Answer:
i think it'd be around 20
Explanation:
no one could ever truly know bcuz there were only 150,000 people that stormed in on d-day
How would the United States be different today if the South had won the Civil War?
Answer:
Explanation:
If the confederates had won the war, the contemporary world order would be very different, as the Federal United States has played a determining role in forging the world we know. Many can defend it would have strengthened the world tragedies, such as World-Wars, Cold-Wars, and post-cold-Wars
Were the benefits of westward expansion worth its
negative consequences?
The benefits and negative consequences of westward expansion are complex and varied, and opinions on whether the benefits outweighed the negative consequences may vary.
Were the benefits of westward expansion worth its negative consequences?On one hand, westward expansion brought significant economic benefits, such as the expansion of the nation's land base, the development of new markets, the growth of industries, and the spread of technological advances.
On the other hand, westward expansion had significant negative consequences for Native American communities, who were forcibly removed from their lands and subjected to violence, disease, and cultural destruction.
Therefore, whether the benefits of westward expansion were worth its negative consequences is a matter of perspective and interpretation, and opinions on this topic may vary depending on a variety of factors, including cultural background, personal values, and historical context.
Learn more about westward expansion at:https://brainly.com/question/693883
#SPJ1
In "Aesop's Life" and "Harun al-Rashid & One Thousand and One Nights," Aesop and Harun al-Rashid are remembered throughout history for their stories.
Which statement best explains why their stories are unique?
Responses
A Aesop's fables follow a framework that ties them together, while Harun al-Rashid's are about animals and mythical characters instead of people.
B Aesop's fables were passed from one generation to the next by word of mouth, while Harun al-Rashid's collection was written down in Arabic.
C Aesop's fables told about his life as a slave, while Harun al-Rashid's told about his life as a caliph.
D Aesop's fables were comedies and tragedies, while Harun al-Rashid's were life lessons with morals.
The statement that best explains why their stories are unique is B. Aesop's fables were passed from one generation to the next by word of mouth, while Harun al-Rashid's collection was written down in Arabic. This detail highlights a key difference in the way the stories were transmitted and preserved over time. It also suggests that Aesop's fables may have evolved over time as they were passed down orally, while Harun al-Rashid's stories were more likely to have remained consistent over time due to their written form.
According to Taoist teachings, why might a demon cause sickness on the earth?
a. because they were given that job by the Jade Emperor
b. because they are orphaned souls who want to be remembered
c. because they want independence from god
d. because they want to gain the chance to be human
According to Taoist teachings, demons might cause sickness on the earth because they want independence from god.
The fundamental beliefs of early Taoism regarding the causes of evil and how to combat it was remarkably stable. Evil is essentially everything that threatens or is hostile to life.
Life is the highest good, hence all efforts should be made to preserve and even prolong life. However, the concept of sin, guilt, debt and personal responsibility was added to what it meant to be devoted to life very early on.
Adherents conjured up a massive bureaucracy that spied on people and reported their actions to a central repository. It is one's responsibility for whatever occurs to them, whether it is illness or poor luck.
The guilty-inducing mistakes must be admitted, and corrections or restitution must be made.
To learn more about Taoist teachings refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14278631
#SPJ1
Why were the battles of trenton and princeton important?
Answer:
The main importance is that this battles brought back the morale of the army and people once more started believing in the cause of the Revolution. This happened after the Patriots lost a couple of battles and the morale wasn't that high.
Explanation:
After the lost that happened during the siege of New York the cause of Revolutionary army seems somehow lost, and that is why Washington decided to cross the river Delaware and to try to defeat the enemies on their own ground. Not only that the morale was once more high, but they also managed to restore control of certain regions.
Answer: They encouraged more soldiers to enlist in the army.
Explanation:
NEED NOW
What was Thomas Jefferson Administration’s policy? *
1.Loose interpretation of the Constitution and supported industry
2.Strict interpretation of the Constitution and supported farmers
3.Strict interpretation of the Constitution and supported industry
4.Loose interpretation of the Constitution and supported farmers
Answer:
Image result for What was Thomas Jefferson Administration’s policy? *
Jefferson championed the rights of states and insisted on limited federal government as well as limited taxes. This stood in stark contrast to the Federalists' insistence on a strong, active federal government. Jefferson also believed in fiscal austerity.
Works written: Embargo Act of 1807
Nationality: United States
Explanation:
how many more soviet soldiers than german soldiers were killed or missing
The Soviet Union is thought to have suffered the greatest loss of life during World War Two. Approximately 27 million people from the Soviet Union died, of which 11.4 million were military personnel and 10 million were killed as a result of military action.
What was the World War II?The Second World War, sometimes known as World War II or just World War II, lasted from 1939 to 1945 and was a global battle.
The vast majority of the world's nations, including all of the great powers, participated in the conflict as members of two competing military alliances: the Allies (headed by the Soviet Union, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China) and the Axis (led by Germany, Japan, and Italy).
According to estimates, the Soviet Union lost the most people during World War Two.
Up to 27 million Soviet citizens perished, with 11.4 million of them serving in the military, 10 million dying as a result of military action, and another 8 to 9 million dying through famine and disease.
Therefore, the Soviet Union is thought to have suffered the greatest loss of life during World War Two. Approximately 27 million people from the Soviet Union died, of which 11.4 million were military personnel and 10 million were killed as a result of military action.
Know more about World War II here:
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ1
Answer each of the questions below. Answer each question in paragraph form using complete sentences, proper capitalization, and punctuation.
Identify and describe at least two (2) positive events during this period. Tell why you believe these events were positive and whether these events were influenced by Jackson's presidency.
The two positive events during the period of Jackson's presidency are:
The passage of the Indian Removal Act in 1830 and the establishment of the Second Bank of the United States in 1816.
One positive event during the period of Jackson's presidency was the passage of the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act allowed the forced removal of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to newly designated Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River.
While controversial, this act allowed for the westward expansion of American settlers, paving the way for the growth and development of the United States. Jackson's presidency heavily influenced the passage of this act, as he was a strong advocate for westward expansion and was willing to use force to achieve it.
Another positive event during this period was the establishment of the Second Bank of the United States in 1816. This bank played a crucial role in stabilizing the American economy by regulating the money supply and promoting economic growth. Jackson's presidency, however, was marked by his opposition to the bank, which he viewed as a tool of the wealthy elite that favored the interests of the Northeast over the South and West. Jackson's veto of the bank's recharter in 1832 eventually led to its demise.
Nonetheless, the establishment of the Second Bank of the United States was a significant achievement of the period, and it helped to lay the foundation for the modern American banking system.
Therefore, the Indian Removal Act in 1830 and the establishment of the Second Bank of the United States in 1816 are the two events during the period of Jackson's presidency.
for more such question on Jackson's presidency
https://brainly.com/question/19319327
#SPJ11
Who would win in a fight? The greek Gods or the Norse Gods
Answer:
Greek GOds
Explanation:
Answer:I would say the greek gods
Explanation:
They have powerful gods and godes. Like Zeus,hades amd poseidon
Hera,Athena and Aphrodite
marking brainleist + a thanks + 10 points!
Can you please help me thank you
The beliefs that motivated the Europeans to spread their culture to other groups include:
A. the belief that non - Europeans needed Europeans to teach them how to live in a civilizaed wayB. The belief that Europeans were more evolved c. The belief that Christians should convert others to Christianity Why did Europeans spread Christianity ?The belief that non-Europeans needed Europeans to teach them how to live in a civilized way was rooted in the idea of European superiority and the notion that European culture and values were superior to those of other cultures.
They believed that they were more advanced than other cultures, and this belief was used to justify colonialism and imperialism. Missionary work and religious conversion were often seen as key aspects of colonialism and imperialism.
Find out more on Europeans at https://brainly.com/question/11639031
#SPJ1
When the Western Roman Empire fell, what groups settled in that part of Europe?
A. Huns
B. Germanic tribes
C. Malian tribes
D. Muslims
After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the major groups that settled in its former territories were the Germanic tribes. The Huns, Malian tribes, and Muslims did not make significant settlements in this region during this period.
Explanation:When the Western Roman Empire fell, a number of different groups settled in the regions formerly controlled by Rome. However, the predominant ones were the Germanic tribes. These included the Franks, Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Lombards among others. They established several successor kingdoms on the territory of the fallen empire, significantly changing the cultural and political landscape of Europe. Though the Huns did play a role in the destabilization of the Western Roman Empire, they did not noteworthy settled in its former territories after its fall. The Malian tribes and Muslims did not settle in Western Europe during this period.
Learn more about The fall of the Western Roman Empirehttps://brainly.com/question/1578351
#SPJ2
What Native American tribes were most impacted by the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears?
Answer:
Trail of Tears, in U.S. history, the forced relocation during the 1830s of Eastern Woodlands Indians of the Southeast region of the United States
Explanation:
Discussion Topic
Which among the various techniques of stellar distance measurement is the best
one? Discuss the merits and demerits of all the techniques (stellar parallax, using
absolute and apparent magnitudes, using periods of variable stars, and red shifts of
very distant objects).
The stellar parallax is the best techniques of stellar distance measurement. The Option A is correct.
What is the parallax method for measuring stellar distance?Stellar parallax is the apparent shift in position of any nearby star (or other object) against the background of distant objects, and it serves as a basis for determining the object's distance (via trigonometry).
The angle or semi-angle of inclination between two lines of sight is used to measure parallax, which is a displacement or difference in the apparent position of an object when viewed along two different lines of sight. Astronomers use the parallax principle to calculate distances to nearby stars.
Options "stellar parallax, using absolute and apparent magnitudes, using periods of variable stars, red shifts of very distant objects"
Read more about stellar parallax
brainly.com/question/14315796
#SPJ1
Tom Stoppard's play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, draws on two previous theatrical works: Shakespeare's Hamlet and Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead follows the "off-stage" exploits of two minor characters from Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. While the two main characters in Stoppard's play occasionally make brief appearances in "Hamlet," as scripted in Shakespeare's original tragedy, the majority of the play takes place in other parts of the castle where Hamlet is set. While "off stage" in this way, the characters resemble the main characters in the absurdist Waiting for Godot. As in Beckett's play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern pass the time by impersonating other characters, engaging in word play, and remaining silent for long periods of time. These same two characters were also featured in a parody of Hamlet, the short comic play by W. S. Gilbert entitled Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Gilbert's play makes Rosencrantz and Guildenstern into central characters and alters the storyline of Hamlet.
The author of this passage is describing
The author of this passage is describing Tom Stoppard's play, "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." The passage highlights how Stoppard's play draws on two previous theatrical works.
Theatrical works names are William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot.""Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead" focuses on the "off-stage" exploits of two minor characters from Shakespeare's "Hamlet," namely Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. While they occasionally make brief appearances in "Hamlet," Stoppard's play primarily takes place in other parts of the castle, exploring the perspectives and experiences of these two characters in their own story.The passage further draws a parallel between Stoppard's play and Beckett's "Waiting for Godot." Both works feature characters who pass the time through wordplay, impersonations, and prolonged periods of silence, capturing the absurdity and existential themes common in absurdist literature.The passage mentions that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were also featured in a parody of "Hamlet" by W. S. Gilbert, where they became central characters and the storyline of "Hamlet" was altered.The author provides an overview of Stoppard's play, its sources of inspiration, and its connection to both Shakespearean tragedy and the absurdist tradition of Beckett's work.For more such questions on play
https://brainly.com/question/30149581
#SPJ8
Which of the following is the reason the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation exists?
Protects consumers' bank balances, encouraging saving and investing
Protects employers' business earnings, encouraging hiring
Protects government revenues, encouraging higher taxes
Protects international trade, encouraging increased exports
Protects consumers' bank balances, encouraging saving and investing of the following is the reason the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation exists. The correct option is A.
Why was the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation created?
Involved in the country's financial system for 50 years, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. At the height of the nation's worst banking crisis, the Banking Act of 1933 was passed, and its immediate contribution was to rebuild public trust in banks.
In the event that a bank fails, depositors are safeguarded by the FDIC, an arm of the U.S. government. Deposits up to a specific amount are insured by the FDIC, which can reassure clients and motivate them to save and invest their money. By offering this security, the FDIC aids in fostering banking system stability and fostering economic growth.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29835942
#SPJ2
why did washington believe that mankind was unfit for their own government?
Between 1610 and 1700, the population of Native Americans in North America
Did the 19th Amendment have any impact of the United States economy? How?
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the 19th Amendment has an impact on the United States economy.
This is evident in the fact that since the women have been allowed or given the right to vote and be voted for, they have been able to influence the voting pattern and thereby able to vote for progressive-minded individuals who also have women's interests at heart in terms of socio-economic progress.
Similarly, through the 19th Amendment, there comes an increase in the women equality policies and laws in the economic space such as equality in wages, job prospects, and the idea that women should not be restricted to the house only or particular role.
Can anyone better explain what is Check and Balances means for a 7th grader American History
Answer: I hope this is helpful
Explanation Checks and balances, principle of government under which separate branches are empowered to prevent actions by other branches and are induced to share power. Checks and balances are applied primarily in constitutional governments.The Checks and Balances system provides each branch of government with individual powers to check the other branches and prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.Checks and balances are various procedures set in place to reduce mistakes, prevent improper behavior, or decrease the risk of centralization of power. Checks and balances usually ensure that no one person or department has absolute control over decisions, clearly define the assigned duties, and force cooperation in completing tasks.The term is most commonly used in the context of government but also refers to limiting power in businesses and organizationschecks and balances: a system that allows each branch of a government to amend or veto acts of another branch so as to prevent any one branch from exerting too much power.
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police
may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
must never, even with reasonable cause, carry out a stop and frisk.
must always have a warrant to seize evidence, even if it is in plain view.
may never violate the Fourth Amendment protections concerning searches and seizures.
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court established the "stop and frisk" exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. The Court ruled that if an officer has reasonable suspicion that a person is engaged in criminal activity and poses a threat to the safety of the officer or others, they may conduct a limited search for weapons.Horton v. California further clarified the scope of warrantless searches. The Court held that if the police are lawfully present in a location and evidence is in plain view, they may seize it without a warrant. This is known as the "plain view doctrine."These decisions recognize that in certain circumstances, law enforcement officers may need to act quickly to ensure public safety or prevent the destruction of evidence. These exceptions are narrowly defined and subject to scrutiny to ensure that they do not violate individuals' Fourth Amendment rights.The correct option is: may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
For more such questions on Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ8
What cost is generally the most expensive for a year of college?
_______ is becoming the primary language of global communication systems. Question 14 options: Spanish English Russian Japanese
English is increasingly becoming the primary language of global communication systems due to its widespread usage and dominance in various sectors such as business, academia, and the internet.
English has emerged as the primary language of global communication systems for several reasons.
First, it is the most widely spoken language worldwide, with a large number of native and non-native speakers. This widespread usage facilitates cross-cultural communication and serves as a common linguistic ground for individuals from different countries and backgrounds.Furthermore, English has become the dominant language in various sectors.In the business world, English is often considered the international language of commerce and trade, enabling global transactions and negotiations.
In academia, a significant portion of research papers, conferences, and educational materials are published and conducted in English, making it essential for international collaboration and knowledge exchange.The internet has also played a significant role in promoting English as the language of global communication. Many online platforms, social media networks, and websites predominantly use English as their primary language, facilitating interaction and information sharing on a global scale.While other languages such as Spanish, Russian, and Japanese are important in their respective regions, English's widespread usage and dominance across various domains position it as the primary language of global communication systems.
For more questions on language
https://brainly.com/question/32089705
#SPJ8
what is Connecticut plan?
El Compromiso de Connecticut (también conocido como el Gran Compromiso de 1787 o el Compromiso de Sherman) fue un acuerdo alcanzado durante la Convención Constitucional de 1787 que definió en parte la estructura legislativa y la representación que tendría cada estado bajo la Constitución de los Estados Unidos
What was the reason the Spanish fought while exploring?
A) They were all conquistadors and were trained to fight.
B) They had to fight fevers and mosquitoes.
C) The Spanish wanted to claim all the land and make the natives their slaves.
D) They had to fight to convert all of the natives to Christianity.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
the spanish wanted to conquor all the land that surrounded them
What was the Greeks view regarding the role and limits of government? Responses Citizens should participate in government, but women, foreigners, and slaves cannot become citizens. Citizens should participate in government, but women, foreigners, and slaves cannot become citizens. The role of government is to maintain order in the community, but everyone should have the freedom to do what they want. The role of government is to maintain order in the community, but everyone should have the freedom to do what they want. Each city-state should form its own government, but be overseen by a monarchy. Each city-state should form its own government, but be overseen by a monarchy. Only those who can afford to pay taxes can participate in government.
to act however they like within the boundaries of the law. The Greeks were proponents of democracy and thought that the people should run the government.
What did the Greeks think about human potential?They were able to select and run effective regimes. Although bright, they could not come to a consensus on how to govern themselves.
What kind of governance existed in classical Greece?The four most prevalent forms of government in ancient Greece were: Democracy is the rule of the people in a city. monarchy: a system of government where the ruler has inherited power. A select number of wealthy or powerful people would dominate in an oligarchy.
To know more about law visit:-
brainly.com/question/29621592
#SPJ1
Which of these BEST describes the political structure of Ancient Egypt?
Answer:
Theocractic Monarchy, so basically theocracy.
Explanation:The government of ancient Egypt was a theocratic monarchy as the king ruled by a mandate from the gods, initially was seen as an intermediary between human beings and the divine, and was supposed to represent the gods' will through the laws passed and policies approved. A central government in Egypt is evident by c. 3150 BCE when King Narmer unified the country, but some form of government existed prior to this date. The Scorpion Kings of the Predynastic Period in Egypt (c. 6000-3150 BCE) obviously had a form of monarchial government, but exactly how it operated is not known.
Egyptologists of the 19th century CE divided the country's history into periods in order to clarify and manage their field of study. Periods in which there was a strong central government are called 'kingdoms' while those in which there was disunity or no central government are called 'intermediate periods.' In examining Egyptian history one needs to understand that these are modern designations; the ancient Egyptians did not recognize any demarcations between time periods by these terms. Scribes of the Middle Kingdom of Egypt (c. 2040-1782 BCE) might look back on the time of the First Intermediate Period (2181-2040 BCE) as a "time of woe" but the period had no official name.
EGYPT'S FORM OF GOVERNMENT LASTED, WITH LITTLE MODIFICATION, FROM C. 3150 BCE TO 30 BCE.
The way in which the government worked changed slightly over the centuries, but the basic pattern was set in the First Dynasty of Egypt (c. 3150 - c. 2890 BCE). The king ruled over the country with a vizier as second-in-command, government officials, scribes, regional governors (known as nomarchs), mayors of the town, and, following the Second Intermediate Period (c. 1782 - c.1570 BCE), a police force. From his palace at the capital, the king would make his pronouncements, decree laws, and commission building projects, and his word would then be implemented by the bureaucracy which became necessary to administer rule in the country. Egypt's form of government lasted, with little modification, from c. 3150 BCE to 30 BCE when the country was annexed by Rome.
Sources -------> https://www.worldhistory.org
Which of the following best describes the push factor that brought Mary Antin to the United States?
religious persecution in her home country
business failure in her home country
threat of war in her home country
lack of food in her home country
Answer:
B- business failure in her home country
Explanation:
edg. 20-21
Answer:
B
Explanation:
how did the haptin panic change America? what was so important about this event?
Answer:
Explanation:
The "Halloween Panic" or "War of the Worlds Panic," often referred to as the Orson Welles Panic, was a significant event in American history that took place on October 30, 1938. The event was a radio broadcast adaptation of H.G. Wells' science fiction novel "The War of the Worlds," which described a Martian invasion of Earth. The broadcast was so realistic that it caused widespread panic and hysteria among listeners who believed it was an actual news broadcast.
The impact of the panic was significant, as it showed how powerful the media can be in shaping public opinion and emotions. The incident led to a renewed focus on the regulation of radio broadcasting and censorship. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was established in 1934, but the "Halloween Panic" highlighted the need for tighter controls on the content of radio broadcasts.
The incident also highlighted the power of propaganda and the need for responsible media practices. The broadcast created a sense of fear and panic among the public, which showed how vulnerable people can be to sensational and false information.
Furthermore, the "Halloween Panic" demonstrated the impact of the media on mass psychology, and it became a case study for understanding the psychology of mass hysteria. The event was studied by psychologists and sociologists to understand how people react to frightening and uncertain situations.
In conclusion, the "Halloween Panic" was an event that changed America by bringing to light the power of the media and the need for responsible media practices. The incident highlighted the importance of regulation and censorship in radio broadcasting, the impact of propaganda on public opinion and mass psychology, and the vulnerability of people to sensational and false information. The event remains an important case study in understanding the psychology of mass hysteria and the impact of the media on society.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Which sentence best describes the difference between the statements?
O A. They address different topics.
OB. They make different conclusions.
OC. They use different sources of evidence.
D. They are being presented to different audiences.
SUBM
The sentence that best describes the difference between the statements is: they use different sources of evidence. The Option C.
How do the statements differ in terms of evidence?In the given options, the statement that they use different sources of evidence accurately captures the distinction between the statements. This suggests that the information or data supporting each statement is derived from different sources or references.
It implies that the evidence used to support one statement may not be applicable to the other potentially leading to different conclusions. By relying on different sources of evidence, the statements may present distinct perspectives or arguments on the given topic.
Read more about statements
brainly.com/question/27839142
#SPJ1