Answer:
B
Explanation:
The fleece is a symbol of authority and kingship.
Thomas Jefferson warned that limiting the federal government was essential to the protection of people’s liberties. How does the Constitution provide for limited government?
A.
Power is given to the people based upon law and tradition.
B.
It divides power among three branches of government.
C.
The federal government gives some of its powers to the states.
D.
To simplify the court system, Congress may override state laws.
Reset Submit
Answer:
Jefferson tried to keep a weak national government during his presidency. During his two terms in office, Jefferson sought to stay true to his principles of a weak national government by cutting the federal budget and taxes, while still reducing the national debt.
The Constitution provide for limited government as it divides power among three branches of government. Hence option D is the answer.
What did Thomas Jefferson say about limited government?According to Thomas Jefferson, a smart and thrifty government would prevent people from hurting one another while yet allowing them the autonomy to control their own industrial development and livelihoods. Such a government would also refrain from robbing workers of the wages they have worked so hard to obtain. He desired to alter Federalist principles.
Jefferson believed that the Federalists had enlarged and strengthened the federal government beyond its proper bounds. By slashing the federal budget and lowering the national debt, Jefferson aimed to curtail the power of the government. A national capitol and the federal district were planned, designed, and built in large part thanks to Jefferson. Jefferson worked to create a small federal government in his numerous public positions.
To learn more about Thomas Jefferson, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14242343
#SPJ1
What brought the Kingdom of Kush to an end?
Crop failure led to widespread famine.
It was conquered by the Kingdom of Axum.
The Black Death wiped out much of the population.
It was taken over by Muslim kingdoms from the east.
The Kingdom of Kush came to an end as it was conquered by the Kingdom of Axum.
In the fourth century CE Axum a kingdom in modern day Ethiopia, succeeded in subduing Kush. Axum's dominance over the Red Sea trade routes, which gave them a tactical advantage over Kush, is probably what led to this conquest. The Nubian dynasty came to an end with Axum's conquest of Kush, and the Christian Axumite dynasty took its place.
After that, Ethiopian culture and religion started to have a bigger impact on the area. The conquest by Axum was a significant factor in the Kingdom of Kush's eventual demise, even though there were other factors, such as climate change and economic instability, that also played a role.
Learn more about Kingdom of Kush at:
brainly.com/question/18970095
#SPJ1
What similar purpose did many traditional African religions share
Answer:
They provided rules for living and helped people honor their history and ancestors.
Hope that helped. x
idea that the United States should expand overseas and was destined to
dominate the world
A.Social Darwinism
B.Anglo-Saxonism
C.Manifest Destiny
D.Imperialism
Answer:
B
Explanation:
.
What led to the Great Compromise
Answer:
The Great Compromise was forged in a heated dispute during the 1787 Constitutional Convention: States with larger populations wanted congressional representation based on population, while smaller states demanded equal representation.
Hope this helps!
Which of the following best
describes the Gentleman's
Agreement made between the
United States and Japan in the
beginning of the 1900s?
Answer:
I would assume it to be A. I assume tension didn't just stop overnight, hopefully I am correct!
to all christian out there, help me please.
How were the Navigation Acts of 1651 and the Molasses Act of 1733 alike?
They both put limits on colonial trade.
They both shut down colonial ports.
They both forced the colonies to trade with the Dutch.
They both eliminated taxes on colonial imports.
Answer:
They both put limits on colonial trade.
Explanation:
The Navigation Acts of 1651 and the Molasses Act of 1733 were alike in the way that they both put limits on colonial trade. The correct option is A.
Both the Navigation Acts of 1651 and the Molasses Act of 1733 were aimed at regulating colonial trade and imposing restrictions on the colonies. The Navigation Acts, passed by the British Parliament, were a series of laws that required colonial trade to be conducted primarily with England and limited the colonies' ability to engage in trade with other nations. The Molasses Act, also passed by the British Parliament, imposed a tax on the importation of molasses from non-British colonies, primarily targeting the trade between the American colonies and the French West Indies.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about Navigation Acts of 1651 here:
https://brainly.com/question/33450893
#SPJ2
The complete question might be:
How were the Navigation Acts of 1651 and the Molasses Act of 1733 alike?
A. They both put limits on colonial trade.
B. They both shut down colonial ports.
C. They both forced the colonies to trade with the Dutch.
D. They both eliminated taxes on colonial imports.
In the "New York Day Women" exam, one of the itemized struggles between Suzette and Ma.
200 to 300 words
In the short story "New York Day Women" by Edwidge Danticat, one of the itemized struggles between Suzette and Ma revolves around their differing perspectives on cultural identity and assimilation.
Throughout the story, Suzette, the protagonist, is depicted as a young woman who has embraced American culture and customs, having been raised in the United States. On the other hand, Ma, Suzette's mother, strongly clings to her Haitian heritage and values, resisting assimilation into American society. This clash of perspectives creates tension and conflict between the two characters.
Suzette's struggle lies in her desire to blend into American society and be accepted as an American. She feels a sense of disconnect from her Haitian roots, as she is not fluent in Creole and is unfamiliar with many aspects of Haitian culture. Suzette is caught between two worlds, struggling to find her own identity while navigating the expectations and traditions of her mother's culture.
Ma, on the other hand, sees the preservation of Haitian culture as essential and believes that assimilation erodes one's sense of self and community. She insists on speaking Creole and adhering to Haitian customs, viewing them as a vital part of their identity. Ma's struggle lies in her attempt to instill a sense of cultural pride in Suzette, despite her daughter's inclination towards embracing American culture.
The clash between Suzette and Ma's perspectives on cultural identity and assimilation creates a tension-filled dynamic in the story. It reflects the broader struggle experienced by many immigrant families, where the younger generation strives for assimilation while the older generation holds onto their cultural heritage. This conflict highlights the complexities and challenges of navigating multiple cultural identities within a diverse society.
Overall, the itemized struggle between Suzette and Ma in "New York Day Women" centers around their differing views on cultural identity, assimilation, and the tensions that arise as a result.
for more questions on Suzette and Ma
https://brainly.com/question/25010777
#SPJ8
What was the historic moment that lead to the start of World War 1? Was it the assassination of the Emperor of Austria?
The historic moment that led to the start of World War 1 was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria.
On June 28, 1914, Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, was assassinated in Sarajevo by a Serbian nationalist named Gavrilo Princip. This event triggered a chain reaction of events that ultimately resulted in the outbreak of the war.
Following the assassination, Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia, demanding compliance with a set of conditions. When Serbia did not fully meet these demands, Austria-Hungary declared war on July 28, 1914. This led to a series of alliances and counter-alliances among European powers, escalating the conflict into a full-scale war.
The assassination of the Archduke can be seen as the spark that ignited the tensions and rivalries among the major powers of Europe. It exposed the deep-rooted political and ethnic tensions in the region and ultimately set the stage for the devastating conflict that became known as World War 1.
For more questions on historic moment
https://brainly.com/question/24513174
#SPJ8
Q: What did God give to Abraham and his descendants?
Answer:
God promised to make Abraham the father of a great people and said that Abraham and his descendants must obey God. In return God would guide them and protect them and give them the land of Israel.
Explanation:
The promise that God gave to Abraham and his descendants is that they would fill the earth.
Who was Abraham?
He was a character in the old testament part of the bible. He is kniwn to be a patriarch to the Jews.
The bible refers to him as a man that is after Gods heart. God gave him the promise of having many children through him.
Raed more on Abraham here: https://brainly.com/question/16894766
#SPJ2
SB 4 Chapter 2 QUESTIONS 11 State whether the following statements are true or false, Rewrite the false statements correctly, (a) After Harsha died, his son became the new king. (b) kanauj was the capital of Harsha's empire. (e) After Harsha's death, the samantas and Brahmanas became more powerful. 1.2 List the names of the new kingdoms that came to power during the medieval period. 1.3 What was the tripartite struggle? Explain the main reasons for this struggle. -14 Every time a powerful king dies without an heir or leaves behind a weak heir, the kingdom breaks up into smaller parts. Justify this statement with the example of the new kingdoms in medieval India. 1.5 On an outline map of India, locate and label the kingdoms of the following dynasties: (i) The Rashtakutas (ii) The Palas (iii) The Gurjara Pratiharas (iv) The Chahamanas
(a) The given statement "After Harsha died, his son became the new king " is False because After Harsha died, his son did not become the new king.
Instead, there was a succession struggle, and the empire eventually disintegrated into smaller kingdoms.
(b) The given statement " kanauj was the capital of Harsha's empire " is True because Kanauj was indeed the capital of Harsha's empire.
(c) The given statement "After Harsha's death, the samantas and Brahmanas became more powerful." is True because After Harsha's death, the samantas (feudal chiefs) and Brahmanas (priestly class) did become more powerful, as the central authority weakened.
1.2 During the medieval period in India, several new kingdoms came to power. Some of the prominent ones include:
The Cholas: They established a powerful kingdom in South India, with their capital at Tanjavur.
The Hoysalas: They ruled over the Deccan region, with their capital at Dwarasamudra (present-day Halebidu).
The Kakatiyas: They had their stronghold in the Telangana region, with their capital at Warangal.
The Chalukyas of Gujarat: They emerged as a dominant force in Western India, with their capital at Anhilwara (present-day Patan).
The Yadavas of Devagiri: They held sway over parts of Maharashtra and Karnataka, with their capital at Devagiri (present-day Daulatabad).
1.3 The Tripartite Struggle was a series of battles and conflicts that took place during the 9th to the 12th centuries CE in North India. It involved three major powers: the Pratiharas, the Palas, and the Rashtrakutas. The struggle was primarily for control over Kanauj, a prosperous and strategically important city.
The main reasons for this struggle were:
Control over trade routes: Kanauj was located at the crossroads of major trade routes, making it an economic hub. The control over Kanauj meant control over lucrative trade and commerce.Political supremacy: Kanauj was considered prestigious due to its historical significance and association with ancient empires. Each dynasty desired to establish their dominance over this region to legitimize their rule and claim paramount status.Territorial expansion: The three dynasties sought to expand their territories and gain more resources, wealth, and power. Control over Kanauj would provide them with a strong base for further expansion.Rivalry and competition: Personal ambitions, ego clashes, and thirst for power among rulers fueled the tripartite struggle. Each dynasty aimed to establish its hegemony over the others, leading to frequent conflicts.1.4 The statement that every time a powerful king dies without an heir or leaves behind a weak heir, the kingdom breaks up into smaller parts is a general observation based on historical trends. It is not an absolute rule but often occurred in medieval India. For example, after the death of Harsha, his empire fragmented into smaller kingdoms due to the absence of a strong central authority and conflicts over succession. Similarly, the decline of the Gupta Empire in the 6th century CE led to the rise of regional kingdoms.
In these situations, when a powerful ruler was not succeeded by a capable heir, ambitious local chiefs, feudatories, or nobles often seized the opportunity to assert their independence and establish their own kingdoms. Factors like weak central administration, internal power struggles, and external invasions further contributed to the fragmentation of kingdoms. This pattern can be observed in various parts of medieval India, where regional kingdoms emerged after the disintegration of larger empires.
1.5 The requested explanation exceeds the word limit. However, here are the locations of the mentioned dynasties on an outline map of India:
(i) The Rashtrakutas: Located in the Deccan region, with their capital at Manyakheta (present-day Malkhed
Know more about medieval period here:
https://brainly.com/question/29212136
#SPJ8
Where did the Shang Dynasty develop?
O Hwang
O Yangtze
O Yellow Sea
O Pacific Ocean
Answer:
hwang
Explanation:
Any adult in your life will remember the OJ Simpson trial. It was televised on national tv and everyone followed it closely.
Why do you think so many people were so interested in the case? Do you think that criminal murder trials should be broadcast on national tv? Why or why not?
Answer:
i think they should be broadcasted
Explanation:
I think people are interested in it because its abnormal. its fascinating!! Psychologists believe our interest in true crime and serial killers stems from it being a simple way for us to explore a dark world from the comfort and safety of our own homes. At the end of a documentary, we can switch off and return to life as normal.
which aspect of U.S. politics is most closely tied to the concept of idiredect democracy
In your own words, describe the system of government used in the United States.
Explanation:
Well the United States is a Federal Country with the 3 main Branches of Government ; Executive, Judicial and Legislative.
Legislative—Makes laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate)
Executive—Carries out laws (President, Vice President, Cabinet, most federal agencies)
Judicial—Evaluates laws (Supreme Court and other courts)
hope i helped
What are some ways that a country can pay off debt?
Answer:
Issuing Debt With Bonds.
Interest Rate Manipulation.
Instituting Spending Cuts.
Raising Taxes.
Lowering Debt Successes.
National Debt Bailout.
Defaulting on National Debt.
Explanation:
uhm , it explains itself
How did sit ins push for the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Answer:
Sit-ins were a form of nonviolent protest that were used to push for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Sit-ins were organized by civil rights activists, who would occupy and refuse to leave segregated public spaces such as lunch counters, libraries, and other spaces. These actions were designed to challenge the social norms and laws that upheld racial segregation. The sit-ins were often met with violence and arrests, but they also received significant media coverage, which helped to raise awareness of the issues and put pressure on lawmakers to take action. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed in response to the Civil Rights Movement, which included the sit-ins. The law prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in public places, and it also provided for federal enforcement of voting rights.
Who controls a country if it is ruled by self-government?
Answer:
Self-governance, self-government, or self-rule is the ability of a person or group to exercise all necessary functions of regulation without intervention from an external authority. It may refer to personal conduct or to any form of institution, such as family units, social groups, affinity groups, legal bodies, industry bodies, religions, and political entities of various degree.Self-governance is closely related to various philosophical and socio-political concepts such as autonomy, independence, self-control, self-discipline, and sovereignty.[7]
Explanation:
Answer:
i think the people that live there rule it
Explanation:
cause they vote on what they want
Do you think Thomas Paine's writing was persuasive enough to convince colonists who were still undecided about going to war with Britain? Use details from the text and your own logical reasoning to explain your answer.
Common Sense by Thomas Paine is a very influential piece of literature and laid down the facts, making people want to claim their independence from Great Britain. Many people who were undecided during this time also ended up wanting to become independent from Great Britain after reading Common Sense.
Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense to be very persuasive. To start Common Sense off, Thomas Paine writes, "In the following pages I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments and common sense..." This was very simple and appealed to people who maybe didn't know if they would be smart enough to read his work. Paine assures them that everything he writes about is simple and plain, with common sense.
Paine goes on later to say how they don't need Great Britain to flourish and they can be entirely independent on their own. He believes that people who think they are depending on Great Britain and really need them are incorrect and the facts prove them to be wrong.
By Thomas Paine writing Common Sense, many people started to realize they could in fact be independent. In just a couple of months, Common Sense sold a hundred thousand copies. It also helped influence the Declaration of Independence.
"In the past two centuries, a revolution has transformed women’s lives. Unlike national revolutions, this social upheaval crosses continents, decades, and ideologies. In place of armed struggle it gradually sows seeds of change, infiltrating our consciousness with the simple premise that women are as capable and valuable as men. To measure the breadth of this ongoing upheaval of old patterns, consider the way feminist movements have transformed law and politics. . . . Or note the change in leadership. . . . Women’s movements have never been so widespread.”
–Estelle B. Freedman,
No Turning Back: The History of Feminism and the Future of Women, 2002
A) Identify ONE specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
B) Identify ANOTHER specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
C) Explain ONE specific example of how a continuity in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present counters an argument made in the text.
Answer:
A) One specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can now run for public office. This connects to how the author describes how women are just as capable and valuable as men.
B) Another specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can get a post-secondary education now.
C) One specific example of how a continuity in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present counters an argument made in the text is that women are still struggling to get paid a wage that is equal to that of a man. This counters the argument that these movement would be able to change all the woes women face.
Explanation:
These series of Women movement contributed to the creation of woman suffrage, bridge the gender inequality, changing role in the society etc.
What are Women movement?These are series of liberation movement for woman in the 1960s and 1970s that sought for equal rights, opportunities and personal freedom for women and also coincided with the “second wave” of feminism.
Example of change in the roles of women from 1800?A good example of the changing role is that women can now run for public office and this connects to how the author describes how women are just as capable and valuable as men.
Another example of change in the rights of women?Another good example of the changing role is that that women can get a post-secondary education now.
Example of continuity fight on the rights of women?Till date, the women are still struggling to get paid a wage that is equal to that of a man and this counters the argument that these movement would be able to change all the woes women face.
Read more about Women movement
brainly.com/question/17010685
#SPJ2
How were the lives of free African Americans similar to those of enslaved African Americans in the 1700s?
Neither group was allowed to legally marry.
They both could live wherever they wanted.
Neither group had true equality with whites.
They both could receive an education.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
peace outt...
What was the result of the Russian Revolution of 1917?
Answer:The Russian Revolution took place in 1917, during the final phase of World War I. It removed Russia from the war and brought about the transformation of the Russian Empire into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), replacing Russia's traditional monarchy with the world's first Communist state.
How did Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideas contribute to Enlightenment thinking?
Niccolo Machiavelli is a philosopher and writer from Florence who lived from 1469 to 1527. Machiavelli's contribution to Enlightenment thinking is one that has been debated and controversial since the era itself, with some commentators praising his work as seminal to the movement, while others condemn it as harmful to the movement.
The Enlightenment is a period of intellectual and cultural change that swept through Europe in the eighteenth century. It emphasized reason, scientific progress, and the idea that the world could be understood through natural laws. Machiavelli's ideas, on the other hand, were written two centuries earlier and reflect a different era.Machiavelli's political theories, on the other hand, were based on the idea that the leader should do whatever is necessary to maintain his authority. Machiavelli argued that a leader should be feared rather than loved, that it is better to be feared than loved because love is unstable while fear is constant. In Machiavelli's opinion, rulers should only be interested in power and success.Machiavelli’s ideas contributed to Enlightenment thinking in a number of ways, including the emphasis on human reason, the importance of scientific inquiry, and the belief in progress. Many Enlightenment thinkers were inspired by Machiavelli's ideas on political power, particularly his arguments for the importance of a strong, centralized state, which they saw as a necessary condition for the promotion of liberty and the protection of individual rights.Machiavelli was also an early proponent of the idea that rulers should be judged by the success of their policies rather than by their adherence to moral or religious principles. This emphasis on effectiveness and practicality was an important aspect of Enlightenment thought, which rejected tradition and dogma in favor of reason and empirical evidence.For such more questions on Niccolo Machiavelli
https://brainly.com/question/498850
#SPJ8
Machiavelli's rational, secular and practical political philosophies influenced Enlightenment thinking by fostering a reliance on reason over tradition. This made way for further political theory development, including social contract theory and a shift towards political democratization and the protection of individual freedoms.
Explanation:Niccolo Machiavelli's political philosophy, which he developed through works such as The Prince, greatly influenced Enlightenment thinking. Machiavelli introduced concepts of realistic political theory, advising rulers through a rational, secular worldview that values practicality and effectiveness over idealism.
This rational, real-world approach to governance was a key part of the Enlightenment era's core belief in the power of human reason over tradition and superstition. Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau delved further into political theory, particularly social contract theory, which talked about the protection of individual freedoms.
Machiavelli's un-idealistic analysis of political power, devoid of religious influence, also helped promote an intellectual environment conducive to the rejection of traditional absolutism and the development of political democratization, crucial aspects of Enlightenment thought.
Learn more about Machiavelli's influence on Enlightenment thinking here:https://brainly.com/question/33115472
#SPJ11
This is a MULTIPLE ANSWER question. Choose all that apply, if any.
Incorrect responses result in point deductions from the overall score
for the question. Which of the following is TRUE?
A. The term able-bodied refers to the infinite variation in
neurocognitive functioning with the human species.
B. The following phrase is considered people-first language: My sister
is a wheelchair user.
c. The social model of disability has no overlap with the medical
model of disability (there are no concepts in common).
D. Regarding Title II, public entities are not required to take actions
that would result in undue financial and administrative burdens.
Answer:
AB B beacause considered first lenguage
Which is a characteristic of civilization?
art and literature
an army
bronze tools and weapons
economic activity
A characteristic of civilization is economic activity, which includes trade, agriculture, and the development of complex economies.
One key characteristic of civilization is economic activity. Civilizations develop complex economies that involve various forms of economic exchange and production.
This includes trade, where goods and services are exchanged between different regions or communities, fostering cultural exchange and specialization. Agricultural practices, such as farming and animal domestication, are also fundamental to civilization as they provide a stable food supply and enable sedentary lifestyles. The development of agriculture often leads to the growth of cities and the establishment of social hierarchies.Economic activity in civilizations involves the creation and distribution of goods and services, leading to the development of markets, currency systems, and trade networks. Surplus production allows for the specialization of labor, where individuals can focus on specific skills or professions, such as artisans, merchants, or administrators. This economic specialization contributes to the growth of urban centers, technological advancements, and cultural achievements.In summary, economic activity is a crucial characteristic of civilization. It encompasses trade, agriculture, the development of complex economies, and the specialization of labor. These economic activities are closely intertwined with other aspects of civilization, such as social organization, technological advancements, and cultural expressions like art and literature.
For more questions on civilization
https://brainly.com/question/32708249
#SPJ8
How did President Theodore Roosevelt’s "Square Deal" epitomize the notion that the federal government should serve as a steward protecting the public’s interestsp
Answer:
President Theodore Roosevelt’s "Square Deal"
Explanation:
President Theodore Roosevelt, in his second term, introduces a Square Deal for the American people. It was a domestic policy that looked at the protection of natural resources, control of corporations, and consumer protection. A square deal was a progressive concept by Roosevelt that would help the country's capital, labour, and the public, ending special treatment for entrepreneurs who tend to exploit easily.
Who made a good deal of money off of supplying the materials for the Crusades?
A. slaves
B. landowners
C. peasants
D. merchants
Answer: D. Merchants
Explanation:
Merchants profited by making cash loans to finance the journey. They also leased their ships for hefty fees. In addition, the merchants hoped to win control of key trade routes.
1. Explain what is the Second Great Awakening is.
2. Give an example of what a social reform movement is.
3. How are primary sources different than secondary sources?
Will Give brainly
The second great awakening was when a man found a rock and got paid for giving it away it helped him and his family but progressed badder and badder causing major fights to occur and could've ended in war
A social reform movement:
Climbing a wall/An act of bravery
Primary sources: They are different from secondary sources because primary sources are a first source and secondary source is a second source.
Can you please give brainly it's okay if not!
1. The Second Great Awakening was a religious revival movement that took place in the United States during the early 19th century. It emphasized personal salvation, emotional preaching, and individual responsibility. The movement aimed to renew people's faith and promote moral and social reform. As a result, new religious denominations emerged, and there was an increase in evangelism, camp meetings, and the promotion of social causes such as abolitionism and temperance.
2. A social reform movement is a collective effort by a group of people who seek to bring about positive change in society by addressing social issues or inequalities. These movements aim to improve living conditions, promote equality, and advocate for the rights of marginalized groups. An example of a social reform movement is the civil rights movement in the United States during the mid-20th century. This movement fought against racial segregation and discrimination, with leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. advocating for equal rights through nonviolent means.
3. Primary sources are original materials or firsthand accounts created by individuals who directly witnessed or participated in an event. They provide direct evidence of the topic being studied. Examples of primary sources include diaries, letters, photographs, interviews, and speeches. On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretations or analysis of primary sources. They are created by authors who did not directly witness the events or phenomena being discussed. Secondary sources often summarize, interpret, or provide analysis of primary sources. Examples of secondary sources include textbooks, scholarly articles, and documentaries. The main difference between primary and secondary sources is that primary sources offer direct evidence, while secondary sources provide an interpretation or analysis of that evidence.
How did Watergate affect how the US population viewed their high ranking government officials?
The government was widely despised in America as a result of Watergate. Presidents had amassed too much power, according to some Americans, and the possibility of unrestrained abuses of that power was too great.
What do you mean by Watergate scandal?The Watergate scandal was a major political scandal in the United States involving President Richard Nixon's administration from 1972 to 1974, which resulted in Nixon's resignation.
It established guidelines for the government's data collection. People were granted the right to inspect government documents pertaining to them.
It restricted donations to presidential campaigns. It prevented the president from going to war without the support of Congress.
Therefore, As a result of Watergate, the government was widely reviled in America. Some Americans believed that presidents had amassed too much power, and that the risk of unchecked abuse of that power was too great.
To know more about the Watergate scandal, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3440982
#SPJ9