Answer:
Based on my understanding of Administrators Ate my Tuition and the concept of special governments in Texas, it is possible that community colleges in Texas could be considered special governments. This is because community colleges are established and governed by the state of Texas, and they serve a specific purpose in providing affordable higher education to residents of Texas.
In the book, the author discusses the rise of administrative bloat in colleges and universities, where a growing number of administrators are hired at increasingly high salaries, while tuition costs continue to rise for students. While this is a problem at many institutions, it is important to note that community colleges generally have lower administrative costs compared to four-year universities. This is because community colleges tend to have a narrower focus and fewer programs, and they rely less on research funding and endowments.
That being said, community colleges still face challenges in managing their budgets and providing affordable education to students. One issue is that many community colleges rely heavily on funding from the state government, which can fluctuate based on economic conditions and political priorities. This can make it difficult to plan for the long-term and provide stable funding for programs and services.
In conclusion, while community colleges in Texas may be considered special governments, they still face many of the same financial and administrative challenges as other institutions of higher education. It is important for community college administrators to prioritize student needs and make decisions that support their mission of providing accessible and affordable education to all.
Which method did some white southerners use to try to overcome republican rule?.
Answer:
After the Civil War, some white southerners used various methods to try to overcome Republican rule, including voter intimidation, violence, and fraud. These methods were part of a larger effort to suppress the political power of African Americans and maintain white supremacy in the South. Other methods included the use of paramilitary groups like the Ku Klux Klan, as well as legal challenges and court cases aimed at limiting the rights of African Americans and other minority groups.
What is Conflict of Laws?
a. Conflict of laws is the body of law that applies to legal disputes that have connections to TWO OR MORE different LEGAL JURISDICTIONS, whether STATES OR FOREIGN COUNTRIES
b. Conflicts consist of legal doctrines and rules that determine which jurisdiction's law will apply to the dispute
c. NOTE: as a result of conflict of laws rules, New York courts DO NOT AUTOMATICALLY APPLY NEW YORK LAW to the dispute before it. Rather whenever there is a fact pattern that indicates a PARTY OR PARTIES ARE NOT NEW YORK DOMICILIARIES, or the DISPUTE RELATES TO or INVOLVES something that OCCURRED IN ANOTHER STATE OR COUNTRY, you must be alert to conflict of laws issues
Conflict of laws, also known as private international law, is a legal field that deals with cases that involve multiple jurisdictions or legal systems.
a. Conflict of laws is the body of law that applies to legal disputes that have connections to TWO OR MORE different LEGAL JURISDICTIONS, whether STATES OR FOREIGN COUNTRIES. Conflicts arise when there are differences in the laws of the jurisdictions involved, and it is necessary to determine which jurisdiction's law applies to the dispute.
b. Conflicts consist of legal doctrines and rules that determine which jurisdiction's law will apply to the dispute. These rules may be based on factors such as the parties' residence, the location of the dispute, or the location of the contract.
c. It is true that, as a result of conflict of laws rules, New York courts do not automatically apply New York law to disputes before them. Instead, they will apply the law of the jurisdiction that has the closest connection to the dispute. Therefore, in cases where one or more parties are not New York domiciliaries or the dispute involves something that occurred in another state or country, it is important to be aware of potential conflict of laws issues.
For such more question on Healthcare
https://brainly.com/question/7097922
#SPJ4
what is the phrase for thece rrof scientific research in gh
Answer:
Never give up on the grind
If you were arrested which would you rather have, a private lawyer or a public defender? Explain your answer
traditional instruments of justice are locally establushed by the people.
Explanation:
In the traditional theory of justice, justice is defined against the assumption of good virtues, good character, good deeds, spirituality and appropriateness of a human. All works which are upto the marks on these attributes are called in accordance with justice.
When objecting the introduction of a particular piece of evidence, a defense attorney insisted that the exhibit was not material. What did he mean by that
When a defense attorney objects to the introduction of a particular piece of evidence, they may argue that it is not material.
This means that the evidence in question is not relevant to the case at hand, and therefore should not be considered by the judge or jury.
In legal terms, materiality refers to whether or not a piece of evidence has any bearing on the issues being litigated. Evidence that is not material is not considered relevant to the case, and therefore cannot be used to prove or disprove any of the claims being made by either side
To determine whether or not a piece of evidence is material, the judge will consider whether it has any direct or indirect connection to the events or issues at the center of the case. If the evidence is not directly relevant to the case, the judge may sustain the defense attorney's objection and exclude it from consideration.
Overall, when a defense attorney insists that a piece of evidence is not material, they are arguing that it should not be considered because it has no bearing on the case at hand. This is an important part of the legal process, as it helps to ensure that only relevant evidence is considered in making decisions about a case.
Learn more about evidence :
https://brainly.com/question/21428682
#SPJ11
married people are turning to a , a legal document that specifies how a couple's assets will be divided if they divorce, but it is entered into after the couple is married.
Even After Marriage Contract will be valid and that contract for diving assets is known as prenuptial agreement
A prenuptial agreement catalogues each person's property, assets and debts, and specifies each person's rights to that property if the marriage dissolves or if someone dies. While prenups are best known for dividing assets at divorce, they can also be used as a type of will.
A prenuptial agreement isn't just for wealthy people, though it's often used to protect a person’s wealth from a partner if there is a divorce. Those who are just starting their careers might also execute a prenup; it can help clarify financial and property issues, including debt repayment, should the union end. That can help make a divorce process less expensive and less painful for both parties.
What is a prenup?
A prenup contract may include:
How to divide property if the marriage endsSpousal support agreement for payment amounts upon marriage dissolutionTerms for what triggers certain payments (such as violations of lifestyle clauses that are added to the document — although a court may ultimately deem things like infidelity clauses unenforceable)Sunset clause allowing the agreement to expire after a specific period of time, such as after seven years of marriageLanguage that allows a person’s premarital debt to continue with him or her after the divorceTo learn more about prenup visit here ; https://brainly.com/question/26030510?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
the statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is typically set by individual provinces or territories within their respective legal frameworks.
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges varies depending on the specific charge and the province in which it is being laid. Generally, the limitations range from one to five years, but some charges may have longer limitations or none at all. For example, in Ontario, the limitation period for most provincial offences is one year from the time the offence was committed, while in British Columbia, the limitation period is generally two years. However, some charges, such as sexual assault and murder, have no limitation period and can be laid at any time. It is important to note that the statute of limitations does not apply to all offences, and some charges may be laid even after the limitation period has expired if certain conditions are met.
To know more about provincial visit:
brainly.com/question/31273238
#SPJ11
hành vi hợp pháp là gì
representation level
In the field of Law, representation level refers to the level of detail or abstraction at which legal concepts and arguments are analyzed and presented.
What does adequate representation depend on?The appropriate representation level will depend on the specific legal issue and the context in which it arises. For example, when analyzing a contract, the representation level may vary from a detailed analysis of individual clauses to a more general examination of the overall agreement.
The choice of representation level can impact the effectiveness of legal arguments and the outcomes of legal cases. Therefore, lawyers must carefully consider the appropriate representation level to ensure that their arguments are persuasive and well-supported.
Read more about representation here:
https://brainly.com/question/31224733
#SPJ1
How does the representation level concept relate to the field of Law?
Como as palavras estão organizadas nas estrofes?como são as letras que compõem o poema?
Olá. Primeiramente, é importante ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens". Esse não é o servidor brasileiro e sim o americano, por isso perguntas em português s´´o podem ser respondidas dessa forma.
Em segundo lugar, você não apresentou nenhum texto, o que dificulta que a sua pergunta seja respondida. Entretanto, eu posso te ajudar, afirmando que dentro das estrofes de um poema, as palavras sãpo organizadas em versos. O conjunto de versos, forma uma estrofe.
Em relação as letras, só é possivel determinar com elas são, depois que a leitura do texto for feita, mas podemos afirmar que na maioria dos casos, as letras maiusculas são usadas apenas no inivio do verso, enquanto as letras minusculas são usadas em todos os versos.
Case #1 - An elderly man is found deceased in his apartment. His body
temperature is 33.1C. Calculate TOD (Hours since death). *
8 poir
10 hours
5 hours
22 hours
O 17 hours
Answer:
I am going to guess that the man has only been dead for 5 hours since the normal body temperature is 37C
Explanation:
FIll in the blank_____ is a theory of democratic elections in which voters decide what each party will do if elected and choose the party that best represents their own preferences.
Party mandate is a theory of democratic elections in which voters decide what each party will do if elected and choose the party that best represents their own preferences.
The party mandate is the control that the electorate has over the behavior of politicians.The party mandate is a way for voters to communicate their preferences for particular policies and to hold politicians accountable for implementing those policies. The party mandate theory suggests that voters should choose the party that is most likely to implement the policies they want, rather than simply voting for a particular candidate.The party mandate theory assumes that political parties are responsible for creating and implementing policy. This means that voters should vote for the party that best represents their preferences, rather than voting for a particular candidate based on their personal qualities or qualifications.The statement that fills the blank is "Party mandate."The theory of democratic elections in which voters decide what each party will do if elected and choose the party that best represents their own preferences is the party mandate.Learn more about theory of democratic elections: https://brainly.com/question/13125338
#SPJ11
You driving an ambulance 60 mph it start to rain what mph decrease at what speed
If the roads are wet or covered in snow, we should limit our speed by at least half. If the ambulance is at a speed of 60 mph, after it start to rain, the speed is to be decreased to 30 mph.
What is speed?In everyday language and kinematics, an object's speed is defined as the magnitude of its position change over time or the magnitude of its position change per unit of time. It is a scalar quantity.
The average speed of an object in a given time interval is the distance travelled divided by the duration of the interval.
The average highway speed is 60 miles per hour. At 60 mph, you can travel one mile in one minute. The formula for distance and speed with an automobile, as with any other object, is distance time. To get a car's speed at 60 miles per hour, multiply (60 x5280) by (60 x60)= 88 feet per second.
Therefore, the speed must be 30mph when it is raining.
To learn more about speed, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30138602
#SPJ1
What is the legal threshold in criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction?.
The legal threshold in a criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction is to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt.
What is Reasonable Doubt?Reasonable doubt is a legal standard which a prosecution team must attain in order to secure the conviction of a person on trial.
Reasonable doubt means that the prosecution must present to the court all admissible evidence to prove that a person on trial actually committed that crime and that all the evidence provided must have been obtained through an admissible means.
What is a ConvictionConviction is the formal verdict which is issued by the jury in a competent court of jurisdiction that the accused of a crime is found guilty of that crime.
This means that the jury must have taken in to consideration the evidence set before it by both the defense and the prosecution team and that they have voted amongst themself and the number of votes for conviction outweighs the other.
Learn more about Reasonable Doubt at https://brainly.com/question/27077531
#SPJ1
Which statement is not true with respect to a Regulation that interprets the tax law?
a. Issued by the U.S. Congress.
b. Issued by the U.S. Treasury Department.
c. Designed to provide an interpretation of the tax law.
d. Carries more legal force than a Revenue Ruling.
e. All of these statements are true.
The answer to this question is a. Issued by the U.S. Congress. A regulation that interprets the tax law is not issued by the U.S. Congress.
Instead, it is issued by the U.S. Treasury Department. The purpose of a regulation is to provide an interpretation of the tax law, which can be helpful for taxpayers who need guidance on how to comply with the law. Regulations carry more legal force than Revenue Rulings because they are issued after a more formal process that includes a public comment period. Overall, while all the statements in the question are generally true, the one that is not true is that the regulation is issued by the U.S. Congress.
Visit here to learn more about tax law : https://brainly.com/question/816362
#SPJ11
august vollmer's most daring innovation was the idea of a(n):
if you poop your pants at the lowest gravity possible it would float?
Apple or bark tree?
timothy retains cynthia, an attorney, to bring a lawsuit upon a valid claim against vincent. recently enacted legislation has shortened the statute of limitations for this type of legal action. cynthia fails to make herself aware of this new statute. consequently, she files the complaint after the statute of limitations has run. as a result, the lawsuit is dismissed. a. what duties did cynthia breach? b. can timothy collect money; how much? c. what tort also occurred?
In the given case, Cynthia breaches her care of duty for Timothy. Further, Timothy may be able to recover damages from Cynthia.
The given questions can be answered as-
a. By neglecting to handle Timothy's situation with the appropriate care and attention, Cynthia violated her duty of care to him. As a lawyer, Cynthia had a responsibility to stay up to date on legal developments that may have an impact on the cases of her clients. She has violated this obligation by failing to do so.
b. Cynthia may be liable for paying Timothy compensation for her negligence. The magnitude of losses will determine damages amount eligible to receive. He might be able to get back whole amount of claim against Vincent if he can show that he would have won the case if Cynthia had submitted complaint on time. He could only get back money he lost due to Cynthia's carelessness, including cost of his legal fees and any additional costs, if he cannot demonstrate that he would have won the case.
c. Cynthia's actions might result in a tort claim for professional negligence. Legal malpractice happens when a lawyer violates their fiduciary responsibility to their client and client suffers as a result. Timothy may be entitled to compensation for any losses brought on by Cynthia's carelessness in this situation since her failure to timely file the complaint may be considered legal malpractice.
Read more about damages on:
https://brainly.com/question/31370801
#SPJ4
What are some disadvantages of the adversarial system. List at least 5.
Answer:
The whole thing is a flaw itself.
Explanation:
1. Verdicts can be made without evidence.
2. Impartiality is not always in a adversarial system.
3. " As an accused is not compelled to give evidence in a criminal adversarial proceeding, they may not be questioned by a prosecutor or judge unless they choose to do so." This is a huge flaw since the criminal could be hiding something , and if he does, (under oath) and manages to get away with it, they are just exploiting the system its self. very rare on the other hand though.
4.it is mostly argument based and not evidence prone.
5. The whole system its self is a tedious procedure, lack of evidence, and unclear testimonies lead to serious mistake in the court verdict.
Answer:
It obliges each side to contest with each other.
It might lead to injustice.
It might result in judgments compelled by arguments, instead of evidence.
It has issues with accessibility.
It uses a tedious process.
Explanation:
I just took the test :) Hope this helps
True or False: Criminal justice is defined as the system of law enforcement, adjudication, and correction that is directly involved in the apprehension, prosecution, and control of those charged with criminal offenses.
True: Criminal justice is defined as the system of law enforcement, adjudication, and correction that is directly involved in the apprehension, prosecution, and control of those charged with criminal offenses.
Prosecutors are typically lawyers who possess a law degree, and are recognised as suitable legal professionals by the court in which they are acting. This may mean they have been admitted to the bar, or obtained a comparable qualification where available - such as solicitor advocates in England and Wales. They become involved in a criminal case once a suspect has been identified and charges need to be filed. They are employed by an office of the government, with safeguards in place to ensure such an office can successfully pursue the prosecution of government officials. Multiple offices exist in a single country, especially in those countries with federal governments where sovereignty has been bifurcated or devolved in some way.
Learn more about prosecution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29970118
#SPJ11
Everyone that reading this inspiring message,Lets start off with learning students that are smart, and students that are suffering Are not comprehending what teachers are teaching because all the teaching because all the teaching the teachers do and all the test the teacher gives these test Are no help because what you teachers do is a waste of learning time,Because all students are bored, because you teachers are not really teaching , your makeing the the students give up on what they want to do which is learn And how i know this is because all you teachers do is teach 1 subject 2 days and then put the students to the test And you wonder where the cheating guide comes from And parents that are reading this inspiring message dont blame your kids, for what chores they dont do and all the video games they play because your child sits in the classroom for 7 hours knowing nothing And teachers i hope this message inspires you to Make learning more acceptable by reteaching lesson over and over and test come last.
Answer:
Don't worry about it.....
How does social media affect elections and campaigns? Is this a positive trend? Why or why not?
Information from the Human Genome Project will:
A.all of the them.
B.help to reveal the role and implications of evolution
C.be useful for diagnosing and treating genetic diseases.
D.reveal the location of a gene on a particular chromosome.
Answer:
the answer is option D. Reveal the location of a gene on a particular chromosome.
Hope this helps you, if my answer was helpful can you give me a brainliest it will really help me and thank you have a nice day!
how far along is humankind in its search for knowledge of the ocean’s depths?
What should an employer tell a candidate who is not selected for the position?
The employer should Inform them that he gave their job application careful consideration, but that a better match has come along.
The employer can Inform them of any compliments the recruiting team may have made on their application materials or performance during the interview.
An employee is a person who is employed by an employer to do a certain task. Employers have control over how much money employees receive, when they work, and how they work. Employees receive advantages that contractors do not in exchange. After being chosen as a candidate for employment through an application and interview procedure, the employee is hired by the company. Following the employer's determination that the applicant is the most qualified candidate for the position for which they are hiring, this candidate is chosen.
Learn more about employer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29603057
#SPJ4
ANSWER QUICK
How do Amendments 9 and 10 limit the power of the federal government?
Explanation/answer:
9th:
gives a ton of freedom to the people basically saying that they have the freedom to retain the rights even though they were not specifically discussed in the bill of rights, this limits the power of the government because it gives the people more power
10th:
Lets the states impose their own laws special to those states. having its own law would let the state become nearly as powerful as the federal government, so that takes away power from the federal government.
Honestly, it's good that the federal government doesn't have all the power otherwise it would be kinda like a dictatorship.
The maximum rate for credit transactions is established by
Answer: Each state has a different approach to usury law. If you are a credit card holder in Kansas, the maximum interest rate is set at 15 percent. If you’re in South Carolina, the maximum rate is set at 8.75 percent for credit card debt.
Explanation:
THE EVALUATION/CRITICS/COMMENT ON THE REVIEW
Review on the highland tower of the incident to the citizens
Answer:
Although the criticism of every art will be based in the particularities that arise from its specific media, I am interested here in highlighting aspects of criticism applicable across the arts (and which are therefore relevant to film criticism). Equally, although the characteristics of evaluative criticism have developed through and in relation to written criticism, most of the aspects listed below would be germane to work currently taking place within audio-visual formats. I offer this interdisciplinary résumé because my experience is that many students of film studies ‘in the 21st Century’ are currently lacking an awareness of the practice of evaluative criticism.
Explanation:
Some might consider the phrase “evaluative criticism” tautological because the etymology of the word “criticism” implies evaluation. It is derived from the Greek word kritikos, which means to judge, and the kritikoi were the judges or jurymen who gave verdicts (often in competitions).
which statement best describes the difference between science and philosophy?
OA
Philosophers study human behavior whereas scientists study the natural world.
B.
Science is based on facts whereas philosophy deals with opinions.
Philosophers apply logical reasoning whereas scientists do not.
D.
Scientists gather and analyze empirical data whereas philosophers do not.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
science is based on proven philosophies while philosophies ain't proven