at the preliminary hearing, the judge will ________.

Answer:

It's not the genetic that makes the person commit crime it's the person's background of his or her family. Some races or country are poor which makes new generation that is in a better and developed country gets greedy just by looking.

Explanation:

There are many cases that kids or teens rob because there family has a poor or bad background.

The method for expressing an opinion is to have an attorney frame a legal question based on available factual evidence.

When expressing an opinion in a legal context, it is essential to work with an attorney who can articulate the opinion through the formulation of a legal question. The attorney's role is to analyze the available factual evidence and construct a question that aligns with the relevant legal principles and considerations. By framing a legal question, the attorney provides a structured and legally sound approach to presenting the opinion. This method ensures that the opinion is expressed within the framework of the law and can be appropriately addressed and evaluated within the legal system.

To learn more about legal question, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28147344

#SPJ11

This claim is accurate because it speaks to the widespread understanding that everyone has fundamental rights and opportunities that are fundamental, basic, and equally material to everyone.

A state or community's system of governance is known as a government. Government is described as "a network of political control where the authority to create laws and the right to execute them is vested in a certain group in society" by the Columbia Encyclopedia.

He believed that a good society was one that did the people's will as well as securing their rights and the benefits of their labor in the most efficient manner.

To know more about Governments visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26119802

#SPJ1

Answer: In simple terms, owner's equity is defined as the amount of money invested by the owner in the business minus any money taken out by the owner of the business. For example: If a real estate project is valued at $500,000 and the loan amount due is $400,000, the amount of owner's equity, in this case, is $100,000.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The National Police Commission abbreviated as NAPOLCOM, is an attached agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine National Police (PNP).6975 and 8551 to administer and control the Philippine National Police, the DILG “ for the purpose of effectively discharging the functions prescribe in the  "To exercise administrative control and operational supervision over the PNP.

plz mark as brainliest

Using the democracy standard, federalism can constrain democracy in five ways as democratic power , influence the policy-making process, restricts the powers of elected officials , unequal distribution , national decisions .

1. Federalism creates distinct levels of government that limit the scope of the citizens’ democratic power.
2. Federalism divides the government’s powers, making it difficult for citizens to influence the policy-making process.
3. Federalism restricts the powers of elected officials, resulting in a limited amount of citizens’ input.
4. Federalism can cause unequal distribution of resources and influence among the states, resulting in less power for citizens in some states.
5. Federalism can prevent citizens from having the same voice in national decisions that they do in state and local decisions.

For more similar questions on federalism:

brainly.com/question/12835949

#SPJ11

Answer:

B I think

Explanation:

To prevent theft, misuse of company property, and on-site usage of illegal substances or alcohol, many organisations have policies establishing processes for searching vehicles, lockers, or personal possessions.

The company may need to demonstrate that the search was reasonable, that there was some grounds to suspect an employment crime had occurred, and that the search would lead to the discovery of additional evidence if these rules are challenged by labour unions or in court.

The business might also need to demonstrate that the policy is followed consistently throughout the workforce or facility and that it doesn't single out any particular people or groups for criticism.

Learn more about Miranda warnings here

https://brainly.com/question/30105739

#SPJ1

Answer:

40%9:14pm

Which of the following is correct?

Merry buys stocks for $3,000 and sells them

a year and a half later for $7,000.

Merry has to pay short-term capital

gains taxes on $3,000.

Merry has to pay long-term capital

gains taxes on $4,000.

Merry has to pay long-term capital

gains taxes on $7,000.

CLOSE

Before consuming the Champagne, confirm with the vendor whether it is a gift or a sample.

Detailed explanation:-

If the Champagne is a gift, check your corporate policy to see if the staff members may accept gifts from the vendor that was chosen following a competitive bidding process.

If employees are permitted to accept gifts, ascertain whether there is a cap on the amount and type of gifts they may accept.

Accept the gift and send an appreciation of it to the appropriate person in accordance with the company's policy if the policy permits employees to do so and the champagne meets all the requirements for gifts that they may accept.

If corporate policy prohibits employees from accepting any kind of present or the gift does not meet the requirements of the company policy, you must return the gift right away and notify the relevant authority in accordance with the company's policy.

If the Champagne is a sample, you can request that the vendor submit it to the business in accordance with the vendor sample policy and direct him to the appropriate authority.

To Know more about requirements

https://brainly.com/question/2929431

#SPJ9

Answer:

If jury cannot reach unanimous decision, the jury is referred to as a “hung” jury and the judge declares a “mistrial”.

A hung jury is also sometimes called a deadlocked jury. Either answer would be appropriate.Explanation:

Answer:

Federal administrative law primarily concerns the powers and procedures of Federal administering agencies in relation to the public (but usually not in criminal matters).

Explanation:

Federal administrative law is a branch of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of the federal government. It consists of the procedures, rules, and regulations issued by such agencies, as well as the decisions made by judges in relation to such agency matters.

Administrative agencies are created by the federal government to manage the day-to-day operations of certain areas, such as labor, education, and health care. These agencies make and enforce rules and regulations, issue licenses and permits, and adjudicate disputes. Federal administrative law provides the structure and procedures for these agencies to operate within.

For more such questions on Federal administrative law.

https://brainly.com/question/29668322#

#SPJ11

Answer:

allah has created us to worship him only and no one else

In the American federal framework, sovereignty is divided between the federal government and the individual states.

In the federal structure of the American government, the federal government and the various states share the supreme and independent political authority known as sovereignty. A key component of federalism is this division of sovereignty. All other powers are reserved to the states or the people, as stated in the Tenth Amendment, according to the U.S. Constitution which establishes the federal government as a limited government with only those powers granted to it.

The states retain residual authority to run their internal affairs, while the federal government has certain enumerated powers, such as the ability to control interstate commerce and declare war. Within the American political system, this shared sovereignty ensures a balance between national leadership and state autonomy.

Learn more about federal structure at:

brainly.com/question/31417366

#SPJ4

The constitutional provision at issue in Schenck v. United States was the First Amendment, specifically the freedom of speech.

In Schenck v. United States case, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether Schenck's actions of distributing anti-war leaflets during World War I violated the Espionage Act of 1917 and, if so, whether that violated his First Amendment rights.

The Court ultimately ruled that Schenck's actions did violate the Espionage Act and that the First Amendment did not protect him in this instance. The Court held that the freedom of speech is not absolute and can be limited in times of war or when it presents a "clear and present danger" to the nation's security.

Hence, the constitutional provision at issue in Schenck v. United States was the First Amendment's freedom of speech, and the Court's ruling established the "clear and present danger" test for limiting that freedom in certain circumstances.

Learn more about Schenck v. United States:

https://brainly.com/question/24938794

#SPJ11

The quality that must pertain to a deviant act to be classified as a crime is that it violates a criminal law. This means that the act is considered to be illegal and punishable by law.

For a deviant act to be considered a crime, it must be defined and prohibited by criminal law. This means that the act must be specifically listed as illegal and punishable by law. The act must also meet certain criteria, such as being intentional or reckless, and causing harm or potential harm to others. Additionally, the act must be considered a societal harm, rather than a private dispute. Once an act is classified as a crime, the legal system can take action to investigate, prosecute, and punish the offender. The classification of an act as a crime is important because it establishes a shared understanding of what behaviors are considered unacceptable and punishable by society.

Learn more about violates a criminal law here;

https://brainly.com/question/30169554

#SPJ11

Commercial AE are considered military munitions When it is created by or utilised by the military for national security and defence.

What are the definitions of military munitions?

Military munitions include all ammunition products or components under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Defence, the Coast Guard, the Department of Energy, and the National Guard as well as any ammunition produced for or used by the armed forces for purposes of national defence and security. Early cannonballs and "shells," which were comparable weapons intended to be fired from artillery instead of solid cannonballs, were hollow cast-iron balls packed with gunpowder. The term "shell," which derives from the casing, came to be used as a metaphor for the entire munition.

Know more about munitions- brainly.com/question/28342738

#SPJ1

Answer:

16

Explanation:

Dan is 16 years younger than Emily.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

When I looked more into it, information on certain sites stated that it depended on the minor crime, the most I could find was someone saying 2000. One can only assume the closest number though.

Keep in mind that I'm no expert and just looked it up ;-; I tried to help though

Answer:

C.1000

Explanation:

Answer:

order

Explanation:

Even with a BAC as low as 0.02%, it becomes more difficult to coordinate the eyes, feet and hands as a cohesive unit. Thus, the given statement is true.

Alcohol affects every organ in your body and is a central nervous system depressive (it lessens stimulation in your central nervous system). You could feel relaxed, change your mood, and have a little lack of judgment at this proportion. BAC 0.05%: You could feel unconstrained, be less awake, and have poorer judgment at this level. Alcohol can cause some people to get tolerant of it.

This implies that individuals might not experience the same physical and psychological side effects of alcohol use as they did in the past. Their blood alcohol content (BAC) is not always lower. It simply implies that people react to alcohol in a different ways. You may obtain the results of the BAC test within a few hours to several business days, depending on the cause of the test.

Learn more about alcohol, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28448244

#SPJ5

Answer:

falso

Explanation:

The best action to take to help a co-worker from aggressors is to A. Ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.

This refers to the disagreement that exists between two or more entities where there is a constant struggle among them.

Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario of a person being harrassed in the parking lot, the best action to take based on that the aggressors do not work there is to ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.

Read more about conflict resolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/24769299

#SPJ1

Answer:

Human trafficking is the trade of humans for the purpose of forced labour, sexual slavery, or commercial sexual exploitation for the trafficker or others. This may encompass providing a spouse in the context of forced marriage, or the extraction of organs or tissues, including for surrogacy and ova removal. Human trafficking can occur within a country or trans-nationally. Human trafficking is a crime against the person because of the violation of the victim's rights of movement through coercion and because of their commercial exploitation. Human trafficking is the trade in people, especially women and children, and does not necessarily involve the movement of the person from one place to another.

Hope this help!:)

Answer:

Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act.

Explanation:

Answer:

A, THE DEGREE OF DAMAGE OR LOSS.

Explanation:

Answer:

Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.

Explanation:

In general, taxes are regressive, resulting in less redistribution than could be anticipated.

About Taxes

There are different federal, state, & municipal governments in the United States, and taxes are levied at many levels. Income, wages, property, sales, dividends, imports, estates, gifts, and a variety of other items are all subject to taxation. Federal, state, & local governments collected 25.5% of GDP in taxes in 2020, less than the OECD avg of 33.5% of GDP. In terms of tax income to GDP, the United States ranked seventh lowest among OECD nations in 2020, having a higher ratio than México, Columbia, Chile, Ireland, Costa Rica, & Turkey.

Labor income is taxed significantly more harshly than capital income. Indirect taxation of certain activities over others can also take the shape of various subsidies and taxes for various sources of income and spending.

To know more about taxes:

brainly.com/question/28444752

#SPJ4

Yes, parties to a contract can indeed limit or exclude consequential damages, as long as the limitation is not considered unconscionable.

Consequential damages are a type of damages that arise as a result of the consequences, or secondary effects, of a breach of contract. These damages are typically indirect and not directly caused by the breach itself, but rather by the impact of the breach on the non-breaching party.

In contractual agreements, it is common for parties to include clauses that limit or exclude consequential damages. By doing so, they seek to define the extent of their liability and protect themselves from potential extensive or unforeseen damages resulting from a breach of contract.

However, there are limitations to this ability. Contract law imposes a requirement of reasonableness, fairness, and good faith in the terms of the contract. If a limitation or exclusion of consequential damages is deemed to be unconscionable, meaning it is excessively one-sided or unfairly favors one party over the other, it may be unenforceable.

The determination of whether a limitation or exclusion of consequential damages is unconscionable will depend on the specific circumstances, the nature of the contract, and the applicable laws of the jurisdiction. Courts will consider factors such as the parties' relative bargaining power, the clarity of the contractual terms, and whether the limitation or exclusion was made known and understood by the parties at the time of contract formation.

Learn more about contractual agreements here:

https://brainly.com/question/31080037

#SPJ11

parties to a contract can limit or exclude consequential damages, provided the limitation is not unconscionable. Yes or No.