the executive branch nominates judges and officials, but the legislative branch confirms these appointments, acting as a check on executive power.Lawmaking Process: The separation of powers and checks and balances affect the lawmaking process. The legislative branch proposes and passes laws, while the executive branch can veto them. However, the legislative branch can override the veto with a supermajority vote. This interplay ensures that no single branch has absolute control over the legislative agenda.know more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ8
I HAVE THE BIGGEST QUESTION EVER:what do you do if you used this app got some WRONG answers and because of that failed your test BECAUSE I DID THAT
Answer:
Report
Explanation:
You can definitely report the wrong answers!
Hope you can get great marks next time.
Please give me brainliest if it help you. Thanks!
 Which forms of investment generally pay a higher rate of return than traditional banks?
Investment generally can pay a better price of return than traditional banks. shares, bonds, and mutual price range.
Investment is the determination of an asset to acquire an increase in value over a period of time. investment calls for a sacrifice of a few gift assets, together with time, money, or an attempt. In finance, the purpose of making an investment is to generate a return from the invested asset.
Investment definition is an asset obtained or invested in to build wealth and store money from the tough earned income or appreciation. funding meaning is primarily to gain an additional source of earnings or gain benefit from the investment over a selected period of time. In an economic outlook, funding is the acquisition of products that are not consumed nowadays but are used within the destiny to generate wealth. In finance, funding is a monetary asset sold with the idea that the asset will provide profits further or will later be bought at a higher value charge for a profit.
A good investment is one that is well-proper to an investor's monetary aim has a suitable risk degree and will increase an investor's internet well worth. but, an investment this is appropriate for one investor may not be perfect for any other, so each individual must define their chance tolerance and funding desires.
Learn more about Investment here: https://brainly.com/question/25300925
#SPJ9
Answer:
Answer is A. Stocks, bonds, and mutual funds
Explanation:
Terry was named in his parents’ will as the trustee of the family farm. He does not want the position as he has no interest in farming. His brother, Harold, has worked the farm for the last five years and would be a far better trustee. His parents chose Terry, however, because he was older. What can Terry do in this situation?
Terry can resign as the trustee and nominate Harold to take his place. He can do this by submitting a written resignation to the probate court.
What is probate court?
Probate court is a court of law that handles matters related to the estate of a deceased person. Probate court oversees the distribution of a person's assets, including real estate, investments, and other property. The court also determines the validity of any wills and trusts left by the deceased and appoints guardians for any minor children. The court also investigates any disputes over the estate, such as disagreements among heirs or creditors. The court also ensures that all taxes and debts of the deceased are paid before any assets are distributed.
The court will then consider whether Harold is qualified to serve as trustee, and if so, they will likely approve the nomination. This will allow Harold to take on the responsibility of being the trustee of the family farm.
To learn more about probate court
https://brainly.com/question/15055462
#SPJ1
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
Which idea is an example of voter suppression?
voting by mail
passing voter ID laws
opening polling places on Sunday
helping people register to vote
Passing voter ID laws idea is an example of voter suppression. Thus, the correct option is B.
What is voter suppression?Voter suppression, in American history and politics, is any legal or illegal action taken or tactic employed with the intention of preventing a specific racial group, political party, or religious community from voting or registering to vote.
In the US, African Americans have made up the vast majority of voter suppression victims.
Since at least the conclusion of Reconstruction, when African Americans in the states of the former Confederacy were momentarily free to exercise their newly earned rights to vote, compete for local, state, and federal offices, and serve on juries, voter suppression has been a problem in the United States.
Learn more about voter suppression, here
https://brainly.com/question/14231768
#SPJ1
What was one disadvantage of the first police radio service? ( It was NOT 1..... )
1. The signal was only carried about 300 ft.
2. It carried too many commercials.
3. It was so popular that everyone in the city tuned in to listen and it soon became ineffective.
4. It was one way communication; officers could not respond to the radio message.
The disadvantage of the first police radio service was It was one way communication; officers could not respond to the radio message. The correct answer is option 4.
What is police radio service.Police radio is a radio system used by police and other law enforcement agencies to communicate with one another. Police radio systems almost always use two-way radio systems to allow for communications between police officers and dispatchers.
Learn more about Police Radio here
https://brainly.com/question/2794245
#SPJ1
One disadvantage of the first police radio service was that the signal was only carried about 300 ft. The Option 1 is correct.
What was the history of first police radio service?In 1928, the Detroit Police Department set up a one-way radio system to broadcast crime information to police cars, which was the first police radio system. The Federal Communications Commission assigned the call sign "KOP" to the frequency.
Early police radio systems, however, were only used in police cars and buildings due to their high cost and size; officers on foot patrol had to rely on telephones and call boxes. Portable radios, which were introduced in the 1960s, made radio communications available to all officers. Early portable radios were bulky and had short battery lives, which gradually faded as technology advanced.
Read more about police radio
brainly.com/question/2794245
#SPJ1
Scenario 1
In the Case Study- Vokes v. Arthur Murray (pg. 84); how would you build a case for the plaintiff? Consider what information you would need to build a case against Arthur Murray. Discuss what information you would use and how it would be presented in court.
Scenario 2
In the Case Study- Vokes v. Arthur Murray (pg. 84); how would you build a case if you were the defendant's lawyer? Consider what kind of information you would need to build in defense of the dance school. Discuss what information you would use and how it would be presented in court.
The defendant is Aruthur Murray. The plaintiff is Vokes.
Scenario 1- If the case has to be build for Plaintiff which is Vokes in this case, we need a strong evidence and well written documentation to support it.
For Vokes, the evidence would be her bill for 14 classes which amounted to 31,000$ and the remarks of the organization that she was turning into a 'beautiful dancer' , even though she had no aptitude for dance.
The case will be filed for lie and fraud from the organization and compensation would be demanded.
Scenario 2- If the case has to be build for the defendant, which in this case is Arthur, we also need a strong evidence and well written documentation since its a civil case.
For Arthur, the evidence will be the contract signed by Vokes and her regular coming to courses which would justify her bill.
The case will be defended on these points.
Terms best describe law?Canon, ordinance, precept, rule, regulation, and statute. All of these terms say to "a principle guiding conduct or process," but the word "law" implies imposition by a sovereign power and the requirement of submission on the part of all those who are subject to that authority.
How are laws different from rules?The government enacts laws that hold everyone to the same standards. In contrast to regulations, most laws have some things that do not change depending on the situation.
To know more about Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ1
PLS HELP
Historically, which statement is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States?
O
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation.
O
The vast majority were pocket vetoes and thus could not be overridden.
O
The vast majority were determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
O
The vast majority of vetoes were overridden by Congress.
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States.
Has a president veto ever been overridden in the US?When Congress overrode five of Franklin Pierce's nine vetoes during his presidency, it would be more than a decade until it did so again. More than 2,500 measures have been vetoed by American presidents so far, and Congress has only succeeded in overcoming the veto less than 5% of the time.
Since 1789, there have been 2,584 presidential vetoes. The "normal veto" and the "pocket veto" are the two different forms of veto. Reaching the two-thirds barrier requires significant public support, which is a challenging standard to accomplish. Because Congress has only overridden 106 of the 1,484 regular vetoes since 1789, or 7.1%, the President's veto power is significant.
To learn more about presidential vetoes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1087799
#SPJ1
Billy Bob is 42 years old, lives in Arizona, and moved to the United States 6 years ago.
Which side of the Legislative Branch can he serve in? Why?
Answer:
He could serve as part of the senate since he is atleast 30 years of age.
Explanation:
HELP! I will give brainliest points if correct!!!When tires are underinflated, it leads to ______.
A. less efficiency and poor gas mileage
B. more efficiency and better gas mileage
C. decreased pollution from the vehicle
D. increased pollution from the vehicle
A less efficiency and poor gas mileage
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Answer the following questions that have to do with the "Brown V. Board of Education".
1. do you agree with the decision of the case, explain why or why not.
2. if you were a judge on the case would you have done anything differently, explain what.
PLS HELP!!! Its an assignment for law
Answer:
I agree with the decision of the case because in the declaration of independence paragraph two it states, "All men are created equal." it would be unconstitutional for schools to be separated based on the color of there skin. I wouldnt have done anything differently if I were a judge of the supreme court because I would know that it violates the the 14 Amendment.
Outline the main issues which human authors of the Bible concerned themselves with
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bible is a complex collection of texts that were written by various authors over a period of centuries. However, there are several overarching themes and issues that human authors of the Bible concerned themselves with, including:
The nature and character of God: Many authors of the Bible sought to describe and understand the nature and character of God, including his attributes such as holiness, justice, mercy, and love. They also explored the relationship between God and humanity, including the concept of covenant and the consequences of disobeying God.
Human sin and its consequences: The Bible also addresses the issue of human sin and its consequences, including the need for redemption and salvation. The authors describe how sin entered the world and how it separates humans from God, as well as the various ways in which God has provided a path to forgiveness and reconciliation.
The role of community and society: The Bible also addresses the role of community and society in shaping human behaviour and the consequences of both individual and collective actions. The authors explore issues such as justice, mercy, compassion, and the importance of caring for the marginalized and oppressed.
Prophecy and eschatology: Many authors of the Bible also engaged in prophecy and eschatology, or the study of the end times. They predicted future events and the ultimate destiny of humanity, often invoking apocalyptic imagery and symbolism.
Spiritual growth and personal transformation: Finally, the Bible addresses the issue of spiritual growth and personal transformation, emphasizing the importance of faith, prayer, and spiritual discipline. The authors describe the process of sanctification or becoming more like God, and the various challenges and obstacles that individuals may face in their spiritual journeys.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
1) Giving a turn signal
allows the vehicles behind to adjust their speed in time.
when you initiate the turn
anytime while making a turn
at least one mile before want to make a turn
just before you make a turn
from a minimum of 100 feet before you make a turn
We can complete the sentence as follows: 1) Giving a turn signal when you initiate the turn allows the vehicles behind to adjust their speed in time.
When you should give a turn signalYou should give a turn signal when you initiate the turn. This immediately alerts the other road users likely following behind you to apply caution as they approach a turn.
Giving this signal on time ensures that all are made aware and not taken by surprise when you eventually make the turn. So, the signal should be given when you initiate a turn.
Learn more about turn signals here;
https://brainly.com/question/31673943
#SPJ1