Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
if you answer this question you get 100 points, the question is
what is the meeting of life
To meet knowledge requirement what must tax payer do?
Answer:
Interview the taxpayer, ask questions, and contemporaneously document the taxpayer's responses to determine that the taxpayer is eligible to claim the credit(s) and/or HOH filing status.
Explanation:
Discuss the issues law enforcement face in understanding cybercrime
Answer and Explanation:
One of the biggest problems facing law enforcement in cybercrime is data collection. This is because encryption, technological advances in software and the amount of different data, hinder the search for cyber criminals and often make this search impossible. Furthermore, as the internet is an editable medium, criminal data can be quickly erased and never found.
The interfaces and websites of private institutions are also a big challenge, as they can impede police access to their platforms, preventing law enforcement from being carried out.
Last but not least, cyber attacks can be extremely comprehensive and carried out simultaneously in many different locations and even in different countries and continents. This makes it difficult for the origin of the attack to be identified and hinders enforcement and laws, as countries have different laws to deal with this.
__________ is a form of __________ on the basis of sex and is
illegal under federal law.
Sexual harassment, slander
Sexual orientation, discrimination
Sexual harassment, libel
The answer is Sexual harassment, slander. Sexual harassment, is a form of slander on the basis of sex and is illegal under federal law.
A form of harassment known as sexual harassment uses overt or covert sexual references, as well as unwanted and inappropriate offers of incentives in exchange for sexual favours. From verbal indiscretions to sexual abuse or assault, sexual harassment covers a wide spectrum of behaviours.Harassment can happen in a variety of social contexts, including the workplace, the family, schools, and places of worship. Any sex or gender might be a victim or a harasser. Sexual harassment is forbidden under current legal regulations. Due to the fact that sexual harassment laws do not impose a "general civility code," they sometimes do not outlaw simple taunting, casual remarks, or minor isolated incidences.
Read more about sex discrimination at
https://brainly.com/question/31916116
#SPJ4
when determing whether parties entered into a contract courts look at objective facts, which include
Answer:
Explanation:
When determining whether parties entered into a contract, courts look at objective facts, which include the following:
Offer: Did one party make an offer to the other party? An offer is a clear and definite proposal to do something, such as sell a product or provide a service, that is made with the intention of creating a binding legal agreement.
Acceptance: Did the other party accept the offer? Acceptance is the act of agreeing to the terms of the offer. It must be unconditional and communicated to the offeror in a way that demonstrates an intent to be bound by the terms of the offer.
Consideration: Was something of value exchanged between the parties? Consideration is the value given by one party in exchange for the promise of the other party. It can be in the form of money, goods, or services.
Capacity: Were the parties capable of entering into a contract? Capacity refers to the legal ability of the parties to enter into a contract. This includes being of legal age, being of sound mind, and not being under duress or incapacitated.
Legality: Was the subject matter of the contract legal? The subject matter of the contract must be legal and not against the law or public policy.
If these objective facts are present, a court is more likely to conclude that a contract was formed. However, other factors may also be considered, such as the language and terms of the contract, the parties' conduct, and the surrounding circumstances.
whose primary focus is sustaining and scientifically managing wildlife populations?
A. Responsible market hunters
B. Private hunting clubs
C. The Environmental Protection Agency
D. Professionals in government wildlife agencies
Answer:
A). Responsible market hunters
Explanation:
The key focus of the 'responsible market hunters' is to ensure scientific management and sustenance of wildlife populations. They play a direct and significant role in conserving wildlife by offering information about the amount of hunted as well as non-hunted species, endangered animals, etc. which helps the wildlife agencies to keep a check on managing the wildlife populations and prevent them from extinction and maintain biodiversity. Thus, option A is the correct answer.
When it comes to sustaining and managing wildlife populations, this is the primary focus of D. Professionals in government wildlife agencies.
Government wildlife agencies:
Aim to sustain wildlife by recommending appropriate laws Also recommend action that is aimed at managing wildlife population so that it does not become unsustainableThe professionals in these wildlife agencies are the ones that do the bulk of the work and so it can be said that their primary focus is to sustain and manage wildlife populations.
In conclusion, the roles described are primarily that of wildlife agencies and their professionals.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/4609501.
Which of the following is not a function of the Federal Trade Commission?
In the past, what events served as threats to America’s national identity? Explain why.
Answer: I recommend reading a book named ‘The Challenges to America's National Identity’ is a treatise by political scientist and historian Samuel P. Huntington. The book attempts to understand the nature of American identity and the challenges it will face in the future.
what is 2+2 i will flip shoit if you say 4 if you say 3 i give brainlyest
Answer:
3
Explanation:
it's so obvious
. State law requires that no person shall drive a vehicle on a roadway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. This is referred to as the __________________.
State law requires that no person shall drive a vehicle on a roadway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. This is referred to as the "Basic Speed Law."
The Basic Speed Law emphasizes the importance of driving at a safe speed, taking into account factors such as traffic, road conditions, and visibility.
It aims to minimize the risk of accidents and protect both the driver and other road users.
To adhere to this law, drivers must continuously assess their surroundings and adjust their speed accordingly, ensuring they do not exceed a reasonable and prudent speed for the given conditions.
To know more about State law refer here: https://brainly.com/question/12469633#
#SPJ11
Generally, illegibly obtained evidence will not be allowed in a trial because of the_______________?.
Answer: The exclusionary rule
Explanation: The exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. The fact that evidence was illegally obtained does not mean that the charges are thrown out. It simply means that that evidence is inadmissible as evidence against the person whose rights were violated.
P.s hoped this helps!
What do you believe is at the root behavior of bullying
Bullying behavior can stem from a combination of various factors, including personal, social, and environmental factors.
Some of the root causes that have been identified as contributing to bullying behavior include:
Social and Cultural Influences: Cultural norms and societal values can shape behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs. For example, communities that prize physical strength or bravery may encourage bullying as a means of asserting authority over others.
Personal Factors: Some individuals who engage in bullying may have underlying personal issues such as low self-esteem, a history of abuse or neglect, or a lack of positive role models. They may use bullying as a way to feel powerful, gain attention, or cope with their own feelings of inadequacy.
Environmental Factors: The social and physical environments in which bullying takes place can also contribute to bullying behavior. Colleges or societies with high rates of violence or aggressiveness, for example, may mainstream bullying behavior, making individuals more inclined to engage in bullying.
Parenting Styles and Family Dynamics: Parental styles and family dynamics may both have an impact on bullying behavior. Youngsters who see aggressive or violent conduct at home may be more inclined to use bullying to establish authority or control over others.
It is vital to recognize that each episode of bullying is unique and can result from a variety of circumstances. Understanding these underlying factors can aid in the prevention of bullying and the creation of a safer and more supportive environment for everybody.
To know more about bullying:
https://brainly.com/question/10566405
#SPJ4
In the previous tax year, Albert had a long-term loss carryover of $4,500, he had a current year long-term gain of $1,480, and he claimed the maximum long-term loss allowed ($3,000) on Schedule D in the previous tax year. Albert had a $591 short-term loss in the current year. What is the amount of long-term gain or loss Albert will be able to claim on Schedule D this year after using the carryover loss from the previous year?
Answer: -$611
Explanation:
Long term capital loss = -$1500
Add: Current Capital gain = $1480
Less: short term capital loss = -$591
Therefore, the amount of long-term loss that Albert will be able to claim on Schedule D this year after using the carryover loss from the previous year would be:
= -$1500 + $1480 - $591
= -$611
In the United States, which of the following is a rule on voting found in the Constitution or its amendments?
A No person may be denied the right to vote merely for lack of either state or federal citizenship.
B No person eighteen years of age or older may be denied the right to vote on account of age.
C No person may be denied the right to vote merely because he or she has previously served a prison sentence.
D A state may not establish a residency requirement for voting.
E A state may require a person to pay a poll tax in order to register to vote.
In the United States, a rule on voting found in the Constitution or its amendments is No person eighteen years of age or older may be denied the right to vote on account of age. Thus the correct option is C.
What is an Amendment?An Amendment refers to any alteration or modification taken place in existing laws to support the welfare of the people living in the country by improving the objective for better implementation.
The Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Explicitly forbade the federal government and the states from claiming age as a justification for refusing residents of the United States who are at least eighteen years old the right to vote.
Therefore, the option C Is appropriate.
Learn more about Twenty-sixth Amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3307756
#SPJ1
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
managing security operations
Answer:
thats not a question
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT true about agency law?
It involves an agent and a principal
It determines the rights and obligations of both parties
It is an area of commercial law
It only deals with contractual relationships
Answer:
It only deals with contractual relationships
Explanation:
It is untrue of agency law that it solely deals with contractual ties. As a result, (D) is the best choice.
What is meant by a commercial law?The body of legislation that governs the rights, interactions, and behavior of people and businesses engaged in commerce, merchandising, trade, and sales is referred to as commercial law, also known as mercantile law or trade law. It deals with both private and public law issues and is frequently regarded as a subset of civil law.
Principal and agent, carriage by land and sea, merchant shipping, guarantees, insurance against marine, fire, life, and accidents, bills of exchange, negotiable instruments, contracts, and partnerships are all included in the scope of commercial law.
Many of these categories belong under Financial law, a branch of Commercial law that focuses on financing and financial markets. It can also be understood to control business agreements, employment procedures, and the production
Learn more about commercial law, from :
brainly.com/question/7274469
#SPJ3
Conduct of a practitioner may be sanctionable if the
practitioner intentionally mislead a client so as to defraud that
client.
True or False
Answer:
True
The conduct of a practitioner may indeed be sanctionable if the practitioner intentionally misleads a client so as to defraud that client. This is based on the ethical and professional standards that govern various professions, particularly those in the legal, medical, and financial sectors.
To understand this in detail, let's break it down into smaller logical steps:
1. Professional Conduct: Practitioners across various fields are bound by certain rules of professional conduct. These rules are designed to ensure that practitioners act in a manner that is ethical, honest, and in the best interests of their clients. They cover a wide range of behaviors, including honesty in communications, confidentiality, conflict of interest, and more.
2. Intentional Misleading: Intentionally misleading a client involves knowingly providing false or inaccurate information with the aim of deceiving the client. This could take many forms, such as lying about qualifications, providing incorrect advice, or withholding important information.
3. Defrauding a Client: Defrauding a client involves using deceit or dishonesty to gain an unfair or dishonest advantage, often financial. This could involve overcharging for services, billing for services not provided, or manipulating a client's decisions for personal gain.
4. Sanctions: If a practitioner is found to have intentionally misled a client so as to defraud them, they can face sanctions from their professional body. These sanctions can range from fines and reprimands to suspension or revocation of their license to practice.
5. Evidence and Investigation: Allegations of such misconduct would typically be investigated by the relevant professional body or regulatory authority. The investigation would seek to gather evidence to determine whether the practitioner did indeed intentionally mislead the client and defraud them.
6. Legal Implications: In addition to professional sanctions, practitioners who defraud their clients could also face legal consequences. This could include criminal charges for fraud or civil lawsuits for damages.
Therefore, it is true that the conduct of a practitioner may be sanctionable if they intentionally mislead a client so as to defraud that client.
The probability that this answer is correct is very high given that it is based on widely accepted principles of professional ethics and conduct.
4. How did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
Answer:
Florida law only permitted counsel of poor defendants charged with capital offenses. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition was denied.
Explanation:
Gideon v. Wainright
Supreme Court ruled that the 6th amendment's guarantee of counsel corresponds with the 14th amendment (made obligatory) by the states. In other words, the 6th amendment guarantees the defendant the right to the assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings. Finally, the states had to provide counsel.
What sort of case would be held first at a state court?
Select one:
a. Video game pirating
b. Child custody argument
c. Treason
d. Bankruptcy declaration
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Treason is very illegal and betraying for a country, and should be dealt with first.
Answer:
The Correct Answer is C. Treason.
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU!!!
MARK ME BRAINLEAST!!!
Based on Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights For Natural Objects? Explain the position of Christopher Stone. Under his theory, what has ethical status and why?
In his book "Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights For Natural Objects," Christopher Stone argues that natural objects, such as trees, should have legal rights.
He proposes a theory known as "ecological jurisprudence" or "intrinsic rights theory," which challenges the traditional legal notion that only humans have legal standing.
According to Stone's theory, natural objects should have ethical status because they possess intrinsic value and are interconnected with human and ecological well-being. He suggests that the existing legal framework, which treats nature as property, fails to adequately protect the environment. Stone argues that by granting legal rights to natural objects, such as trees, rivers, or ecosystems, they can be recognized as legal persons with the ability to bring lawsuits on their behalf.
By extending legal rights to nature, Stone believes that it would lead to better environmental protection, as it would require humans to consider the interests of natural objects in decision-making processes. It would also shift the perspective from viewing nature solely as a resource to be exploited, to recognizing its inherent worth and the need for its preservation.
Overall, Stone's position in "Should Trees Have Standing?" is that natural objects have ethical status because of their intrinsic value and interconnectedness with human and ecological well-being. By granting legal rights to nature, he aims to promote environmental conservation and ensure the long-term sustainability of our planet.
To learn more about Christopher Stone, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31750428
#SPJ11
A narrative case report consists of the following elements:
Select one:
a. Introduction, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), conclusion
b. Face sheet, witness statement(s), facts of the case,
conclusion
c. Introduction, your opinion, facts of the case, suspect
statement(s), conclusion
d. Face sheet, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), your opinion, facts of the case
e. Face sheet, introduction, reporting party/victim statement,
witness statement(s), facts of the case, suspect statement(s),
conclusion
Complete the statement about writing email.
When writing an email to multiple recipients, the CC field allows you to add others to a conversation to
, and the BCC field allows you to share the email to
.
Answer:
Explanation: When writing an email to multiple recipients, the CC field allows you to add others to a conversation to keep them informed or involved, and the BCC field allows you to share the email to additional recipients without revealing their identities to other recipients.
7
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is being held outside around
the town square or market. What can you reasonably infer about this case?
O A
O B.
OC.
O D.
The court case was about a minor offense.
The accused was a part of the elite class.
A corporeal punishment was about to be given.
The case involved a violent crime.
If the court hearing is being held outside around the town square or market then the court case was about a minor offense.
Roman legal procedure was a long-evolving system utilised in Roman courts that eventually served as the foundation for contemporary procedure in nations with civil law. There were three major, overlapping phases of development: the legis actiones, which lasted from the late 2nd century BCE until the end of the 5th century BCE law code known as the Twelve Tables; the formulary system; and the cognitio extraordinaria, which was in use during the post-Classical period. The legis actiones procedure was broken down into multiple phases.
To know more about Civil Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
1. Where on a child's body would it be strange to find an injury not mentioned in the slides?
2. Who was Nixzmary Brown and what happened in her case (you may need to look her up on an external webpage)? What could have changed the outcome in this case?
3. Since neglect is the most common form of abuse, what are some of your ideas about prevention (list a minimum of two and explain the implementation)?
4. You are given a case to investigate. A 13-year-old child is addicted to drugs. The mother knows her child is doing drugs but does nothing about it. Is this a form of abuse? Explain your answer and include what type of abuse you conclude this falls under. If you determine that this is not an example of abuse, you must explain why you do not consider this abuse. What would you do in this case (as the investigator)? Explain why you answered the way you did.
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange.
2. To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect.
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange. However, injuries to certain areas such as the genitals, breasts, or inner thighs would typically raise concerns about possible abuse or inappropriate behavior. These areas are considered particularly sensitive, and injuries in these locations may indicate potential harm or mistreatment.
2. Nixzmary Brown was a seven-year-old girl who was tragically killed by her parents in 2006. Her case garnered significant media attention and exposed failures within the child welfare system. Nixzmary suffered from severe physical abuse and neglect, and her parents subjected her to prolonged abuse, leading to her death. The case revealed various systemic failures, including missed opportunities by child welfare agencies and schools to intervene and protect Nixzmary from her abusive parents.
To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial. Ensuring effective information sharing and collaboration between schools, child welfare agencies, law enforcement, and medical professionals would enable early detection and intervention in cases of child abuse. Additionally, enhancing training and awareness for professionals and the public regarding the signs of abuse and neglect can help identify and report cases more effectively.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives. Community support programs can provide resources and assistance to families in need, such as access to affordable housing, job training, mental health services, and childcare options. By addressing the underlying issues that contribute to neglect, such programs can help alleviate stressors and provide support to parents, reducing the likelihood of neglectful behaviors.
Parenting education initiatives are also essential in preventing neglect. These programs can offer classes and workshops that teach parents about child development, positive discipline techniques, communication skills, and stress management. By equipping parents with knowledge and skills, they can better understand their child's needs and respond appropriately, reducing the risk of neglect.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect. By ignoring the situation and not seeking help or intervention, the mother is failing to provide the necessary care and support her child requires.
This type of neglect falls under the category of physical neglect as it involves the failure to ensure the child's physical well-being and safety. Substance abuse can have severe consequences on a child's health, development, and overall welfare. Neglecting to address drug addiction puts the child at significant risk and can lead to long-term harm.
As an investigator, it would be important to assess the situation further, gather evidence, and determine the extent of the child's drug addiction and the impact it has on their well-being. The next steps would involve involving appropriate authorities, such as child protective services or law enforcement, to ensure the child's safety and initiate appropriate interventions. The goal would be to provide support and resources to the child and the family to address the addiction and mitigate further harm to the child's well-being.
Know more about Drug addiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12039156
#SPJ8
Should a psychologist be allowed to give an expert opinion on sanity? Why or why not?
Answer:
yes they should
Explanation:
a psychologist should be able to give an expert opinion on sanity because they study the mind or mental states. This means that they know what is takes to be insane or sane.
mention and clearly explain four essential ingredients for the existence of a contract
Answer:
For a contract to be legally binding it must contain four essential elements:
an offer
an acceptance
an intention to create a legal relationship
a consideration (usually money).
However it may still be considered invalid if it:
entices someone to commit a crime, or is illegal
is entered into by someone that lacks capacity, such as a minor or bankrupt
was agreed through misleading or deceptive conduct, duress, unconscionable conduct or undue influence.
Discuss (one paragraph minimum) what's involved in both a direct and cross examination of a witness. Please list and discuss at least three elements for both.
You must have a reason for each question you pose during direct examination. If you are the plaintiff's attorney, consider how the witness assists you in meeting your burden of proof. Pattern Jury Instructions should serve as a guide for practitioners. Cross-examination is typically regarded as the most challenging aspect of the varied responsibilities of the lawyer. There is no quick 47 shortcut or royal path to mastering the craft of advocacy. Personal 48 experience and imitating people who have been educated in the art are the most reliable ways to become proficient in this crucial need of a professional trial lawyer.
What are the elements of direct examination?
Keep things simple.
Wherever you are, practise speaking like a normal person. either at home or the workplace. It doesn't matter if you're outside or inside the court. A specific legal term of art should only be used when absolutely necessary. Otherwise, write as you normally would for both personal and professional topics. Legalese should be avoided in court because it "is a deadly collection of language habits that we unknowingly turn on or off." Ask a tough question of witnesses and you'll receive a tough answer, according to the saying. A long, rambling query will elicit a long, meandering response. If you ask a confusing question, you'll either get a confusing response or none at all. "Brevity can be crucial.
Make use of topic sentences or headings
"Conversation and direct examination are not the same thing. It ought to sound like one, but it doesn't. Though you do it correctly, you will lead the witness through the entire process without ever coming across as if you are dictating what the witness should say. "The headline way of direct" should be used to direct the witness. The headline technique of direct is described as follows: "[i]n advance of each new set of questions, declare the topic: the headline that informs the witness—and everyone else—what the subject is going to be." The "paragraph method" is another name for the straight headline approach.
To learn more about direct and cross examination from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/9010663
#SPJ1
Discuss (one paragraph minimum) what's involved in both a direct and cross examination of a witness. Please list and discuss at least three elements for both.
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11
which of the following court cases set the precedent that allowed for the civil rights act of 1964? (choose all that apply) A. mcculloch v. maryland C. plessy v. ferguson D. dred scott v. sanford B. gibbons v. ogden
The court case that set the precedent for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was Plessy v. Ferguson.
What court case established the precedent for the Civil Rights Act of 1964?Plessy v. Ferguson, a landmark Supreme Court case in 1896, established the legal doctrine of "separate but equal." This ruling allowed for racial segregation and discrimination, giving states the authority to enact laws enforcing racial segregation in public facilities. However, it was later overturned by the Supreme Court in the case of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.
This case set the stage for the prolonged struggle against racial discrimination, eventually leading to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a monumental piece of legislation that aimed to end racial segregation and protect individuals from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin
Learn more about plessy v. ferguson
brainly.com/question/29534003
#SPJ11