Civil cases may be handled at the federal level if the two parties are from different states and the disputed amount is above a certain level. True False

While hopping between boats on Navy Pier, a man vanished. The body discovered in Lake Michigan belonged to him, according to the officials.

The period of time following a person's passing is known as the post-mortem interval (PMI). When the exact time of death is unknown, the interval can be computed and a rough time of death established.

Not everyone has an autopsy. The family (or next of kin) of patients who pass away in hospitals is questioned regarding whether they would like an autopsy. If the patient has a living will or advance directives that clearly state their preferences

To Know more about   Navy Pier Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19905349

#SPJ1

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

Answer:

Amendment 7- Right to a jury

Explanation:

Answer: An appeal is available if, after a trial in the U.S. District Court, the losing side has issues with the trial court proceedings, the law that was applied, or how the law was applied. Generally, on these grounds, litigants have the right to an appellate court review of the trial court's actions.

Answer:

Equal

Explanation:

Bag 1 has 3 red cubes and 1 blue cube. = 4 cubes

Bag 2 has 3 green cubes, 1 yellow cube, and 1 red cube.= 5 cubes

P ( red bag 1) = red /total = 3/4

P (yellow  bag 2) = yellow /total = 1/5

P(red bag1 , yellow bag2) = 3/4* 1/5 = 3/20

P ( blue bag 1) =blue /total =1/4

P (green  bag 2) = green /total = 3/5

P(blue bag1 , green bag2) = 1/4* 3/5 = 3/20

The probabilities are equal

The economic impacts if the Federal Reserve has RAISED the Discount Rate are:

The term discount rate refers to the interest rate charged or set by Federal reserves to commercial banks and other financial institutions for short-term loans they obtain.

Raising the rate makes it more expensive to borrow from the Fed which in turn lowers the supply of available money, which increases the short-term interest rates. Future cash flows are reduced by the discount rate, so the higher the discount rate the lower the present value of the future cash flows.

One of the effect of raising the discount rate is that there will be a decrease in the amount of reserves in the banking system. This means that fewer reserves will support fewer loans; the money supply will fall and market interest rates will rise.

Learn more about discount rate here: https://brainly.com/question/989075

#SPJ1

A government that is more receptive to the needs of the people is the result of the free press provision provided by the constitution.

To learn more about constitution, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/453546

The statement that best completes the diagram is option   A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces Enlightenment ideas to its readers.

The Pennsylvania Gazette, established by the esteemed Benjamin Franklin, was highly circulated throughout the colonies and effectively promoted the tenets of the Enlightenment, such as personal freedoms, reason, and inherent entitlements, to the general populace.

Therefore,  The colonial leaders were significantly influenced by Enlightenment principles, leading to their ratification of the Declaration of Independence during the Second Continental Congress.

Learn more about Enlightenment  from

https://brainly.com/question/1688832

#SPJ1

See text below

Question 1 of 10

Which statement best completes the diagram?

Diagram is:

The Second Continental Congressratifies the Declaration of Independence.

__

Enlightenment ideas are introduced in Europe.

Options

A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces

Enlightenment ideas to its readers.

B. British military forces are told to withdraw from the colonies as

punishment for their disloyalty.

C. Colonial leaders reject the concept of natural rights because of its

association with Great Britain.

D. British leaders conclude that the only way to control the colonies.

is by enforcing a strict social contract

We can see here that an article from Premium Times reveals that the House of Representatives has ordered the CBN Governor to suspend the restriction on withdrawal of currency. This order came after the Central Bank released a recent policy that limits citizens from withdrawing over a certain limit.

This recent policy of the Central Bank is seen to be a way to achieve the cashless policy which the Federal Government is clamoring for. The restrictions on withdrawal limits has been seen as a bad idea at this moment. Some members of the House stated that it will affect communities that are unbanked.

An article is actually known to be a piece of writing that is written by a writer in order to share ideas and information with the public or with a specified audience.

We see here that the above information is taken from Premium Times. The article was written about seven days. It gives latest information about the recent CBN withdrawal policy.

Learn more about article on https://brainly.com/question/26859358

#SPJ1

Answer:

federal government is a type of government powering up the nation into different level.but its not termed as a constitution .

so i thik the answer is federal government.

Answer:

pass to the right

Explanation:

Green buoy means pass to the right

Answer:

The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:

They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.

It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.

A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.

The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.

The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.

A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

https://brainly.com/question/32247683

#SPJ12

Answer:

As a college student at The University of Pennsylvania she saw and met kids who didn’t grow up in the best families and didn’t get the opportunities like other kids did. These kids were practically shipped off to prison and the ones who had good opportunities in life didn’t.

Other questions and answers:

4.What kind of games did Goffman see children in the neighborhood playing? What does this tell you about what these kids are seeing in their community? Explain.

She had seen kids playing a game of chase. Kids would split up into two groups, those being chased and those doing the catching. If they were caught, they would get handcuffed. This tells me that kids are seeing things they shouldn’t be seeing in their communities.

5.What did Goffman do and what did she witness in the first 18 months that she lived in the neighborhood?  Discuss your reaction to this and how this compares to where you live?

She says that she wrote down every time she witnesses her neighbors had an interaction with thepolice, In the first 18 months she witnesses police stop people in cars, they would search them,

Please give me a 5 star rating!

Answer:

As a college student at The University of Pennsylvania she saw and met kids who didn’t grow up in the best families and didn’t get the opportunities like other kids did. These kids were practically shipped off to prison and the ones who had good opportunities in life didn’t.

Explanation:

E2020

Answer: Marbury v Madison - established judicial review for presidential acts

Explanation: C is the answer

An example of how the courts can invade acts and execute actions is Marbury v Madison that is established Judicial Review for the Presidential acts. Thus option C is correct.

The president's acts are those that have the president's power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, and ask for the written option from the cabinet. Grand pardons and receive ambassadors.

Marbury v Madison was a case of the supreme court which first declared the act as unconstitutional and thus formed the doctrine of judicial review.

Find out more information about the Marbury v Madison :

brainly.com/question/1374827

-Lack of trust between public and private sector

-Differences in goals and priorities

-Legal and regulatory constraints

-Lack of transparency and accountability

-Complexity of project financing and risk sharing

-Inefficiencies in procurement and project management processes

-Lack of appropriate investment climate

-Difficulty in measuring and ensuring return on investment.

Write a short note on public-private partnerships.

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are cooperative agreements between government entities and private sector companies aimed at delivering public services and infrastructure. PPPs aim to maximize value for money, transfer risk from the public sector to the private sector, and increase efficiency and innovation in the delivery of public services.

Hence, the answer is,

-Lack of trust between public and private sector

-Differences in goals and priorities

-Legal and regulatory constraints

-Lack of transparency and accountability

-Complexity of project financing and risk sharing

-Inefficiencies in procurement and project management processes

-Lack of appropriate investment climate

-Difficulty in measuring and ensuring return on investment.

To learn more about public-private partnerships, follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/29793109

#SPJ1

In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court struck down a federal law that prohibited guns in schools, ruling that the law exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and encroached on an area traditionally reserved for the states.

In Printz v. United States (1997), the Supreme Court struck down provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act that required state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers, ruling that this violated the Tenth Amendment by commandeering state officials to perform federal duties.

In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012), the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate as a valid exercise of Congress's taxing power, but struck down provisions of the law that required states to expand Medicaid, ruling that this coerced states into participating in a federal program and violated the Tenth Amendment.

Answer:

I assume you are talking about the legal naturalization process.

Explanation:

Naturalization is the legal process a non-U.S. citizen undergoes to become a citizen of the United States. A person can become a citizen of the United States through one of the following ways: Through the naturalization process. By deriving citizenship from his or her parent when the parent naturalizes.

These legal requirements help the immigration service ensure that only those people who are sincere in their desire to become U.S. citizens become naturalized.

now gimme brainliest >:3

Answer:

I will let the other person get brainliest.

Explanation:

Answer:

-4/5

Explanation:

it came be two possible answer for x

Explanation:

???

-(-x) = -1×(-1×x) = -1×(-1×-4/5) = -1×(4/5) = -4/5

therefore, yes, -(-x) = x

Leaving the classroom without asking is a safety issue that should be taken seriously.

Leaving the classroom without asking is a safety issue for several reasons. Firstly, it compromises the overall security of the school environment. By allowing students to freely leave without permission, it becomes easier for unauthorized individuals to enter the premises unnoticed, posing a potential threat to the safety of everyone inside.

Secondly, in the event of an emergency such as a fire, earthquake, or lockdown, it is crucial for students and teachers to remain accounted for. If students are permitted to leave without proper authorization, it becomes difficult to ensure everyone's well-being and evacuate them efficiently. This lack of control can lead to chaos and potentially exacerbate the dangers of the situation.

Furthermore, when students leave the classroom without permission, it disrupts the learning environment and can distract other students. It undermines the authority of the teacher and sets a precedent that it is acceptable to disregard rules and regulations. This can create a culture of noncompliance, making it harder for teachers to maintain discipline and ensure a conducive learning atmosphere.

In conclusion, leaving the classroom without asking is not just a matter of discipline but a genuine safety concern. By enforcing strict protocols and emphasizing the importance of seeking permission, schools can prioritize the well-being of their students and maintain a secure learning environment.

For more such questions on safety, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/21082629

#SPJ8

2-207 is the correct answer edge 2020

Answer:

Possible Changes to the Confirmation Process · by I Shapiro · Cited by 1 — Historically, the Senate has confirmed fewer than 60 percent of Supreme Court nominees under divided.

Explanation:

Answer:

hope this helps

Explanation:

Grounded in shared values, human rights offer unifying principles that can be used to connect with people on a personal level, build their leadership, create a vision for change, shift the public debate, guide policy advocacy and build common ground within and between movements.

Answer:

I think it would be D. making a cast of a tire track

Explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

60 u believe

Explanation:

if im wrong let me know

The idea that people can do whatever they want is often associated with the concept of absolute freedom or individualism, which suggests that people have the right to pursue their own self-interest without regard for the well-being of others or the larger community. This notion is often criticized because it ignores the fact that individual actions can have negative consequences for others and for society as a whole.

For example, if someone decides to dump toxic waste into a river, they may benefit economically or personally, but this action can harm the health of people and wildlife downstream, as well as damage the environment. Similarly, if someone decides to drive while under the influence of alcohol, they not only put themselves at risk but also endanger other drivers and pedestrians on the road.

In addition, the idea of unlimited individual freedom can lead to social inequalities and injustices. People who have more resources and power may be able to exercise their freedom in ways that disadvantage others who are less fortunate or marginalized.

Therefore, many argue that while individuals should have some degree of freedom and autonomy, this must be balanced with responsibilities and obligations to the larger community. Society needs rules and regulations to ensure that people are able to pursue their goals and interests while also considering the needs and rights of others and protecting the  common good.

For the defense of the defendant, I will choose for another witness from the same team.

A defense is supporting or defending  someone in an argument when he has been criticized.

After choosing the another witness from the another team, as a lawyer I will make try to make him puzzled by asking the complex questions again and again. So that he will not be able to respond in a proper manner.

I will also make sure that the statement of this witness varies with the statement of another important witness of the same team. Giving contradictory statements by the witnesses of the same team makes no important conclusion in accusing my defendant.

Learn more about defense here:

https://brainly.com/question/16223801

#SPJ1